Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,819 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 579,564
Pageviews Today: 1,279,633Threads Today: 598Posts Today: 11,502
07:38 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79328073
11/30/2021 06:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
Time to find a new model !!!!!!

Also all SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE STARS disproven in the same video !!!




Also SUN model destroyed !!



Flat earthers think they live in/on the DIELECTRIC PLANE (UTTERLY DESTROYED)




GLOBEHEADS don’t know there are multiple layers of glass in the sky !!



And finally, NO SOCIETY WANTS YOU TO BECOME WISE!


You’re living INSIDE of earth !!
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 79328073
11/30/2021 06:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
Righteous bump

bump
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 79328073
11/30/2021 06:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
Flat earthers can’t refute this !!!

They can only say

“There is no curvature”

They say this because of flat horizon , rising to eye level, 360 degrees of observer , at all altitudes observed

It’d be a shame , if CONCAVE EARTH also exhibited the same characteristics!! When you’re inside of earth , the horizon remains at the eye level of the observer , as they ascend, they see further and further out while the horizon remains at eye level 360 degrees of the observer

It’ll be a shame if they stand by the beach and think the FLAT HORIZON = it’s flat !!!

It’d be a shame if they experience such cognitive dissonance as to forget about the stars + Polaris + sun + field theory irrefutably destroying the model they believe !!

90% of flat earthers engage in idolatry, in the form of parrot fashion repetition !!!

Only 10% of the FE community are actual truth seekers , having sovereignty over their own intelligence


Have you forgotten ????
[youtube [link to youtube.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 72709424
United States
11/30/2021 06:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
First video: the north star doesn't move an inch

Also first video: shows multiple examples of the north star moving and forming a curved line.


???
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 79328073
11/30/2021 06:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
First video: the north star doesn't move an inch

Also first video: shows multiple examples of the north star moving and forming a curved line.


???
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72709424


Flat earthers think Polaris sits at the axis of rotation of the universe “stationary North Pole star Polaris”

This video , utterly destroys their belief system because it isn’t !!

It’s near the north axis of rotation of the celestial sphere inside of earth !!! Sigma octanis is near the South Axis of rotation of the celestial sphere !!!

[link to youtube.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79496558
United States
11/30/2021 06:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
bump

Need an answer
Curvature Guru
User ID: 79763897
United States
11/30/2021 06:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
no curve = no globe

welcome to flat earth

curverts!!! lol hf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78511804
United States
11/30/2021 06:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
Lol when I first came on here I thought it was a pro FE thread

I bet every single FE person has not taken an astronomy course, used a telescope, or performed calculus

There are some things so obvious when you have experiences in them, it becomes hard to deny

My top favs
-polarization of sunlight (only possible w double sphere sun + atmosphere)
-satellites (what are they stuck in, space goo?)
-blue skies
-weather
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79799033
United States
11/30/2021 07:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
Lol when I first came on here I thought it was a pro FE thread

I bet every single FE person has not taken an astronomy course, used a telescope, or performed calculus

There are some things so obvious when you have experiences in them, it becomes hard to deny

My top favs
-polarization of sunlight (only possible w double sphere sun + atmosphere)
-satellites (what are they stuck in, space goo?)
-blue skies
-weather
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78511804


I have taken an astronomy course, used a telescope, and performed advanced calculus, and still I have broken through the programming and know that the Earth is flat.

Your “top favs” do nothing to denounce the truth of that.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81262991
United States
11/30/2021 07:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
Righteous bump

bump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79328073


All the stars move together like a static 2d picture rotating

And there is the glaring fact you idiots still go down to the horizon(tal) to see the water LEVEL. It's easier too fool someone than it is to convince them they have been fooled
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81262991
United States
11/30/2021 07:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
Lol when I first came on here I thought it was a pro FE thread

I bet every single FE person has not taken an astronomy course, used a telescope, or performed calculus

There are some things so obvious when you have experiences in them, it becomes hard to deny

My top favs
-polarization of sunlight (only possible w double sphere sun + atmosphere)
-satellites (what are they stuck in, space goo?)
-blue skies
-weather
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78511804


I have taken an astronomy course, used a telescope, and performed advanced calculus, and still I have broken through the programming and know that the Earth is flat.

Your “top favs” do nothing to denounce the truth of that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79799033

I agree, took astronomy, got the astronomy merit badge, used many telescopes, camped in the mountains to watch the stars but I have never seen the ocean or any water NOT settle flat.... imagine the buildings if we actually used a water level that curved... buildings would be falling over >> they got people to believe we live on a ball that spins and holds water to the surface... nowhere in science can you replicate this bullshit but like I say it's much easier to fool someone than it is to convince them they have been fooled
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79496558
United States
11/30/2021 08:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
Only a flat earther will avoid the videos in this thread and stick to their cult following

Flat Earth Truth seekers will watch and adjust
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79799033
United States
11/30/2021 08:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
Only a flat earther will avoid the videos in this thread and stick to their cult following

Flat Earth Truth seekers will watch and adjust
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79496558


Lol I watched the videos and they’re bullshit.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79496558
United States
11/30/2021 08:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
Only a flat earther will avoid the videos in this thread and stick to their cult following

Flat Earth Truth seekers will watch and adjust
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79496558


Lol I watched the videos and they’re bullshit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79799033


Your sun can't have different concentric (distance) spins while going the (relative) same speed

Tropic of cancer vs capricorn on flat earth model is atleast 50-100% extra distance the sun neesd to cover

Speed = Distance / Time

Sun destroyed

---------------

Polaris , the star that your claimed model has as the axis point for the concentric spin of the universe, ISN'T STATIONARY.

---------------

The southern stars don't work, it would require multiple (triple) locations on different sides of the flat earth to the see same stars simultaneously -- recall why nothern hemisphere (like canada) doesn't see southern himsphere stars : perspective : It's too far

If that's the case, then 3 opposite sides of the world map can't see the same stars simultaneously -- even if there is some dome overhead that causes inversions, those inversions are localized, not magically visible from the whole of the southern hemisphere at once

---------------

The dielectric plane isn't something to live on, magnetism is the loss of inertia from the dielectric plane, all of matter = torus by nature , a torus isn't flat. Flat earther's don't understand field theory

---------------

Time to adjust your model, this doesn't mean the spinning ball flying through space is true


irrefutable, ping Eric Dubay, your idol, for a counter, most flat earther's don't think for themselves they just copy and parrot
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79496558
United States
11/30/2021 08:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79799033
United States
11/30/2021 08:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
Only a flat earther will avoid the videos in this thread and stick to their cult following

Flat Earth Truth seekers will watch and adjust
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79496558


Lol I watched the videos and they’re bullshit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79799033


Your sun can't have different concentric (distance) spins while going the (relative) same speed

Tropic of cancer vs capricorn on flat earth model is atleast 50-100% extra distance the sun neesd to cover

Speed = Distance / Time

Sun destroyed

---------------

Polaris , the star that your claimed model has as the axis point for the concentric spin of the universe, ISN'T STATIONARY.

---------------

The southern stars don't work, it would require multiple (triple) locations on different sides of the flat earth to the see same stars simultaneously -- recall why nothern hemisphere (like canada) doesn't see southern himsphere stars : perspective : It's too far

If that's the case, then 3 opposite sides of the world map can't see the same stars simultaneously -- even if there is some dome overhead that causes inversions, those inversions are localized, not magically visible from the whole of the southern hemisphere at once

---------------

The dielectric plane isn't something to live on, magnetism is the loss of inertia from the dielectric plane, all of matter = torus by nature , a torus isn't flat. Flat earther's don't understand field theory

---------------

Time to adjust your model, this doesn't mean the spinning ball flying through space is true


irrefutable, ping Eric Dubay, your idol, for a counter, most flat earther's don't think for themselves they just copy and parrot
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79496558


The sun speeds up during the winter and slows during the summer.

Polaris is stationary.

The southern stars work fine. You didn’t explain how they can’t work.

Even if matter doesn’t take toroidal form, that doesn’t exclude the possibility of a flat Earth. The North Pole is the center of the torus.

Eric Dubay is a genius, but not necessarily my idol. He is human.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79496558
United States
11/30/2021 08:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
Only a flat earther will avoid the videos in this thread and stick to their cult following

Flat Earth Truth seekers will watch and adjust
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79496558


Lol I watched the videos and they’re bullshit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79799033


Your sun can't have different concentric (distance) spins while going the (relative) same speed

Tropic of cancer vs capricorn on flat earth model is atleast 50-100% extra distance the sun neesd to cover

Speed = Distance / Time

Sun destroyed

---------------

Polaris , the star that your claimed model has as the axis point for the concentric spin of the universe, ISN'T STATIONARY.

---------------

The southern stars don't work, it would require multiple (triple) locations on different sides of the flat earth to the see same stars simultaneously -- recall why nothern hemisphere (like canada) doesn't see southern himsphere stars : perspective : It's too far

If that's the case, then 3 opposite sides of the world map can't see the same stars simultaneously -- even if there is some dome overhead that causes inversions, those inversions are localized, not magically visible from the whole of the southern hemisphere at once

---------------

The dielectric plane isn't something to live on, magnetism is the loss of inertia from the dielectric plane, all of matter = torus by nature , a torus isn't flat. Flat earther's don't understand field theory

---------------

Time to adjust your model, this doesn't mean the spinning ball flying through space is true


irrefutable, ping Eric Dubay, your idol, for a counter, most flat earther's don't think for themselves they just copy and parrot
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79496558


The sun speeds up during the winter and slows during the summer.
(The sun doesn't speed up 50-100% in speed to cover the extra distance needed to cover LFMAO)

Polaris is stationary.
(Dumb fuck never watched the video LMFAO! Cult mentality detected)

The southern stars work fine. You didn’t explain how they can’t work.
(Never watched the video, cult mentality. The video explained it, i'm just here to make fun of you)

Even if matter doesn’t take toroidal form, that doesn’t exclude the possibility of a flat Earth. The North Pole is the center of the torus.


Eric Dubay is a genius, but not necessarily my idol. He is human.
(Eric Dubay schlong gobbler detected LMFAO)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79799033


You can't make this stuff up LMFAOOOOOOOOOOO
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
11/30/2021 09:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
Why can't the Earth be modelled accurately on a flat map (Do not fold, spindle, or mutilate) if it was, itself, flat?

[link to geoawesomeness.com (secure)]

Why can't you get the distances between cities worldwide to be modelled correctly on a flat map?

How can there be direct flights between Africa, South America, and Australia on a flat Earth? The distances become far too great for flights that exist.

Why are great Circle routes used in long-distance aircraft navigation?

Why has spherical trignometry been used to navigate the Earth, for centuries?

Why do Foucault pendulums precess?

On a flat Earth, where does Coriolis come from?

Why are all the other planets we can observe spheres?

Why is the shadow of the Earth when the Moon is eclipsed a sphere?

Why do constellations in the Southern Hemisphere circle a different point than the constellations in the Northern hemisphere on a flat Earth?

Heck, why are there different Southern Constellations on a flat Earth?

How does the FE believer explain this? [link to www.triplem.com.au (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79829618
United States
11/30/2021 09:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
Why can't the Earth be modelled accurately on a flat map (Do not fold, spindle, or mutilate) if it was, itself, flat?

[link to geoawesomeness.com (secure)]

Why can't you get the distances between cities worldwide to be modelled correctly on a flat map?

How can there be direct flights between Africa, South America, and Australia on a flat Earth? The distances become far too great for flights that exist.

Why are great Circle routes used in long-distance aircraft navigation?

Why has spherical trignometry been used to navigate the Earth, for centuries?

Why do Foucault pendulums precess?

On a flat Earth, where does Coriolis come from?

Why are all the other planets we can observe spheres?

Why is the shadow of the Earth when the Moon is eclipsed a sphere?

Why do constellations in the Southern Hemisphere circle a different point than the constellations in the Northern hemisphere on a flat Earth?

Heck, why are there different Southern Constellations on a flat Earth?

How does the FE believer explain this? [link to www.triplem.com.au (secure)]
 Quoting: 74444


Ayr Phorce Yuan

User ID: 81373829
United Kingdom
11/30/2021 09:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
I apologise for this Mad Mike Hughes gif I made, its in bad taste & I know its a little inflammatory, but............ for balance......


theflatbit
GLP alert level 2; "Go get a Hard Hat:.

GLP alert level 1; "Put the fucking Hat on:.
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
11/30/2021 11:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
Why can't the Earth be modelled accurately on a flat map (Do not fold, spindle, or mutilate) if it was, itself, flat?

[link to geoawesomeness.com (secure)]

Why can't you get the distances between cities worldwide to be modelled correctly on a flat map?

How can there be direct flights between Africa, South America, and Australia on a flat Earth? The distances become far too great for flights that exist.

Why are great Circle routes used in long-distance aircraft navigation?

Why has spherical trignometry been used to navigate the Earth, for centuries?

Why do Foucault pendulums precess?

On a flat Earth, where does Coriolis come from?

Why are all the other planets we can observe spheres?

Why is the shadow of the Earth when the Moon is eclipsed a sphere?

Why do constellations in the Southern Hemisphere circle a different point than the constellations in the Northern hemisphere on a flat Earth?

Heck, why are there different Southern Constellations on a flat Earth?

How does the FE believer explain this? [link to www.triplem.com.au (secure)]
 Quoting: 74444



 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79829618


Such an idea seems contraindicated on its face: we do not observe giant walls of Earth going upward around us. (See "Ringworld")

Likewise, we can accurately measure some faraway stuff with methods as reliable as boring old parallax. Geometry seems to belie the idea as well.

Many of the questions I posed above would also fail were such an idea correct.

Parsimony suggests such a complex explanation is unnecessary to explain what we can, in fact, observe. Is there any observation that can be made to give such a theory more credence than the super-predictability and accuracy of the round Earth model?

Last Edited by 74444 on 11/30/2021 11:16 PM
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 79328073
12/01/2021 08:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH’s stationary North Pole star Polaris , IRREFUTABLY and UTTERLY DESTROYED - (WWE Donald Trump Undertaker Edition) >> UNDESPUTED&
bump





GLP