RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION NEEDED IMMEDIATELY (NOT ANYMORE!!!) :)

Revelation 18:23


For they were great men of the earth, by their Pharmakea were all nations deceived.


2 Esdras 15:27
“For now are the plagues come upon the whole earth and ye shall remain in them: for God shall not deliver you, because ye have sinned against him.”

Matthew 9

10And it came to pass, as Jesus sat at meat in the house, behold, many publicans and sinners came and sat down with him and his disciples. 11And when the Pharisees saw it, they said unto his disciples, Why eateth your Master with publicans and sinners? 12But when Jesus heard that, he said unto them, They that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick.

Only 3 verses biblically you will need.

Search this site. There are samples as well as a religious organization you can contact that will send you a letter.

Good luck!

I have one I can sell to you if you're willing to change your name.

What's wrong with my name?

You are exempt, my son.

Now go in peace.

Get a lawyer to write you one idnyoundont have clergy. It is not on you too explain your belief it is on them to prove they cant accomadate you. Just get a simple letter that states ot is against your sincerely held spiritual beliefs to take this vaccine and if they cant a accomadate they should reach out to your lawyer.

Feel horrible for you. Best wishes and may your credits transfer.

I wish it was that easy but you know how these bs people are nowadays

My work approved mine. I guess it's hit and miss. The only things they are allowed to evaluate though, are:

1. Is the belief sincere? They asked me if I take other meds, vaccines, etc. I would recommend describing any way that your beliefs affect your life...like eating habits, for example. I think it is better to write something sincere than to copy from someone else. Even if the belief is whacky, they can only evaluate whether it is sincere.

2. Does the accommodation cause a hardship? If you will accept masking, testing, etc, then there should be no hardship to the college. I wrote that I am not requesting anyone else to perform any action on my behalf, so there is no hardship. I did accept testing, though, as a condition.

Your beliefs aren’t “clergy” , people with religious beliefs don’t all go to an institution , your god is within you , not at some local non profit church

Your college is led by evil fucks, period

Thread: PLEASE PIN - The BEST religious exemption form for employer mandated Covid Vaccine! Your life may depend on this!

My exemption has my name on it. I suppose you could use some White-Out and put your name over it.

my HEART bleeds for you ...
well
not yet ...

This is the only one I've heard that works.

I cannot ingest anything that used genetic material from an aborted fetus to initially create it.

You have to phrase it like that or they will just tell you that there are no cells from aborted fetuses in the vax.

That is not your argument...your argument is cells from aborted fetuses were used in the initial study and creation of this vax...and that is your objection to using it!

Thread: It's called the Marcionite Christian church. They have religious exemptions for ALL this nonsense, and they WORK.

It is against your religion to take the mark of the beast.

Simple as that.
They will probably just say that it isn't the mark of the beast. Then ask them if they think the mark of the beast will come with full disclosure stating that it is the mark of the beast?

Wow, that really sucks. That's a rough predicament to be in. I hope you get it. I am glad I am older. You young people are fucked.

I hope you can find a way around it. I'm sorry. :(

Hypothetically, if the college president woke up with a horse head in their bed with a (non-handwritten) note attached, telling them to fully abolish "vaccine" mandates, they might reconsider. I do not condone such behavior and would not do so myself. However, tyrants understand only one language, and it's not English.

College is a scam, though. Unless you're socially connected, you're throwing money away.

[link to www.jdfarag.org (secure)]

I was just going to post this link also.

To share freely from Robert Barnes local site:


Employer Letter Example: Vaccine Mandate Objection

No authorship claim or copyright asserted...A letter that also came to me via a route like a letter in a bottle.

Dear Boss,
First, I request a religious exemption. "Each of the manufactures of the Covid vaccines currently available developed and confirmed their vaccines using fetal cell lines, which originated from aborted fetuses. ( [link to lozierinstitute.org (secure)] ) For example, each of the currently available Covid vaccines confirmed their vaccine by protein testing using the abortion-derived cell line HEK-293. ( [link to lozierinstitute.org (secure)] ) Partaking in a vaccine made from aborted fetuses makes me complicit in an action that offends my religious faith. As such, I cannot, in good conscience and in accord with my religious faith, take any such Covid vaccine at this time. In addition, any coerced medical treatment goes against my religious faith and the right of conscience to control one’s own medical treatment, free of coercion or force. As fellow governments recognize: "Religion includes all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief. Religious beliefs are not only those beliefs held by traditional, organized religions, but also include moral or ethical beliefs as to what is right or wrong which are sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views." ( [link to www.tn.gov (secure)] Please provide a reasonable accommodation to my belief, as I wish to continue to be a good employee, helpful to the team.

Equally, compelling any employee to take any current Covid-19 vaccine violates federal and state law, and subjects the employer to substantial liability risk, including liability for any injury the employee may suffer from the vaccine. Many employers have reconsidered issuing such a mandate after more fruitful review with legal counsel, insurance providers, and public opinion advisors of the desires of employees and the consuming public. Even the Kaiser Foundation warned of the legal risk in this respect. ( [link to www.kff.org (secure)]
Three key concerns: first, informed consent is the guiding light of all medicine, in accord with the Nuremberg Code of 1947; second, the Americans with Disabilities Act proscribes, punishes and penalizes employers who invasively inquire into their employees' medical status and then treat those employees differently based on their perceived medical status, as the many AIDS related cases of decades ago fully attest; and third, international law, Constitutional law, specific statutes and the common law of torts all forbid conditioning access to employment, education or public accommodations upon coerced, invasive medical examinations and treatment, unless the employer can fully provide objective, scientifically validated evidence of the threat from the employee and how no practicable alternative could possible suffice to mitigate such supposed public health threat and still perform the necessary essentials of employment. As one federal court just recently held, the availability of reasonable accommodations like accounting for prior infection, antibody testing, temperature checks, remote work, other forms of testing, and the like suffice to meet any institution’s needs in lieu of masks, public shaming, and forced injections of foreign substances into the body that the FDA admits we do not know the long -term effects of.
For instance, the symptomatic can be self-isolated. Hence, requiring vaccinations only addresses one risk: dangerous or deadly transmission, by the asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic employee, in the employment setting. Yet even government official Mr. Fauci admits, as scientific studies affirm, asymptomatic transmission is exceedingly and "very rare." Indeed, initial data suggests the vaccinated are just as, or even much more, likely to transmit the virus as the asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic. Hence, the vaccine solves nothing. This evidentiary limitation on any employer's decision making, aside from the legal and insurance risks of forcing vaccinations as a term of employment without any accommodation or even exception for the previously infected (and thus better protected), is the reason most employers wisely refuse to mandate the vaccine. This doesn't even address the arbitrary self-limitation of the pool of talent for the employer: why reduce your own talent pool, when many who refuse invasive inquiries or risky treatment may be amongst your most effective, efficient and profitable employees?
This right to refuse forced injections, such as the Covid-19 vaccine, implements the internationally agreed legal requirement of Informed Consent established in the Nuremberg Code of 1947. ( [link to www.cirp.org] ). As the Nuremberg Code established, every person must "be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision" for any medical experimental drug, as the Covid-19 vaccine currently is.

Second, demanding employees divulge their personal medical information invades their protected right to privacy, and discriminates against them based on their perceived medical status, in contravention of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (42 USC §12112(a).) Indeed, the ADA prohibits employers from invasive inquiries about their medical status, and that includes questions about diseases and treatments for those diseases, such as vaccines. As the EEOC makes clear, an employer can only ask medical information if the employer can prove the medical information is both job-related and necessary for the business. ( [link to www.eeoc.gov (secure)] An employer that treats an individual employee differently based on that employer’s belief the employee’s medical condition impairs the employee is discriminating against that employee based on perceived medical status disability, in contravention of the ADA. The employer must have proof that the employer cannot keep the employee, even with reasonable accommodations, before any adverse action can be taken against the employee. If the employer asserts the employee’s medical status (such as being unvaccinated against a particular disease) precludes employment, then the employer must prove that the employee poses a “safety hazard” that cannot be reduced with a reasonable accommodation. The employer must prove, with objective, scientifically validated evidence, that the employee poses a materially enhanced risk of serious harm that no reasonable accommodation could mitigate. This requires the employee's medical status cause a substantial risk of serious harm, a risk that cannot be reduced by any another means. This is a high, and difficult burden, for employers to meet. Just look at the all prior cases concerning HIV and AIDS, when employers discriminated against employees based on their perceived dangerousness, and ended up paying millions in legal fees, damages and fines.

Third, conditioning continued employment upon participating in a medical experiment and demanding disclosure of private, personal medical information, may also create employer liability under other federal and state laws, including HIPAA, FMLA, and applicable state tort law principles, including torts prohibiting and proscribing invasions of privacy and battery. Indeed, any employer mandating a vaccine is liable to their employee for any adverse event suffered by that employee. The CDC records reports of the adverse events already reported to date concerning the current Covid-19 vaccine.( [link to www.cdc.gov (secure)] )

Finally, forced vaccines constitute a form of battery, and the Supreme Court long made clear "no right is more sacred than the right of every individual to the control of their own person, free from all restraint or interference of others." ( [link to www.law.cornell.edu (secure)]

With Regards,

Employee of the Year,
Thomas Paine"


Viva Barnes Locals law site.


Its a premium site but this is info that is to give out.

Reword slightly of course and also note:


Legally, religious exemption means; STRONG MORAL BELIEF. Not a minister can be asked for or a church.

I, ______________________, declare religious exemption from the COVID-19 vaccination mandate. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, I attest to having sincerely held personal religious beliefs which will not permit me to abide by this mandate. Additionally, I am not willing to describe these personal religious beliefs for the reasonable fear that if others have knowledge of them it may engender discrimination against me and/or my family. I am aware that reasonable accommodations may have to be made regarding this declaration of religious exemption, and am willing to discuss accommodations that would be necessary and reasonable in order to come to an agreement. I will finally also expect this letter to remain confidential, and its contents to only be known to those for whom there is an express need.

My Wife's got approved last week, we got the information here.
[link to www.thehealthyamerican.org (secure)]

Good luck, I'll be praying yours gets approved as well.

Thank you guys for your suggestions but I need a priest or a religious leader preferably in NYS because I'm in New York and the college is based here in NY. The priest or religious leader will need to give me a letter that will attest to the religious beliefs that will provide on the exemption. Unless I do not have to necessarily have the priest attestation in NY?

Last Edited by Thranduil’sWife on 12/02/2021 12:18 AM

That is considered religious discrimination under the law. They can't question a strongly held moral belief and the religious exemptions have won time and time again in the courts so lawyers are readily available.

I could be wrong, but I think most religious exemptions are disqualified by employers because they just don't believe it. I honestly think the best exemption is a medical one.

I have seen one person get a medical exemption because of a family history of heart issues and there is a lack of long-term data for the risk of heart trouble from the shot. I think it depends on the doctor you have and how willing he/she is to work with you on it.

The religious exemption does not and should not require clergy. You can be an atheist and still be eligible for a religious exemption. Lawyer up and inform the university that engaging in religious discrimination and placing themselves the judge of your beliefs is setting them up to pay off your student loans for you... and then transfer and complete your degree elsewhere. Yeah I know- it sucks. But you will survive and its just a stupid piece of paper that counts for your first job. After that no one cares unless you are pursing a research or other academic career - in which case get the shot - when you choose to spend your life around authoritarians - get used to bending over.