Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,895 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 873,425
Pageviews Today: 1,570,012Threads Today: 525Posts Today: 11,082
03:32 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81467889
United States
12/09/2021 12:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
It's just incredible that the crazy mass vaccination campaign won't be slowed by any evidence.

[link to healthimpactnews.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 81467889
United States
12/09/2021 12:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots


[link to www.bitchute.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 81467889
United States
12/09/2021 12:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots


[link to www.bitchute.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 49331619
United States
12/09/2021 12:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
whoever is running AHA is making a ton of enemies.

lol
Dr. Clayton Forrester

User ID: 80583192
United States
12/09/2021 01:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
bump
2b1ask1

User ID: 5488061
United States
12/09/2021 04:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
bump
2b1ask1
beeches

User ID: 78973486
United States
12/09/2021 04:20 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
whoever is running AHA is making a ton of enemies.

lol
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 49331619


even more friends
Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face – Thomas Sowell
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78247657
United States
12/09/2021 04:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
The Bill Gates Challenge
SeekerForward

User ID: 80954763
United States
12/09/2021 05:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
OP title: "American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots"

I'm sympathetic, but that's not what the AHA article cited in the healthimpactnews says. At all.

Please pause think and comment thoughtfully before you share this kind of study.

Otherwise, it only discredits any criticism of the shot.

I gave this a quick read and need to go back, but this is what I saw.

This study looked at a sample of 140 events (some confirmed, most suspected) from 139 young people only after they reported heart episodes. It does not offer any clue about what percentage of all people who took the shot got heart problems.

It is not peer-reviewed and two of the authors are Pfizer consultants.

1. The authors demonstrate that reported cases need to be taken seriously. Over 75% of people examined had an irregular heart image using cMRI.

2. The authors indicate that heart problems in young people after the shot are real.

3. The authors are desperate, maybe because they have to say it to have any hope of being published, to say all the problems are temporary and there is nothing to see here. They say that with basic treatment, symptoms like chest pain go away. I see no convincing data that this kind of heart damage magically heals itself, especially in the long-term.

4. What I find interesting is that a lot of studies, even when they reveal serious problems with the shots, almost always have to include some kind a line that says "get the shot!" or "nothing to see here!"

Be especially careful with AHA publications. I keep seeing "bombshell" headlines pointing to conference abstracts. That probably just means researchers found something interesting, and they want feedback before they submit it for peer-review in a journal.

Also, don't be impressed by a long list of authors in the sciences. You have to go the university site if applicable to get a sense of who was listed just for prestige or to help students get a publication, and who actually did the work.

Last Edited by SeekerForward on 12/09/2021 05:35 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79755087
United States
12/09/2021 05:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
OP title: "American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots"

I'm sympathetic, but that's not what the AHA article cited in the healthimpactnews says. At all.

Please pause think and comment thoughtfully before you share this kind of study.

Otherwise, it only discredits any criticism of the shot.

I gave this a quick read and need to go back, but this is what I saw.

This study looked at a sample of 140 events (some confirmed, most suspected) from 139 young people only after they reported heart episodes. It does not offer any clue about what percentage of all people who took the shot got heart problems.

It is not peer-reviewed and two of the authors are Pfizer consultants.

1. The authors demonstrate that reported cases need to be taken seriously. Over 75% of people examined had an irregular heart image using cMRI.

2. The authors indicate that heart problems in young people after the shot are real.

3. The authors are desperate, maybe because they have to say it to have any hope of being published, to say all the problems are temporary and there is nothing to see here. They say that with basic treatment, symptoms like chest pain go away. I see no convincing data that this kind of heart damage magically heals itself, especially in the long-term.

4. What I find interesting is that a lot of studies, even when they reveal serious problems with the shots, almost always have to include some kind a line that says "get the shot!" or "nothing to see here!"

Be especially careful with AHA publications. I keep seeing "bombshell" headlines pointing to conference abstracts. That probably just means researchers found something interesting, and they want feedback before they submit it for peer-review in a journal.

Also, don't be impressed by a long list of authors in the sciences. You have to go the university site if applicable to get a sense of who was listed just for prestige or to help students get a publication, and who actually did the work.
 Quoting: SeekerForward


Thank you for some reason. People here tend to fill in gaps with what they want it to say.

Remember, all of these published studies are funded by pharmaceutical corporations so the odds of any bombshells is virtually zero.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79192717
United States
12/09/2021 06:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
So 98% is rare.
SeekerForward

User ID: 80954763
United States
12/09/2021 06:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
Thank you for some reason. People here tend to fill in gaps with what they want it to say.

Remember, all of these published studies are funded by pharmaceutical corporations so the odds of any bombshells is virtually zero.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79755087


You are correct. Unfortunately. A lot of studies are funded by NIH or drug company. This one claims no outside funding, but I'm skeptical when a couple authors are Pfizer consultants.
A lot of journals are hesitant to publish anything that overtly challenges the drug companies, and when they do editors soften the blow.

One possible exception is BMJ (British Medical Journal), and in retaliation one of the editors has been subjected to personal attacks online that look really stupid when you give them any thought. Remember, companies pay to strafe comments sections and set up their own pro-industry shill sites made to look respectable to the unwary visitor.

If you want to see the danger, and you will see it even in articles like this one (they can only hide so much) you have to read between the lines. Look beyond the titles, critically read the data for yourself, and look for irregularities, omissions or deviations from standard procedures,

Last Edited by SeekerForward on 12/09/2021 06:13 PM
Disgruntled Health Worker
User ID: 80613437
United States
12/09/2021 06:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
For those of you that don't know what Troponin is that missed my breakdown of EKGs and double the amount of 20-50 yr olds in hospital here for heart problems I will break it down into Leymans terms for ya.

Troponin is a natural occuring enzyme in your heart (only) and is released when your heart is either under stress (Myocarditis) or being damaged (Myocardial Infarction - MI)

Generally what we do for observation is give a patient 2 sets of ekgs and bloodwork within 5 hours time. EKG's will present an active MI through ST elevation that is more so than less very obvious to a trained eye. However, some MIs cannot be seen on an EKG but its noticable in the bloodwork at the insane amount of elevated troponin that is gained within that 5 hour period. These are known as nSTEMIs (non-ST elevated myocardial infarction.) What he is basically saying is the bloodwork is coming back with elevated Troponin that is not heart attack related in mostly healthy people, hence the myocarditis.

Anyone with a medical background can confirm what I am saying to be true.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81436857
Argentina
12/09/2021 06:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
It's just incredible that the crazy mass vaccination campaign won't be slowed by any evidence.

[link to healthimpactnews.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81467889


FUCK. i PINNED THIS SHIT. SO THE TARDS parents who visited this website by accident see it. WE MAY SAVE SOME LIFE OF KIDS TONITE GUYS!

GOOD JOB OP. WE ARE SAVIGN KIDS LIVE TONITE.


best karma spent of the year if it saves 1 kid life here.



clappa
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80518353
Luxembourg
12/09/2021 06:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
And that remaining 2% took it less than two weeks prior so they were counted as unjabbed

chuckle
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81436857
Argentina
12/09/2021 06:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
And that remaining 2% took it less than two weeks prior so they were counted as unjabbed

chuckle
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80518353


sad but true

verysad
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80613437
United States
12/09/2021 07:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
For those of you that don't know what Troponin is that missed my breakdown of EKGs and double the amount of 20-50 yr olds in hospital here for heart problems I will break it down into Leymans terms for ya.

Troponin is a natural occuring enzyme in your heart (only) and is released when your heart is either under stress (Myocarditis) or being damaged (Myocardial Infarction - MI)

Generally what we do for observation is give a patient 2 sets of ekgs and bloodwork within 5 hours time. EKG's will present an active MI through ST elevation that is more so than less very obvious to a trained eye. However, some MIs cannot be seen on an EKG but its noticable in the bloodwork at the insane amount of elevated troponin that is gained within that 5 hour period. These are known as nSTEMIs (non-ST elevated myocardial infarction.) What he is basically saying is the bloodwork is coming back with elevated Troponin that is not heart attack related in mostly healthy people, hence the myocarditis.

Anyone with a medical background can confirm what I am saying to be true.
 Quoting: Disgruntled Health Worker 80613437
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79875745
United States
12/09/2021 07:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
Ninety-Eight Percent.

Only TWO out of ONE HUNDRED YOUNG PEOPLE did not get heart damage from the shots.

yet will it be on cnn, msnbc, fox news tonight?


yep, right after I sell you that bridge, I'm gonna show it to you on the mainstream news, by golly....
Happy in Nature

User ID: 81071993
Nicaragua
12/09/2021 07:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
OP title: "American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots"

I'm sympathetic, but that's not what the AHA article cited in the healthimpactnews says. At all.

Please pause think and comment thoughtfully before you share this kind of study.

Otherwise, it only discredits any criticism of the shot.

I gave this a quick read and need to go back, but this is what I saw.

This study looked at a sample of 140 events (some confirmed, most suspected) from 139 young people only after they reported heart episodes. It does not offer any clue about what percentage of all people who took the shot got heart problems.

It is not peer-reviewed and two of the authors are Pfizer consultants.

1. The authors demonstrate that reported cases need to be taken seriously. Over 75% of people examined had an irregular heart image using cMRI.

2. The authors indicate that heart problems in young people after the shot are real.

3. The authors are desperate, maybe because they have to say it to have any hope of being published, to say all the problems are temporary and there is nothing to see here. They say that with basic treatment, symptoms like chest pain go away. I see no convincing data that this kind of heart damage magically heals itself, especially in the long-term.

4. What I find interesting is that a lot of studies, even when they reveal serious problems with the shots, almost always have to include some kind a line that says "get the shot!" or "nothing to see here!"

Be especially careful with AHA publications. I keep seeing "bombshell" headlines pointing to conference abstracts. That probably just means researchers found something interesting, and they want feedback before they submit it for peer-review in a journal.

Also, don't be impressed by a long list of authors in the sciences. You have to go the university site if applicable to get a sense of who was listed just for prestige or to help students get a publication, and who actually did the work.
 Quoting: SeekerForward


Thank you.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80829544
United States
12/09/2021 08:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
They look to be pro-vax by website www.heart.org
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81468698
United States
12/09/2021 08:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
It's just incredible that the crazy mass vaccination campaign won't be slowed by any evidence.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81467889



which is the strongest evidence that there really is
a malevolent conspiracy in play.

.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77112757
United States
12/09/2021 08:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
OP title: "American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots"

I'm sympathetic, but that's not what the AHA article cited in the healthimpactnews says. At all.

Please pause think and comment thoughtfully before you share this kind of study.

Otherwise, it only discredits any criticism of the shot.

I gave this a quick read and need to go back, but this is what I saw.

This study looked at a sample of 140 events (some confirmed, most suspected) from 139 young people only after they reported heart episodes. It does not offer any clue about what percentage of all people who took the shot got heart problems.

It is not peer-reviewed and two of the authors are Pfizer consultants.

1. The authors demonstrate that reported cases need to be taken seriously. Over 75% of people examined had an irregular heart image using cMRI.

2. The authors indicate that heart problems in young people after the shot are real.

3. The authors are desperate, maybe because they have to say it to have any hope of being published, to say all the problems are temporary and there is nothing to see here. They say that with basic treatment, symptoms like chest pain go away. I see no convincing data that this kind of heart damage magically heals itself, especially in the long-term.

4. What I find interesting is that a lot of studies, even when they reveal serious problems with the shots, almost always have to include some kind a line that says "get the shot!" or "nothing to see here!"

Be especially careful with AHA publications. I keep seeing "bombshell" headlines pointing to conference abstracts. That probably just means researchers found something interesting, and they want feedback before they submit it for peer-review in a journal.

Also, don't be impressed by a long list of authors in the sciences. You have to go the university site if applicable to get a sense of who was listed just for prestige or to help students get a publication, and who actually did the work.
 Quoting: SeekerForward



Pfizer was approved without p3, administering trials unblinded, crap breakdown of what defines covid positive, won’t release data and the control groups destroyed

Need I say more? Everyone is crooked.
Aha , fda , my cpa
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77512693
United States
12/09/2021 08:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
Only two things could account for such an increase in youthful hearts being damaged like this, a nuclear reactor meltdown, or harmful chemicals accumulating in young people's muscle tissues.

I haven't heard of any nuclear reactors melting down lately.


hf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81381419
United States
12/09/2021 08:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
So 98% is rare.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79192717


Rarely is any percentage is that high. So yeah.
Coy

User ID: 72667806
United States
12/09/2021 08:58 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
Covid and the vaccines are the vehicle to demean and permanently destroy all of America's institutions so the NWO will rise from the ashes. AHA, FDA, OSHA... The whole enchilada is being set up for universal ire.
nwo
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80610697
United States
12/09/2021 09:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
The vax is the death note.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80986146
United States
12/09/2021 09:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
It's just incredible that the crazy mass vaccination campaign won't be slowed by any evidence.

[link to healthimpactnews.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81467889


If they start to backtrack that the vaxxes KILL, the lawsuits would cripple the govt, the health industry, insurance companies - CAN'T WAIT.
Pilgrim001

User ID: 78018011
United States
12/09/2021 09:42 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
It's just incredible that the crazy mass vaccination campaign won't be slowed by any evidence.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81467889



which is the strongest evidence that there really is
a malevolent conspiracy in play.

.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81468698


That they are hellbent to shove that shit in every man woman and child on the face of the earth to protect from a cold ought to tell you something. It sure tells me something. And that nothing slows down their obsession for everyone to get the "vaccine".
I don't have the time or the crayons to explain this to you.



Slake Blake
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80802935
United States
12/09/2021 10:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
Resist Don't take the death jab
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81134247
Canada
12/09/2021 10:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
Thanks for sharing.
What’s happening is criminal! I cannot believe they are getting away with this!
Makes my stomach sick!
TXP

User ID: 80383054
United States
12/09/2021 10:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots
OP title: "American Heart Association Journal: 98% of young people with heart damage took the clotshots"

I'm sympathetic, but that's not what the AHA article cited in the healthimpactnews says. At all.

Please pause think and comment thoughtfully before you share this kind of study.

Otherwise, it only discredits any criticism of the shot.

I gave this a quick read and need to go back, but this is what I saw.

This study looked at a sample of 140 events (some confirmed, most suspected) from 139 young people only after they reported heart episodes. It does not offer any clue about what percentage of all people who took the shot got heart problems.

It is not peer-reviewed and two of the authors are Pfizer consultants.

1. The authors demonstrate that reported cases need to be taken seriously. Over 75% of people examined had an irregular heart image using cMRI.

2. The authors indicate that heart problems in young people after the shot are real.

3. The authors are desperate, maybe because they have to say it to have any hope of being published, to say all the problems are temporary and there is nothing to see here. They say that with basic treatment, symptoms like chest pain go away. I see no convincing data that this kind of heart damage magically heals itself, especially in the long-term.

4. What I find interesting is that a lot of studies, even when they reveal serious problems with the shots, almost always have to include some kind a line that says "get the shot!" or "nothing to see here!"

Be especially careful with AHA publications. I keep seeing "bombshell" headlines pointing to conference abstracts. That probably just means researchers found something interesting, and they want feedback before they submit it for peer-review in a journal.

Also, don't be impressed by a long list of authors in the sciences. You have to go the university site if applicable to get a sense of who was listed just for prestige or to help students get a publication, and who actually did the work.
 Quoting: SeekerForward


And, this ^^^ is old school GLP where an OP would have not posted a piece without some level of this verification and checking, or, at minimum, the 'I haven't verified' disclaimer. And, rarely would something be posted without the original source.

Thank you, Seeker.

Cheers!
.
"Stop the lockdown. Stop the masks. Stick your vaccine up your ass." - Tess....AMEN!

"What does CENSORSHIP reveal? It reveals FEAR."
- Julian Assange

.





GLP