Hillary Clinton Says If Trump Wins Again In 2024: ‘I think that could be the end of our democracy’

the end of the Clintons´democracy

F*ck Hillary and f*ck joe, they are not even American.

Hillary Clinton is a communist

of course she would say that

Some sort of swami asstypes.

In order to kill democracy the Republic must rise!

No she isn't, but we don't support greedy pigs either.

I love how terrified she still is of Trump all these years later. Beautiful

Last Edited by Rick Deez Nuts on 12/13/2021 12:01 PM

Civics lesson: a democracy equates to MOB RULE, which is why the founders made us a Representative Republic, where everyone has a vote through their representatives.

Hillary the Cow is simply highlighting the fact that Democrats/Communists have done a great job dumbing down citizens of this country. She makes fools of the entire country with a comment like this one.

But most dummies/sheeple don’t know, are idiots, and took the jab.

We are not a democracy you dumb cunt

I would be happy to end any form of democracy that is not supposed to be any part of our Constitutional Republic, and you will not find democracy in our constitutional documents. All states are supposed to have a constitution based on the republic form of government when they joined the confederation of states of the Union.

If you were taught this in school you had a very bad teacher who never read about the founding of our country.

Democracies put all the power in the Federal Governments, which means they rule over you and they give you any rights you have, this is not how our government was set up, our rights come from our creator and they met the Lord God and his Son because that is who the founders believed in, every one of them did, if someone taught you differently, they lied. It is all in the writing of all of them, which were more men than is named so often in public, today.

Some fought for our rights than others, and they won.

Yep, Hillary speaks with forked tongue.

All feelings that we experience could be classified as one of two categories, justice and injustice, and all it is that people want to feel for every millisecond of their lives is justice.

An autocracy of humanism is a human space, in which every human continuously experiences growing justice with respect to everything.

To establish an autocracy of humanism, you would require a constitution that says, "Do only that, which would be acceptable by the 95% of the humanity."

This means that we have to be very careful when we say something or do something because we have to consider all of the people and how they would feel. For example, spreading LGBT ideas publicly would be unacceptable because it is not mainstream with respect to the entire world. You could still have private homosexual relationships but you wouldn't be able to push them publicly - sort of the former US military "don't ask, don't tell" policy.

Democracy on the other hand is defined as "Do that, which you want and can." That is, you can do anything you want except what Congress doesn't allow. This is exactly why we have Wokeism.

Some ideas once they get out of the bag can't be put back in it or be regulated by Congress. We have to live with them and let them destroy our world. This happens because "Do that, which you want and can" doesn't immediately require a person to think about all of the people before the idea gets out. And in the absence of a prohibition by Congress, the idea gets out into the world, causing more injustice than justice. And if you constantly let world-destroying ideas get out of the bag, then at one point the beautiful idea of Liberalism turns into a perverted version of it and injustice begins to multiply, which creates a bubble that will definitely burst at some point.

Democracy is bad. Autocracy of humanism is good.