Anyone has experience with Rife machine? Simon Parkes and Kim talk about Biomedis Global Rife Machine

Simon Parkes is full of shit...take from that what you will.

Dr. Rife was suppressed by American Medical Association. This product was patented and made in Russia to avoid regulation.

Audio Frequencies vs. Radio Frequencies - What is the difference?

In a nutshell, Radio Frequencies (RFs) are higher than Audio Frequencies. The science shows that more power and more cycles per second (higher frequency), allow the signal to penetrate more deeply. The first known frequencies from the 20's and 30's were in the millions of hertz range. (like our generator)

So why do most of the instruments built today only use low audio frequencies, when original frequencies were much higher? The FCC (Federal Communication Commission) is the main reason why. In 1935 Congress created the FCC and by 1936 they began to regulate the airwaves. Before 1935 there were no regulations to prevent Dr. Rife from using his high frequencies output through a plasma powered ray tube. The frequencies output through the ray tube would travel about 12 miles in each direction from his laboratory, and would. Dr. Rife said his equipment would “raise the devil” with all the radios.

In 1936, Philip Hoyland built the first audio frequency instrument. (right) In these early designs, a radio frequency was used to "carry" a newer set of lower audio frequencies into the body. (like our generator does)

In the 1950s, Rife's research partners John Crane and John Marsh continued to build this lower audio frequency instrument, using simple off-the-shelf technology of the day. From this time on, Dr. Rife’s original high frequencies were no longer used in any of the equipment, nor were his RF carrier waves used. Most of today’s modern frequency generators are patterned after these early 50's style instruments.

Without the RF carrier frequency, they couldn’t get the same harmonics and penetration as the earlier ray tube instruments. This is why our frequency generator does use a RF carrier wave. A very simplified way to think of this is this: when you hear a song on the radio, it is audio frequencies that you are hearing. However, these audio frequencies are brought to your radio antenna by a modulated radio frequency, or "carrier wave". The audio frequencies are "piggy backed" onto the radio frequencies. This "RF" carrier signal simply delivers the lower audio signal deeper. (which is what you want)

Square Wave vs. Sine Wave

Another debate within this field is "which wave format to use?" Before the newer instruments were developed, all the generators output only radio frequencies, or "RF". When emitting these radio frequencies, the sine wave format is produced. Basically because this higher frequency range (in the millions of pulses per second, or hertz), creates a wave form that is naturally rounded at the top and bottom. It's more difficult to create very sharp signals at this high rate of oscillation.

With advent of the newer Crane/Marsh design, the rate at which these signals are emitted dropped substantially into what is referred to as the Audio Frequency range. (this was not a desired design aspect at the time.) With these lower frequencies, the signal can be very sharply turned on and off, as seen below. This square wave design is used when running the lower audio frequencies. One important reason is because it helps to better create entrainment between the signal being emitted and the target. The principle of entrainment is at the very foundation of this entire science.

Entrainment is defined as the "tendency for two oscillating bodies to lock into phase so that they vibrate in harmony." It is also defined as "a synchronization of two or more rhythmic cycles". The principle of entrainment is universal, appearing in chemistry, pharmacology, biology, medicine, psychology, sociology, astronomy, architecture and more.

In the Radio Frequency range, a sine wave pattern is desired & generated. (above 40,000Hz)

In the lower Audio range, a square wave pattern is desired and generated. (below 40,000Hz)

Signal gently rises and falls. Can vary the rate of this rise and fall, top and bottom limits, etc...

Signal sharply turns on and off. Can vary the rate of this "on/off" signal. (Note:our device now can produce square waves to 400,000 Hz)

Analog vs. Digital

The question always arises about the type of signal that should be used. It is generally accepted that the most effective of these frequency generating devices will deliver an analog signal, versus a digital signal. Analog is better because it is a more natural frequency. It includes the sub-tones and overtones to the base number, providing a maximized fullness, essentially a richness of tonal qualities. A very big part of that is what is called the harmonics. An audiophile understands this. Those who desire only "true" sound on their stereo systems insist on analog devices for just this reason.

The current analog vs. digital discussion is wrought with misconceptions and disinformation. Such as, digitally generated frequencies do not vary, which implies that they do not have overtones and undertones. This would only be true if the frequencies remained digital. That is why digital frequencies from DDS (Direct Digital Synthesis) and DSP (Digital Signal Processing) are converted to analog before they are put out. These Digital-to-Analog Converters are called a DAC for short. You can see in the diagram below that a frequency comes out of a DDS or a DSP looking like stairs. The signal then goes through a DAC or Digital-to-Analog Converter. Then it goes through a Low-Pass or Bandpass Filter to finish the analog conversion. Now the frequency that you have is a very accurate analog frequency with all the overtones and undertones of that analog frequency. The analog frequency produced by a digital chip can be swept up or down with more accuracy than any old tube analog instrument. The most important thing to remember is the frequency has to be converted to analog before it is output from the frequency generator.

Digitally produced frequencies converted to analog are far superior to any signal that comes from an old antique tube type analog frequency generator. Antique tube type generators are very limited. If I want a frequency of 2128.5, an old tube analog generator would not be accurate enough to give me that frequency to use. It could only give me 2128. Also, digitally converted frequencies allow me to sweep with far more accuracy than old analog tube type instruments. Even a thousandth or millionth of a frequency is possible even though this kind of accuracy is not needed. This is something that a purely analog instrument could not do as accurately. Digitally produced frequencies when converted to analog can accurately produce minute details. These analog frequencies when converted to a square wave waveform produce square wave harmonics. Some claim that their instruments which output analog frequencies produce advanced analog harmonics, but this is just sales hype. All the digital-to-analog frequency generators on the market today that have been tested with a spectrum analyzer produce the same analog harmonics. Anyone claiming to have some form of superior advanced square wave harmonics is just giving you lots of sales hype.

Output of Contact Pad type instrument vs. Ray Tube?

Contact instruments deliver frequencies through direct contact, while plasma ray tube instruments transmit frequencies indirectly through the air. Direct contact makes it possible to get the full energy into the body without power loss. Indirect contact though a plasma tube (broadcast method) is efficient also, but a bit more time consuming and cumbersome, as ray tubes should be held within several inches of the body. The tube is waved over the entire body or target very slowly, or you sit very close to a stationary light tube.

Many people believe that you can simply sit in the same room with one of these plasma ray tubes to get the full effect... this is incorrect! The laws of physics in regards to signal loss come into play when using a ray tube. It requires much more power at the frequencies to deliver its output. For every foot that you move the ray tube away from the body you have to divide the power output by the ray tube by a factor of 4. Example: If you have 50 watts of power coming out of a ray tube, then at one foot away from the ray tube you only have 12.5 watts. At two feet you only have 3.125 watts and at 3 feet you only have about .78 of a watt. Because of this loss, researchers and doctors from the 30's had to stay within 6 to 12 inches of the body with the ray tube.

Today, many ray tube instruments output about 100 watts or more. (Our MOPA outputs 190 watts). Some manufacturers recommend those who use them to stay at least 3 feet away from the ray tube, due to some notion of a "null zone", which DOES NOT EXIST with a true gas filled lamp. In fact, JUST THE OPPOSITE IS TRUE! (this industry is a minefield of misinformation!) Stay within 3 feet for best results!

With a direct contact instrument, this power loss is not a problem. Direct contact also requires much less power, as the body is essentially the 'antenna' pulling in the signal. Both methods have their benefits.

This kind of technology is amazing and works miracles for me. I personally use the QiCoil PEMF ( 299$USD payable in fiat or in crypto) device by David Wong which used it on himself to cure his incurable disease before starting his own business afterwards.

Here is a link to a complete overview of QiCoil PEMF's benefits

[link to qilifestore.com (secure)]

There is a PDF file on the page if you ever wanna back it up locally or print it ( 15 pages )

May God bless y'all!

I always thought there was something to the Rife tech. Never built one but might try now.

I would like to share my personal experience using the RIFE machine. I recently had testicular surgery to remove a cancerous testicle (left nut) and part of the recovery therapy was the RIFE machine.

Something weird or in the words of the nurse "AMAZING!" happened. Not only did my left nut regrow back, it also made my penis larger and stronger like Incredible Hulk and Bruce Lee.

The doctor and nurse weighed my testicles and made clinical remarks on how they noticed that my penis had transformed almost overnight into the Incredible Hulk and Bruce Lee of penises. I was very happy, my girlfriend was very happy, and her best friend was very happy too.

LMAO!

Simon Parkes believes he has sex with an alien wife or something every year. Of course, he has no proof, and forgets every year to get any proof.

Totally bat crap crazy right there.

Gb-4000


Rife was a genius healer