Federal Reserve Statistical Release is now omitting data! February 7, 2008 data does not include the prior week??????? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 362363 United States 02/07/2008 05:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
*-L5-* User ID: 369330 Canada 02/07/2008 05:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Reserve Statistical Release is now omitting data! February 7, 2008 data does not include the prior week??????? They seem to post data for new dates every 2 releases, which is weird why do they bother to make another release when it's just the same dates? Maybe it's a revision? All hail Lord Schildkrote, blessed be his name. Mehow Sequence: 1 3 5 7 9 11 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 362363 United States 02/07/2008 05:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Alan Greenspan (OP) User ID: 306376 United States 02/07/2008 05:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Reserve Statistical Release is now omitting data! February 7, 2008 data does not include the prior week??????? [link to www.federalreserve.gov] About the Release The H.3 release provides data on aggregate reserves of depository institutions, including required reserves, total reserves, excess reserves, nonborrowed reserves, and borrowings by depository institutions from the Federal Reserve's discount window. The release also provides data on the monetary base, which includes currency and reserves. The release is published weekly. Current and historical data are also available from the Economic Bulletin Board of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Statistical releases |
Alan Greenspan (OP) User ID: 306376 United States 02/07/2008 05:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Halloran User ID: 146325 United States 02/07/2008 05:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Reserve Statistical Release is now omitting data! February 7, 2008 data does not include the prior week??????? This definitely looks like it updates WEEKLY, and that last week's data IS omitted. Great catch, Mister Greenspan. Oh yeah, and I almost forgot to add AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACK! "It can be held certain that information that is withheld or suppressed contains truths that are detrimental to the persons involved in the suppression." ~ J. Edgar Hoover |
Alan Greenspan (OP) User ID: 306376 United States 02/07/2008 05:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Reserve Statistical Release is now omitting data! February 7, 2008 data does not include the prior week??????? Here is a great read: This is some seriously deep shit that should have everyone screaming and kicking. The Central Bank is BROKE! [link to www.zimbio.com] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 306376 United States 02/07/2008 05:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Reserve Statistical Release is now omitting data! February 7, 2008 data does not include the prior week??????? Another hint about this pending crisis is when you do a 'Google News' search on 'federal reserve non borrowed reserves' there is not a single result. There is literally a complete MSM 'blackout' about this. Not only is the fact that last week they were in the negative, now you have nothing about the omitted data. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 291612 United States 02/07/2008 05:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Reserve Statistical Release is now omitting data! February 7, 2008 data does not include the prior week??????? [link to www.federalreserve.gov] Quoting: Alan Greenspan 306376Reserve just released this week’s data. This happens every Thursday at approximately 4:30. Last weeks release showed for the first time ever a -negative balance for 'non borrowed reserves' (2nd column). This is the first time ever this has happened. Look at the February 7, 2008 release! The Fed is not publishing this weeks data in the current release. So the question that begs is why? There can only be one reason and that is they are in deep-deep shit. The reserve is now out of reserves!!!!!!!!!! NO IFS ANDS OR BUTS ABOUT IT. Look at the other releases and you will see for yourself what this means! I took a mozilla photo of the link you put up showing the red ink... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 369776 United States 02/07/2008 05:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 363847 United States 02/07/2008 05:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13448 United States 02/07/2008 06:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sam User ID: 249527 Canada 02/07/2008 06:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 330782 United States 02/07/2008 06:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 369722 United States 02/07/2008 06:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Reserve Statistical Release is now omitting data! February 7, 2008 data does not include the prior week??????? Meaning they are IN DEBT and have no more MONEY to trade, lend or give to old Mrs Applebee, who wanted to take out "just $11.28" (IAWL)from the Bedford Falls Savings and Loan- can the FED stop the collapse of the banks being sucked down the black hole? Will Mr Potter finally own all of Bedford Falls in the end? stay tuned |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 349426 United States 02/07/2008 06:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Reserve Statistical Release is now omitting data! February 7, 2008 data does not include the prior week??????? the banks have -3 billion dollars in NEGATIVE fractional assets. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 369722Meaning they are IN DEBT and have no more MONEY to trade, lend or give to old Mrs Applebee, who wanted to take out "just $11.28" (IAWL)from the Bedford Falls Savings and Loan- can the FED stop the collapse of the banks being sucked down the black hole? Will Mr Potter finally own all of Bedford Falls in the end? stay tuned LOL Thanks! NOW I get it! |
~Ajax~ User ID: 359231 United States 02/07/2008 06:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Reserve Statistical Release is now omitting data! February 7, 2008 data does not include the prior week??????? the banks have -3 billion dollars in NEGATIVE fractional assets. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 369722Meaning they are IN DEBT and have no more MONEY to trade, lend or give to old Mrs Applebee, who wanted to take out "just $11.28" (IAWL)from the Bedford Falls Savings and Loan- can the FED stop the collapse of the banks being sucked down the black hole? Will Mr Potter finally own all of Bedford Falls in the end? stay tuned lol |
Alan Greenspan (OP) User ID: 306376 United States 02/07/2008 06:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 341598 United States 02/07/2008 07:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 369463 Australia 02/07/2008 07:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Reserve Statistical Release is now omitting data! February 7, 2008 data does not include the prior week??????? What does the "Term Auction credit, NSA" column mean ? Quoting: Sam 249527Is that where they pumped the economy to keep her afloat ? Not Seasonally Adjusted. What _I think_ they are doing is auctioning Treasury notes. They offer $50 billion of notes at a very low interest rate and then bid (auction) up the interest rate on the note to see when some bank will bite and lend them money by purchasing a note. At some point the banks decide the interest rate Fed is offering is high enough that they want to invest in it and they buy the note. Think of Fed as a homebuyer in an auction house full of mortgage brokers offering to sign a home loan for first 2.0%, then when that fails, 2.1%, and so on. Eventually one of the brokers puts up his hand. Currently the banks have no money to lend because of the securitisation disaster, so interest rates on the notes have to be high and Fed must print lots of money each month to make payments. So yes, pumping the economy by pouring money into banks, off into the future. Banks are getting a nice ROI for investing in .. nothing. |
simpletruth User ID: 363496 United States 02/07/2008 07:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Reserve Statistical Release is now omitting data! February 7, 2008 data does not include the prior week??????? They post an anouncement( Hit the link) that states that this does not affect the reserves available to the banking funds. And that is an arithmatic fact that we SIMPLY have more money borrowed than in reserve. Hum... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 369870 United States 02/07/2008 09:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Reserve Statistical Release is now omitting data! February 7, 2008 data does not include the prior week??????? Here is a great read: This is some seriously deep shit that should have everyone screaming and kicking. The Central Bank is BROKE! Quoting: Alan Greenspan 306376[link to www.zimbio.com] "...But the fact that total reserves also dropped during this period also lends credence to the idea that this dramatic drop in non-borrowed reserves is decidely Not a Good Thing." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 357364 United States 02/07/2008 09:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 331956 United States 02/07/2008 10:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
thegov User ID: 340756 United States 02/07/2008 11:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Reserve Statistical Release is now omitting data! February 7, 2008 data does not include the prior week??????? Fed does not make money Quoting: Anonymous Coward 331956The Federal Reserve Banks do make money. As our central bank they charge banks for currency delivery, transfer, as well as interest on certain loans to banks. They just don't work with the public, banks only. As for the Fed being out of reserves, by definition they can never be out of reserves. As the central bank of the United States the Fed is the institution which tells the BEP and Mint to make them money, the only setback is if they have them make more money than is being taken out of the system (via shredding, lost bills, and people saving their money at home instead of in a bank) then you get inflation. The Fed try to manage how much money it puts into the system and offset its negative affects by simultaneously lowering the interest rate when they put large sums of cash into the economy. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 356456 United States 02/07/2008 11:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 356456 United States 02/07/2008 11:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 369961 United States 02/08/2008 12:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Reserve Statistical Release is now omitting data! February 7, 2008 data does not include the prior week??????? [link to www.federalreserve.gov] Quoting: Alan Greenspan 306376Reserve just released this week’s data. This happens every Thursday at approximately 4:30. Last weeks release showed for the first time ever a -negative balance for 'non borrowed reserves' (2nd column). This is the first time ever this has happened. Look at the February 7, 2008 release! The Fed is not publishing this weeks data in the current release. So the question that begs is why? There can only be one reason and that is they are in deep-deep shit. The reserve is now out of reserves!!!!!!!!!! NO IFS ANDS OR BUTS ABOUT IT. Look at the other releases and you will see for yourself what this means! BS. Its updated weekly but the data is based on 2 week increments (for recent data). The recent data is always listed as preliminary. This doesn't change the fact that the data is scary as hell. However, there is no lack of publishing. -at |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 225509 United States 02/08/2008 12:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Federal Reserve Statistical Release is now omitting data! February 7, 2008 data does not include the prior week??????? [link to www.federalreserve.gov] Quoting: Alan Greenspan 306376There can only be one reason and that is they are in deep-deep shit. The reserve is now out of reserves!!!!!!!!!! NO IFS ANDS OR BUTS ABOUT IT. Look at the other releases and you will see for yourself what this means! This is EXACTLY WHAT THIS MEANS. I saw the negative reserves last week... first time ever that I remember. Now they're not publishing this negative balance? WTF??? We are imploding here and MSM is in la-la land about it. WTF??? Buy GOLD NOW people or you will soon not be able to buy gold at all because it will be thousands of dollars per ounce. |