Photographer accused of helping MI6 kill Diana was found dead in burnt-out BMW with a hole in his head

The original newspaper article revealing that the wireless operator had been ejected from the wireless room at the British Embassy in Paris minutes by Lord Fellowes (Diana's brother-in-law and Private Secretary to the Queen).
[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]
Questioned by Lord Stevens about this allegation, he denied he was even in France at the time. So why would a humble wireless operator make such an accusation against a bigwig like yourself if it were not true, Lord Fellowes? What do you have to hide?

Warning

Do not tell anyone before you plan on outing illuminati chicanery.

It could be dangerous to your health.

Reuter news, 11 Sept:

Henri Paul's mother, Giselle:

"My son was not an alcoholic, he's now paying for the personalities he was driving…. Can one imagine the Princess of Wales and Dodi Al Fayed would have agreed to get into a car driven by a drunk? Henri had the full confidence of his employer. [My son was] not depressive and was getting along perfectly. I don't need to defend him. I wish any mother could have a son like him."

There was no death certificate.

Claude Garrec, who played tennis with Paul the day of the crash:

"He didn't have the profile of an alcoholic or depressive. He always walked straight."

For chauffeur Henri Paul to have a 0.30% BAT, a level nearly requiring him to be unconscious, he would have had to have had at least twelve drinks in a one hour period (or 24 four drinks if he had eaten dinner), or at least thirteen in a two hour period, or at least fourteen in a three hour period, etc. Do you really think intelligent people like Diana and Dodi would have gotten into a car with a driver who not only could not stand up, but who probably could not even find his way to a parked car? Do you think the Fayed's would allow an alcoholic chauffeur and security director to work for them eleven years? Do you think Diana's personal bodyguard would have allowed it? Security videotape of driver Henri Paul, immediately prior to the crash, clearly does not show any intoxication. Coincidentally, a MUCH lower BAT might be much more plausible to an informed observer -- at least TEN TIMES LOWER.

Henri Paul is also alleged to have had prescription psychiatric drugs (to treat depression) in his body, yet a medical report for his flying license two days prior to the crash gave him a clean bill of health, both drug and alcohol free. His autopsy revealed no liver disease or damage whatsoever, proving he was not an alcoholic.

Security video at Ritz Carlton in Paris captures a sober Henri Paul, Dodi and Diana beginning their ride through Daley Plaza in Dallas, er, deja vu all over again. Paparazi provacateurs stalked their every move at high speed.
Henri Paul had a level of poisonous carbon monoxide in his blood of 20%—potentially a fatal dose. How did this poison get into his blood if he died instantaneously of a broken neck? Why did the other passengers not have any carbon monoxide in their blood? (OP: Umm, because their blood samples did not need to be switched with that of a carbon monoxide suicide case whose body was in the same mortuary that Diana's body was taken to?)

Henri Paul DWI autopsy:

Dr. Alan Barbour:

Blood samples drawn from heart, fluid samples from urine, eyeball and bile. Aorta ruptured. Instantaneous death (steering column stabbed chest despite airbag, as revealed in paparazzi photos). "No liver damage or signs of alcoholism." Hair analysis for past drug use allegedly showed Prozac for three months and Tiapridol for one month. "[T]he private lab under Dr. Gilbert Pepin 'mandated to do more sophisticated blood analysis' reported that Paul 'had been in a state of moderate chronic alcoholism for a minimum of one week (the limit of the test's reliability).' This strikes me as an extraordinary statement (perhaps 'fantastic' would be a better adjective). Absent compelling evidence for the reliability of the testing (whatever it was) one must completely discount the statement, in my opinion."

"A switched blood sample? The mix of antidepressants, alcohol, and CO [carbon monoxide] 'found' in HP's [Henri Paul's] blood is typical of a suicide by exhaust gas inhalation, who are frequently depressed, taking antidepressants, and typically have a few drinks before committing suicide. Since it is very hard to explain how HP could have walked and talked normally with his blood in that state, or even walked at all, the simplest explanation is that it wasn't his blood, but that of a car-exhaust suicide, of which it [is] typical…. I honestly can't imagine how anyone can seriously claim this preposterously intoxicated blood sample came from HP. My guess is that the authorities know full well that someone must have switched the blood samples, simply because whatever fool that did it stupidly picked a preposterously intoxicated sample, but they are stuck with accepting it now as really HP's blood because to question it opens up the conspiracy can of worms…. [M]ight the syringes have been washed/stored in alcohol and reused? You would think such a thing is well-nigh impossible, but I know of a particular coroner's office where it happened…. '[G]iven the violent nature of the death, the possibility of contamination of the blood is real and must be seriously considered.' He is probably thinking of the weel-known phenomenon of a ruptured gut spilling alcohol into body cavities, where it might mix with blood from ruptured blood vessels."

The chain of evidence was broken according to doctors. It was impossible to convict Henry Paul of DWI, had he survived the 60 mph crash.
*************************************************
[link to www.geocities.com]

And the car doors were all locked and no car keys anywhere

Suicide.