DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: WE’VE HAD 21,000+ CASES OF VAXX-INDUCED MYOCARDITIS THAT THE CDC HAS VERIFIED

Just say he told the truth and liberal heads start to explode.

Myocarditis AND Pericarditis

Among a slew of other illnesses and diseases.

just starting

Truth

can someone share the statistical data that was used to derive the cause and outcome? I would like to verify the data spread independently?

I guarantee you 21,000 is the tip of the iceberg.

It's so troubling that these dangerous mRNA gene therapy inoculations are actually instructing your body to become a "Pathogen Factory" by causing your cells to produce the poisonous spike protein which your body is then supposed to fight off and make you immune to the virus. Problem is, over time it's having the opposite effect by suppressing the body's immune system and allowing other normally suppressed diseases to emerge (cancer, tuberculosis, etc...).

The BOOSTER$ become necessary to keep the spike protein factory going allowing for short term, artificial immune response, but long term damage!

Players like Fauci, Dustin Moskovitz (Facebook founder and big Crispr investor), Daszak, Baric and others have been planning this for years.

Sadly, fear and ongoing media hype (paid for by big Pharma's media placements) are allowing these bad actors to continue to win.

all coincidences and not related to vaccines at all

just pure fiction

j/k

NEGATIVE VIEWPOINTS OF THE LIFE-SAVING VACCINE ARE MISINFORMATION!!! ESPECIALLY IF THEY'RE TRUE!!!

I would also like to understand the distribution of how these cases were reported, and who they were reported by.

I hate to make it political, but there may be some placebo effect here.

The MIND is the most powerful organ in the body, and if one has been told that they are going to have some reaction, in some cases, the body makes good on that.

I would like to understand the correlation between the mental diet of those who came down with these problems, and those that did not.

myocarditis is no laughing matter, but thankfully it is treatable and in many cases is resolved without the need for additional medicine or even treatment.

ita a hidden genocide

In this age group?

People who are 51 and over aren’t necessary to the findings I guess

More co in tel pro please

you should be looking foe that data on who suppos3dly came down with or died from "covid" because THAT VIRUS AND VARIANTS DOES NOT EVEN EXIST.

What a joke you write.
Myocarditis is an extremely injurious condition and often fatal over 5 year timeframe.
And all you have to do is examine every Vaers system yourself which are largely entered by doctors and nurses.
All you have to do is notice the quick media campaigns that are now teaching that the heart problems are normal in young people.
Or how about seeing that there were more recoded deaths in the Pfizer 6 month trial data in jabbed group then the non jabbed group and ask yourself why both Pfizer and Moderna unblinded their trial groups which was supposed to be giving regulators health safety data until 2023 ?

There is no safety data coming from any of the ongoing phase 3 clinical trials - no data comparing health outcomes in the jabbed groups versus the jab-free control groups.

None.
Nada.

well if what you are saying is true, the data should be there. I mean real clinical data, not just VAERS data (which is not vetted, and has been over run with exaggerated or false reports).

Science requires real data, not hear-say. There is a lot of hear-say in recent years... what's the issue with providing real, verifiable data?

What's wrong with questioning who is falling ill with any of the maladies mentioned. my anecdotal experience is that based on the media they are consuming, the greater their side-effects. Some of them seem to feign their over all health condition or exacerbate it for sympathy.

From what I can ascertain from speaking with my own doctor, and my kids doctors, if the data showed that vaccines (any vaccine, not just for covid) had verified, linked repercussions, it would be scaled back, or discontinued. This is coming from folks that have been in the field for 40+ years, and a few newer doctors (less than 10 years). The old timers can even rattle off a few vaccines that were pulled over the years.

In GOD we trust, but the rest better BRING DATA.

So what happens if you already have a family history of heart problems and have been on statins for over 10 years, and then you get 3 modernas ?????

It’s not an FDA approved vaccine.
Pay more attention .

AC wrote:

"well if what you are saying is true, the data should be there. I mean real clinical data, not just VAERS data (which is not vetted, and has been over run with exaggerated or false reports)."

Overrun? do you have any proof of that statement? I doubt it, and I doubt you are aware that the VAERS database is POLICED by the CDC itself.

AC wrote: "Some of them seem to feign their over all health condition or exacerbate it for sympathy."

Do you have any proof of such fakery, or do you consider what "seems" to you to be scientific evidence?

AC wrote: From what I can ascertain from speaking with my own doctor, and my kids doctors, if the data showed that vaccines (any vaccine, not just for covid) had verified, linked repercussions, it would be scaled back, or discontinued.

in the past, any jab that was pulled was due to analysis of VAERS data exclusively.

Ok, back to sleep now AC. Sorry to disturb your slumber.

Eat the berries next summer.
Bilberries.

Triggered!

Does anyone have a link to that entire symposium? I cant find it.
The one that just took place last week with Sen Johnson

Plz and thnx

Attention: SHILL ALERT!

for the guy who was not aware that at least one of the vaccines is now FDA approved
[link to www.fda.gov (secure)]


Previous to this, vaccines were not nearly as politicized, or would you disagree? There have always been "anti-vaxxers" especially here on GLP.

Sadly VAERS data is not policed to the extent you and I wish it was. They even tell you straight away that its a "passive reporting system, meaning it relies on individuals to send in reports of their experiences."
[link to vaers.hhs.gov (secure)]

Can you think of someone maybe exacerbating, or down right falsifying a report, to push a narrative? That seems to be the running mantra here, that the "other side" is falsifying information, what makes you think its not a 2 way street?

The evidence I could provide is (as stated in the previous post) anecdotal. The things that my family and friends have said happened to them cleared up soon as the news cycles changed, interestingly enough.

Now I am not saying NO ONE was ever harmed by a vaccine, obviously that is not true, there will always be outliers. I am just saying that maybe with this particular vaccine, we let our own political bias and lack of empirical scientific data cloud our judgment. Mix that with a fair amount of propaganda and an effective disinformation campaign and you have plenty fooled.

Another thing for those interested in the recent emergence of cases of myocarditis, toggle your search settings to limit results prior to Jan 1st 2020. You can read reports of myocarditis and its prevalence in late teens, early 20s males. Why?

Take of the blinders folks. You are being led by the nose whether you realize it or not.

^ Most of the politicization of mRNA and Covid - by far- has been done by the Karen-Gestapo Left.

However, Joe Rogan did have a guest on recently who noted that the percentage of younger people suffering from myocarditis was higher in the unvaccinated than the vaccinated. But how accurate are the stats.

Are "unvaccinated" now people who've not been jabbed more than one time, etc?

I am not a rogan listener anymore, but some of his guests are actually really intelligent people. Valid questions and concerns in this case.

Unfortunately more anecdotal evidence.. but I did have a friend that got myocarditis in college 10+ years ago, and interestingly enough, a friend of his ALSO got it. They went to different schools, but were pot smokers who regularly shared the same blunts on the weekends. They both are still alive today, and seem to not have any issues.

I don't think it was the weed, but maybe there is a viral cause of myocarditis?

Since early 2020, my mantra has been, "just the facts, ma'm."

Why Covid-19 and mRNA have become so politicized along largely liberal vs conservative, leftwing vs rightwing lines I'm not sure. Then again, notice how just about everything in today's America/world is now politicized along largely liberal vs conservative lines.

Since people of the left seem to be the most loyal to the Fauci-pro-mRNA side, and since liberals are not exactly sticklers for honesty, common sense, integrity and ethics, I tend to view anything they support with great suspicion. Or anything they don't support as probably something that should be supported.

The injections administered in the USA are not an approved VACCINE.

There is no FDA approval for any mRNA Gene therapy posing as a COVID vaccine. The Comirnaty bait and switch scam has been addressed for months now. Where have you been?

And even if the FDA did approve it, the FDA is fully captured at this point and can no longer be trusted.

You are wrong about VAERS yet again. Passive reporting system does not mean it relies on "individuals". It means it is not mandatory by law. DOCTORS and NURSES are predominantly the one's to enter reports, the reports take 1/2 hour to do properly, and only a professional author or a doctor or nurse would have the chops to enter a false report that would not easily be seen through. Thus those claiming any significant fraud is also claiming that there are professional people spending 1/2 hour to create ONE fraudulent report. Sure you want to stick with that "mantra"?

There is overwhelming evidence that these faux vaccines have no significant efficacy, and equal evidence that they have catastrophic effects on the health of the recipient.

The fact you are here on this site where all the evidence backing my statements is easily available, and you are taking the shill position, speaks volumes.