Let's Settle the LUCIFER Debate once and for all. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79633373 ![]() 04/14/2022 07:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I see a lot of chit chat... about Lucifer. Quoting: Plato seven of 9 What's the big deal anyway? According to my glp uncle Lucifer was one of God's mightiest seraphim. Then he tried to break the status quo and share knowledge with us naked apes. No good deed going un punished... he was cast down and became a different deity known as satan. So when someone is exalting Lucifer Chances are they are A) into astrotheology B) commemorating the pre-fall angelic form of Lucifer aka Prometheus Or c) flaunting their immense esoteric knowledge in your face to get a reaction out of the plebeians, for kicks. But I promise it has absolutely nothing to do with: Eating babies Sacrificing people Or any other depravity That's a whole set of other ancient gods like moloch and ba'al. Get your shit straight. Ok that's my argument. Dont get mad, I didn't go to college. Now please of there can be a rational discussion ...with only classy trolling please. Let's put this whole thing to rest once and for all. You have to show your sources of knowledge or people will just say you are making stuff up. Your GLP uncle was ignorant of all the sources on knowledge relating to the entity known as Lucifer who is worshiped in the lodges of Freemasonry as God under the name of The Great Architect of the Universe. They have different stories. So do many of trhe ancient sources who name him by a different names. Some call him YHWH, Yalbadoath the Demiugre and creator of this reality and one of the Sons of God. In this debate first we define our terms as all formally trained debaters do. Then you debate. No resolutions will ever be made as it is just opinion based information and cannot be verified. All you will do is find the pools of people who believe the same things and there will be many. All will insist they are correct. Courts don't allow second hand knowledge as credible evidence or hearsay. This debate will only contain hearsay and second hand knowledge. Nothing will be settled this way. You must have known that from the outset though...unless you are not very clever. |