| Users Online Now: 2,100 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,186,107 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,983,005 | Threads Today: 792 | Posts Today: 13,688 |
| 07:58 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,100 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,186,107 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,983,005 | Threads Today: 792 | Posts Today: 13,688 |
| 07:58 PM | ||
President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79378349  Luxembourg05/26/2022 08:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest ... Quoting: Mike_account_5 Wtf are you talking about? The cops would have had no excuse to not be able to stop him if he was armed with a pistol or a hunting rifle instead of an assault rifle which is intended for use in fucking war. What scared you about not having assault rifles, do you have micropenis? Ar-15 IS a hunting rifle, vermin and varmint mainly. Which of his rifles was selective fire? I’ll wait. The AR-15 is the civilian adaption of a military rifle. It's civilian because it doesn't have selective fire. That does not make it a hunting rifle. It's an assault rifle created for warfare. 2nd amendment is not about hunting food for eating unless you are a cannibal, nothing more needs to be said.  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83424368  United States05/26/2022 08:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest You "can" do whatever you can get away with that doesn't mean you're doing it legally. Quoting: Mike_account_5 So again, do you think that creature that shot them kids would have said "no, I better not use an AR, they're illegal? That what I dont get about you stupid fuckers. how you cant see we know your true motovation is FEAR FOR YOURSELF, not little kids WHY>? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83424368 United States05/26/2022 08:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest ... Quoting: Mike_account_5 Wtf are you talking about? The cops would have had no excuse to not be able to stop him if he was armed with a pistol or a hunting rifle instead of an assault rifle which is intended for use in fucking war. What scared you about not having assault rifles, do you have micropenis? Ar-15 IS a hunting rifle, vermin and varmint mainly. Which of his rifles was selective fire? I’ll wait. The AR-15 is the civilian adaption of a military rifle. It's civilian because it doesn't have selective fire. That does not make it a hunting rifle. It's an assault rifle created for warfare. 2nd amendment is not about hunting food for eating unless you are a cannibal, nothing more needs to be said. The specific purpose of the second amendment is to give the people the means to throw off tyrants, PERIOD |
Mike_account_5  User ID: 83071468 United States05/26/2022 08:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest ... Quoting: Mike_account_5 Wtf are you talking about? The cops would have had no excuse to not be able to stop him if he was armed with a pistol or a hunting rifle instead of an assault rifle which is intended for use in fucking war. What scared you about not having assault rifles, do you have micropenis? Ar-15 IS a hunting rifle, vermin and varmint mainly. Which of his rifles was selective fire? I’ll wait. The AR-15 is the civilian adaption of a military rifle. It's civilian because it doesn't have selective fire. That does not make it a hunting rifle. It's an assault rifle created for warfare. The definition of assault rifle is select fire, full auto or three round burst you phaggit ass. AR is a semi auto and is not in any way the same version the military uses. Not even the same fucking bolt carrier or reciever. These crimes could just as easily be commited with a lever action 357 or hand guns. Whats your solution? Ban all firearms and fuck each other in the ass? Select fire is only half the definition the other half is that it's designed for infantry use, which is for use in combat. The entire purpose of the gun is for killing people in a firefight, not hunting and a gun has more characteristics than just it's rate of fire. You are brain dead if you think being in a fire fight with an assault rifle is the same as a handgun and there should have been no way for him to get past the first two cops if he was armed the same as them. No excuse for it anyway. Assault rifles were already banned 94-04 and no one but you and your dad was having butt sex because of it. Or did you forget the assault rifle ban was already a fucking thing? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83050270 United States05/26/2022 08:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest If you have the money you can buy whatever the fuck you want to, PERIOD. And no unconstitutional usurpation of the bill of rights will ever change THAT or make it but you know "we is stupid massa".  This was a conversation about what is legal to own or not so maybe you are stupid? why would we concern ourselves with legalities when we all know "MURDER" is illegal by any means. This is a mental health issue not a gun issue. May is mental health month by the way.... |
| Mike_account_5 User ID: 83071468 United States05/26/2022 08:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest ... Quoting: Mike_account_5 Wtf are you talking about? The cops would have had no excuse to not be able to stop him if he was armed with a pistol or a hunting rifle instead of an assault rifle which is intended for use in fucking war. What scared you about not having assault rifles, do you have micropenis? Ar-15 IS a hunting rifle, vermin and varmint mainly. Which of his rifles was selective fire? I’ll wait. The AR-15 is the civilian adaption of a military rifle. It's civilian because it doesn't have selective fire. That does not make it a hunting rifle. It's an assault rifle created for warfare. 2nd amendment is not about hunting food for eating unless you are a cannibal, nothing more needs to be said. 2nd amendment says: A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Translation; Because a militia is necessary, the people shall have the right to bear arms. News flash: THERE IS NO MORE MILITIAS |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83424368 United States05/26/2022 08:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79086114 Ar-15 IS a hunting rifle, vermin and varmint mainly. Which of his rifles was selective fire? I’ll wait. The AR-15 is the civilian adaption of a military rifle. It's civilian because it doesn't have selective fire. That does not make it a hunting rifle. It's an assault rifle created for warfare. 2nd amendment is not about hunting food for eating unless you are a cannibal, nothing more needs to be said. 2nd amendment says: A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Translation; Because a militia is necessary, the people shall have the right to bear arms. News flash: THERE IS NO MORE MILITIAS They teach that at your Synagogue? YOU do not define militia |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83050270 United States05/26/2022 08:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79086114 Ar-15 IS a hunting rifle, vermin and varmint mainly. Which of his rifles was selective fire? I’ll wait. The AR-15 is the civilian adaption of a military rifle. It's civilian because it doesn't have selective fire. That does not make it a hunting rifle. It's an assault rifle created for warfare. 2nd amendment is not about hunting food for eating unless you are a cannibal, nothing more needs to be said. 2nd amendment says: A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Translation; Because a militia is necessary, the people shall have the right to bear arms. News flash: THERE IS NO MORE MILITIAS Yes there is a militia its called the NATIONAL GUARD, TARD. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83424368 United States05/26/2022 08:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest You "can" do whatever you can get away with that doesn't mean you're doing it legally. Quoting: Mike_account_5 So again, do you think that creature that shot them kids would have said "no, I better not use an AR, they're illegal? That's what I dont get about you stupid fuckers. how you cant see we know your true motivation is FEAR FOR YOURSELVES, not little kids WHY are you afraid?? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83424368 United States05/26/2022 08:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest ... Quoting: Mike_account_5 The AR-15 is the civilian adaption of a military rifle. It's civilian because it doesn't have selective fire. That does not make it a hunting rifle. It's an assault rifle created for warfare. 2nd amendment is not about hunting food for eating unless you are a cannibal, nothing more needs to be said. 2nd amendment says: A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Translation; Because a militia is necessary, the people shall have the right to bear arms. News flash: THERE IS NO MORE MILITIAS Yes there is a militia its called the NATIONAL GUARD, TARD. Militias are all throughout this country |
| Mike_account_5 User ID: 80925118 United States05/26/2022 08:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest That could not be farther from the reality behind people owning guns today. And home defense, hunting, and sport shooting I have no problem with but I'm tired of reading about mass shootings involving fucking assault rifles. |
| Mike_account_5 User ID: 80925118 United States05/26/2022 08:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest ... Quoting: Mike_account_5 The AR-15 is the civilian adaption of a military rifle. It's civilian because it doesn't have selective fire. That does not make it a hunting rifle. It's an assault rifle created for warfare. 2nd amendment is not about hunting food for eating unless you are a cannibal, nothing more needs to be said. 2nd amendment says: A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Translation; Because a militia is necessary, the people shall have the right to bear arms. News flash: THERE IS NO MORE MILITIAS Yes there is a militia its called the NATIONAL GUARD, TARD. EXACTLY and they provide you with guns you stupid cocksucker, you don't need to have your own assault rifles! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83050270 United States05/26/2022 08:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest So...let's look to the Europeans for answers.... Highest homicides in a decade how's that working out for them? Death by bombings, wars, knives, hammers, cars, fists, feet just not good enough anymore? What makes one type of death more valuable than another? |
| Mike_account_5 User ID: 80925118 United States05/26/2022 08:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83050270 2nd amendment is not about hunting food for eating unless you are a cannibal, nothing more needs to be said. 2nd amendment says: A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Translation; Because a militia is necessary, the people shall have the right to bear arms. News flash: THERE IS NO MORE MILITIAS Yes there is a militia its called the NATIONAL GUARD, TARD. Militias are all throughout this country In the constitutional sense they have been replaced by the military and national guards. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83424368 United States05/26/2022 08:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest Before there was a professional military, citizens not only had the right to bear arms but they were required to keep a specific amount of ammunition and powder ready in case they were called to those arms. It was actually meant to provide for a "well regulated militia" who used their own guns. Quoting: Mike_account_5 That could not be farther from the reality behind people owning guns today. And home defense, hunting, and sport shooting I have no problem with but I'm tired of reading about mass shootings involving fucking assault rifles. There has NEVER been a time in history where the American people needed to be armed more than they do right now. |
| Mike_account_5 User ID: 80925118 United States05/26/2022 08:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest So...let's look to the Europeans for answers.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83050270 Highest homicides in a decade how's that working out for them? Death by bombings, wars, knives, hammers, cars, fists, feet just not good enough anymore? What makes one type of death more valuable than another? That's because of refugees but nice try. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83424368 United States05/26/2022 08:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest ... Quoting: Mike_account_5 2nd amendment says: A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Translation; Because a militia is necessary, the people shall have the right to bear arms. News flash: THERE IS NO MORE MILITIAS Yes there is a militia its called the NATIONAL GUARD, TARD. Militias are all throughout this country In the constitutional sense they have been replaced by the military and national guards. Well, luckily you saying they dont exist has no weight in reality |
| Mike_account_5 User ID: 80925118 United States05/26/2022 08:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest Before there was a professional military, citizens not only had the right to bear arms but they were required to keep a specific amount of ammunition and powder ready in case they were called to those arms. It was actually meant to provide for a "well regulated militia" who used their own guns. Quoting: Mike_account_5 That could not be farther from the reality behind people owning guns today. And home defense, hunting, and sport shooting I have no problem with but I'm tired of reading about mass shootings involving fucking assault rifles. There has NEVER been a time in history where the American people needed to be armed more than they do right now. I just don't think it would do you any good you can't win a revolution or overthrow the government all the guns are for is mass murder. |
| Mike_account_5 User ID: 80925118 United States05/26/2022 08:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest In the constitutional sense they have been replaced by the military and national guards. Well, luckily you saying they dont exist has no weight in reality Militias today are not relied on to defend the nation which is what the 2nd amendment refers to. |
| Pres. Elect Festus Hoggbottom User ID: 81479191 United States05/26/2022 08:34 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest the 2nd amendment says the right to keep and bare arms shall not be infringed joe needs to look up the definition of infringed as defined in 1776. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79904252 "Arms" when the 2nd amendment was written were flintlock muskets, not semi-automatic rifles. You don't have a right to carry a bazooka and what you do have the right to is arbitrary. How do you know what the founding fathers would say about the issue today seeing the weapons and the damage they cause? I highly doubt Jefferson would want the average person having assault rifles he didn't even want them to vote he distrusted their intelligence so much. Those men would be aghast at what society has become I doubt they would still defend the right of rednecks to carry military rifles. Arms means anything from thermonuclear weapons to pocket knives Not as far as the 2nd amendment goes, the Supreme Court has already decided on that. They could easily decide to include assault rifles (made for military use) also. Maybe you should do a simple Google search before expounding your "wisdom". What you and your ilk call "assault rifles" are not made for military use. Nor are they used by the military. They're just semi-automatic rifles that are made to look militaryish. I did it. I did it on purpose. And I'll do it again. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83424368 United States05/26/2022 08:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest Before there was a professional military, citizens not only had the right to bear arms but they were required to keep a specific amount of ammunition and powder ready in case they were called to those arms. It was actually meant to provide for a "well regulated militia" who used their own guns. Quoting: Mike_account_5 That could not be farther from the reality behind people owning guns today. And home defense, hunting, and sport shooting I have no problem with but I'm tired of reading about mass shootings involving fucking assault rifles. There has NEVER been a time in history where the American people needed to be armed more than they do right now. I just don't think it would do you any good you can't win a revolution or overthrow the government all the guns are for is mass murder. I wouldn't bey my dreidles on it if I were you. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83050270 United States05/26/2022 08:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83050270 2nd amendment is not about hunting food for eating unless you are a cannibal, nothing more needs to be said. 2nd amendment says: A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Translation; Because a militia is necessary, the people shall have the right to bear arms. News flash: THERE IS NO MORE MILITIAS Yes there is a militia its called the NATIONAL GUARD, TARD. EXACTLY and they provide you with guns you stupid cocksucker, you don't need to have your own assault rifles! That would be all good and fine if the "militia" never tried to exterminate "the people". Get it yet...idiot? The people's right shall not be infringed not the fucking militia. |
| Mike_account_5 User ID: 80925118 United States05/26/2022 08:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83424368 If you have the money you can buy whatever the fuck you want to, PERIOD. And no unconstitutional usurpation of the bill of rights will ever change THAT or make it but you know "we is stupid massa". This was a conversation about what is legal to own or not so maybe you are stupid? why would we concern ourselves with legalities when we all know "MURDER" is illegal by any means. This is a mental health issue not a gun issue. May is mental health month by the way.... Only the U.S. has this problem because only we have the guns, mental health issues are worldwide. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83424368 United States05/26/2022 08:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest In the constitutional sense they have been replaced by the military and national guards. Well, luckily you saying they dont exist has no weight in reality Militias today are not relied on to defend the nation which is what the 2nd amendment refers to. The second amendment is there for this moment in history, when the government has gotten out of control and needs to be reined in. The US government has been at war with the people since Waco |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83439704  Australia05/26/2022 08:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79086114 Ar-15 IS a hunting rifle, vermin and varmint mainly. Which of his rifles was selective fire? I’ll wait. The AR-15 is the civilian adaption of a military rifle. It's civilian because it doesn't have selective fire. That does not make it a hunting rifle. It's an assault rifle created for warfare. 2nd amendment is not about hunting food for eating unless you are a cannibal, nothing more needs to be said. The specific purpose of the second amendment is to give the people the means to throw off tyrants, PERIOD But but Tyrants are not running through the forrest Derp |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83424368 United States05/26/2022 08:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Mike_account_5 User ID: 80925118 United States05/26/2022 08:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest ... Quoting: Mike_account_5 2nd amendment says: A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Translation; Because a militia is necessary, the people shall have the right to bear arms. News flash: THERE IS NO MORE MILITIAS Yes there is a militia its called the NATIONAL GUARD, TARD. EXACTLY and they provide you with guns you stupid cocksucker, you don't need to have your own assault rifles! That would be all good and fine if the "militia" never tried to exterminate "the people". Get it yet...idiot? The people's right shall not be infringed not the fucking militia. The peoples right shall not be infringed BECAUSE a militia is necessary you stupid fuck. No militia no reason for your right. But you don't even know the meaning of the fucking amendment you're trying to quote. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83050270 United States05/26/2022 08:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest In the constitutional sense they have been replaced by the military and national guards. Well, luckily you saying they dont exist has no weight in reality Militias today are not relied on to defend the nation which is what the 2nd amendment refers to. exactly..."the people" are relied on to defend the nation. Damn man...its so Biden does not become Hitler or desantis does not become pol pott or mao. |
| Mike_account_5 User ID: 80925118 United States05/26/2022 08:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 83424368 United States05/26/2022 08:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: President Biden: ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Has ‘No Negative Impact on 2nd Amendment’ --Deer aren’t running through the forest ... Quoting: Mike_account_5 The AR-15 is the civilian adaption of a military rifle. It's civilian because it doesn't have selective fire. That does not make it a hunting rifle. It's an assault rifle created for warfare. 2nd amendment is not about hunting food for eating unless you are a cannibal, nothing more needs to be said. The specific purpose of the second amendment is to give the people the means to throw off tyrants, PERIOD But but Tyrants are not running through the forrest Derp Who said they were? They are busting down our doors and shooting us for no reason though, arent they? |
thats what you think....