Pertinent Questions About Georgia Guidestones That Must Be Answered

1. Why did the light in the background pulse so brightly upon the explosion if it was just a bomb? You can clearly see the ground lighting up all around the light so we know that the it became brighter upon the explosion. What could cause this to happen other then some type of voltage surge?

2. Why is the camera angle cropped at the top? Shouldn't the camera be positioned to see the entire monument? The angle was conveniently cropped so we could not see the top of the monument. Why position a camera there if not to capture the entire monument in view?

3. If they released footage from an entirely different camera angle, asking for the public's help in identifying the car driving away from the scene as well as the person walking up to the monument and planting the bomb, why did they not release footage of the person walking up to the monument and planting the bomb from the original camera angle which was much better? This angle would have yielded a much clearer picture as it was pointed directly at where the bomb was placed.

4. Why was there no time stamps on any of the other footage from the alternate cameras? how do we compare time frames with no time stamp? Don't all security cameras have time stamps for just this sort of thing?

5. If it is an ongoing investigation, why did they tear down the monument so fast instead of taping it off if it was a public hazard, like they do to so many other crime scenes that are deemed hazardous to the public? Why tear it down so quickly? Even a 24 hour investigation while the monument was taped off could have yielded important clues.


6. Why was there no investigative forensic analysts on the scene before they tore it down so hastily, looking for clues like shoe prints, dropped items or DNA that might identify the perpetrator? It is almost as if they made no effort to solve who did this.

7. What is the significance of the dates and time the monument was blown up? If it was coincidence, it was one heck of a synchronicity in regards to the exact date and time of the explosion. I think Murphy's Law applies here in the most logical sense that the date and time were significant.

These are just a few of the questions that need to be answered before the official narrative can be accepted, although I am quite sure there are more details and questions that can and should be uncovered.

Something is not right about this event and this monument has always been a bit a of a mystery since it's inception.

Thoughts?