What's the difference between FDA Approved and EUA? - The Covid ‘Vaccine’ Scam

“Emergency Use Authorization” (EUA) came into prominence with the “Right to Try” law. This law was another way for patients who had been diagnosed with life-threatening diseases, who had tried all approved treatment options and who were unable to participate in a clinical trial, to access certain unapproved treatments.

What is the difference between FDA Approval and Emergency Use Authorization?

“FDA Approval” from the Food and Drug Administration is an independent, scientifically reviewed approval for medical products, drugs and vaccines. Approval is based on substantial clinical data and evidence, the product is deemed safe, effective and able to be produced within federal quality standards. Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is a mechanism used by the FDA to facilitate making products available quickly during a public health emergency, when there is no other adequate and approved medical product available.

What is the difference between an EUA “vaccine” under President Trump and the same one under President Biden? One was available and the other became mandatory.

What is in the EUA “vaccine” exactly? This new technology—mRNA—has not been FDA approved after over 20 years of research?

Consider there was no vaccine for HIV after 40 years of research. There were no vaccines for cancer after 100 years of research.

And yet when a mysterious deadly coronavirus from China appeared on America’s shores, within a year we not only have a “COVID-19 vaccine” but a “vaccine” found by four pharmaceutical companies within a week—with new technology that you will be impressed with. But there is a catch: we cannot ask any questions, like asking your doctor if 32 pages of side effects is right for you.

It is revealing that the pharmaceutical companies have been unwilling to reveal the contents of their mRNA EUA “vaccines.” They want to wait 75 years before telling anyone. Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA technology said the vaccine is gene therapy.

no voluntary informed consent allowed—is not in your best interests.

Why were they so hellbent in trying to get every single person on the planet “vaccinated” when Drs. Fauci and Birx knew from the beginning that the “vaccines” were deeply problematic? They knew there was over twenty years of research on messenger RNA gene therapies that killed all the lab rats and test animals. Did Fauci and Birx ignore the science and hoped it would work on humans?

Why didn’t the government constantly inform its citizenry of the difference between FDA Approved and EUA?

MORE
[link to www.americanthinker.com (secure)]

:faucibobble:

Great link

And all the manufacturers claim they used the communist party scientists upload to engineer their injections …

FDA said Pfizer's clottschott is "approved," yet the version they are using is still EUA.

So! They still don't have to tell us what's in it, or be subject to any liability for it.

And companies, healthcare organizations, and parts of the military can still MANDATE the experimental thing.

Ridiculous!

and S.A.D.

and, BAFFLING!

FDA said Pfizer's clottschott is "approved," yet the version they are using is still EUA.

So! They still don't have to tell us what's in it, or be subject to any liability for it.

And companies, healthcare organizations, and parts of the military can still MANDATE the experimental thing.

Ridiculous!

and S.A.D.

and, BAFFLING!

"version they are using is still EUA"

do u have a link to this?

they did that through most of last year but had no idea this still rang true

Correct. All mRNA shots and all mRNA booster use the protein sequence published by China electronically on January 10th 2020.

So we are just going to trust China like that???

We have yet to isolate the virus and sequence one of its proteins to match the China January 10th 2020 sequence.

FDA approved now means: RUN.