I found out more Greek was what English was built upon which surprised me. Yes, it was a common Greek language, yes, some Latin is thrown in but the English language comes from Greek I got a start of my learning about this by just studying how the English language became common among so many. It was slowly developed by changing letters like I to J from the Greek words there was no J back in the early year of the Greek Church, they were the first Roman Catholic Church the Greek Orthodox Catholic Church is different except recently the force of some into joining the combination with the Western one in Rome.
But the fact is, our English language is not based on Latin. There was some hole that couldn't be filled before then but did after finding this. It makes a whole lot more sense than the Latin who was barely a group until the takeover of Italy, and the sons and others brought their religion to Italy along with problems of trying to control the Church which lead to wars.
Where language developed turned into a very good part of this find, also led to other messes up in history but that is another part of doing a mistake and has to do the with misdating very thing, just the one thing not having a J only the I which was written to be the name shorten for Our lord Jesus but they didn't spell it this way, they use the Iesous.
In the older books, they put the date with me for the year of our lord by the I, but in copying they thought the I was a one, not everyone but the majority of the copiers put 1 instead of the I which changed all dating. I heard this before but you don't believe it until you do your own investigations well what I found is yes, they sure did this. say your date was in the Year of our Lord written this way I332 that was year 332 not 1332 do you understand how this change can cause a huge problem?
By the way, I also found books copied correctly with the correct dating with an I, and not 1 later it was done correctly unless they printed their I as one exactly like each other.
History is full of surprises and we don't know for sure what dangerous year we really live in. It does answer some other things that this change can explain because it brings them into the correct time to fit correctly.
No one wants to mess with this hot potato so they just go don't rock the boat.
There is a lot he said that doesn't fit the last Rome, the Parthian Persia was the first Roman Republic, this is where the laws were partially used later. This was in DC, not AD
This is where they lost their Empire because someone started games for entertainment and then they lost their Empire because someone wanted to rule over everyone. This was the first real Republic, not the last Rome.
If you really want to know who ran this know they Spoke Latin they were Latin people who were behind the first Roman Empire that became the Greek Roman Empire. You better look all around or the thieves come and steal, this happened before, this is the real problem, you get fooled into laziness with entertainment instead of being watchful of the ones who are not wanting the same things and they come to steal and kill. I guess they forgot Greece was where Constantine sat when he became the POPE, leader in other words.
Rome had fallen and it was around 300 years before Constantine but Constantine was not in Italy and Old Roman people were very much in Greece, at the palaces there, in the Bible, this is where everyone went to Greece when they went to first. This is where John Preached.
By the way, the first Constantine never went to Italy. He was born in Greece and pretty much stay in this part. This messed me up finding out, because they kept saying he came into Rome, but not this Rome today it was the Roman Empire.
History is weird with the change of phases then you get mixed up of where what, who, and timeline.
Otherwise, he was right about the money and others but their money was fiat also. Their gold was used for idols for their sick perverted ways.
