So to put to rest the question of if UV-C radiation is reaching the surface of the earth, and how much...

lol its not the scientists its those hand rubbers who own the tv stations and internet that wont allow it to be aired. we know factually there are thousands of doctors. 70,000 alone in americas frontline doctors that signed on saying the vax is bad and ivermectin treats covid etc, but we know how that went on deaf ears due to the tv and internet owned by these people.

For years I have read an internet thread by a fellow who has a multi decade career in cpmputers. This fellow recounted, st the time of occurance, how the sun ejected a CME (Coronal Mass Ejection) that struck Earth and blew off a portion of our upper atmosphere (Ozones' home address, not all, just a large amt). And subsequently, this allowed UVC to reach down to the surface of the Earth. Hence ALL the effects noted in previous posts. All of which I too experience. Stinging of skin and not the delicious warmth I formerly experienced while in the Sunlight. etc. Oh well...not much we can do about it. The utter silence of the Scientific community in this matter is, dare I say it, EVIL.

Will try it out tomorrow and post the results here and on the other thread around 1:00 p.m., after I take the daily reading. How’s that for service?

So glad I'm not a Caucasian. This melanin kissed skin of mine feels GREAT even spending hours in the sun!

Burn demons burn!!

That's a great service indeed. Can I have some fries with that?

Anybody over 50 can CLEARLY see the sun is white now. It used to be more yellow.

I am a person who spends a great deal of time outside. The sun has changed, period.

Strangely, I have found the sun is less damaging to my skin at the minute. I am covered in freckles so maybe they are helping

It's not the sun, it is right on its scheduled path ... it is what they are putting in our atmosphere that has weaponized the suns rays

don't ask me why, but barrium is in all the solutions that they spray on us, and it is radiation ... not to forget how much radiation FUshima is STILL dumping into the atmosphere

what we are experiencing is the cumulitive effect of man - weaponizing Nature so they can blame it on Nature and not be held accountable

they have been telling us to stay out of direct sunlight for over a decade ... and you believe that putting carcinogens (sun blocker) all over your body will protect you from radiations - you believe that the SUN which sustains life - is a killer

which just proves how successfully you have been PROGRAMED

keep on drinking and bathing in the tap water and eating your GMOs ... and trusting science

I have NEVER felt a “sting” while in the sun…never. Perhaps you are overly sensitive? Never !

[link to www.researchgate.net (secure)]

Important reading from the other thread....

Mainstream science states that UV-C, the most destructive wavelength range in solar radiation, never reaches the surface of the planet and is filtered out by atmospheric ozone.

Well I purchased a UV-C light meter to see if that is the truth. The answer is a resounding NO.

My first reading in afternoon sun here in the desert southwest was 27 microwatts/cm2. I am guessing that high noon sun would probably produce roughly double that.

To put that into perspective, the below is the chart of maximum exposure times based on UV-C irradiance:

Permissible exposure time * Effective irradiance

(seconds) (uW/cm2)
28800 0.10
14400 0.21
7200 0.42
3600 0.83
1800 1.67
900 3.33
600 5.00
300 10.00
60 50.00
30 100.00
10 300.00
3 1000.00
1 3000.00
0.5 6000.00
0.3 10000.00
0.1 30000.00

At 27 uW/cm2, your max exposure time is about 2.5 minutes before it starts damaging your cells.

To give you another example, I have an LED UV-C sterilization lamp, and it produces 20 microwatts/cm2. The sun was producing even more UV-C than my pretty intense UV-C sterilization lamp when shined directly onto the sensor.

Notice that the sun feels hotter these days and the sting comes on much faster than it did many years ago? That's the UV-C destroying your skin cells.

Imagine what it is doing to everything else that isn't shielded from the sun outside? Would be interesting to hear how everyone's open air uncovered garden is doing this year.

So that puts it to rest. UV-C is most definitely reaching ground level, which means something is very wrong with the atmospheric ozone that is supposed to completely filter it out.

UPDATE: Took another reading during the noon hour on a partly cloudy day today. 38 microwatts/cm2.

EQUIPMENT:

[link to generaltools.com (secure)]

Specifications:

Measurement ranges: 1 to 9999 μW/cm2 (low) and 0.01 to 40 mW/cm2 (high)
Measurement accuracy: ±(4% of reading +1 digit)
Spectral range: 220 to 275 nm
Calibration point: 254 nm
Sampling time: 0.3 seconds
Memory capacity: 20 measurements, plus 1 for interval time
Interval time options: 1, 2, 5, 10 and 30 seconds and 1, 3, 5 and 10 minutes
Operating temperature: 32° to 122°F (0° to 50°C) @< 90% RH
Weight: 3.2 oz. (90g)
Power source: "9V" battery (included)

THREAD OBSERVATIONS:

Central Arizona: 27-38 uW/cm2
Northwest New Jersey: 28-39 uW/cm2
Central Florida: 42-49 uW/cm2

===============================
Location: NW New Jersey, USA - Lat. 41°
Altitude: 600’ ASL
Air temperature: 83°F
Relative humidity: 27%
Sky conditions: clear w/few scattered cumulus
Wind: calm
Sun altitude above horizon: 59°

UV-C reading: 36uW/cm² *(note below)
===============================

Above reading taken at 10 minutes after astronomical noon.
All readings taken with General UVC Digital Light Meter No. UV512C, range 220nm to 275nm.

*Note: yesterday evening a poster asked, in the interests of accuracy and to dispel doubts, if I would be willing to arrange for a shield for the sensor, in order to make certain that no possible spurious UVC was coming in from another source (whatever that might be) apart from the Sun:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

I agreed to do this, and this afternoon attached a cardboard tube, 11” in length and 1-1/2” in diameter, to the sensor, making sure that it was perpendicular to it. I took the first reading with the tube attached, aiming it carefully at the Sun using it’s shadow as an alignment guide. Off-axis, the sensor was picking up only 2-3 mw/cm² of UVC energy, but once it was aligned, and the sunlight was falling directly down the tube onto the sensor, the readings went to 34mw/cm².

I then removed the tube shield and took a reading in the manner that those here have been doing since we began. The sensor now indicated a reading of 36mw/cm². This might be attributable to sky shine, the slight diffusion of the rays in the atmosphere, but more likely as reflection from the few fair-weather cumulus clouds that were visible 20° to 30° away from the Sun.

2mw/cm² isn’t much difference in reading, but were there more cumulus present, it might have had much greater effect. In the interests of accuracy, it might be good form to shield the sensor for all our readings.

Your thoughts?

Anyone Remember that solar observatory that got raided by the fbi a few years ago and nobody knew why? People were speculating about mercury theft.

The sun changed from yellow to white. We grew up with it we know what it used to look and feel like and what it looks and feels like now.

[link to www.scienceabc.com (secure)]

Our sun is a "White Binary Dwarf" as shown in this chart.

You lame ass duck!

Why don't you post a YouTube video where you measure uv c

You won't because you are a entertaining



Fraud clown!

You lame ass duck!

Why don't you post a YouTube video where you measure uv c

You won't because you are a entertaining



Fraud clown!

White dwarfs are what is left when stars like our sun have exhausted all of their fuel.
Compared to our sun (opens in new tab), a white dwarf has a similar carbon and oxygen mass though it is much smaller in size — similar to Earth (opens in new tab), according to New Mexico State University (opens in new tab) (NMSU).
If the companion is another white dwarf instead of an active star, the two stellar corpses merge together (opens in new tab) to kick off the fireworks. This process is known as a "double-degenerate model" of a Type 1a supernova.
At other times, the white dwarf may pull just enough material from its companion to briefly ignite in a nova, a far smaller explosion. Because the white dwarf remains intact, it can repeat the process several times when it reaches that critical point, breathing life back into the dying star over and over again.
"These are the brightest and most frequent stellar eruptions in the galaxy, and they're often visible to the naked eye."
[link to www.space.com (secure)]