Why to avoid LINUX

Anyone who brags on a forum like this has zero hacking skills. Just another 200 pound idiot.

Yes richtig, german hackers are ze best

we created SuSE and siemens

and yet snowden ran linux on a usb key and walked out of the nsa lol

snowden was CIA

even gov cant trust CIA

Alternatives to Linux with a security focus, huh.

Hurd? No. OpenBSD.

Retard.

So the CIA trusts linux, that just proves linux is the most trustworthy op system

ok big secret on this forum is

we can spell but are not allowed

are are all cia

there is only 1 (just one!) person in the world who is not one of us, who hasn't awakened yet...

he is in the truman show

His name shall not be named

everyone else is in the cia universe

created in 1947 when the simulation started

everyone on this site is cia

Do you understand the OPs claim?

no the cia is civillian scriptkids

they have no access to "Proprietary Military Operating Systems"

so they use linux because thats what they get for free

feeding off the hard labour of hobbyists who dedicated their life to building things with other intent

No os is perfect but Linux is a far cry better than Windows

basically we are all space nazis but there is 1 guy who has the potential to kill us all

but he also has the potential to save us

the only problem with this guy is: he too knows linux

but he is more on ubuntu level

imagine one guy who knows his stuff

you cant scan his computer

everything needs to be done passively

when he sees strange ip packet he freaks out

etc

he is awake but still asleep

50/50

why

When you hear the word Linux, probably the first thing that will cross your mind is a terminal filled with a lot of commands. This might be true for servers running Linux, but it’s not all.

Nowadays, more and more people are using Linux as their operating system, and even though the market share isn’t as big as Windows, many new Linux users choose it for its security and stability.

[link to www.itpro.co.uk (secure)]

One of the most effective ways Linux secures its systems is through privileges. Linux does not grant full administrator or root access to user accounts by default, whereas Windows does. Instead, accounts are usually lower-level and have no privileges within the wider system.

[link to vivaldi.com (secure)]


As you might expect, the volume of malware developed for an operating system is proportionate to its popularity. Windows has a large market share and because of that, it is a bigger target for scammers. Compared to that, there’s barely any malware in existence for Linux. That’s one reason some consider Linux more secure than Windows.

FreeBSD? OpenBSD?

People using linux its like those green screens with japanese letters in the matrix....

[link to hackr.io (secure)]

I've installed probably hundreds of distros in my years and I got a new laptop and I tried everything except getting an external disk drive because it didn't come with a disk drive and that's the only method I haven't tried and I can't install anything I tried installing a distro from another computer onto a hard drive and then booting to that hard drive using a USB to SATA adapter, I tried installing from micro USB MicroSD USB and I can't get any of them to be recognized by the BIOS I turn off fastboot secure boot everything


I absolutely hate that I'm stuck with Windows I hate windows it's garbage and it makes me sick that I can't install a distro on this laptop

i guess thats why cia use linux

only the brightest people understand reading codes like that

you know, i have a matrix screensaver to mimic them

to scare people in the cafe.. when they see my matrix screensaver they think its linux , they think im an intelligence guy , or something

LeeT :P

Find "Hurd" and Replace with "FreeBSD"

Welcome to the same argument 15 years ago, junior.

counter argumentz

1. Your other options are: Industrial Operating Systems

2. Linux is just kernel. There is just 1 version and maintainer (a liberal btw) a liberal who doesnt even install his own systems because he doesn't understand it.. he is just a kernel coder. he admits this

3. open source means the governments can easily find backdoors. no user is going through 10.00 lines of codes modified every day. it also allows ANY government to embed their agents in ANY opensource project and 'by mistake' introduce errors for exploitation when needed

4. free meaning what? i dont mind paying for licenses if money is what you are after. and "muh open source" does not provide a sense of intrinsic freedom to me.. this is a lie, emotional deception


5. no it hasnt. linux is just a kernel and when it launches you get a shell at user zero




new argument:


microsoft kernel security team has better tracking system and uses better memory protection by default. linux has it default disabled... linux these days is focussed on the gamer community with zen kernels and lts because regular kernels are not stable like when windows was bad and linux was good


we are on a new timeline , yes

but i know the entire linux community here disagree with me

average person on glp installed linux to run a bluetooth scanner on the graveyards to find evidence of the upcoming genocide

.....

but you can linux all you want

remember they are liberals now

enjoy your crossdressing genderless pinguin system

:)

At the core of linux is Google. Nuff said.

Let's come up to speed.

Hacked OS is irrelevant.

Back entry is built into most CPUs now at level far below OS.

When you bring home a new computer you are already hacked.

So go ahead and cheerlead your pointless (from security standpoint) OS. It doesn't matter anymore.

[link to www.sysjolt.com (secure)]

Linux is only great if you truly understand it, very little do.