Why to avoid LINUX

1. Linus Torvalds got infected by the woke virus and his mind might be subject to extremist ideologies

2. He prefers functionality over security and his kernel is too big, buggy and it seriously sucks in many ways

3. Even Windows 10 does better kernel security than Linux 4.x (Windows NT team changed their bug tracking and follow up after two decades of failures)

4. Linus Torvalds does not know how to install a Linux distribution. Find the interviews. He is only a kernel guy. He runs simple things like Red hat ... he can't maintain systems

Who knows who else watching his own 'secure' system in real time...

5. He had unbased battles with gr who did actual kernel security

6. Linux used to be 300k lines of code. Now 5 million

7. Who knows how many developers are on some foreign pay roll to undermine things 'by accident' in their communities, introducing new bugs for a living while playing programming guy...

Get Hurd instead of Linux

Let's come up to speed.

Hacked OS is irrelevant.

Back entry is built into most CPUs now at level far below OS.

When you bring home a new computer you are already hacked.

So go ahead and cheerlead your pointless (from security standpoint) OS. It doesn't matter anymore.

[link to www.sysjolt.com (secure)]

Yep, the government agencies are going to have access to your system regardless of what OS you are running.

The reason I use MX Linux is because it does everything I need on an older computer using much less resources than any other non Linux OS.

Why you SHOULD use Linux:

1. Your only other options are Windows or Mac. Both horrible, full of back doors for the NSA etc.

2. There are about 1000 different versions of Linux, so you can't just lump them all together like it's one operating system.

3. Linux is OPEN SOURCE. When means anyone can see the code. This makes it safer as the govt cannot install back doors etc, that Windows and Mac are RIDDLED WITH.

4. Linus is FREE.

5. Linux has the built in security of asking for passwords for any changes made to the system.

I switched to Linux when the "Windows 10" garbage came out. I will never go back. I still use Windows at work because that's what they have there. Would never use Windows for person use or business use if I had my own business.

But the the hell writes GNOME, KDE, GIMP, Blender, LibreOffice or even Firefox ? Are they communists ?

im glad for you, but i dont know what a kernel is

Do you understand the OPs claim?

I bet I can hack it in 3 days at console without root knowledge

why would i let you have console access?

thats like saying "i can rob your bank if you unlock the vault".

I've always been suspicious that people develop these programs totally free of charge out of some belief in open source software and desire to donate their time, effort and expertise for no personal gain.

It's just not human nature, the vast majority of people only do something if there's a direct benefit to them. And developing software for free is hardly a "feel good" charitable endeavour, it's not exactly volunteering at a soup kitchen or homeless shelter.

My gut feeling is there's more than meets the eye with this "FOSS" software, but I'm not sure what exactly.

Alternatives to Linux with a security focus, huh.

Hurd? No. OpenBSD.

This!

I bet I can hack it in 3 days at console without root knowledge

Anybody out there remember XENIX ??? When I was a sys admin in early 80's Microsoft owned a port of unix and seriously considered Unix as their kernel but Gates sold it to SCO. I used to tech on Fortune systems that ran SCO Xenis and Sys 5 Unix.

I use Linux Mint 95% of the time for decades and it just runs. There are times when you need windows but Mint handles most jobs beautifully.

cat /dev/urandom > /dev/kmem

1. Linus Torvalds got infected by the woke virus and his mind might be subject to extremist ideologies

2. He prefers functionality over security and his kernel is too big, buggy and it seriously sucks in many ways

3. Even Windows 10 does better kernel security than Linux 4.x (Windows NT team changed their bug tracking and follow up after two decades of failures)

4. Linus Torvalds does not know how to install a Linux distribution. Find the interviews. He is only a kernel guy. He runs simple things like Red hat ... he can't maintain systems

Who knows who else watching his own 'secure' system in real time...

5. He had unbased battles with gr who did actual kernel security

6. Linux used to be 300k lines of code. Now 5 million

7. Who knows how many developers are on some foreign pay roll to undermine things 'by accident' in their communities, introducing new bugs for a living while playing programming guy...

Get Hurd instead of Linux

windows is still shit for security

unless you use pro or enterprise and know how to use group policy and security policy
to lock the shit down

the defaults for "home" from XP to 11
are as wide open as they were in win 95

NTFS file ownership only applies to other windows users

with any liveCD,DVD,USB I can boot a windows system
and access all system and user files on any windows home version system

can't boot with a windows disc
and access any nix file system

Why you SHOULD use Linux:

1. Your only other options are Windows or Mac. Both horrible, full of back doors for the NSA etc.

2. There are about 1000 different versions of Linux, so you can't just lump them all together like it's one operating system.

3. Linux is OPEN SOURCE. When means anyone can see the code. This makes it safer as the govt cannot install back doors etc, that Windows and Mac are RIDDLED WITH.

4. Linus is FREE.

5. Linux has the built in security of asking for passwords for any changes made to the system.

I switched to Linux when the "Windows 10" garbage came out. I will never go back. I still use Windows at work because that's what they have there. Would never use Windows for person use or business use if I had my own business.

What is this "Hurd" that you speak of?