Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,673 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 155,577
Pageviews Today: 718,088Threads Today: 199Posts Today: 3,775
07:46 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters for Young Adults: A Risk-Benefit Assessment and 5 Ethical Arguments against Mandates at Universities

 
Time to end this nonsense
User ID: 75926024
United States
09/14/2022 07:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters for Young Adults: A Risk-Benefit Assessment and 5 Ethical Arguments against Mandates at Universities
"... Students at North American universities risk disenrollment due to third dose COVID-19 vaccine mandates. We present a risk-benefit assessment of boosters in this age group and provide five ethical arguments against mandates. We estimate that 22,000 - 30,000 previously uninfected adults aged 18-29 must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent one COVID-19 hospitalisation. Using CDC and sponsor-reported adverse event data, we find that booster mandates may cause a net expected harm: per COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented in previously uninfected young adults, we anticipate 18 to 98 serious adverse events, including 1.7 to 3.0 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity which interferes with daily activities. Given the high prevalence of post-infection immunity, this risk-benefit profile is even less favourable. University booster mandates are unethical because: 1) no formal risk-benefit assessment exists for this age group; 2) vaccine mandates may result in a net expected harm to individual young people; 3) mandates are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission; 4) US mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare serious vaccine-related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes; and 5) mandates create wider social harms. We consider counter-arguments such as a desire for socialisation and safety and show that such arguments lack scientific and/or ethical support. Finally, we discuss the relevance of our analysis for current 2-dose CCOVIDovid-19 vaccine mandates in North America. ..."

[link to papers.ssrn.com (secure)]

August 31, 2022





GLP