‘Fully vaccinated’ people at 44% higher risk of COVID infection than unvaccinated: Oxford study

Vaccine effectiveness against death 14 or more days after the second jab is just 61 percent (the first highlighted figure), well below the 90–99 percent claimed by the government. Note that the overall protection will be even lower owing to the vaccinated being more likely to be infected: the 44 percent higher infection rate mentioned above would reduce the 61 percent effectiveness to just 34 percent.

Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab (the second highlighted figure) jumps up to 97 percent from 61 percent following the second jab



60-95% decrease in risk of death is not something to sneeze at

So then you go ahead and get the third injection, and I will get a total of zero injections, and let's run a comparison parallel data graph in 24 months to determine which one of us is still alive.

Well, judging from the article you posted, and the study associated with it...

That's already been done.

Maybe next time read the whole fucking thing and understand it before posting

Vaccine effectiveness against death 14 or more days after the second jab is just 61 percent (the first highlighted figure), well below the 90–99 percent claimed by the government. Note that the overall protection will be even lower owing to the vaccinated being more likely to be infected: the 44 percent higher infection rate mentioned above would reduce the 61 percent effectiveness to just 34 percent.

Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab (the second highlighted figure) jumps up to 97 percent from 61 percent following the second jab



60-95% decrease in risk of death is not something to sneeze at

Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab was cooked up by big pharma to increase their profits, and decrease the population.

but you need to look at the numbers..

im too lazy to look up the real numbers... but it will be something like this

chance of death
vax .00001%
unvax .0001%

then you have huge % of safety... but in reality you have a much higher chance of dying driving to the jab appointment.

Ah well if thats your best guess, who am I to argue?

How many otherwise healthy people will now die listening to your mRNA misinformation?

Shame on you. Answer to God on judgement day for all the lives lost because of the deceptive sorcory you pushed.

ferrets

Vaccine effectiveness against death 14 or more days after the second jab is just 61 percent (the first highlighted figure), well below the 90–99 percent claimed by the government. Note that the overall protection will be even lower owing to the vaccinated being more likely to be infected: the 44 percent higher infection rate mentioned above would reduce the 61 percent effectiveness to just 34 percent.

Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab (the second highlighted figure) jumps up to 97 percent from 61 percent following the second jab



60-95% decrease in risk of death is not something to sneeze at

Mate...I'm just quoting the sources you posted here. Not my fault you didn't understand them



When he explains the actions of his priesthood, and the atrocities committed in his name, then we can discuss my "crimes"

That was already 0.05%

Damn you are fucking stupid. You took an experimental drug for the common cold…

Not really a shocker tho, you’ve been on my ignore list for years now.

The ODD data from 3rd injection was doctored (pun intended).

I realize you are Australian and might have difficulty with abstract concepts, so you are forgiven by me, but stop with the bad advice to others and get boosted again and again if you are so sure the injections are the fountain of everlasting life, as big pharma has convinced you.

Safe and Effective.

Third shot from VAX cheerleader results in neverlasting life:


[link to thecovidblog.com (secure)]

It was your article dumb ass

You're pissed at me for pointing out your lack of reading comprehension on the very article you posted...

And instead assume I'm not only vaxxed, but for it?

I just can't stand idiots posting stuff they can't understand, that, if anything, prove Trumps Warp Speed Vaccine is just the bestest

Name calling just proves your lack of intellect.

I read the article, and all the links multiple times.

ODDLY the government data after 3rd injection was propaganda because they were caught red-handed promoting genocide.


Watch the documentary in full before you post again on this thread, and stop with the name calling.


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Just because you try to come across as intelligent in your insults, does not detract from what they are.

I mean, as an Aussie with difficulty in abstract concepts, ill stick with reading the articles and medical studies you posted here, that since you can't refute, are now trying to redirect to another source to "prove yourself"

Keep on keeping on Skippy

The vaxzeenated think they are now immune and invincible. Little do they realize the vaxzeen simply does not work.

The vaxzeen is not meant to protect you from any virus. It's intended to shorten your lifespan, and through various means. Blood clots is one common means. Another are the metals in those vaxzeens. When the war starts, and the EMPs explode, your brain is going to light up like a 4th of July sparkler. And down you all go.

BTW, I'm not going to help with the cleanup work afterwards. Screw that idea. A most, I might be willing to drive one of the garbage trucks. But only if the corpses are airtight within their body bags.

Oxford University researchers found that those who had taken the anti-COVID shots stood at substantially higher risk of infection with the coronavirus compared to those who had did not receive any COVID jab.

Two doses of COVID-19 vaccine make you 44 percent more likely to be infected, a study from Oxford University has found, contradicting the basis of global vaccine policy, which assumes vaccination significantly cuts incidence and transmission.

The study, published in the Lancet, looked at all infections reported in England among adults registered at a medical practice from December 8, 2020, to November 17, 2021, meaning it spanned the alpha and delta periods. It used a case-control design to estimate vaccine effectiveness, allowing potential confounding factors such as age, sex, and underlying conditions to be controlled for, while individuals with prior infection were excluded.

The results for effectiveness against positive COVID test (i.e., reported infection), which were found buried away in the supplementary appendix, are shown (at link) below.

MORE
[link to www.lifesitenews.com (secure)]

:safeandeffective:

Wakey wakey coxid never was......ONLY VAXED DYING