Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,747 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 256,108
Pageviews Today: 479,137Threads Today: 152Posts Today: 3,494
06:49 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients

 
Happy in Nature
the earth laughs in flowers

User ID: 81071993
United States
11/01/2022 04:17 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
Tried posting this multiple times on the latest Paul Joseph Watson video, but my comment disappears in less than a minute, no matter what I do to eliminate banned words.

Every single time I post about SM-102 on YT, my comment disappears. I am not shadow banned because all other comments appear, just not one that mentions vaxx ingredients.

My edited, banned comment:

"They didn't just smear us, they supported mandatory vaccinations that killed and injured millions of people. They banned us when we spoke the truth about the ingredients and effects of these not-vaccines.

SM followed by 102 (full name not allowed on YT) is a proprietary lipid by Cayman followed by Chemicals. It is 10% lipid and 90% chloroform. Chloroform penetrates the cell walls to deliver the lipid. The MSDS clearly states it is not for human or animal use, yet it is the second ingredient in vaccines by the company that starts with an M.

Chloroform has a half life of 180 days. When chloroform breaks down and touches an oxygen molecule, it becomes cyanide. Both cyanide and chloroform poisoning have similar side effects as covid. This is a crime that every single US Congressperson was made aware of in May 2021, as were the NIH, CDC, and the F-ing NY Times. There is no excuse. Every lying journalist, publisher and Twtter/FB/YT censor deserves to face a military tribunal for their role in the genocide of humanity. "I"m sorry," doesn't cut it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 50487851
United Kingdom
11/01/2022 04:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
Someone should go to youtube HQ and make a complaint
Happy in Nature  (OP)
the earth laughs in flowers

User ID: 81071993
United States
11/01/2022 04:34 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
Someone should go to youtube HQ and make a complaint
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 50487851

I emailed every single US Senator and representative (individually, not en mass), the CDC, NIH, NY Times, CNN, FOX, MSNC, and Robert Kennedy the MSDS for SM-102, the 2nd Moderna vaxx ingredient. I sent the info to Bernie Sanders and Occasional Kotex a dozen times. They cannot say they didn't know that the second ingredient clearly states not for human or animal use on the MSDS. They deliberately chose to ignore the warning.
XJDUB

User ID: 75816770
Canada
11/01/2022 05:48 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
go to youtube HQ and
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 50487851

...
Let the facts fall wherever, whenever, and however they may.

INTP - The Logician. 'Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning.' - Albert Einstein.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 84616736
United States
11/01/2022 05:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
Someone should go to youtube HQ and make a complaint
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 50487851

I emailed every single US Senator and representative (individually, not en mass), the CDC, NIH, NY Times, CNN, FOX, MSNC, and Robert Kennedy the MSDS for SM-102, the 2nd Moderna vaxx ingredient. I sent the info to Bernie Sanders and Occasional Kotex a dozen times. They cannot say they didn't know that the second ingredient clearly states not for human or animal use on the MSDS. They deliberately chose to ignore the warning.
 Quoting: Happy in Nature


Your awesome.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73987782
United States
11/01/2022 05:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
Supprize!

Gosh. I wonder why they don’t tell you what’s IN it?

Ahh. Who cares. Yah. I want your shots. So I can go spend money. I trust you.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 84445193
Germany
11/01/2022 06:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
"vaccinations that killed and injured millions of people" might be a problematic phrase...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77962052
United States
11/01/2022 07:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
Well done, OP. Keep getting the word out there! We admire you.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 83522628
United Kingdom
11/01/2022 07:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
YT is trash. Tons of comments, even on cooking channels, are always blocked.
Someone video always taken down for something petty.
Great work OP, but YouTyrants needs to go down like MySpace and FB.
Try TG to get your message out.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 82846315
United States
11/01/2022 07:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
Use bitchute it's like glp youtube.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 82846315
United States
11/01/2022 07:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
Someone should go to youtube HQ and make a complaint
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 50487851


They're the ones doing the censoring.

Google is evil as fuck there is no reasoning with them, the only solution is not use Youtube.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 83907461
Finland
11/01/2022 07:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
bump
The Mexican Thinker.
User ID: 84600661
Mexico
11/02/2022 01:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
Companies owned by the Israeli bankstards carry a set of rules that further the goals of Agenda 2030, globalization, depopulation, ghey depravation and the taking down of the world economy and the like. These companies are owned by the bankstards through their companies, Black Rock, Vanguard and State Street, who nobody can tell who their owners are....

Then they have a second tier and even a third, fourth and fifth tier of companies that finally are owned by the three major companies exposed above. They have been pushing the vaccines among their employees, forcing them to take the vaccines to continue being employed, and have pushed for totalitarian rules like Paypal taking people´s money through heavy censoring to start tightening the rules on people for the New World Order to take control of slaves and even behead people for reasons beyond any reasoning which we will see after 2024-25...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 84195312
11/02/2022 01:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
Someone should go to youtube HQ and make a complaint
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 50487851

I emailed every single US Senator and representative (individually, not en mass), the CDC, NIH, NY Times, CNN, FOX, MSNC, and Robert Kennedy the MSDS for SM-102, the 2nd Moderna vaxx ingredient. I sent the info to Bernie Sanders and Occasional Kotex a dozen times. They cannot say they didn't know that the second ingredient clearly states not for human or animal use on the MSDS. They deliberately chose to ignore the warning.
 Quoting: Happy in Nature


Because they get hundreds of ranting wingnuts like you mailing them every day and they know how to spot them.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 82846315
United States
11/02/2022 01:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
What makes no sense is if the vaccine is good what would be wrong with posting the ingredients? Nothing.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80122451
11/02/2022 01:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
This one again?

Fake pseudoscience claim:

The Moderna vaccine contains SM-102 which could cause health complaints such as cancer, fertility damage and damage to the nervous system, kidneys or respiratory system.

Fact:

These claims about SM-102 are from a product safety leaflet when it is in a mixed solution with a toxic substance called chloroform. The Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, but not chloroform.

A Facebook user has posted a video which suggests that the Moderna vaccine is dangerous to human health because one of its ingredients appears to be described as hazardous and toxic in a safety data sheet. But this warning applies to the ingredient (a lipid called SM-102) when it is in a mixture with chloroform, a known highly toxic substance.

The video shows someone Google “simple ingredients for the moderna vaccine”. They then scroll through the results, and find that an ingredient “SM-102” is first in a bullet point list. Searching for SM-102 leads to a chemical supplier’s website.

The user downloads the safety data sheet provided and highlights a number of hazards associated with the substance. These include warnings that it is “highly flammable”, “suspected of causing cancer”, “suspected of damaging fertility” and causes “damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver, the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure” amongst others.

Although the Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, and the Facebook video does follow a link to a genuine safety data sheet, the safety information refers to SM-102 in a mixture with chloroform, which is known to be a toxic substance.

The third page of the leaflet shown in the video, explains the product listing, stating that chloroform (which makes up 90% of this particular mixture) is a “dangerous” component. The SM-102 makes up 10% of the mixture described in the leaflet.

[link to fullfact.org (secure)]

And OP wonders why nobody will listen to them.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80037713
Austria
11/02/2022 01:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
They're Halth Expurts.
Follow the Orders, or don't get paid!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 83625806
11/02/2022 02:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
Someone should go to youtube HQ and make a complaint
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 50487851


You actually think Joowicki is gonna listen?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77949466
United States
11/02/2022 03:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
This one again?

Fake pseudoscience claim:

The Moderna vaccine contains SM-102 which could cause health complaints such as cancer, fertility damage and damage to the nervous system, kidneys or respiratory system.

Fact:

These claims about SM-102 are from a product safety leaflet when it is in a mixed solution with a toxic substance called chloroform. The Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, but not chloroform.

A Facebook user has posted a video which suggests that the Moderna vaccine is dangerous to human health because one of its ingredients appears to be described as hazardous and toxic in a safety data sheet. But this warning applies to the ingredient (a lipid called SM-102) when it is in a mixture with chloroform, a known highly toxic substance.

The video shows someone Google “simple ingredients for the moderna vaccine”. They then scroll through the results, and find that an ingredient “SM-102” is first in a bullet point list. Searching for SM-102 leads to a chemical supplier’s website.

The user downloads the safety data sheet provided and highlights a number of hazards associated with the substance. These include warnings that it is “highly flammable”, “suspected of causing cancer”, “suspected of damaging fertility” and causes “damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver, the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure” amongst others.

Although the Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, and the Facebook video does follow a link to a genuine safety data sheet, the safety information refers to SM-102 in a mixture with chloroform, which is known to be a toxic substance.

The third page of the leaflet shown in the video, explains the product listing, stating that chloroform (which makes up 90% of this particular mixture) is a “dangerous” component. The SM-102 makes up 10% of the mixture described in the leaflet.

[link to fullfact.org (secure)]

And OP wonders why nobody will listen to them.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80122451


Did you actually read the MSDS? Or did you just take their word for it? Do you have experience with this at work? It clearly says SM-102 is specifically what it is addressing. If it was a mixture it would say the name of the product or mixture at the top not specifically SM-102. It’s not talking about a 90/10 mixture at all. It shows the dangers of mixing it. That doesn’t mean shit. Politifact is partisan bullshit and that should be your first clue
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77949466
United States
11/02/2022 03:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
So you are saying SM-102 is safe to drink? I guess you think that you shouldn’t call POISON CONTROL when you ingest it because it’s yummy. I’m sure it’s safe to inject into your arm
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78067678
11/02/2022 03:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
This one again?

Fake pseudoscience claim:

The Moderna vaccine contains SM-102 which could cause health complaints such as cancer, fertility damage and damage to the nervous system, kidneys or respiratory system.

Fact:

These claims about SM-102 are from a product safety leaflet when it is in a mixed solution with a toxic substance called chloroform. The Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, but not chloroform.

A Facebook user has posted a video which suggests that the Moderna vaccine is dangerous to human health because one of its ingredients appears to be described as hazardous and toxic in a safety data sheet. But this warning applies to the ingredient (a lipid called SM-102) when it is in a mixture with chloroform, a known highly toxic substance.

The video shows someone Google “simple ingredients for the moderna vaccine”. They then scroll through the results, and find that an ingredient “SM-102” is first in a bullet point list. Searching for SM-102 leads to a chemical supplier’s website.

The user downloads the safety data sheet provided and highlights a number of hazards associated with the substance. These include warnings that it is “highly flammable”, “suspected of causing cancer”, “suspected of damaging fertility” and causes “damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver, the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure” amongst others.

Although the Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, and the Facebook video does follow a link to a genuine safety data sheet, the safety information refers to SM-102 in a mixture with chloroform, which is known to be a toxic substance.

The third page of the leaflet shown in the video, explains the product listing, stating that chloroform (which makes up 90% of this particular mixture) is a “dangerous” component. The SM-102 makes up 10% of the mixture described in the leaflet.

[link to fullfact.org (secure)]

And OP wonders why nobody will listen to them.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80122451


Did you actually read the MSDS? Or did you just take their word for it? Do you have experience with this at work? It clearly says SM-102 is specifically what it is addressing. If it was a mixture it would say the name of the product or mixture at the top not specifically SM-102. It’s not talking about a 90/10 mixture at all. It shows the dangers of mixing it. That doesn’t mean shit. Politifact is partisan bullshit and that should be your first clue
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77949466


Yes, it’s right here.

[link to cdn.caymanchem.com (secure)]

And there’s no chloroform in it. Besides, this is not the stock that was used in formulating the vaccines anyway. It’s the lipid SM-102, but it’s a product that’s not for human use, as it says right in the SDS.

Now think about this for a minute - it’s easy to analyze a liquid down to the parts per billion level of chloroform. If there was actually any chloroform in the vaccines, which there isn’t, don’t you think someone would have done that analysis to prove it?

This is just such utter nonsense.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78067678
11/02/2022 03:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
So you are saying SM-102 is safe to drink? I guess you think that you shouldn’t call POISON CONTROL when you ingest it because it’s yummy. I’m sure it’s safe to inject into your arm
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77949466


Sure, it’s just a lipid and wouldn’t harm you in the least.
Happy in Nature  (OP)
the earth laughs in flowers

User ID: 81071993
United States
11/02/2022 08:49 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
Someone should go to youtube HQ and make a complaint
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 50487851

I emailed every single US Senator and representative (individually, not en mass), the CDC, NIH, NY Times, CNN, FOX, MSNC, and Robert Kennedy the MSDS for SM-102, the 2nd Moderna vaxx ingredient. I sent the info to Bernie Sanders and Occasional Kotex a dozen times. They cannot say they didn't know that the second ingredient clearly states not for human or animal use on the MSDS. They deliberately chose to ignore the warning.
 Quoting: Happy in Nature


Because they get hundreds of ranting wingnuts like you mailing them every day and they know how to spot them.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84195312


Fuck off, Langley.
Happy in Nature  (OP)
the earth laughs in flowers

User ID: 81071993
United States
11/02/2022 08:50 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
So you are saying SM-102 is safe to drink? I guess you think that you shouldn’t call POISON CONTROL when you ingest it because it’s yummy. I’m sure it’s safe to inject into your arm
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77949466


Sure, it’s just a lipid and wouldn’t harm you in the least.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78067678


But the 90% chloroform carrier will poison the body.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 83746061
United States
11/02/2022 08:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
Someone should go to youtube HQ and make a complaint
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 50487851

I emailed every single US Senator and representative (individually, not en mass), the CDC, NIH, NY Times, CNN, FOX, MSNC, and Robert Kennedy the MSDS for SM-102, the 2nd Moderna vaxx ingredient. I sent the info to Bernie Sanders and Occasional Kotex a dozen times. They cannot say they didn't know that the second ingredient clearly states not for human or animal use on the MSDS. They deliberately chose to ignore the warning.
 Quoting: Happy in Nature


All of them are part of the system, OP. Even Robert Kennedy is controlled opposition. We are in the end times. Trust no one but the Lord!
Happy in Nature  (OP)
the earth laughs in flowers

User ID: 81071993
United States
11/02/2022 08:58 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
This one again?

Fake pseudoscience claim:

The Moderna vaccine contains SM-102 which could cause health complaints such as cancer, fertility damage and damage to the nervous system, kidneys or respiratory system.

Fact:

These claims about SM-102 are from a product safety leaflet when it is in a mixed solution with a toxic substance called chloroform. The Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, but not chloroform.

A Facebook user has posted a video which suggests that the Moderna vaccine is dangerous to human health because one of its ingredients appears to be described as hazardous and toxic in a safety data sheet. But this warning applies to the ingredient (a lipid called SM-102) when it is in a mixture with chloroform, a known highly toxic substance.

The video shows someone Google “simple ingredients for the moderna vaccine”. They then scroll through the results, and find that an ingredient “SM-102” is first in a bullet point list. Searching for SM-102 leads to a chemical supplier’s website.

The user downloads the safety data sheet provided and highlights a number of hazards associated with the substance. These include warnings that it is “highly flammable”, “suspected of causing cancer”, “suspected of damaging fertility” and causes “damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver, the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure” amongst others.

Although the Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, and the Facebook video does follow a link to a genuine safety data sheet, the safety information refers to SM-102 in a mixture with chloroform, which is known to be a toxic substance.

The third page of the leaflet shown in the video, explains the product listing, stating that chloroform (which makes up 90% of this particular mixture) is a “dangerous” component. The SM-102 makes up 10% of the mixture described in the leaflet.

[link to fullfact.org (secure)]

And OP wonders why nobody will listen to them.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80122451


Did you actually read the MSDS? Or did you just take their word for it? Do you have experience with this at work? It clearly says SM-102 is specifically what it is addressing. If it was a mixture it would say the name of the product or mixture at the top not specifically SM-102. It’s not talking about a 90/10 mixture at all. It shows the dangers of mixing it. That doesn’t mean shit. Politifact is partisan bullshit and that should be your first clue
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77949466


Yes, it’s right here.

[link to cdn.caymanchem.com (secure)]

And there’s no chloroform in it. Besides, this is not the stock that was used in formulating the vaccines anyway. It’s the lipid SM-102, but it’s a product that’s not for human use, as it says right in the SDS.

Now think about this for a minute - it’s easy to analyze a liquid down to the parts per billion level of chloroform. If there was actually any chloroform in the vaccines, which there isn’t, don’t you think someone would have done that analysis to prove it?

This is just such utter nonsense.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78067678

I read the MSDS and wrote to Cayman Chemicals. They changed their MSDS info three days after receipt of my email.

The lipid needs a carrier. SM102 uses a chloroform. The patent for SM02 includes the chloroform carrier. SM102 is sold with 90% chloroform as a carrier.
Happy in Nature  (OP)
the earth laughs in flowers

User ID: 81071993
United States
11/02/2022 09:01 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
This one again?

Fake pseudoscience claim:

The Moderna vaccine contains SM-102 which could cause health complaints such as cancer, fertility damage and damage to the nervous system, kidneys or respiratory system.

Fact:

These claims about SM-102 are from a product safety leaflet when it is in a mixed solution with a toxic substance called chloroform. The Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, but not chloroform.

A Facebook user has posted a video which suggests that the Moderna vaccine is dangerous to human health because one of its ingredients appears to be described as hazardous and toxic in a safety data sheet. But this warning applies to the ingredient (a lipid called SM-102) when it is in a mixture with chloroform, a known highly toxic substance.

The video shows someone Google “simple ingredients for the moderna vaccine”. They then scroll through the results, and find that an ingredient “SM-102” is first in a bullet point list. Searching for SM-102 leads to a chemical supplier’s website.

The user downloads the safety data sheet provided and highlights a number of hazards associated with the substance. These include warnings that it is “highly flammable”, “suspected of causing cancer”, “suspected of damaging fertility” and causes “damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver, the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure” amongst others.

Although the Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, and the Facebook video does follow a link to a genuine safety data sheet, the safety information refers to SM-102 in a mixture with chloroform, which is known to be a toxic substance.

The third page of the leaflet shown in the video, explains the product listing, stating that chloroform (which makes up 90% of this particular mixture) is a “dangerous” component. The SM-102 makes up 10% of the mixture described in the leaflet.

[link to fullfact.org (secure)]

And OP wonders why nobody will listen to them.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80122451

All that and you failed to acknowledge the MSDS and the patent.

I never watched the video you referenced, so that us not where I got the info.
Happy in Nature  (OP)
the earth laughs in flowers

User ID: 81071993
United States
11/02/2022 09:04 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
Thread: Chloroform, SM-102 and Death in 180 Days: Important Update, page 9

I shared this in the SM-102 thread, but I am making a separate post and green pinning to start because I feel this is relevant and important. I am not a biochemist, but everything he states makes perfect sense. SM-102 is the third listed ingredient. It is more than minute concentrations. This is how the vaccine will kill people, but it will be blamed on the cytokine storm. Maybe it is a combination of both.

This is serious. Hoping some biochemists and those in the know will chime in.

From the article: Connecticut Publishes Moderna COVID Vax Ingredients: DEADLY POISON “SM-102 – Not for Human or Veterinary Use”

(Less than 50%)

"I am getting a lot of bullshit emails from biochemists telling me that the evil data about SM-102 has to do with the fact that it is delivered via a solution of Chloroform and the hazards listed on the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) deal with Chloroform. No, they don’t.

The MSDS deals with the substance SM-102 as it is manufactured by Cayman Chemical Company. Period.

The ingredients list in the Moderna COVID ‘Vaccine” lists SM-102 as the third most-prevalent ingredient in the vaccine, and that ingredient is as the Cayman Chemical Company describes it. It’s that simple.

But this actually gets worse.

Chloroform is the solution used with the SM-102 and Chloroform has been outlawed for use by consumers for decades.

The reason Chloroform is outlawed for use by consumers has to do with how long it stays in a human body and what it does to a human body while it’s inside. The Half-Life of Chloroform is 180 days. That means that it takes half a YEAR for only HALF of the chloroform, to be exited out of the body. You with me so far?

Chloroform, like any other chemical, breaks down. And when it comes into contact with oxygen, it breaks down into . . . . wait for it . . . . Phosgene Gas.

Phosgene gas is fatal to humans in concentrations as low as seven parts per million (7ppm).

So all these folks getting the “jab” are getting an arm full of Chloroform which, as it circulates through their bodies will break down into phosgene gas.

Depending upon the unique functions of various people, some — maybe many — of those people MIGHT reach the fatal threshold of phosgene gas in their system, and die from it; likely within 180 days after the second “jab.”

But wait, there’s even MORE! Phosgene is a highly toxic substance that exists as a gas at room temperature. Owing to its poor water solubility, one of the hallmarks of phosgene toxicity is an unpredictable asymptomatic latent phase before the development of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. Yes, the lungs fill with fluid and the patient can’t breathe. Just like . . . . wait for it . . . . “COVID.

As these people start dropping like flies, the very same people who brought us the vaccine can simply blame it on a COVID variant. Gee, too bad they died from a COVID variant that the vaccine couldn’t protect them from."

Less than 50%

[link to infiniteunknown.net (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79740883
United States
11/02/2022 10:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
Thread: Chloroform, SM-102 and Death in 180 Days: Important Update, page 9

I shared this in the SM-102 thread, but I am making a separate post and green pinning to start because I feel this is relevant and important. I am not a biochemist, but everything he states makes perfect sense. SM-102 is the third listed ingredient. It is more than minute concentrations. This is how the vaccine will kill people, but it will be blamed on the cytokine storm. Maybe it is a combination of both.

This is serious. Hoping some biochemists and those in the know will chime in.

From the article: Connecticut Publishes Moderna COVID Vax Ingredients: DEADLY POISON “SM-102 – Not for Human or Veterinary Use”

(Less than 50%)

"I am getting a lot of bullshit emails from biochemists telling me that the evil data about SM-102 has to do with the fact that it is delivered via a solution of Chloroform and the hazards listed on the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) deal with Chloroform. No, they don’t.

The MSDS deals with the substance SM-102 as it is manufactured by Cayman Chemical Company. Period.

The ingredients list in the Moderna COVID ‘Vaccine” lists SM-102 as the third most-prevalent ingredient in the vaccine, and that ingredient is as the Cayman Chemical Company describes it. It’s that simple.

But this actually gets worse.

Chloroform is the solution used with the SM-102 and Chloroform has been outlawed for use by consumers for decades.

The reason Chloroform is outlawed for use by consumers has to do with how long it stays in a human body and what it does to a human body while it’s inside. The Half-Life of Chloroform is 180 days. That means that it takes half a YEAR for only HALF of the chloroform, to be exited out of the body. You with me so far?

Chloroform, like any other chemical, breaks down. And when it comes into contact with oxygen, it breaks down into . . . . wait for it . . . . Phosgene Gas.

Phosgene gas is fatal to humans in concentrations as low as seven parts per million (7ppm).

So all these folks getting the “jab” are getting an arm full of Chloroform which, as it circulates through their bodies will break down into phosgene gas.

Depending upon the unique functions of various people, some — maybe many — of those people MIGHT reach the fatal threshold of phosgene gas in their system, and die from it; likely within 180 days after the second “jab.”

But wait, there’s even MORE! Phosgene is a highly toxic substance that exists as a gas at room temperature. Owing to its poor water solubility, one of the hallmarks of phosgene toxicity is an unpredictable asymptomatic latent phase before the development of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. Yes, the lungs fill with fluid and the patient can’t breathe. Just like . . . . wait for it . . . . “COVID.

As these people start dropping like flies, the very same people who brought us the vaccine can simply blame it on a COVID variant. Gee, too bad they died from a COVID variant that the vaccine couldn’t protect them from."

Less than 50%

[link to infiniteunknown.net (secure)]
 Quoting: Happy in Nature


But it’s still bullshit about your chloroform claim. See above. I don’t care what infiniteunknown.net says.
Garufal

User ID: 79964821
United States
11/02/2022 10:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
Someone should go to youtube HQ and make a complaint
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 50487851


Or how about post the good stuff on Rumble? Control freaks HATE competition.
A epiphany I had watering my lawn one day.

"Karma is the universal judicial system that NOBODY is Immune from" -Me

I LOVE good juicy gossip. Lay it on me.
Happy in Nature  (OP)
the earth laughs in flowers

User ID: 81071993
United States
11/02/2022 10:12 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients
Thread: Chloroform, SM-102 and Death in 180 Days: Important Update, page 9

I shared this in the SM-102 thread, but I am making a separate post and green pinning to start because I feel this is relevant and important. I am not a biochemist, but everything he states makes perfect sense. SM-102 is the third listed ingredient. It is more than minute concentrations. This is how the vaccine will kill people, but it will be blamed on the cytokine storm. Maybe it is a combination of both.

This is serious. Hoping some biochemists and those in the know will chime in.

From the article: Connecticut Publishes Moderna COVID Vax Ingredients: DEADLY POISON “SM-102 – Not for Human or Veterinary Use”

(Less than 50%)

"I am getting a lot of bullshit emails from biochemists telling me that the evil data about SM-102 has to do with the fact that it is delivered via a solution of Chloroform and the hazards listed on the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) deal with Chloroform. No, they don’t.

The MSDS deals with the substance SM-102 as it is manufactured by Cayman Chemical Company. Period.

The ingredients list in the Moderna COVID ‘Vaccine” lists SM-102 as the third most-prevalent ingredient in the vaccine, and that ingredient is as the Cayman Chemical Company describes it. It’s that simple.

But this actually gets worse.

Chloroform is the solution used with the SM-102 and Chloroform has been outlawed for use by consumers for decades.

The reason Chloroform is outlawed for use by consumers has to do with how long it stays in a human body and what it does to a human body while it’s inside. The Half-Life of Chloroform is 180 days. That means that it takes half a YEAR for only HALF of the chloroform, to be exited out of the body. You with me so far?

Chloroform, like any other chemical, breaks down. And when it comes into contact with oxygen, it breaks down into . . . . wait for it . . . . Phosgene Gas.

Phosgene gas is fatal to humans in concentrations as low as seven parts per million (7ppm).

So all these folks getting the “jab” are getting an arm full of Chloroform which, as it circulates through their bodies will break down into phosgene gas.

Depending upon the unique functions of various people, some — maybe many — of those people MIGHT reach the fatal threshold of phosgene gas in their system, and die from it; likely within 180 days after the second “jab.”

But wait, there’s even MORE! Phosgene is a highly toxic substance that exists as a gas at room temperature. Owing to its poor water solubility, one of the hallmarks of phosgene toxicity is an unpredictable asymptomatic latent phase before the development of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. Yes, the lungs fill with fluid and the patient can’t breathe. Just like . . . . wait for it . . . . “COVID.

As these people start dropping like flies, the very same people who brought us the vaccine can simply blame it on a COVID variant. Gee, too bad they died from a COVID variant that the vaccine couldn’t protect them from."

Less than 50%

[link to infiniteunknown.net (secure)]
 Quoting: Happy in Nature


But it’s still bullshit about your chloroform claim. See above. I don’t care what infiniteunknown.net says.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79740883

It is listed in the MSDS and the patent, shill.





GLP