Broccoli and raspberries could give you COVID,lives on these for a week , yeah and Fritos are healthier than chicke…

What a joke!

:fivestars4u:

They are targeting the food like crazy right now. It’s almost like phase 2 of the body positivity movement bullshit.

Broccoli raw is one of the best cruciferous vegetables out there, I eat the hell out of broccoli for lunch, while I work at Frito LOL

Last Edited by H. Rorschach on 12/03/2022 04:20 PM

Food safety and so called dieticians are a joke. They want everyone addicted to HFCS and GMO foods.

Thread: NIH-Funded "Food Pyramid" Rates Lucky Charms Healthier Than Steak

I remember early on they literally said someone infected with covid could sneeze on your salad and you counldn't catch it.

Soon they'll say every healthy natural food causes covid, except for the bugs, those are safe and yummy.

They tell us what we they want. Just have to stop listening to them. They do not have our best interests at heart.

No need to worry about that any more because Bill Gates is going to put the Covid vaccine into lettuce.

I sneezed on my wife's salad in 2021, she still hates me.

yjttututu

See there is this concept when eating most food. It's called COOKING. COOKING is known for destroying pathogens, making food safe to eat.

I dont rhink was a dig in tour company just that crazy food pyramisld where sweet mfg food is rated better than natural protein sources

Yes this was posted several months back too.

Crazy

Also several posts about putting vaccine in veggies several months back too. And
other mrna too

I honestly wouldn’t care, I tell everyone not to eat their products. Lol

Covid is a fiction.

It is just the regular flu.

Wash your broccoli and raspberries

You should be anyway

Throw them in a bowl of water with apple cider vinegar to wash them.

Broccoli and raspberries cannot give you Covid, they cure many diseases.

There are no viruses and they don't cause disease.
Read this


[link to wissenschafftplus.de (secure)]
[link to wissenschafftplus.de (secure)]
/uploads/article/Dismantling-the-Virus-Theory.pdf


Dismantling the virus theory

The “measles virus” as an example

Why should we doubt the existence of viruses?
What are viruses and what are they not?
How are viruses being scientifically demonstrated to exist (using fraud)?

Author: Dr. Stefan Lanka

Scientists must question everything and especially
what they love the most, i.e. their own discoveries
and ideas. This basic rule of scientific research helps
avoid erroneous developments and reveals the ones
that already exist. Also, we must all be allowed to
question the status quo, otherwise we would live in a
dictatorship. Moreover, science cannot be limited to a
selected number of institutions and experts. Science
can and must be conducted by anyone who has the
necessary knowledge and the appropriate methods.
Science can be considered science only if its claims
are verifiable, reproducible and if they allow predictions. Science also needs external control, because,
as we will see, a part of the medical sciences has lost
touch with reality for quite some time. Anyone who
has knowledge of biology and the genesis of life, of
the development and functions of the tissue, of the
body and of the brain, will automatically question
the assumptions about viruses.

In the reality of the body and of its mechanisms,
there is no place for hypothetical malignant processes. All biological processes, including those that
can end in suffering, pain and death, are originally
meant to be useful.
A different approach to the virus phenomenon is
possible and necessary: any layman with some background knowledge reading scientific papers about
pathogenic viruses can realize that such viruses do
not exist and what is being described are only typical
components and characteristics of cells. This background knowledge will be provided in this article.

The origins of the idea

The present notion of a virus is based on the ancient
ideas that all diseases were caused by poisons (“toxins”) and that people would regain their health by
producing “antitoxins” as an “antidote”. Indeed, a
few diseases are caused by poisons. The subsequent
idea, that the body can restore its health by producing or being given “antidotes”, was born when it
was observed that people survived bigger amounts
of poison (such as alcohol) when their body was
trained by consuming slowly increasing amounts
of that poison. However, in reality there are no antidotes, instead the body produces enzymes, which
neutralize and eliminate the poisons (alcohol).
In 1858, Rudof Virchow, the founder of modern medicine, plagiarized the findings of other scientists, suppressed their essential discoveries and thus a false
view on the cause of diseases was born and imposed
as a dogma, which is in fact still in effect to date. According to this dogma, all diseases supposedly originate inside the cells.1
Virchow’s cellular pathology
re-introduced into medicine the ancient and refuted
the humoral doctrine and claimed that diseases develop from pathogenic poisons (in Latin: virus).
The search for these pathogenic poisons remains
to date fruitless, however, when bacteria were discovered, it was assumed that they were producing
the pathogenic poisons. This supposition, called
“the germ theory”, was immediately accepted and
remains very successful up to the present time.
This theory is so successful that the majority of
the people are still not aware of the fact that the
so-called bacterial toxins are actually normal enzymes, which either cannot appear in a human
being, or, if they do, they never appear in such an
amount as to make them dangerous.

Then it was discovered that, when they slowly begin to die, bacteria create tiny, apparently lifeless
forms of survival, the so-called spores. It was then
suspected that these spores were toxic and that
they were the so-called pathogenic poisons. This
was then refuted, since the spores are rapidly developing into bacteria when their vital resources
are being restored. When scientists in the laboratory observed that the weak, highly inbred bacteria perished very quickly while turning into much
smaller structures than the spores, it was first believed that the bacteria were being killed by the alleged pathogenic poisons, called viruses, and that
the viruses were thereby replicating.
Due to the belief that these -at the time of their
discovery still invisible- structures were killing the
bacteria, they were called phages/bacteriophages,
“eaters of bacteria”. Only later it was determined
that merely highly inbred and therefore almost
non-viable bacteria can be made to turn into phages, or bacteria which are being destroyed so fast
that they do not have time to form spores.
The introduction of the electron microscopy led to
the discovery of the structures resulting from the
transformation of bacteria when these were suddenly dying or when the metabolism of the highly
inbred germs was overwhelmed by processes triggered by the adding of “phages”. It was also discovered that there are hundreds of types of different-looking “phages”. The discovery of phages, the
so-called bacterial “viruses”, reinforced the wrong assumption and the belief that there were human
and animal viruses that looked the same and had
the same structure. This is not and cannot be the
case, for several different reasons.
After introducing chemical examination techniques in biology, it was discovered that there are
thousands of types of phages and that phages of
one type always have the same structure. They consist of a particular molecule, made of nucleic acid,
which is covered in a shell of proteins of a given
number and composition. It was only later discovered that merely the bacteria which had been highly inbred in the test tube could turn into phages
themselves, by contact with phages, but this never
applied to natural bacteria or bacteria which had
just been isolated from their natural environment.
In this process, it was discovered that these “bacterial viruses” actually serve to provide other bacteria with important molecules and proteins, and
that the bacteria themselves emerged from such
structures.
Before it could be established that the “bacterial viruses” cannot kill natural bacteria, but they
are instead helping them to live and that bacteria
themselves emerge from such structures, these
“phages” were already used as models for the alleged human and animal viruses. It was assumed
that the human and animal viruses looked like the
“phages”, were allegedly killing cells and thereby
causing diseases, while at the same time producing
new disease poisons and in this way transmitting
the diseases. To date, many new or apparently new
diseases have been attributed to viruses if their origin is unknown or not acknowledged. This reflex
found an apparent confirmation in the discovery of
the “bacterial viruses”.
It is important to note that the theories of fight
and infection were accepted and highly praised by
a majority of the specialists only if and when the
countries or regions where they lived were also
suffering from war and adversity. In times of peace,
other concepts dominated the world of science.2
It is very important to note that the theory of infection – starting from Germany – has only been
globalized through the third Reich, when the Chewish* researchers, most of which had opposed and
refuted the politically exploited theories of infection, were removed from their positions.3

Page 1/4




And in this interview he explains why the whole idea of infection/ transmissibility/ contagion is probably false too.

Re: Important Interview with Dr Stefan Lanka re Dismantling the Virus Theory. 2017.
Thread: Important Interview with Dr Stefan Lanka re Dismantling the Virus Theory. 2017.
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
/forum1/message5280815/pg1

Raspberries were 50 cents for 6 oz today. This must be the reason why they are selling for the lowest price ever.

Yep, cost of raspberries is being subsidized by tax dollars being funneled through the Demonratic party.

Broccoli and raspberries are not co sure

Have they done any scientific studies on how long covid last on Reeces Peanut Buttercups?

This is of national importance

Probably going to give you the shits if you eat enough. Not sure about china virus, though. That sounds like some horse shit..

That is why I bought a Ninja Creami and make my own.

Same in my area, last week were 1.49 and that is still super cheap considering they are coming from Kali and diesel cost. I asked the guy working in fruit area and he had no idea how either.

They steer us with money.