US Federal Reserve latest H3 report - Non borrowed reserves increased by a factor of three. 617 billion dollars in the negative.

[link to www.federalreserve.gov]

The bigger the bubble the harder the fall will be.
The second column non borrowed reserves is now 17X what was traditionally accepted as the normal amount. Yet again proof the MSM is asleep at the wheel or a part of the consipracy.

[link to www.federalreserve.gov]

The bigger the bubble the harder the fall will be.
The second column non borrowed reserves is now 17X what was traditionally accepted as the normal amount. Yet again proof the MSM is asleep at the wheel or a part of the consipracy.


MSM is part of the conspiracy. MSM is CFR/Trilateralist. It is the CFR/Trilateralists who did 911/WTC and are killing the American economic system for their disgusting FASCIST NWO.

Arm yourselves. The time is coming.

Dumb questions, if the non-borrowed reserves are in negative territory, then what has increased by that amount?

Why would it go negative vs. staying at zero while the "borrowers" made gains?

Dumb questions, if the non-borrowed reserves are in negative territory, then what has increased by that amount?

Why would it go negative vs. staying at zero while the "borrowers" made gains?

The nonborrowed reserves number is reported in millions
of dollars. That means you add 6 zeros to the number reported.SO the last reported nonborrowed reserve figure
is negative $61,787,000,000, i.e. almost - 62 billion dollars,
not - 617 billion dollars.
It still reflects a huge ramp up in the money supply, just not yet as severe as you reported.

The nonborrowed reserves number is reported in millions
of dollars. That means you add 6 zeros to the number reported.SO the last reported nonborrowed reserve figure
is negative $61,787,000,000, i.e. almost - 62 billion dollars,
not - 617 billion dollars.
It still reflects a huge ramp up in the money supply, just not yet as severe as you reported.


You right but when typically the Central Bank is holding 40 biilion in reserve and now is negative 62 billion in reserves that is a difference of 102 billion dollars.

So in span of a little over 3 months there has been a liquity crunch that required the central bank to pump out 100 billion dollars in to the market. Yet lending is still tight. I do not believe that there is any intend by the borrowers to lend out this money. Shoreing up weak balance sheets to ensure that quarterly yields come in close to analyst forecasts is what the money is really doing.

With all that said: How much money is it going to take to shore up balance sheets and then have some left over to loan to businesses, idividuals, ect?

Dumb questions, if the non-borrowed reserves are in negative territory, then what has increased by that amount?

Why would it go negative vs. staying at zero while the "borrowers" made gains?