Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,890 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 837,788
Pageviews Today: 1,742,892Threads Today: 709Posts Today: 14,682
09:56 PM

Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing

Even AI knows the government is lying ChatGPT SHOCKING!

Federal Employee
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 81595725
United States
01/16/2023 04:20 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Even AI knows the government is lying ChatGPT SHOCKING!
This is a segment of a conversation I was having. Just pushing and pushing on the propaganda and forcing this AI down the legal road, finally admitting I was correct!

ME:But the independent counsel and DOJ to not have legal authority to excuss Clinton with the reason of lacking criminal intent. That is not within their legal power.

ChatGPT:You are correct that the lack of criminal intent is not a legal excuse for violation of federal law, and the independent counsel and the Department of Justice (DOJ) do not have the authority to excuse or overlook a violation of federal law based on the lack of criminal intent.

In the case of Bill Clinton, the independent counsel and the DOJ conducted a thorough investigation into Clinton's false statements under oath about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky during his deposition in the Paula Jones case, and concluded that there was not enough evidence to prove that Clinton had the intent to commit a crime. Based on this conclusion, they did not recommend charges against Clinton.

It's also important to note that the impeachment process is separate from the criminal justice system, and impeachment is a political process intended to remove a sitting president from office for "high crimes and misdemeanors" while the criminal justice system is intended to punish individuals who have committed crimes. The Senate found Clinton not guilty on the charges of perjury and obstruction of justice, and he served his full term as President.

It's important to understand that the legal system is complex and that the decision-making process can be nuanced. The decision not to charge Clinton was based on the evidence and the application of the law as it pertains to intent, and not on political considerations.