T-90A vs M1A2 Abrams. Which tank is better? | |
Recollector User ID: 84986214 ![]() 01/25/2023 03:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The one who fires first. Or the one who have air support. Since we don't know which will fire first (can be any), T90 is much better then Abrams, because Abrams won't have air support in Ukraine, unless it's WW3, and the LAST THING YOU WILL CARE ABOUT is which tank is better when missiles start flying. Last Edited by Recollector on 01/25/2023 03:13 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73804227 ![]() 01/25/2023 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80819065 ![]() 01/25/2023 03:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The one who fires first. Quoting: Recollector Or the one who have air support. Since we don't know which will fire first (can be any), T90 is much better then Abrams, because Abrams won't have air support in Ukraine, unless it's WW3, and the LAST THING YOU WILL CARE ABOUT is which tank is better when missiles start flying. They have reactive armor that explodes outwards and intercepts any shot (in theory) but yes first shot that goes past the active charges. |
SwampCreature User ID: 81826970 ![]() 01/25/2023 03:23 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The M1A2 is also way way heavier and in a country designed around the other tank and its ilk thats a dissadvantage. Many bridges in Ukraine can hold a soviet tank just fine but this thing, no go. Also all the soviet bridging equipment is designed around lighter soviet tanks so M1A2 wont be able to cross on the same bridging equipment. Also not sure how much weight we put on those videos but it seems its not as great in winter conditions. Also in theory these tanks will be operated by Ukrainians hastily trained to operate these vs soviet tanks vs Russians trained from the start to operate the T90m Now in syria or somewhere else I think its a different story but in Ukraine I give the T90M the win SwampCreature |
Devoted Follower User ID: 84985188 ![]() 01/25/2023 03:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84896035 ![]() 01/25/2023 03:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 85088544 ![]() 01/25/2023 04:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 85088544 ![]() 01/25/2023 04:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80386914 ![]() 01/25/2023 04:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TerraFirma's Esoterrorist User ID: 85122848 ![]() 01/25/2023 04:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The one who fires first. Quoting: Recollector Or the one who have air support. Since we don't know which will fire first (can be any), T90 is much better then Abrams, because Abrams won't have air support in Ukraine, unless it's WW3, and the LAST THING YOU WILL CARE ABOUT is which tank is better when missiles start flying. And the tank that you have 12,000 - 13,000 replacement tanks for that can be brought in at a short 1-2 weeks notice with already trained crews to operate them. Only one nation in the world has that. Hint: not in NATO LOL. Last Edited by TerraFirma's Esoterrorist on 01/25/2023 04:31 PM "Keep a weather eye to the chart on high and go home another way" –James Taylor Never Die Young |
SwampCreature User ID: 81826970 ![]() 01/25/2023 05:44 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | both are pretty good, Kornet has a hell of a range on it, but even the older konurs system can do the job. This is a konkurs hitting an Abrams in Iraq. Last Edited by SwampCreature on 01/25/2023 05:45 PM SwampCreature |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 85088544 ![]() 01/25/2023 07:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 85088544 ![]() 01/25/2023 07:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 85153821 ![]() 01/25/2023 07:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 85145798 ![]() 01/25/2023 07:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80657289 ![]() 01/25/2023 07:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Estonian User ID: 85058691 ![]() 01/25/2023 07:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The one who fires first. Quoting: Recollector Or the one who have air support. Since we don't know which will fire first (can be any), T90 is much better then Abrams, because Abrams won't have air support in Ukraine, unless it's WW3, and the LAST THING YOU WILL CARE ABOUT is which tank is better when missiles start flying. And the tank that you have 12,000 - 13,000 replacement tanks for that can be brought in at a short 1-2 weeks notice with already trained crews to operate them. Only one nation in the world has that. Hint: not in NATO LOL. You're a special kind of stupid, ain't ya? Russia is fielding fucking 60 year old tanks, as all newer shit has been blown to bits. They only had about 200 modernised T90 tanks in existence, those got their shit pushed in back in spring and now, it's a T-62 war, lol. And those are stripped tanks, with no reactive armor or newer barrels left. Russia is putting tankers into infantry squads as they have nowhere else to put them. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 85153821 ![]() 01/25/2023 07:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The one who fires first. Quoting: Recollector Or the one who have air support. Since we don't know which will fire first (can be any), T90 is much better then Abrams, because Abrams won't have air support in Ukraine, unless it's WW3, and the LAST THING YOU WILL CARE ABOUT is which tank is better when missiles start flying. And the tank that you have 12,000 - 13,000 replacement tanks for that can be brought in at a short 1-2 weeks notice with already trained crews to operate them. Only one nation in the world has that. Hint: not in NATO LOL. You're a special kind of stupid, ain't ya? Russia is fielding fucking 60 year old tanks, as all newer shit has been blown to bits. They only had about 200 modernised T90 tanks in existence, those got their shit pushed in back in spring and now, it's a T-62 war, lol. And those are stripped tanks, with no reactive armor or newer barrels left. Russia is putting tankers into infantry squads as they have nowhere else to put them. The retards on this site think Russia is just wasting old equipment and one day they're going to bust out swarms of Armata tanks to overrun Europe. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 85152906 ![]() 01/25/2023 07:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84437196 ![]() 01/25/2023 07:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The one who fires first. Quoting: Recollector Or the one who have air support. Since we don't know which will fire first (can be any), T90 is much better then Abrams, because Abrams won't have air support in Ukraine, unless it's WW3, and the LAST THING YOU WILL CARE ABOUT is which tank is better when missiles start flying. And the tank that you have 12,000 - 13,000 replacement tanks for that can be brought in at a short 1-2 weeks notice with already trained crews to operate them. Only one nation in the world has that. Hint: not in NATO LOL. You're a special kind of stupid, ain't ya? Russia is fielding fucking 60 year old tanks, as all newer shit has been blown to bits. They only had about 200 modernised T90 tanks in existence, those got their shit pushed in back in spring and now, it's a T-62 war, lol. And those are stripped tanks, with no reactive armor or newer barrels left. Russia is putting tankers into infantry squads as they have nowhere else to put them. The retards on this site think Russia is just wasting old equipment and one day they're going to bust out swarms of Armata tanks to overrun Europe. Theybare qtard idiots that are traitors because 'a democrat president' Glp is full of shit. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84972590 01/25/2023 07:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | T-90s are designed for the European battle ground because they have much better range and use diesel fuel. M1s use jet fuel (JP8) for their turbine engine and instead of miles per gallon it's more like gallons per mile. The logistics involved in putting those tanks on the front lines without proper U.S. Army support forces in the rear to supply spare parts, maintenance and the proper fuel (and allot of it) will result in a disaster. Plus, any cheap anti tank missile will take those tanks out without the proper infantry defense boots on the ground attacking enemy ambush positions. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84437196 ![]() 01/25/2023 07:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |