This Is Fantastic ! African Cooperation With Non-Western Powers Could Build A NEW WORLD ORDER Favourable to the Continent

Wonder how long before they try to get Americans to believe Africa is full of evil Nazi white Supremecists. I bet there’s enough libtards that would believe that shit

black african countries must engage in immediate repatriation efforts and incentives.

did they not sell people into slavery in the first place? yes, their ancestors did.

it is time for black african countries to make reparations to their people for selling them into slavery to the J.

Absolutely !


These guys even compare the Russian president with Hitler. That is funny, because, that country was one of Hitler's biggest victims.

Sadly, the policy in Africa appears to be, if necessary, to help African Americans form their own country on the South Eastern part of the continental USA.

Yes they really must , how bout as a compromise , they just give citizen ship and a free airfare back to country of origin …I’m sure most whites in America would be agreeable and the blacks should be super stoked to be finally able to get away from all that white supremacy

Half of the eastern half of USA would be fine.

There is no alternative to ending USA's / West's world order from the year 1945 European calendar, because this is a mainly African and Asian world.

In the meantime, even white supremacists are talking about the gigantic fraud the West is involved in for decades, worth tens of trillions of USD annually: " ... will politicians shrug and say “Let’s push up house prices, stocks, and bonds?” "

That quote is amazing, when one considers, we are talking about a currency, that was given the privilege to chase goods, assets and services around the world, that currency is not the Mexican Peso, Indian Rupee, Ethiopian Birr or Polish Zloty.



Quote:

What benefits does USA get for issuing the global reserve currency ?

1. Paying imports with money it can print nonstop

2. To be in a position to buy all assets in all countries (as the country can print any amount and the USD enjoys the privilege to chase goods, services and assets around the world)

3. Distributing money through the stock market, by inflating share prices.

4. Inflating GDP by inflating budgets for defense, education system, health system and welfare

5. Financing startups with out-of-thin-air created money till necessary. That might explain why USA has above average number of multinational corporations.

Etc



The two emphasized points are particularly interesting. One wonders, if point no. 2 is the reason why the Bretton Woods institutions IMF and World Bank push for "privatization" in foreign lands.




Quote:

EUROPE & USA Scared to lose 40 Trillion USD Annual Income !


EUROPE & USA are scared to lose 40 Trillion USD (1/3 of the global GDP) annual income when the USA world order collapses.

Most of us are not aware, and that is so by design, that the economic model that was imposed by the USA in 1945 was in simple terms,

1. to take wealth primarily from Africa and Latin America, and also from Asia and,

2. to give it to Europe and North America.

Of course in reality that happened in very complex ways, say in the form of declining prices for commodities and rising prices for industrial goods, manipulation of exchange rates of currencies, creation of "soft currencies" and "hard currencies", manipulation of interest rates, manipulation of credit ratings, petrodollar, global reserve currency status of the USD, USD denominated debt, derivatives, etc.

Europe and USA could do that because they controlled the global financial system, now they are about to lose that control.

Link to the article??

Insert text in search engine.

Africa will never learn, it will be the start of a new slave trade, mark my words.

You white supremacists are embarrassingly very aggressive in your attempts to instill negativism in blacks, sure motivated by your fear.

In the West's position, i would think how to benefit from 1.5 billion consumers in the new created FTA.



Quote:

Africa's New FTA Offers GIGANTIC OPPORTUNITIES To African Companies; African Brands to Benefit from 1.5 Billion Consumers


The tiny West now find itself in the biggest crisis in its history in 500 years.

For example, HOW WILL THE WEST GONNA PAY FOR IMPORTS FROM DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, should the rest of the world dump Western currencies ?



Quote:

... Are Western countries wealthy ?

Not really (eg. in Germany 70% don't own homes, over 50% depend on welfare):


They can not feed themselves

They must import raw materials from developing countries for their industries

In the meantime, developing countries produce everything Western countries produce, that means, Western countries are f**ked if they have no access to markets in developing countries.

Western countries' only "wealth" are their currencies or their control of the global financial system, sadly, they are about to lose that control.




Quote:

"The Chinese are planning more military bases for Eastern Africa
They are gonna turn the continent into one big plantation to harvest and ship out its natural resources

Wanna watch how many Africans start studying Chinese"


The Chinese interest in the eastern half of Africa is strategic:

* It is the part of Africa closer to China (particularly the HOA with other regions in the Gulf region is of special interest)

* It is the potentially richest part of Africa

* It is mineral rich

* It is the most interesting part of Africa for tourism

* It is the region with diverse racial mix





Quote:


The "Southerners" are taking over the world !

Blessed are the"Southerners", the new masters of the universe.
Quote:

The Africans, Chinese and Indians need only to integrate tradewise the area from South China, India, Gulf region and the Eastern Africa up to Cape Town (watch map below), then they will dominate the world, given the density of the population in those areas and the richness of the regions.

[link to na.unep.net (secure)]

[link to wallsdesk.com (secure)]


Quote:

Lucky are the "Southerners".

These guys are blessed, they represent 80% of the global population, they are filthy rich and armed to the teeth.


FYI:

Almost 100% of the world's,

1. Resources

2. Industrial capacities and

3. Markets

are concentrated in the non-white regions Africa, Asia and Latin America.



[link to www.atlasdigitalmaps.com (secure)]



According to projections, the combined population of Africa (ca. 3 billion by 2050 European calendar) and Asia will reach 8 billion in few decades.

That development is of gigantic importance for some lucky (because strategically located) countries, that are located WITHIN THE CIRCLE THROUGH INDIA-HOA-TURKEY-IRAN (watch map above), as, due to the shift of the global economic center of gravity TO SOUTH-EAST (not to east as "white nationalists" say), they have become the center of the world. Sadly, on the other hand, this development made Europe only a periphery of the global center.

It is for that reason Africans are siding with the rising superpowers China and Russia, the only countries capable of ending/replacing the present order.

Of course, as a united continent with a common market of 1.5 billion consumers, Africa itself has the potential to become a superpower.

African Universities are the absolute best.

Oh wait….





.

Well, they can improve.

But that is linked to the USA/Western world order, that pressured African countries to cut budgets for health, education and other sectors as conditionalities of western/IMF/world bank loans. The Africans are now realizing that, they don't need loans from the West.

Fk IMF and the USA/Western World Order !

What a dark age for the developing world to have been forced to allow the Neanderthals to have that much say in their internal affairs.

The Neanderthals should never have that kind of influence again !



Quote:

Criticisms of IMF - Economics Help
International_Monetary_Fund_logo.svg
Over time, the IMF has been subject to a range of criticisms, generally focused on the conditions of its loans. The IMF has also been criticised for its lack of accountability and willingness to lend to countries with bad human rights records.

Criticisms of the IMF include

1. Conditions of loans

On giving loans to countries, the IMF make the loan conditional on the implementation of certain economic policies. These policies tend to involve:

The problem is that these policies of structural adjustment and macroeconomic intervention can make difficult economic situations worse.

For example, in the Asian crisis of 1997, many countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand were required by IMF to pursue tight monetary policy (higher interest rates) and tight fiscal policy to reduce the budget deficit and strengthen exchange rates. However, these policies caused a minor slowdown to turn into a serious recession with very high levels of unemployment.

2. Exchange rate reforms. When the IMF intervened in Kenya in the 1990s, they made the Central bank remove controls overflows of capital. The consensus was that this decision made it easier for corrupt politicians to transfer money out of the economy (known as the Goldenberg scandal, BBC link). Critics argue this is another example of how the IMF failed to understand the dynamics of the country that they were dealing with – insisting on blanket reforms.

The economist Joseph Stiglitz has criticised the more monetarist approach of the IMF in recent years. He argues it is failing to take the best policy to improve the welfare of developing countries saying the IMF “was not participating in a conspiracy, but it was reflecting the interests and ideology of the Western financial community.”

3. Devaluations In earlier days, the IMF have been criticised for allowing inflationary devaluations.

4. Neo-Liberal Criticisms There is also criticism of neo-liberal policies such as privatisation. Arguably these free-market policies were not always suitable for the situation of the country. For example, privatisation can create lead to the creation of private monopolies who exploit consumers.

5. Free market criticisms of IMF

As well as being criticised for implementing ‘free-market reforms’ Others criticise the IMF for being too interventionist. Believers in free markets argue that it is better to let capital markets operate without attempts at intervention. They argue attempts to influence exchange rates only make things worse – it is better to allow currencies to reach their market level. [criticism of IMF]

There is also a criticism that bailing out countries with large debt creates moral hazard. Because of the possibility of getting bailed out, it encourages countries to borrow more.

6. Lack of transparency and involvement

The IMF has been criticised for imposing policy with little or no consultation with the affected countries.

Jeffrey Sachs, the head of the Harvard Institute for International Development said:

“In Korea the IMF insisted that all presidential candidates immediately “endorse” an agreement which they had no part in drafting or negotiating, and no time to understand. The situation is out of hand…It defies logic to believe the small group of 1,000 economists on 19th Street in Washington should dictate the economic conditions of life to 75 developing countries with around 1.4 billion people.” source

7. Supporting military dictatorships

The IMF has been criticised for supporting military dictatorships in Brazil and Argentina, such as Castello Branco in 1960s received IMF funds denied to other countries.

Response to criticism of IMF

1. Crisis always lead to some difficulties

Because the IMF deal with the economic crisis, whatever policy they offer, there are likely to be difficulties. It is not possible to deal with a balance of payments without some painful readjustment.

2. IMF has had some successes

The failures of the IMF tend to be widely publicised. But, its successes less so. Also, criticism tends to focus on short-term problems and ignores the longer-term view. IMF loans have helped many countries avoid liquidity crisis, such as Mexico in 1982 and more recently, Greece and Cyprus have received IMF loans.

3. Confidence

The fact there is a lender of last resort provides an important confidence boost for investors. This is important during the current financial turmoil.

4. Countries are not obliged to take an IMF loan

It is countries who approach the IMF for a loan. The fact so many take loans suggest there must be at least some benefits of the IMF.

5. IMF easy target

Sometimes countries may want to undertake painful short term adjustment but there is a lack of political will. An IMF intervention enables the government to secure a loan and then pass the blame on to the IMF for the difficulties.

6. IMF better than previous alternatives.

J.M. Keynes who helped found principles of IMF stated “IMF is the exact opposite of the Gold Standard. It is an attempt at an improved system of international currency.”

External pages

These are absolutely fantastic times indeed !

And the Africans and others could pay the USA/West back, say by dumping Western currencies and banning Western culture.

You can't believe it guys, the developing world was forced to allow the operation of even Western religious sects as part of IMF/world bank conditionalities !



Quote:

I tell you guys, it is hard to discuss with ignorant people.

These are the most fantastic times for most people on the planet for many reasons, including the ability to finance infrastructure projects with own money, one can print nonstop, a privilege previously enjoyed by Western countries alone, as we can read in the interview below




Quote:

The Most Fantastic Times In History; With Gigantic Previously Unseen Opportunities !



This is absolutely fantastic !

Really, we now have previously unseen opportunities, like the opportunity to finance infrastructure projects with own printed money, a privilege previously enjoyed by Western countries alone !



Quote:

Loss of Economic/Financial Influence Over Africa is MOST MADDENING To Tiny West


We hear things like, African countries (also others) don't need foreign or Western loans to finance infrastructure projects, they can simply print their own currencies, provided, the inputs for the projects are found locally.


What inputs are necessary in infrastructure projects ?

Steel

Cement

Manpower

Machinery


Most African countries have those things locally available.


Guys, the Western era ends now. We are extremely pleased to have contributed in this development.




Here, an expert explains why foreign currency is not necessary in certain cases, that means, by availability of inputs locally.


Quote:

Bonnie Faulkner: You write that, “The objective of the coup d’état was to deny Brazil’s sovereignty in the formulation of macroeconomic policy.” Why is Wall Street or the United States against a nation’s sovereignty?

Michel Chossudovsky: That’s a very important question and it really has to do with monetary policy. Monetary policy really defines the sovereignty of a country. It’s the ability of a country to actually finance its own development through lending to the private sector, the building of public infrastructure and so on. To do that, you have to be able to increase the levels of internal debt. We do it in the United States and Canada and so on. We use debt operations to fund the infrastructure, roads, schools and hospitals.

But what is at stake in developing countries is that the currency is dollarized and in currency markets it’s upheld by dollar-denominated debts, which have to be incurred to support the currency. So that when you start expanding the money supply to finance development – it’s a difficult and complex mechanism – you really have to borrow in dollars, and really what it means is that your currency really is a proxy. It’s a dollarized currency, so that each time you want to build a road or a bridge or a hydroelectric complex using your domestic resources, you have to increase your indebtedness in dollar terms. In other words, the internal debt becomes a foreign debt.

That is ultimately what happened in Brazil with the Real Plan. The Real Plan established the real as the Brazilian currency on a peg with the US dollar, sustained by persistent propping up of the currency to maintain that parity. And what it meant is that Brazil was indebting itself in terms of dollars and each time it expands let’s say its levels of expenditure and so on so forth it ultimately has to borrow in dollars. What that means, to get back to the question, is that it’s Wall Street that controls monetary policy and all actions of internal development, funding infrastructure, schools, roads and so on, requires borrowing dollars to do it.

I’ll give one example of this. Vietnam, in the wake of its normalization with the United States, decided to initiate a major project of repairing the country’s main highway, which links the capital, Hanoi, in the north to Ho Chi Minh City, or what was formerly known as Saigon. It’s called Road Number 1. The east coast of the United States also has a road linking New York right down to Miami.

What happened is that the project was to repair the road, and for that they had to have an international tender by construction companies coming in – big multi-million dollar contracts – and to repair the roads they needed foreign capital. But in fact, what the foreign capital would do was to subcontract with local enterprises which then would build the road. What happens under that type of mechanism is the transformation of an internal debt into an external debt. You don’t need to bring in foreign capital to repair a road, or even to build a road. The technologies are there, the know-how is there, and you don’t need much investment in terms of capital or materials. It’s all local.

And that disturbs the mechanics. Immediately these financial institutions, once they normalize with the country they will say, ‘Okay, we’re going to lend you money under World Bank project to build a road but there has to be an offer of tender to international construction companies, etc. And then the money we lend you, you use it to pay these companies.” That’s how countries get indebted and they are unable under World Bank, IMF auspices to mobilize internal debt operations. I’ve seen this in numerous countries. There’s what is called the PIP, Public Investment Program, which is a list of projects and the World Bank ultimately goes through this list and they can choose which ones they want to finance, and they override the government in the choice of investment projects.

That is ultimately what economic sovereignty is all about: It’s the ability of a country to use its monetary instruments to finance development, and that ability is denied under the prevailing relations that these countries have with the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank and the creditors.





Quote:

Rank of continents on GDP (PPP) basis, should Western currencies be dumped

1. Asia

2. Africa

3. South America

4. Europe

5. North America

6. Australia


[link to www.atlasdigitalmaps.com (secure)]




Hard times are coming for the West !

Losing reserve currency statuses for USD, EUR, Pound, Franc, ... would be catastrophic for Western countries !

I think, that is the main reason we have the Ukraine conflict.



Quote:

... Are Western countries wealthy ?

Not really (eg. In Germany 70% don't own homes, over 50% depend on welfare):


* They can not feed themselves

* They must import raw materials from developing countries for their industries

* In the meantime, developing countries produce everything Western countries produce, that means, Western countries are f**ked if they have no access to markets in developing countries.

Western countries' only "wealth" are their currencies or their control of the global financial system, sadly, they are about to lose that control.



===> In the meantime, developing countries produce everything Western countries produce, that means, Western countries are f**ked if they have no access to markets in developing countries.


That is a gigantic development !

When Western currencies are dumped and Africa, China, India (each with 1.5 billion consumers) and other developing regions trade with each other, HOW ARE WESTERN COUNTRIES GONNA PAY FOR IMPORTS FROM DEVELOPING COUNTRIES ?

LOL

Yeah, the Chinese will work out much better for them.

Guys,

looks like, this is happening right now in Africa.


A new world order is being built, as we speak, whether the tiny West like that or not is absolutely irrelevant.



Quote:

WARNING ! Beware of Economic Theories !



"Competitive Advantage", "laissez-faire economics" - other trash economic theories imposed on the developing world !


Those theories are trash, as a consequence of how they were developed.

First, there was the interest of the developers of the theory.

The theory is developed to advance the interests of the developers at the expense of others, but to the public it is sold as something different, as something matter of fact, scientific, good and beneficial.

That is how privatization, deregulation, free market, neoliberalism, shareholder value, ... developed.

Those guys are tricksters.


Tiny USA/West we are coming for you.

[link to www.scribd.com (secure)]

You will have new masters, not equals.

https://twitter.com/_/status/1649553460298121217

You are a low IQ Neanderthal, so, you don't understand that, it is impossible to enslave 1.5 billion organized Africans.








Quote:

Africa's New FTA Offers GIGANTIC OPPORTUNITIES To African Companies; African Brands to Benefit from 1.5 Billion Consumers



This is absolutely fantastic !

1.5 billion consumers are source of power for the continent, like a similar number of consumers are for China.


By the way, the big African companies like Dangote, Eskom, Ethiopian Airlines and Ezz Steel are pleased to play the role of the empire builders.


The decline of the USA/West is such a gigantic opportunity to Africans and others.

What a disappointment to USA & West, who thought, they could name an organization UNO, and then they could control Africans.


USA and West could go to hell with their UNO and "world order".

For Africans to accept an organization like UNO,

1. It must have African languages as official languages (Of course, other regions' languages too)

2. It MUST ADVANCE African interests (of course, those of other peoples too)

3. It MUST BE CONTROLLED by Africans (of course, by others too)

.

.

.



With the Vienna Convention called "Diplomatic Immunity", which was passed in 1961 European calendar, one year after the African year of decolonization, the USA world order gave the continent, one of its biggest national/continental security threats. High time to end that order.




Quote:


Africa, DUMP THE UNO, Take The Empire !


That sh*t organization called UNO, a tool of Africa's biggest enemy of all times, needs to be dissolved ASAP or abandoned by non-western countries.


The empire will provide both,

1. security and

2. trade


In the past that sh*t USA puppet organization provided,

1. insecurity (as a result of Western interference) and

2. exploitation (as a result of Western manipulation)




"22 African Presidents Have Been Assassinated By France Since 1963"


Warning ! Consider that France was a subcontractor of the USA and Anglo-Saxons, they gave many of the orders to eliminate the presidents.

I dont care for most blacks but i admit i have met some nice ones over the years, that said, the usa is probably the biggest threat to the survival of the entire world and we have raped many countries for a century

We are not that bright beacon of hope for freedom our forefathers established for us, we are fucking evil

I’m a navy vet

You only need to listen to what your own people say, including CIA.

Really, a bleak future for the country.




Quote:

USA's FUNNY World Order Has Expired; We Demand A NEW WORLD ORDER !



You know what ?

USA paid a gigantic price for its anti-Africanism, really sad, but true. I guess Neanderthal DNA is to blame here.

Look at USA's world order from 1945 European calendar, for example, it is obvious that, the USA and company offered the opposite of what they promised.
For example, it was the West, that was behind the security problems of the developing world.


John Stockwell The Third World War








Quote:

... It looks like, Africans have not yet a clear opinion about USA, THE MOST ANTI-AFRICAN SUPERPOWER IN HISTORY (that is out of ca. 16 superpowers of the last 5000 years).

Did you guys hear USA insiders, that means Congress members and officials, call the CIA "the most evil organization ever created" ?

Or, did you hear Bush senior, linked with the CIA for decades, long before becoming director in 1976 European calendar, say: "If the American People ever find out what we have done, they will chase us down the street and lynch us." ?

Do you realize, given the fact that the CIA's records were worst in Africa, that those US Americans were talking about CIA's horrible crimes in Africa ?


In the second video at 39:21, the former CIA agent says: "everything it happens in Latin America or any place else in the world, begins in our Congress."


High time to end USA's funny world order from 1944/45 European calendar.

The end of Western Global Dominance is indeed great news for all Non-White Peoples, and is cause for celebration!

Absolutely !

It is the END OF A DARK AGE for the rest of the world.

Blacks will one day sing songs in rememberance of a time when they had great opportunity, wealth, and happiness alongside Whites. This China / Russia lead NWO will bring about a time of great sorrow for all, but open genocide for Blacks and eventually Indians/Mexicans.

Russia and China are among the purest nations, racially. Demographics are Destiny..

BWAHAHA
you obviously have no idea how tarded Mordor is ,China USA,Russia and Germany all rescuing us xD,

This , is Africa: