| Users Online Now: 1,536 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 518,996 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,126,138 | Threads Today: 465 | Posts Today: 8,738 |
| 08:39 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,536 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 518,996 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,126,138 | Threads Today: 465 | Posts Today: 8,738 |
| 08:39 PM | ||
Don’t let the government criminalize free speech | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 85779768  Canada05/11/2023 01:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Swamprat  User ID: 57854626  United States05/11/2023 01:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Stalking is not free speech We aren't cut out to be socialists.We are the people who couldn't be constrained by Europe. We are the malcontents, idealists, speculators, dreamers, inventors, debtors and criminals who would not be chained. We don't play well with others, we are brash, outlandish and cunning. let us do what we do best; let us be Americans. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81475502  Seychelles05/11/2023 01:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | less than 50% OPINION: Speak Your Truth: Don’t let the government criminalize free speech By John Whitehead and Nisha Whitehead - April 19, 2023 Modified date: April 19, 2023 John Whitehead, attorney and president of the Rutherford Institute, based in Charlottesville, Virginia. What the police state wants is a silent, compliant, oblivious citizenry. "What the First Amendment affirms is an engaged citizenry that speaks truth to power using whatever peaceful means are available to us. Speaking one’s truth doesn’t have to be the same for each person, and that truth doesn’t have to be palatable or pleasant or even factual. We can be loud. We can be obnoxious. We can be politically incorrect. We can be conspiratorial or mean or offensive. We can be all these things because the First Amendment takes a broad, classically liberal approach to the free speech rights of the citizenry: in a nutshell, the government may not encroach or limit the citizenry’s right to freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly and protest. This is why the First Amendment is so critical. It gives the citizenry the right to speak freely, protest peacefully, expose government wrongdoing, and criticize the government without fear of retaliation, arrest or incarceration. Nowhere in the First Amendment does it permit the government to limit speech in order to avoid causing offense, hurting someone’s feelings, safeguarding government secrets, protecting government officials, discouraging bullying, penalizing hateful ideas and actions, eliminating terrorism, combatting prejudice and intolerance, and the like." |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 85768528 05/11/2023 01:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81475502 Seychelles05/11/2023 01:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 85798109 05/11/2023 01:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 84181513 United States05/11/2023 01:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 84181513 United States05/11/2023 01:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Americans used to ridicule the Chinese for being too weak to resist tyranny, but now Americans have found out that they are cowards, too. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 85768528 And what are you doing... typing? Your mom is locking you in the basement tonight, we have business to attend. You can come out in the morning... if you're not too preoccupied 'saving the world'. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 85768528 05/11/2023 01:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you said that the government was wiretapping your phone in 1999, everybody would have called you a nutjob. Now if you say that the government is wiretapping your phone, no one cares. How can Americans sleep at night now or look in a mirror without feeling disgusted and ashamed? |
| Possum70 User ID: 72529388 United States05/11/2023 01:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79515989 United States05/11/2023 01:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 85797874  Netherlands05/11/2023 02:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 84181513 United States05/11/2023 02:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Everything is illegal, everyone is a criminal, everyone is under surveillance 24/7, and no one cares. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 85797874 Living in a police state means that you must live in dread of being arrested. You can't help feeling hopeless. True that everything is "illegal". But it only applies to you if you sign the contract. Example: You can't cross a double yellow line. But if you've never had a 'Drivers license', it doesn't apply to you. There are only two Laws: 'Bring no harm to another' and 'Keep your word' Everything is built upon those two. (Criminal and Civil) "Consensus facit legem. Consent makes the law. A contract is a law between the parties, which can acquire force only by consent." "Where the law ends, tyranny begins." |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 85798297 United States05/11/2023 03:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 85143023  Greece05/11/2023 03:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They already did. The Courts are the enablers and clearly have no moral basis. Veterans of WWII fought for free speech and they paid for that with the blood of fellow soldiers. People are allowed to say what they like whether they are right or wrong. That is what those WWII veterans fought for. You are allowed any opinion. To criminalise opinion is the piss on the graves of all those soldiers. All current serving soldiers are HONOUR BOUND to protect the rights earned for us by veterans who are departed. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 85797874 Netherlands05/11/2023 04:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77004817  France05/11/2023 05:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation |  You cherry pick one example to steer the conversation away from the premise of the entire article knowing damn well the writer substantiated stalking is a serious issue that can be surgical in the legislative solution Instead you shills cherry pick your Lifetime Channel manifestations into validating laws to hollow out more of our rights instead of learning how to proficient in firearms training to protect yourself from anyone Less Than 50% “The question the U.S. Supreme Court was asked to decide in Elonis was whether his activity, in the absence of any overt intention of committing a crime, rose to the level of a “true threat” or whether it was protected First Amendment activity. In an 8-1 decision that concerned itself more with “criminal-law principles concerning intent rather than the First Amendment’s protection of free speech,” the Court ruled that prosecutors had not proven that Elonis intended to harm anyone beyond the words he used and context. That was back in 2015. Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling in Elonis, Corporate America has taken the lead in policing expressive activity online, with social media giants such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube using their formidable dominance in the field to censor, penalize and regulate speech and behavior online by suspending and/or banning users whose content violated the companies’ so-called community standards for obscenity, violence, hate speech, discrimination, conspiracy theories, etc. The fallout is as one would expect. The internet has become a forum for the government — and its corporate partners — to monitor, control and punish the populace for speech that may be controversial but is far from criminal. Everything is now fair game for censorship if it can be construed as hateful, hurtful, bigoted or offensive provided that it runs counter to the established viewpoint.” [link to richmondobserver.com (secure)] Interpretation: The same Operation: Mockingbird Media that Trump never once mentioned by that name, by design, so you don’t realize FOX has been controlled opposition all along, but I am sure those two links below I provided, are just more coincidences like the dozens of other coincidences that prove the calls for repeal of section 230 by the Trump Administration were designed to play right into our adversaries’ hands Thread: Breaking...Tucker Carlson to head up Elon Musk's New TwitterTV Cable News Network Thread: New Federal Disinformation Offices Created GLP used to understand that DARPA funded Google and Facebook and Twitter, were fronts for CIA/NSA Domestic Intelligence Gathering Operations, being run by the same DEEP STATE that used Operation: Mockingbird Media to not only infiltrate newsrooms, but finance their own social media companies Which is how we ended up here in the first place while those GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIARIES now use their own UNCONSTITUTIONALITY to justify changing a law that was designed to prevent the government from doing exactly what they’re doing right now a. Replace Vague Terminology in (c)(2). First, the Department supports replacing the vague catch-all “otherwise objectionable” language in Section 230(c)(2) with “unlawful” and “promotes terrorism.” This reform would focus the broad blanket immunity for content moderation decisions on the core objective of Section 230—to reduce online content harmful to children—while limiting a platform's ability to remove content arbitrarily or in ways inconsistent with its terms or service simply by deeming it “objectionable.” It’s almost like you Qtards and Musktards and Rogantards are all paid by the same Cambridge sock puppet company that the Trump Campaign hired DEEP STATE FEDERAL AGENCIES that framed General Flynn to literally regulate the internet to approve only STATE SANCTIONED CONTENT and you geniuses are applauding the further erosion of the Bill Of Rights all in the name of revenge against sites that silence you when you’re free and more than welcome to go to a new site or start your own The repeal of Section 230 allows the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT to file a FEDERAL LAWSUIT not only against websites and apps but it also will be used to annihilate anonymity to set the legal precedent for targeting anyone that makes a comment online that the government disagrees with Literally using the same old argument when it comes to the “OUTDATED” and aging Constitution where this same exact premise was used in this article to condition your opinion that this law is old and needs to be updated for your safety Another example of the government profiting off of a problem they legislatively created Less Than 50% From 2020 “Trump DOJ, Citing Hunter Biden Story, Justice Thomas Supports Change To Section 230 In Letter To Congress” [link to www.foxnews.com (secure)] Thread: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was an Attorney for MONSANTO Thread: The Fraud of Bill Gates Monsanto and the Vaccine Connection Thread: Pentagon-Funded Censorship Firm Graphika Began Monitoring Covid “Disinfo” On Dec. 16, 2019 – Two Weeks Before WHO Knew Covid Existed Thread: Operation Life Log Killed Same Day FaceBook Launched Thread: Steve Bannon Used Cambridge Analytica Data Stolen From Facebook To Brainwash People Now Called "Trump Supporters." (Page 2) Thread: Hillary has CTR/ShareBlue. Trump has Cambridge Atlantica. On the board of CA: Steve Bannon. Funded by billionaire Robert Mercer, who Bloomberg ca Thread: Newly released financial disclosure: Steve Bannon was VP of Cambridge Analytica and was on their payroll!  |
| Updated User ID: 77004817 France05/11/2023 05:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You cherry pick one example to steer the conversation away from the premise of the entire article knowing damn well the writer substantiated stalking is a serious issue that can be surgical in the legislative solution Instead you shills cherry pick your Lifetime Channel manifestations into validating laws to hollow out more of our rights instead of learning how to be proficient in firearms training to protect yourself from anyone Less Than 50% “The question the U.S. Supreme Court was asked to decide in Elonis was whether his activity, in the absence of any overt intention of committing a crime, rose to the level of a “true threat” or whether it was protected First Amendment activity. In an 8-1 decision that concerned itself more with “criminal-law principles concerning intent rather than the First Amendment’s protection of free speech,” the Court ruled that prosecutors had not proven that Elonis intended to harm anyone beyond the words he used and context. That was back in 2015. Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling in Elonis, Corporate America has taken the lead in policing expressive activity online, with social media giants such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube using their formidable dominance in the field to censor, penalize and regulate speech and behavior online by suspending and/or banning users whose content violated the companies’ so-called community standards for obscenity, violence, hate speech, discrimination, conspiracy theories, etc. The fallout is as one would expect. The internet has become a forum for the government — and its corporate partners — to monitor, control and punish the populace for speech that may be controversial but is far from criminal. Everything is now fair game for censorship if it can be construed as hateful, hurtful, bigoted or offensive provided that it runs counter to the established viewpoint.” [link to richmondobserver.com (secure)] Interpretation: The same Operation: Mockingbird Media that Trump never once mentioned by that name, by design, so you don’t realize FOX has been controlled opposition all along, but I am sure those two links below I provided, are just more coincidences like the dozens of other coincidences that prove the calls for repeal of section 230 by the Trump Administration were designed to play right into our adversaries’ hands Thread: Breaking...Tucker Carlson to head up Elon Musk's New TwitterTV Cable News Network Thread: New Federal Disinformation Offices Created GLP used to understand that DARPA funded Google and Facebook and Twitter, were fronts for CIA/NSA Domestic Intelligence Gathering Operations, being run by the same DEEP STATE that used Operation: Mockingbird Media to not only infiltrate newsrooms, but finance their own social media companies Which is how we ended up here in the first place while those GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIARIES now use their own UNCONSTITUTIONALITY to justify changing a law that was designed to prevent the government from doing exactly what they’re doing right now a. Replace Vague Terminology in (c)(2). First, the Department supports replacing the vague catch-all “otherwise objectionable” language in Section 230(c)(2) with “unlawful” and “promotes terrorism.” This reform would focus the broad blanket immunity for content moderation decisions on the core objective of Section 230—to reduce online content harmful to children—while limiting a platform's ability to remove content arbitrarily or in ways inconsistent with its terms or service simply by deeming it “objectionable.” It’s almost like you Qtards and Musktards and Rogantards are all paid by the same Cambridge sock puppet company that the Trump Campaign hired DEEP STATE FEDERAL AGENCIES that framed General Flynn to literally regulate the internet to approve only STATE SANCTIONED CONTENT and you geniuses are applauding the further erosion of the Bill Of Rights all in the name of revenge against sites that silence you when you’re free and more than welcome to go to a new site or start your own The repeal of Section 230 allows the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT to file a FEDERAL LAWSUIT not only against websites and apps but it also will be used to annihilate anonymity to set the legal precedent for targeting anyone that makes a comment online that the government disagrees with Literally using the same old argument when it comes to the “OUTDATED” and aging Constitution where this same exact premise was used in this article to condition your opinion that this law is old and needs to be updated for your safety Another example of the government profiting off of a problem they legislatively created Less Than 50% From 2020 “Trump DOJ, Citing Hunter Biden Story, Justice Thomas Supports Change To Section 230 In Letter To Congress” [link to www.foxnews.com (secure)] Thread: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was an Attorney for MONSANTO Thread: The Fraud of Bill Gates Monsanto and the Vaccine Connection Thread: Pentagon-Funded Censorship Firm Graphika Began Monitoring Covid “Disinfo” On Dec. 16, 2019 – Two Weeks Before WHO Knew Covid Existed Thread: Operation Life Log Killed Same Day FaceBook Launched Thread: Steve Bannon Used Cambridge Analytica Data Stolen From Facebook To Brainwash People Now Called "Trump Supporters." (Page 2) Thread: Hillary has CTR/ShareBlue. Trump has Cambridge Atlantica. On the board of CA: Steve Bannon. Funded by billionaire Robert Mercer, who Bloomberg ca Thread: Newly released financial disclosure: Steve Bannon was VP of Cambridge Analytica and was on their payroll!  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81805868  Romania05/11/2023 05:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You cherry pick one example to steer the conversation away from the premise of the entire article knowing damn well the writer substantiated stalking is a serious issue that can be surgical in the legislative solution Instead you shills cherry pick your Lifetime Channel manifestations into validating laws to hollow out more of our rights instead of learning how to proficient in firearms training to protect yourself from anyone Less Than 50% “The question the U.S. Supreme Court was asked to decide in Elonis was whether his activity, in the absence of any overt intention of committing a crime, rose to the level of a “true threat” or whether it was protected First Amendment activity. In an 8-1 decision that concerned itself more with “criminal-law principles concerning intent rather than the First Amendment’s protection of free speech,” the Court ruled that prosecutors had not proven that Elonis intended to harm anyone beyond the words he used and context. That was back in 2015. Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling in Elonis, Corporate America has taken the lead in policing expressive activity online, with social media giants such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube using their formidable dominance in the field to censor, penalize and regulate speech and behavior online by suspending and/or banning users whose content violated the companies’ so-called community standards for obscenity, violence, hate speech, discrimination, conspiracy theories, etc. The fallout is as one would expect. The internet has become a forum for the government — and its corporate partners — to monitor, control and punish the populace for speech that may be controversial but is far from criminal. Everything is now fair game for censorship if it can be construed as hateful, hurtful, bigoted or offensive provided that it runs counter to the established viewpoint.” [link to richmondobserver.com (secure)] Interpretation: The same Operation: Mockingbird Media that Trump never once mentioned by that name, by design, so you don’t realize FOX has been controlled opposition all along, but I am sure those two links below I provided, are just more coincidences like the dozens of other coincidences that prove the calls for repeal of section 230 by the Trump Administration were designed to play right into our adversaries’ hands Thread: Breaking...Tucker Carlson to head up Elon Musk's New TwitterTV Cable News Network Thread: New Federal Disinformation Offices Created GLP used to understand that DARPA funded Google and Facebook and Twitter, were fronts for CIA/NSA Domestic Intelligence Gathering Operations, being run by the same DEEP STATE that used Operation: Mockingbird Media to not only infiltrate newsrooms, but finance their own social media companies Which is how we ended up here in the first place while those GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIARIES now use their own UNCONSTITUTIONALITY to justify changing a law that was designed to prevent the government from doing exactly what they’re doing right now a. Replace Vague Terminology in (c)(2). First, the Department supports replacing the vague catch-all “otherwise objectionable” language in Section 230(c)(2) with “unlawful” and “promotes terrorism.” This reform would focus the broad blanket immunity for content moderation decisions on the core objective of Section 230—to reduce online content harmful to children—while limiting a platform's ability to remove content arbitrarily or in ways inconsistent with its terms or service simply by deeming it “objectionable.” It’s almost like you Qtards and Musktards and Rogantards are all paid by the same Cambridge sock puppet company that the Trump Campaign hired DEEP STATE FEDERAL AGENCIES that framed General Flynn to literally regulate the internet to approve only STATE SANCTIONED CONTENT and you geniuses are applauding the further erosion of the Bill Of Rights all in the name of revenge against sites that silence you when you’re free and more than welcome to go to a new site or start your own The repeal of Section 230 allows the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT to file a FEDERAL LAWSUIT not only against websites and apps but it also will be used to annihilate anonymity to set the legal precedent for targeting anyone that makes a comment online that the government disagrees with Literally using the same old argument when it comes to the “OUTDATED” and aging Constitution where this same exact premise was used in this article to condition your opinion that this law is old and needs to be updated for your safety Another example of the government profiting off of a problem they legislatively created Less Than 50% From 2020 “Trump DOJ, Citing Hunter Biden Story, Justice Thomas Supports Change To Section 230 In Letter To Congress” [link to www.foxnews.com (secure)] Thread: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was an Attorney for MONSANTO Thread: The Fraud of Bill Gates Monsanto and the Vaccine Connection Thread: Pentagon-Funded Censorship Firm Graphika Began Monitoring Covid “Disinfo” On Dec. 16, 2019 – Two Weeks Before WHO Knew Covid Existed Thread: Operation Life Log Killed Same Day FaceBook Launched Thread: Steve Bannon Used Cambridge Analytica Data Stolen From Facebook To Brainwash People Now Called "Trump Supporters." (Page 2) Thread: Hillary has CTR/ShareBlue. Trump has Cambridge Atlantica. On the board of CA: Steve Bannon. Funded by billionaire Robert Mercer, who Bloomberg ca Thread: Newly released financial disclosure: Steve Bannon was VP of Cambridge Analytica and was on their payroll! fuck off from me. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 84195579 United States05/11/2023 05:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Do not forget the main group trying to destroy white worlds free speech, is the pa,edo j people. These people want all you toddlers taught sex, as they hate innocence of children, they are religious pa,edos. J people hate that whites created a world where kids are given protections, as j religious texts say j adults should be able to sexually abuse and rape babies, and toddlers. So, its the j people who are trying to destroy free speech, and no one else. Remember this, groups like adl, shut down any voice in usa, against there plan to destroy white america, as j people used white america to get there power play to make there hell 1 world communist j run gov, where everyone but them will be treated like dirt. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 63342294  Germany05/11/2023 05:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 85063662 United States05/11/2023 05:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77004817 France05/11/2023 05:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You cherry pick one example to steer the conversation away from the premise of the entire article knowing damn well the writer substantiated stalking is a serious issue that can be surgical in the legislative solution Instead you shills cherry pick your Lifetime Channel manifestations into validating laws to hollow out more of our rights instead of learning how to be proficient in firearms training to protect yourself from anyone Less Than 50% “The question the U.S. Supreme Court was asked to decide in Elonis was whether his activity, in the absence of any overt intention of committing a crime, rose to the level of a “true threat” or whether it was protected First Amendment activity. In an 8-1 decision that concerned itself more with “criminal-law principles concerning intent rather than the First Amendment’s protection of free speech,” the Court ruled that prosecutors had not proven that Elonis intended to harm anyone beyond the words he used and context. That was back in 2015. Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling in Elonis, Corporate America has taken the lead in policing expressive activity online, with social media giants such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube using their formidable dominance in the field to censor, penalize and regulate speech and behavior online by suspending and/or banning users whose content violated the companies’ so-called community standards for obscenity, violence, hate speech, discrimination, conspiracy theories, etc. The fallout is as one would expect. The internet has become a forum for the government — and its corporate partners — to monitor, control and punish the populace for speech that may be controversial but is far from criminal. Everything is now fair game for censorship if it can be construed as hateful, hurtful, bigoted or offensive provided that it runs counter to the established viewpoint.” [link to richmondobserver.com (secure)] Interpretation: The same Operation: Mockingbird Media that Trump never once mentioned by that name, by design, so you don’t realize FOX has been controlled opposition all along, but I am sure those two links below I provided, are just more coincidences like the dozens of other coincidences that prove the calls for repeal of section 230 by the Trump Administration were designed to play right into our adversaries’ hands Thread: Breaking...Tucker Carlson to head up Elon Musk's New TwitterTV Cable News Network Thread: New Federal Disinformation Offices Created GLP used to understand that DARPA funded Google and Facebook and Twitter, were fronts for CIA/NSA Domestic Intelligence Gathering Operations, being run by the same DEEP STATE that used Operation: Mockingbird Media to not only infiltrate newsrooms, but finance their own social media companies Which is how we ended up here in the first place while those GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIARIES now use their own UNCONSTITUTIONALITY to justify changing a law that was designed to prevent the government from doing exactly what they’re doing right now a. Replace Vague Terminology in (c)(2). First, the Department supports replacing the vague catch-all “otherwise objectionable” language in Section 230(c)(2) with “unlawful” and “promotes terrorism.” This reform would focus the broad blanket immunity for content moderation decisions on the core objective of Section 230—to reduce online content harmful to children—while limiting a platform's ability to remove content arbitrarily or in ways inconsistent with its terms or service simply by deeming it “objectionable.” It’s almost like you Qtards and Musktards and Rogantards are all paid by the same Cambridge sock puppet company that the Trump Campaign hired DEEP STATE FEDERAL AGENCIES that framed General Flynn to literally regulate the internet to approve only STATE SANCTIONED CONTENT and you geniuses are applauding the further erosion of the Bill Of Rights all in the name of revenge against sites that silence you when you’re free and more than welcome to go to a new site or start your own The repeal of Section 230 allows the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT to file a FEDERAL LAWSUIT not only against websites and apps but it also will be used to annihilate anonymity to set the legal precedent for targeting anyone that makes a comment online that the government disagrees with Literally using the same old argument when it comes to the “OUTDATED” and aging Constitution where this same exact premise was used in this article to condition your opinion that this law is old and needs to be updated for your safety Another example of the government profiting off of a problem they legislatively created Less Than 50% From 2020 “Trump DOJ, Citing Hunter Biden Story, Justice Thomas Supports Change To Section 230 In Letter To Congress” [link to www.foxnews.com (secure)] Thread: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was an Attorney for MONSANTO Thread: The Fraud of Bill Gates Monsanto and the Vaccine Connection Thread: Pentagon-Funded Censorship Firm Graphika Began Monitoring Covid “Disinfo” On Dec. 16, 2019 – Two Weeks Before WHO Knew Covid Existed Thread: Operation Life Log Killed Same Day FaceBook Launched Thread: Steve Bannon Used Cambridge Analytica Data Stolen From Facebook To Brainwash People Now Called "Trump Supporters." (Page 2) Thread: Hillary has CTR/ShareBlue. Trump has Cambridge Atlantica. On the board of CA: Steve Bannon. Funded by billionaire Robert Mercer, who Bloomberg ca Thread: Newly released financial disclosure: Steve Bannon was VP of Cambridge Analytica and was on their payroll! fuck off from me.  Like moths to a flame Our own government has been giving kickbacks and tax breaks to government contractors in exchange for infringing on our constitutional rights The same Elon Musk who has been a government contractor for a decade using 5G Starlink and Space X as subsidiary fronts for communications all over the world as a means to spy on everyone? Irrefutable proof that our own government hires contractors, even rewarding them with tax breaks, to use as a loophole, to legally circumvent the Constitution, as a means to infringe on our 4th Amendment right to privacy The irony that this was expanded and weaponized on Trump’s watch, when he funded and fast tracked, the 5G biometric vaccine passport infrastructure, 2 years before COVID was used to suspend the Constitution You mean the same Elon Musk, that is the architect behind the 5G Starlink vaccine passport compliant A.I. controlled autonomous electric execution pods, which is why Trump funded and fast tracked the 5G vaccine passport infrastructure, that Tesla’s electric execution pods connect to? It’s all staged, with both of them scripting our entire reality still, to steer the conversation away from the 5G Starlink Biometric Vax Passport Infrastructure, that Trump already funded and fast tracked That Trump, and his closest advisors on his staff, while in the White House, personally profited from Rogantard and a Qtard Thread: Elon Musk - NeuraLink -Charles Lieber -Wuhan - COVID - Thread: Biometric Tracking System - Trump (pre-2016 election)  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 85798297 United States05/11/2023 05:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 85798297 United States05/11/2023 05:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
