Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,036 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 759,117
Pageviews Today: 1,332,324Threads Today: 432Posts Today: 9,048
01:22 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Abiogenesis Is A Hoax, Proof 1

 
Wretch Fossil
Wretch Fossil

User ID: 7640040
Denmark
01/14/2024 07:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Abiogenesis Is A Hoax, Proof 1
Last edited on Jan. 15, 2024

The followimg article comes from [link to www.cs.unc.edu (secure)]

According to the theory of evolution, taken in the broad sense, living matter arose at some point in the past from non-living matter by ordinary chemical and physical processes. This is called abiogenesis. Creationists often attempt to calculate the probability of this occurring, which is difficult to do. However, it is possible to give an estimate based on reasonable assumptions. Amino acids and nucleic acids are the building blocks of life, and they come in two forms, which spiral left and right. All life consists of only one of these forms. Since both forms are generated equally by inorganic chemical processes, it seems hard to imagine that life could have originated having only one of these forms. Recently it has been claimed that meteorites have an excess of one form over another. But due to racemization, these forms tend to equalize over time, so we can expect that in a primitive earth, there would have been essentially equal numbers of both forms.

Biologists currently estimate that the smallest life form as we know it would have needed about 256 genes. (See Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Volume 93, Number 19, pp. 10268-10273 at [link to journals.at-home.com] A gene is typically 1000 or more base pairs long, and there is some space in between, so 256 genes would amount to about 300,000 bases of DNA. The deoxyribose in the DNA ``backbone'' determines the direction in which it will spiral. Since organic molecules can be generated in both forms, the chance of obtaining all one form or another in 300,000 bases is one in two to the 300,000 power (practically zero, note 1). This is about one in 10 to the 90,000 power. It seems to be necessary for life that all of these bases spiral in the same direction. Now, if we imagine many, many DNA molecules being formed in the early history of the earth, we might have say 10 100 molecules altogether (which is really much too high). But even this would make the probability of getting one DNA molecule right about one in 10 to the 89,900 power, still essentially zero. And we are not even considering what proteins the DNA generates, or how the rest of the cell structure would get put together! So the real probability would be fantastically small.

Biologists are hypothesizing some RNA-based life form that might have had a smaller genome and might have given rise to a cell with about 256 genes. Until this is demonstrated, one would have to say that the problem of abiogenesis is very severe indeed for the theory of evolution.

Note 1: I asked my Poe assistant: "What is one in two to the 300,000 power?" The robot replied: "To calculate 1 divided by 2 raised to the power of 300,000, we can express it as:

1 / nope300,000)

However, the result of this calculation is an extremely small decimal number, which is practically zero. It is because the denominator grows exponentially while the numerator remains constant. Therefore, the result is effectively indistinguishable from zero.

In mathematical terms, the value is approximately equal to 0: 1 / nope300,000) ≈ 0"

Last Edited by Wretch Fossil on 01/15/2024 04:44 AM
Countryboyseein

User ID: 76007089
United States
01/14/2024 08:48 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Abiogenesis Is A Hoax, Proof 1
Hmm, so because a site that supports creationism says the math is improbable, you believe it?
Wretch Fossil  (OP)
Wretch Fossil

User ID: 77117606
Denmark
01/15/2024 04:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Abiogenesis Is A Hoax, Proof 1
Original Post was just edited.





GLP