I just found this thread. The hyper advanced aliens above sound much like the "hyperversals" I discuss in a book I wrote called Alien Mind. Now, in a second book, I'm simply referring to them as hyper-advanced aliens. I was absolutely wowed upon first, telepathic (and remote sensing) contact with them. They clearly demonstrated capabilities and awareness beyond all other aliens I'd remotely interacted with prior to May 4, 2006, when I first encountered hyper-advanced aliens. I should note that it took years for me to get up to speed to be able to adequately interact---it's now very easy to expand the space of my awareness and be attentive to such. In my next book I note that, to interact remotely over great distances is considered a norm among aliens. They have psychotronic systems that essentially amplify and network more than one alien in order to maintain group communications and interact via/or control their technology by mind.

However, any good, thoughtful human can do such communications without technology. First, fade down your mind's energy, then remember: all of what you do next essentially resonates via scalar energy fluctuations that can resonate across any distance nearly instantly (as numerous researchers report). They can do so because such resonance is merely a fraction of a greater universal whole (i.e. the number one) quantity. So, it's a slightly faded or darkened kind of fractional resonance. When you do this correctly, it feels as though your mind’s awareness does a half-spin and a half-flip so that it converges mind energy and opposing energy waves mirror each other and cancel out. Then you contour your mind’s focus so that it resonates with the distant surface or space that you’re sensing. Although it sounds like a jumble of complex parts, it happens all at once (the contouring aspect is like
any of your fast thoughts). This kind of scalar near-immediacy implies that all atomic quanta merely pose a slightly deeper kind of energy horizon, which can be slightly varied to resonate with other locations. It's as though the depths of atomic quanta (quarks/gluons and such) are actually inter-resonant, universally, as are all black holes, gravity, and condensed energy phenomena.

In early interactions with hyper-advanced aliens (call them transversals, if you choose---I merely used the term hyperversal to suggest that they are still part of the same overall universe--in hyperspace--that we're part of) ... in early interactions, one cautioned me to be wary when any of them asserted that they are disincarnate, without a body, so to speak. However, they clearly begin from a larger, more expanded kind of community mind resonance, and, if they define themselves and their physics in more expanded terms (fractions of the universe), their notion of self would clearly be a social kind of identity, less individual. Yet they must maintain a kind of individual critique or would lapse into the collective error of a given regime, a kind of group-think that can begin to view many others as less real, less valid, in a sense. Crimes committed by such aliens immediately plunge them into a lesser kind of configuration space, a too-singular kind of arrogation. To exceed them (and their error) merely expand the space of your awareness so that it cycles beyond them (you can do the same with any aliens).

In some of the above discussion, a given transversal appears to be trying to wordily, awkwardly say how his cohorts frame (or framed) their perspective on less evolved aliens. He also appears to be trying to rationalize harm done during direct interventions, or interventions they likely steer via at least some younger, yet large mega-populations. My reading of the remarks is that the transversal is trying to explain how some planets were ruined during such interventions and how that was rationalized. He also appears to be trying to say that at least some of his kind are trying to regain certain sensitivities dulled by such history, suggesting that some of their past judgements of other aliens may have been overly weighted by expediency or regime-think. To destroy a planet is to violate a vast, deeply intricate kind of natural evolution, a complex domain of the universe that doesn't reduce to the stupidity of but one elite regime on a planet.

But when such aliens get overly wordy and can't explain their reasoning concisely and clearly, I'd say be on the watch for what could be the extinction of emotional sensitivities among them, an either planned genetic selection (damping of certain associated genes), or a kind of enforcement by their larger council of elders, or government. They can easily rationalize ruin of some planets based on a perceived threat to the energy or (prohibited) weapons ecology. They certainly would also have a way of categorizing certain populations (by planet size, degree of sexual influence over rational thought, body type, social definitions, technological evolution, etc).

But I would add that, given the gray and related alien intervention here (a breeding program, insertion of hybrids into the human lineup, use of such hybrids and corrupt elite figures to sabotage humankind--or compel change) their basis for judgement is muddied and fouled by the material goals and basing/trading/hegemonistic ambitions of the gray-related alignment (reportedly not even from this galaxy). Such issues often arise in my own interactions with hyper-advanced aliens, which have continued since writing Alien Mind. For example, one noted hyper-advanced alien said that his population was once over one quadrillion individuals, in number. In other words, twice the reported size of the aliens journalist Phillip Krapf calls Verdants, who reportedly task grays and lead their intervention here. And if that's true, then the given hyper-advanced alien's population has a mega-population outlook (past colonizations, abductions, interventions, etc.) Some of his population is clearly sexual in nature, albeit a subdued form. They clearly understand human sexuality, and it appears to not be too different from what they once presumably were. Please remember, given the fact that JPL now estimates that there are 2 billion Earth-like planets in the Milky Way (maybe 50 billion Earth-sized, also), a number of populations in this galaxy likely evolved far before the so-called Verdants (reportedly from a galaxy about 14 million light years away--there are about 150 other galaxies of various sizes that are closer to us). Meaning that we can expect to encounter actual, native alien neighbors who abhor the crudeness and material ambitions of the Verdant-gray aggregate. Which would help to explain their detailed, non-aligned critiques of the Verdant-gray combination that a variety of humans now report.

I'd like to talk with kai or "anonymous coward" about how to compare notes about transversals. There aren't many of us reporting on such aliens. We need to share data. For example, the hyper-advanced aliens I'm in contact with said they either communicate or interact (in detail) on a scale of some 257 million light years (they may be at least minimally aware of interactions beyond that range). Contact me at [email protected] --George LoBuono