Ears Analysis

ANALYSIS II


German guy, 12/15/2004, 12:52 am EST

I don´t think the German people would tolerate a desire to take back former colonies as we are very opposed to such discredited imperial politics. You must also remember that Germans are mostly pacifists, having suffered two horrendous wars that were organised by their enemies in London.

This is one reason why your President is so unpopular in Germany. He reminds a lot of people of Adolf Hitler.

Analysis:

Gg uses his answer to bring the focus back to the City of London cabal that was responsible for the disaster of Germany’s suffering “two horrendous wars that were organised by their enemies in London.” Their stooge in the second one of these was the Austrian expatriate Adolf Hitler. Gg is saying that George W. Bush stands in the same relationship with the City of London that Adolf Hitler did seventy-five years ago. It is the same gang, the same game and the same methodology. Only the stakes are higher this time.


German guy, 12/15/2004, 1:14 am EST

Dml, I´m not familiar with the prophet of whom you speak but I have read about other prophecies made many years ago that have come to nothing.

At the moment in Germany we have severe economic problems and this is likely to last for some years to come. In fact, there is so little money in the public purse that the government is thinking of abolishing compulsory miltary service (young people may also opt for civil service if they are pacifists).

We have a very small standing army and cuts are to be made here too. There are also constitutional factors which would prevent an aggressive foreign policy. No political party that I know of (not even the far right) supports the idea of imperialism. People are too concerned with unemployment and cuts in social spending.

Analysis:

First sentence: Gg reveals that he is not a fan of prophecy. This may be less a statement about personal ideology (Gg is, after all, an organization rather than an individual), and more a reminder that the need of the hour calls for practical action, not cosmological musings.

Second paragraph: Gg points to the fact that Germany is in dire financial straits, which is of course the ideal time for unfortunate events like “staged terrorist attacks” to take place. It was the financial chaos of post Versailles that eventually brought about the demise of the Weimar Republic and the rise of National Socialism.

Third paragraph: Gg bends over backward to show that Germany is not a part of the British/American “imperialism,” because her people and government are actually grappling with the very domestic problems that would also be addressed by the Bush administration, if it were actually working for the American people.


Interlude:

Worried finally asks the obvious question:

German guy,

Thank you for sharing the information you have received.
Do you have any information as to what cities in the U.S. or Europe might be targeted?


German guy, 12/15/2004, 1:36 am EST

Yes, the cities that are mentioned most as sites for nuclear detonation are Houston, Dallas and Atlanta. In Europe, we have computed multiple references to Frankfurt, Paris, Munich and Berlin (Frankfurt is at the top of the CIA/Mossad "hit list").

A lot of this chatter can be accessed by intercepting the Echelon system, the raw information output of which is processed by the NSA in America and the Royal Signals in Britain (as a sidepoint, the Echelon system is no longer reliable or efficient because it doesn´t use intelligent algorithms).

What I rely on is good old-fashioned telephony interception, but on a software platform that unencrypts communications between the various US military installations and CIA stations dotted around Europe. Also, the best intelligence you have is another long-forgotten system called "human contact"! Yes, taking briefings from the intelligence community direct (on an informal off-duty basis, of course).

The Israelis are very good at selling software-based intelligence systems but I have never had much faith in their objectivity (on the human side). The Russians are progressing rapidly in this area and many agency people I know are extremely impressed with their communication robots (they are like software vacuum cleaners that suck up information from electronic communications, but are in Russia much more advanced than the "dumb" Echelon system. Echelon produces too many false positives).

Analysis:

First paragraph: Gg’s use of the phrase “the cities that are mentioned most” indicates that multiple events might be being planned, as was the case in the 9/11 scenario. “Houston, Dallas and Atlanta” are mid-sized commercial hubs that could create a national collapse without destroying the national governmental and financial infrastructure. They probably have the right features for lending themselves to think-tank scenarios with an acceptable range of predictability. Gg’s mention of Frankfurt as being “at the top of the CIA/Mossad hit list" is another veiled reference to the City of London that views Frankfurt’s Central Euro Bank as an annoying upstart competitor. Paris and Berlin are the capitals of the two leading nations in the European Union. Both countries have been largely uncooperative toward the transnational’s hegemonistic movements and the concept of a Greater Israel in the Middle East. It is unclear how Munich figures into the picture, except that a terrorism event during the 1972 Olympics may make it a credible candidate for a staged attack.

Second paragraph: Gg’s reference to “intercepting the Echelon system” merely points out that massive intelligence gathering mechanisms are vulnerable because their scope makes them unwieldy. A stationary system that is “all ears” can hardly escape being snooped on itself. “The Royal Signals in Britain” are well within the intercepting range of the BND. Gg wants the 12/27 Gang to know that the BND knows what they think they know.

Third paragraph: Gg gives another nod to the rank and file by stating his preference for “old-fashioned telephony interception” and “human contact.” The “informal off-duty briefings from the intelligence community direct” lets the 12/27 Gang know that they have no hope of remaining anonymous. There are evidently enough agents willing to spill the beans if push comes to shove.

Fourth paragraph: Gg’s statement that he has no “faith in their objectivity” is to pre-empt the idea that his information might have been contaminated by the Mossad. On the other hand, his praise for Russian intelligence gathering implies that the Russians do have the goods and will likely make them available if the U.S. military tries to step on their toes. Gg’s message in this phase is that the 12/27 Gang is isolated and surrounded by capable enemies.


German guy, 12/15/2004, 1:56 am EST

These are interesting questions. If I only have time to answer one before I travel to Frankfurt, I shall try to address the others when I return.

To 9-11. I personally (and many within the German intelligence services) believe that 9-11 was an internal operation planned and executed by an extreme pro-Israel faction within the American government and intelligence services. The technicalities evident in both planning, timing and precision flying point to the use of technologies not available to so-called terrorist groups.

We believe that the relationship between the so-called al-Qaeda group (really the Muslim Brotherhood which is financed by the British) and the Israeli intelligence services is very complicated, but there is an alliance of convenience. We ran a personality profile on some of the alleged hijackers, analysed handwriting and applied linguistic methodologies, and thus believe that Atta was a Mossad asset.

There is also an enabling aspect on the part of the Pakistani intelligence services, which is a clone of the CIA. Yesterday Musharraf told your media that he had done everything possible to destroy the Taliban enclave in the border areas of Afghanistan and Pakistan. This is a lie. Neither the Americans nor the Pakistanis have any intention of breaking the Afghan rebel forces, as they will need them to become more extreme and regain the coüntry at a future date.

I think it would be very interesting to see Osama bin Laden and Mr Wolfowitz in a room together privately, for I am sure they would kiss each other on the cheeks as brothers under the skin with roughly the same general project, though sharply divergent goals.

Analysis:

First sentence: Gg is about to travel to “Frankfurt” for “meetings.” We already discerned that this was essentially a signal to the 12/27 Gang that operations against them are ongoing and that they must respond with some positive sign before Gg returns to the keyboard for more disclosure. He now makes sure that they understand his intention to continue being indiscreet unless they give a reliable sign that the heat is off of Germany. He says that he just has “time to answer one” of the questions put to him. He picks the one that the other side would most have him be quiet about.

Second paragraph: Anonymous Coward had asked about the reliability of intercepts and Gg’s take on 9/11. Gg refers to the latter as an “internal operation planned and executed by an extreme pro-Israel faction within the American government and intelligence services.” Nothing new there. There are many details though that would be embarrassing to the neo-con circles, that much is clear from Gg’s words.

Third paragraph: Gg lays “the so-called al-Qaeda group” at the doorstep of the City of London and speaks of a complicated “alliance of convenience” between al-Qa’eda and the Mossad. Again, this is just enough of a hint to impress the 12/27 Gang with the seriousness of Germany’s insistence on being left out of any “staged terrorist attacks.” If Gg can reveal that “Atta was a Mossad asset,” then it is pretty obvious that the group has a list of all other Mossad assets, and is willing to put them on the Internet, one by one.

Fourth paragraph: Gg speaks “of the Pakistani intelligence services” as a “clone of the CIA,” but presumably one quite amenable to “informal off-duty briefings from the intelligence community direct.” There are thus things to be spilled from that end too. Gg gives only a little taste, implying that it could be spiced up quite a bit if need be: “Neither the Americans nor the Pakistanis have any intention of breaking the Afghan rebel forces, as they will need them to become more extreme and regain the country at a future date.” No wonder that President Bush had said some time ago that he does not particularly care to know where Osama Bin Laden is.

Fifth paragraph: “Osama bin Laden and Mr Wolfowitz in a room together privately” puts them together alright. Gg wants to make sure that the 12/27 ears get that message loud and clear. He draws a picture, in which the two “kiss each other on the cheeks as brothers under the skin with roughly the same general project.” We have already discerned that the “project” is the destruction of the U.S. army, so that nothing will stand in the way of dismantling the United States of America, and the rest of the world’s national entities along with it. Now, will making this information public make much of a difference in Mr. Wolfowitz’ pursuit of his agenda? No, but it does plant the seed for his being set up as the fall-guy by the City of London in case of anything going wrong. Mr. Wolfowitz probably does not enjoy being in that position, which is exactly Gg’s point of putting him into it.


German guy, 12/15/2004, 2:25 am EST

I have often heard my American friends remark with surprise that Germans are not "controlled", as they thought.

By NWO I think you are referring to the "new world order" system Bush Senior spoke of during the first Gulf War.

Firstly: in Germany it is illegal for government agencies to share information about citizens they deal with on an ordinary basis. There is no central computer that links all of the various departments. (It is a different matter if you are seen as a threat to the constitution, and that matter is dealt with by your local state and not by the federal authorities.)

As yet we do not have a biometric ID system, although that may happen in the future following approval from the European Parliament. This has been forced on us by the American government. Nobody in Germany is enthusiastic about this development, but if you travel to America regularly, you will not get entry permission after October 2005 without biometric data in your passport.

I have not heard about Satan appearing on any ID card. You can however see such things by folding various international paper currency in a certain way, so I think it has more to do with imagined demons than any deliberate symbolism.

If there is a continuing move to a world order of concentrated power, then this would rely first on the destruction of the American people and the American system of government. This is already happening in the United States and the biggest culprits are to be found in the American government itself.

It seems that a grouping of international corporate entities and financial institutions have decided that America at this late stage is only good for projecting military force, and so it will use up American resources to advance its own agenda until there is not much left of American power and credibility.

At the geopolitical level there are only two main beneficiaries: Israel and the City of London (Israel will then be destroyed by the CoL and international corporate power groups). At the financial-imperial level, the major corporations and institutions involved in the bleeding away of American military power have little to lose, since all of them have sufficient assets outside of US territories and would survive the collapse of the United States as a global power.

So if this is what you mean by a world order, then you are correct. It will not be a global system of control connived by nation states, but rather by corporate and financial entities (who already enjoy enormous power and influence at all levels in all countries).

I shall have to answer other questions when I return later today.

Analysis:

First to fourth paragraph: Gg once more refers to transnationals’ manipulations in Europe. The advent of the European Union has given them the tool for introducing the same privatization and globalization trends that have already reduced the U.S. to a caricature of what it once was. That is the purport of Gg’s linking “a biometric ID system” with “the European Parliament” and “the American government.”

Fifth paragraph: Gg distances his message from the genre of conspiracy theories that deals in “imagined demons” rather “than any deliberate symbolism,” just as he had previously set aside the popular prophecy fashion. While it did use a Houston plot as the attention-getter, Gg’s information is quite sober. The message is addressed to the treasonous factions in U.S./British/Israeli intelligence, and it basically says to keep hands off of Europe and particularly off of Germany.

Sixth paragraph: Anonymous Coward had challenged Gg with the idea that Germany’s government is itself a participant in the drive toward the New World Order. Gg steers this back to logistics, saying that it first requires the already ongoing“destruction of the American people and the American system of government.” In other words, the very argument for the existence of the New World Order drive subsumes that prerequisite anti-American activities like the deliberate destruction of the U.S. military must already be in progress.

Seventh paragraph: Referring to the transnationals as “a grouping of international corporate entities and financial institutions,” Gg points to how they “advance their agenda,” part of which is to “use up American resources.” The U.S. is being used in two capacities. First, it offers a ready consumer pool for absorbing products and services from the global market. Second, it provides the standing army that is the transnationals’ current enforcement arm. This army is being used to bring about an international conflagration that will result in a weakening of the worlds other major standing armies, including those of China and Russia. When the job is done, there will be no resistance to the dissolution of nation states in favor of a new grid of economic zones of interest. Nations will simply not have the military capacity for defending their sovereignty. The notion that the U.S. military is being used to further American interests, albeit immoral ones, is fundamentally flawed. Gg repeatedly points to the City of London and its allied "grouping of international corporate entities” as the true managers of both the U.S. government and its military.

Eighth paragraph: While the information in this paragraph is likely to go over the head of many “ordinary readers,” it will be significant to the patriotic contingent of the intelligence community. Gg says that Israel itself is also marked for eventual dismantling by the City of London and the transnationals. He also offers a rationale for this to the general public, to whom the idea of the globalists’ deliberate destruction of cash cow U.S.A. may seem incongruous: “At the financial-imperial level, the major corporations and institutions involved in the bleeding away of American military power have little to lose, since all of them have sufficient assets outside of US territories and would survive the collapse of the United States as a global power.” Not only that, but the collapse itself would be a looting fest of epic proportion.

Ninth paragraph: Gg discounts the popular belief that it is the U.S. or even Israel who is seeking to establish global hegemony. He says that both are targeted for dissolution, along with other nation states that are viewed as pesky regulating obstacles to the ambitions of “corporate and financial entities (who already enjoy enormous power and influence at all levels in all countries).”


Interlude:

John Doe, an ex-CSIS operative with past connections to the BND, confirms some of Gg’s references to chatter with a late December 2004 content. He speaks of “a multi-intel-agency operation involving a number of Western governments, including the CIA which initiated the op.” John Doe is hoping that “the German insider may pass along some more sound bytes,” particularly with regard to the operation that John Doe has come to know as “Feuerball.”

Comment:

This is likely a message from patriotic intelligence that Gg’s efforts on behalf of the German government are not being regarded as compromising to the saboteurs. A heads up, in other words. It is unlikely that “John Doe” will make another appearance.


Interlude:

AC writes:

I think we have to be patient with german guy.
On page 4 he posted at 12:31 am that he has to get ready for a trip to Frankfurt, which was 6:31 am german time.

Comment:

As was said before, Gg has no intention of “driving” to “Frankfurt,” especially not to meet with a friend working at “the American Consulate in the Siesmayerstrasse.” These details, just like John Doe’s tidbit about the Candian consulate in Beijing and Gg’s reminiscing about “1979” and a friendship with “Clinton appointee” “Douglas Kramer,” are meaningful only to special recipients. They certainly are not intended to make it easy for anybody to figure out who the speaker is and where s/he is at any given moment.


Interlude:

Anonymous Coward writes:

I thought the same. I do not doubt the guy is a Kraut..too many actual European references. But why? With his intelligence and knowledge, why in God´s name would he waste his time HERE? Is it the old human thing of the person with a secret just dying to tell SOMEONE?

Comment:

Gg acts in two capacities. The first is on behalf of the German government, with the objective of discouraging the 12/27 Gang from going ahead with “proactively hoped-for staged terrorist attacks” in “Frankfurt, Berlin and Munich.” GLP was picked because it is one of the forums that gets regularly scanned by intelligence, and because many posters here are active in other forums. There is a good chance that information dropped at GLP will make a quick splash elsewhere, and that the underlying message will also quickly reach the right ears in the 12/27 Gang. Gg’s second capacity has to do with bringing the intelligence fence-straddlers to swing over to the organized underground. In the process of presenting them with the imperatives for such a move, Gg also educates the general puplic about what is afoot. For that objective, too, GLP is a suitable venue.

ANALYSIS IV

German guy, 12/15/2004, 6:13 pm EST

To answer a previous question:

I didnÄt find the GLP forum, rather it found me. I spend all my free time doing researches for papers I am writing and (hopefully) a book. This is apart from my activities in private intelligence and communications monitoring.

The internet is a good source of post-qualified information if you know where to look. It is not a primary source. In addition, I enjoy reading posts made in many so-called "intelligence forums" where people speculate about what may or may not happen. That´s how I found a lively discussion here about two months ago and I thought it would be interesting for me to post some of my information here too.

Analysis:

Gg preserves the element of deniability for Germany. An “ex” intelligence professional would not divulge information simply because he “thought it would be interesting for me to post some of my information here too.” To cover, he speaks of doing Internet research for “papers” and a “book.” The story is not really meant to be credible, just usable. On the other hand, the idea of papers and a book are meant to be perceived as serious threats by the 12/27 Gang. They fairly drip with implied disclosure of well-guarded secrets.


German guy, 12/15/2004, 6:21 pm EST

Maybe you should ask the FBI (perhaps anonymously) whay they aren´t investigating reports that Atlanta, Dallas and Houston are being singled out for the detonation of a nuclear device.

I think you probably know the answer. In fact, we have no indication that the FBI has been informed at all and this pattern looks very similar to that seen prior to the events of 9-11.

Analysis:

By now, the FBI will certainly know about the allegation. If there is independent evidence for fishy things going on in these cities, some rank and file agent may bring it to the attention of the national office. Gg knows very well that nothing would come of it via that route. He is basically saying that America’s well-being is the responsibility of Americans. If Americans have no way of thwarting nefarious plans through their own efforts, why should they expect that German nationals have better hopes? Let Americans deal with the criminal cabal that they have allowed to take the helm. Gg keeps appealing to the fence-straddlers in U.S. intelligence to commit to the patriotic cause. That is the group. Which can collectively bring down the criminally insane cabal at the top.


German guy, 12/15/2004, 6:24 pm EST

"and risks all his confidentiality agreements"

I´ve already explained that I cannot talk about cases to which I was personally assigned during my service until 1999. What I am discussing with you now does not contravene either confidentiality agreements or my own code of ethics. This is fine for publication.

Analysis:

Gg’s repetition of the allusion to “1999” is another message to someone in the organized intelligence underground. The rest of the statement indicates that he has thus far avoided sharing anything that is not already known. It should be remembered that Gg pursues a practical purpose, which is to make it unattractive for the 12/27 Gang to persist in bringing Germany into the fold of the so-called war on terror by means of staged attacks. Because the hubris of the transnationals transcends their intelligence, they will probably not satisfy Germany’s request for guarantees. As a result, Gg will provide more detailed information of an incriminating nature, particularly with respect to the 12/27 gang’s nefarious intentions on American soil.


German guy, 12/15/2004, 6:30 pm EST

Does the term "The Libary" mean anything to you? (I´m not referring to a conventional library.)

This was apparently in answer to Anonymous Coward’s question:

So GG, if I understand it, the info you are imparting to us derives from the buzz in the intel connections you still have?

Comment:

Gg is referring to a loosely connected international fraternity of ex-intelligence personnel who maintain contacts that they made with their counterparts while in service. As an old hand, Gg benefits from the running commentary. This is the worldwide intelligence underground to which the “German guy” group belongs. From Gg’s various hints, the group also has a contingent of members that are in active service. Having access to current data while at the same time being relatively free of political control gives this group a decided edge over the regular intelligence services. They enjoy more freedom of movement, for one.


Interlude:

Various posters keep throwing “test questions” at Gg. Someone purporting to be Anonymous Coward asks:

OK German Guy, who comes along with St. Nick?

The question should have been, “Who accompanies Sankt Nikolaus?” The answer would have been, “Krampus.” It is silly, though, to expect Gg to respond to that kind of stuff. He has nothing to prove. He is accomplishing his objective for posting on GLP, and each of his four audience groups is getting the message. The least important one of these is GLP’s general readership. The test questions are thus wasted.

There are, however, other questions that do interest Gg because they give him an opportunity for making extra drops. One of these is by Clio:

German Guy -
In your post today at 5:36 you mention an industrialist complex agenda...

Are we talking Sigma Ag here?


German guy, 12/15/2004, 7:08 pm EST

First of all, Clio, let me say I´m having great difficulty posting replies at the moment. There seems to be a long delay in submitting.

Corporate interests across the board have a vested interest in causing a bigger crisis than 9-11. All of our findings point to a nuclear incident in one of the three cities I mentioned.

Let´s refer to the people behind this as the "Hidden Hand".

Who in the public eye is most closely identified with this Hidden Hand?

Paul Wolfowitz.

From whence does it draw its membership?

Inter-services: CIA, military, mercenary (ex-SAS: British logistics and ex-CIA Latin America operatives); Mossad aka "al-Qaeda" (Muslim Brotherhood backed by the City of London power brokers).

How is it financed?

Laundered money (Cayman Isles up until 1999), Afghan and SA drug money, funds diverted from the military budget.

What is their purpose?

To collapse the US economy, suspend normal government and militarise American society (conscription) - in place of destroying Frankfurt´s finacial district which is home to the Central European Bank.

What do they gain?

In terms of politics, complete power and the sympathy of the world. It would then allow them to default on the national debt caused by huge budget deficits. At a personal level, the corporations of which key US admin would guarantee an income stream since many have already bailed out of US stocks.

Who else gains?

In the short term, the City of London financial super-class and Israel.

Who loses?

Almost everyone else.

Please also note: We have reason to believe that many "terrorist" prisoners in US custody are being subjected to long periods of intense sensory deprivation and methods by which they acquire a new controlled personality. We think they are being programmed for something.

Analysis:

First sentence: Gg speaks of “corporate interests across the board,” although the true transnationals are relatively few in number compared to the vast majority of business corporations. The members of the military-industrial-corporate-complex are actively engaged in transferring the commonwealth into private ownership. Toward that end, they externalize their production costs through practices that divert tax moneys into bearing the hidden expense of manufacturing, marketing and exploration. This is effected through a revolving-door arrangement, by which captains of industry seek political election or appointment. While in office, they manipulate laws and regulations in favor of their respective industries. Upon leaving office, they return to their private sector positions and capitalize on the contacts they made in government. A contingent of them become consultants and lobbyists who use their contacts in government to widen the cracks in public oversight. The same figures sit on each other’s boards coordinating the common agenda. They also consolidate their power by becoming controlling shareholders in the public information media, through which they manipulate public opinion toward their objectives.

The revolving-door also operates between the corporate entities and the military, yielding similar long-lasting profit-driven policies. Included under military are the various police and intelligence organizations that serve as enforcement arms for the corporate interests. On the domestic level, deregulation and government contracts are the main objectives of filling public office seats with their people. On the international level, it is the establishment of trade and exploration monopolies. Oil, weapons and finance industries lead the MICC pack. The political ideology advocated by this complex is fascism. Gg points out that fascist methodology involves the creation of crises that invite the introduction of totalitarian control. 9/11 was one of these and, according to Gg, another, bigger one is in the making now.

Second to fourth sentence: Gg suggest using the term the "Hidden Hand" for the top political echelon of MICC. He points to Paul Wolfowitz as nominal figurehead of this force.

Fifth and sixth sentence: Gg describes the current objective of induced crises, which is to cultivate the American populace as the funder and staffer of mercenary forces for transnational looting operations overseas and in South America.

Sixth and seventh sentence: Gg identifies a monitary meltdown as the near-term goal. This will allow MICC to throw the population at large into poverty, reducing its options to those offered by the transnationals.

Eighth to eleventh sentence: Gg points to the financial cabal he calls the City of London and the militaristic state of Israel as the immediate beneficiaries of the next crisis.

Twelfth sentence: All of the above is common knowledge. However, Gg now opens a window to an operation that the Bush administration would very much like to keep under wraps. He mentions a particularly sinister aspect of the detention powers facilitated by the Patriot Act. Gg says that "terrorist" prisoners in US custody are being subjected to long periods of intense sensory deprivation and methods by which they acquire a new controlled personality. We think they are being programmed for something.”


German guy, 12/15/2004, 7:24 pm EST

Many, many questions. It is now 01.20 and I´m ready to sleep, so I will have to return tomorrow.

To the library: Ever heard of Barry Seal? He was helped by "The Library" and many members still remember him with fondness.

In short, it is an informal "club" for ex-intelligence operatives, from all nations, who fear that the "Hidden Hand" organisations are out of control and are leading the world to destruction.

Some people reading this will understand.

Analysis:

Gg alludes to the third of his three audience groups, the patriotic contingents of the intelligence community. His statement, “some people reading this will understand” most likely refers to “It is now 01.20 and I´m ready to sleep.” Gg will be using precise time references frequently from now on. Clearly, this marks a new phase in the communications. For one, it indicates that a known contact is now checking into the forum for updates from Gg.


Interlude:

koernigsblut writes:

No wonder Europeans hate us Americans. You morons who are attacking "German Guy" are very hard to like, with your foul language and cognitive deficits so evident in your every post. Let him speak. He is worth reading and weighing the evidence if only because he is so much more intelligent than most of you. That includes the federal disinformers on this list.

Comment:

The federal disinformers and the general noise-makers actually provide an excellent cover for Gg, which is probably why this forum was recommended to him in the first place as a dropping site. It should be understood that Gg’s objective is not primarily to educate the general readership. That is merely the context for dropping information packages for the three other groups, although education is a bonus for those who know how to extract it. The imbecile’s clamor that pervades the thread allows the subtle communications to take place almost unnoticed.


Interlude:

Anonymous Coward writes:

It should be apparent German Guy is utilizing this public forum to address the London and US Intelligence folk speaking to them by proxy.

By speaking vicariously to various Intell agencies and the US administration that monitor GLP, he is publicly trying to avert a disaster.

Comment:

I agree with Anonymous Coward, except that the disaster that Gg has probably already averted is not the one in the U.S., but the one that had been planned for Frankfurt. Averting the U.S. disaster, whatever that might eventually turn out to be, is the responsibility of groups like Gg within U.S. intelligence.


Interlude:

Anonymous Coward writes:

entschuldige bitte, aber das bricht dir das genick..jeder verschwörungslaie kennt die baphomet-form im perso..das is so bekannt wie in amerika die pyramide auf dem dollar..
aber der bundesnachrichtendienst ist darüber nicht informiert ?
und antworte mir bitte mal in deutsch..

Comment:

Du solltest nicht vergessen, daß Gg sich nicht um Verschwörungsleien scheren kann. Es geht ihm auch nicht um Esoterisches hier, sondern um etwaige geplante Anschläge auf deutsche Städte. Es mag wohl sein, daß der Teufel selbst im Spiel ist. Das ändert aber nichts and der Tatsache, daß die gegenwärtige Lage rasches Handeln, nicht gemütliche Geschichtsforschung verlangt. Vom Genickbrechen kann man da wohl kaum sprechen. Stimmts?


Interlude:

Someone posting as German guy writes:

I was just joking all along. Go sleep you guys.

Comment:

If this were a follow-up to the earlier “It is now 01.20 and I´m ready to sleep,” it should be seen as a statement that no action is being taken at the moment. However, the second message was not posted by Gg. There is no chance that this poster would be mistaken by the intended recipients as a genuine source because s/he does not understand Gg’s trademark nuances. Possibly though this was posted by a friendly source letting Gg know something important.


German guy, 12/16/2004, 8:22 am EST

I have just logged on earlier than anticipated to read your messages, some of which are very perceptive and some of which are deliberately misleading.

Other people posting as "German guy" must understand that they are not doing themselves or their fellow citizens any favours. I won´t register so you must use discernment.

I shall be back with more information and background this evening at around 23.00 hrs CET.

Analysis:

First sentence: Gg is acknowledging one or more of his intelligence target groups that has posted a message for him on the forum. He wants the 12/27 Gang to know that a certain assurance given earlier won’t fly. He has learned that an understanding reached earlier (during the “drive” to “Frankfurt”) is unreliable and that he will resume spilling the beans. “Not doing themselves or their fellow citizens any favours” means that the 12/27 Gang is shooting itself in the foot by trying to lull him.

Second paragraph: Gg wants the patriotic contingent in intelligence to be aware of false information about the German position. Most likely, he has learned that there is an effort afoot of presenting his activities as compromising the community.

Third paragraph: He expects to receive a revised proposal within 15 ½ hours.


German guy, 12/16/2004, 1:38 pm EST

I may only be able to post once this evening as I have a very urgent meeting later. So here goes. It should follow next.

Analysis:

Gg is saying that he urgently expects to hear something positive from the 12/27 Gang. “Post only once” indicates that he is making good on his earlier threat of starting to spill the beans.

ANALYSIS V etc available

my eyes are bleeding

I´ve been wondering about this myself. I think you hit the nail on the head.
How do you know this stuff?
Anxious to read your take on the rest of the messages.
thx

Quote:
We can now form some idea about who Gg’s audience might be. He alternates between three groups, emphasizing a point for the benefit of one or another as the occasion warrants. On a superficial level, Gg is addressing the general group of Internet users, with a special focus on the U.S. citizenry. They represent the trump card, so to speak, in his subtler game with U.S./British/Israeli intelligence. He distinguishes at least two factions among the latter. There is the proactive faction we can call the 12/27 Gang, to use Gg’s own metaphor for these communications. This is the group that plots and implements the “staged terrorist attacks” he hopes to prevent by spilling the beans. They stand in the service of a conglomerate of transnational corporations under the leadership of a financial cabal. The message Gg intends for 12/27 ears is that they must scrap plans for staging events in Germany. Gg provides the incentive for this by threatening to disclose delicate facts and backing them up with files from the BND.

Gg’s third audience is the rank and file of U.S./British/Israeli intelligence. He seems to regard many of these agents and analysts as genuinely patriotic in outlook. Gg’s message to them is to not cooperate with those who are obviously not concerned with the well-being of their own citizenry or with that of humanity at large. There appears to be a fourth group as well, and some of Gg’s apparently coded messages must be for them. These intelligence professionals may already be engaged in an organized effort of sabotaging the 12/27 Gang’s nefarious plans. We can assume that the group that calls itself “German guy” belongs to this underground intelligence organization. An American contingent of the underground is apparently engaged in active operations intended to derail 12/27 plans in the U.S. When reading Gg’s communications, it would be helpful to keep in mind that different parts of it are directed at different audiences.

I much appreciate your analysis, Ears. Please continue. You may have only a few readers since your commentary is so intelligent, but those of us who are interested, are rapt.

Thank you "Ears" for your input on Gg. Something sure smells bad.

Thanks for the analysis. Are you US intel?

get some dental work

McC? maybe???

Dental work?

<>

WHERE?
WHEN?

the russians are very slick

ears... excellent work.. very well written and thought out. thanks

german guy and ears are fellow travelers

ANALYSIS V

German guy, 12/16/2004, 1:39 pm EST

Paul Wofowitz will authorise the detonation of a nuclear payload in the Houston area on December 27, 2004. The Hidden Hand network (Mossad/al-Qaeda/SAS) of which he is the nominal controller has verified in advance every aspect of operational integrity - a failsafe job with zero chance of discovery.

Houston has been primed for months via deliberate mismanagement, incompetence, corruption and embezzlement at its FEMA-independent Emergency Center. The police and fire services have been deliberately and systematically sabotaged and thrown into administrative chaos so as to ensure maximum fatalities in the aftermath of the detonation. However, the existence of the center will provide the Bush administration with a "we did everything we could" excuse.

We believe the Hidden Hand envisages the following scenario:

1. Detonation on Dec 27 (could be delayed, but all our intercepts point to this date)
2. The State Department blames "al-Qaeda", whose leaders are allegedly hiding in Iran
3. Iran (truthfully) denies giving refuge to said leaders
4. Bush issues Iran with a cowboy-style deadline for delivery of alleged leaders
5. Iran fails to comply because it cannot
6. UN convenes in emergency session - no agreement (Watch Ariel Sharon quietly flee to his private estate in Greece)
7. Other foreign intelligence agencies dispute the State Department version
8. Happily for Wolfowitz, Osama bin Laden releases a videotape claiming responsibility, warning America not to attack his "brave warriors" in Iran
9. American fighters launch a "decapitation" attack on the Iranian government and alleged "al-Qaeda" bases

We know that the Wolfowitz network has concealed a remote-controlled nuclear payload in the Houston area. None of our intercepts give us exact coordinates. We have also heard the same code system used in regard to Atlanta and Dallas, although not with the same frequency. We believe that Mara Salvatruchas, the CIA-run Salvadora syndicate, is peripherally involved with the Wolfowitz network in protecting and running cover for a rogue ex-SAS British assassin who is perhaps the world´s leading logistics and reconnaisance expert.

Last known as either Frank Riley or Terence Lawley, we believe that he was responsible for the murder of nuclear physicist John Mullen on June 29. Mullen was approached by a Hidden Hand contact man posing as a CIA agent at the behest of Wolfowitz on February 12, 2003, and was asked to provide the "CIA" with an hypothetical schematic of a remote-controlled, trunk-sized nuclear device with a payload "several times greater than ´Fat Man´" (in the interests of nationaly security). Mullen was told that the hypothetical impact area would be "a city the size of Houston". Mullen complied with this request but grew suspicious toward the end of 2003 and abruptly ended his cooperation.

At the beginning of June, Mr Mullen decided to contact the staff of former National Security Adviser, Sandy Berger, with a view to discussing his CIA work with him. At the time Berger was too busy too see him immediately owing to his work as foreign policy adviser to John Kerry. We believe that this is what sealed the fate of Mr Mullen, as Sandy Berger does indeed have informal links to the Wolfowitz network and it is conceivable that Berger warned Hidden Hand. Incidentally, three weeks later Berger was charged by the FBI with the theft of critical documents from the National Archive relating to evidence that he had helped Wolfowitz facilitate the 9-11 attacks.

Wolfowitz is also running a Mossad agent in the Houston area called Avner Meir, whose present status is unknown, but we believe he is currently holding a visitor´s visa. His job is to facilitate the smuggling of Muslims (any Muslims will do) across the Mexican border and provide them with accomodation and distress funds under the asuspices of a fake charitable organisation. We suspect that Meir, also a master forger, will provide the unwitting Muslims with forged US passports and driving licences, plenty of Muslim literature, commendations and enough money to be "seen and remembered".

This was the basis of my discussions with American diplomatic personnel in Frankfurt yesterday, both of whom have been locked in secret discussions with the German government over, among many other things, their application for political refugee status in the event of making this known to the media.

The far side of the CIA and Mossad have been ordered to drop any plans they may have had for bombing the financial district of Frankfurt, including the European Central Bank. The Wolfowitz Network has decided that the Houston detonation must take priority over everything else.

All of our intercepts, field information and disclosures from former (and not so former!) US diplomatic personnel, tell us that the American people are being set up for another, but even more devastating, 9-11 tragedy in which a tiny group of people will gain enormously at the expense of the rest of the world.

Analysis:

SHIFTING INTO HIGHER GEAR

Gg’s stepping up the level of disclosure with this message indicates that he is not convinced of the removal of threats to Germany. The passage “the CIA and Mossad have been ordered to drop any plans they may have had for bombing the financial district of Frankfurt” merely shows that the 12/27 Gang has indeed let it be known that they want Gg to discontinue his campaign.

First paragraph:

IMPRESSIONS BASED ON WHAT WAS HEARD

Very little in intelligence communications is straightforward language. Pseudonyms, symbols and codes are usually worked out ahead of any communications in operational development. The objects to which they point will later be understood by initiated communicators, but not by outsiders who are listening in. The significance of “December 27, 2004” or 12272004 may be something entirely different than what the superficial meaning suggests. Although Gg does state a preference for telephone interception and for informal direct briefings, he did not say that the information about the 12/27 Houston plot was sourced in that way. On the contrary, he indicated in his first message that in this case the information was compiled from chatter. Gg’s remark that the 12/27 plotters have “verified in advance every aspect of operational integrity” sounds definitive enough, but it still is only an impression based on what the Gg group heard without benefit of the code keys.

One needs to give some credit to the planners of clandestine operations, particularly if they happen to be CIA/Mossad operatives. It is unlikely that the specifics of a planned event would have been broadcast without regard for security. The 12/27 Gang surely knew that there is an abundance of domestic and foreign listening capability that must not learn of their plans, or if they do, then at least only a disguised version. Gg obviously knows that items like dates and locations are generally codes for something else, just as a military name like, say, Task Force Olympia does not refer to the Olympic Games or to a landscape in Greece.

Looked at from this perspective, a term like “nuclear payload” more probably points to the level of magnitude of the operation than to a specific device. It would be downright stupid on the part of the 12/27 Gang to chatter about a nuclear payload if that were actually the weapon to be used. Gg did not see fit to provide us with the transcript of the pertinent intercepts (although those may be made available to interested government officials). We thus do not know what terminology was being used. The Gg group applied its best educated guess and determined that the chatter was about a nuclear device. That should be taken seriously, and Gg clearly did. It does not, however, account for the high probability that some of the chatter was deliberately misleading.

Continuing in this vein, a term like “the Houston area” also does not necessarily have a geographic value. It may refer to a class of scenarios that was worked out in think tank simulations under that name. If the city of Houston were meant specifically, the word “area” would be a redundant addition. It is of course possible that the 12/27 Gang is indeed brazen or stupid enough to be so straightforward in its shop talk about a diabolical plot, but we should assume that they were a bit more circumspect. In light of this, it is more reasonable to simply acknowledge that a serious event is indeed being planned, but that the date, location and specifics may vary from the contents of the chatter.

The inclusion of the U.K. Special Air Service, along with Mossad and Qa’eda elements points to an assault method that is typical of U.K. Special Forces operations. SAS troops regularly participate in joint anti-terrorism training with foreign forces. There is probably a good number of them in the U.S. at any given time. Their presence is not likely to be compromised through having them participate in an ultra-clandestine action against an American city. They might be used for providing cover, but it is difficult to imagine the need for this in a scenario using a remote-detonated nuclear device. Even if we assume that mercenary ex-SAS personnel is meant, they would not have much of a job in such a scenario. Since Gg’s intercepts do point to SAS involvement, it is easier to imagine a planned operation that features some type of assault group action in which the SAS could excel.

“Failsafe job with zero chance of discovery” implies action under cover of large-scale exercises, as 9/11 had been. Zero chance of discovery would at the very least require background events that can be manipulated to accommodate later emerging evidence. There has been no word of large-scale exercises for the specified time frame. Not knowing the quality and scope of the information gathered by the Gg group, it is highly problematic to ascertain the date, location of whatever staged attack is in the works. The important thing in Gg’s information is that a firm decision for an attack has been made. That fact can be extracted much more readily than the details.

Second paragraph: It is probably demonstrable that “Houston has been primed for months.” That certainly is suspicious. It may turn out though that other U.S. cities were similarly primed. Conversely, the priming of Houston may be camouflage for an event elsewhere. Again, the quality and scope of Gg’s intercepts may warrant his conclusions, but we have not seen facsimiles of that. We should also look at another aspect of this plot: the objective of an attack on Iran.

Third paragraph: We can be fairly certain that, if there is an incident in the U.S., it will be featured as an al-Qa’eda attack and crafted into a rationale for attacking Iran. Gg concurs: “The State Department blames "al-Qaeda", whose leaders are allegedly hiding in Iran.” To the best of my knowledge, the media footwork for fixing in the public mind the supposed Iran location of al-Qa’eda leaders has not yet been done. It is unlikely that the “discovery” of their hiding in Iran can be credibly made, without having the seed planted in the media well in advance. The Afghanistan location of al-Qa’eda had been well cultivated before 9/11. The other aspects of the Iran-framing make sense, but it does not seem realistic that this can be pulled off on short notice now. Another fact that speaks against the 12/27 timeline is the Iraqi election planned for the end of January. Fingering Iran would be a lot easier if it could be based on a failed Iraqi election. At the very least, we should have already read in the media that the election had to be called off because of massive infiltration from Iran. Planting this idea will also take more time than is afforded by the next two days.

The reference to a “remote-controlled nuclear payload” having already been “concealed” makes the “Mossad/al-Qaeda/SAS” type operation in the “Houston area” unlikely. Such an operation would be more suited to a conventional attack rather than a remote-detonated nuclear device. Detonating an already concealed device hardly requires the services of “Mara Salvatruchas” in “protecting and running cover for rogue ex-SAS Britisch assassin… Frank Riley.” Gg is broadcasting these Wolfowitz contacts because they certainly raise red flags all over the place. Now that they are on the web, it will be far more difficult for Wolfowitz to use these assets in any capacity.

Forth paragraph: Gg’s pointing to “the murder of nuclear physicist John Mullen on June 29,” apparently on the order of Wolfowitz” underscores Gg’s demonstration that he means business with his disclosures.

Fifth paragraph: “Sandy Berger” and “the theft of critical documents from the National Archive relating to evidence that he had helped Wolfowitz facilitate the 9-11 attacks” is more of the same. Gg is piling it on nonstop. He is implying that Germany may supply documents that even the complicit U.S. press cannot ignore. Gg is also using classic divide-and-conquer strategy. Alliances between people like Wolfowitz and Berger are always fragile. In case of mishaps, each will seek to maximally inculpate the other, while saving his own butt. Such people each have a private network that will go into action when the chips are down. It then becomes a contest of who can leak ugly things about the other one more quickly.

Sixth paragraph: The “Wolfowitz network,” a.k.a. the 12/27 Gang, should feel quite uncomfortable at Gg’s naming “Avner Meir,” especially in connection with Muslims that might later be apprehended as “al-Qa’eda operatives.” The neat thing about dropping a cluster bomb like the one that Gg is dropping with these communications is that they can set off a chain reaction in the target group. As I said, alliances between these people are tenuous, to say the least. They are in fact natural enemies and will act as such when their own survival is put in question.

Seventh paragraph: Gg says that he had discussed these things with two American diplomats in Frankfurt “yesterday.” The remark that these persons “have been locked in secret discussions with the German government” show Gg to be more closely connected with the German government than could be expected from a “hobbyist” who retired from the BND in 1999. Of course we know that Gg is not a person but a German underground intelligence network, but having easy access to foreign diplomats who are “locked in secret discussions with the German government” show the Gg group as being quite well-placed. Gg’s remark is meant to be a message to the 12/27 Gang that there are U.S. live sources willing to create a media furor if push comes to shove. I think that we should see all of this as being part of a blackmailing strategy on the part of the German government to get the Mossad off of Germany’s back. When Gg says, “This was the basis of my discussions…in Frankfurt yesterday,” it means that this is what he meant yesterday when he threatened to be “back with more information later.” Today’s naming of names is meant to demonstrate to “the Wolfowitz network” that Germany will not shy away from becoming ugly and very specific.

Eighth paragraph: “The far side of the CIA and Mossad have been ordered to drop any plans they may have had for bombing the financial district of Frankfurt, including the European Central Bank.” This has not yet happened. It is the ultimatum given by Gg on behalf of the German government. This is what Germany demands in return for not spilling everything that the BND knows about goings on in the “Wolfowitz network.” Had the order to drop plans against Germany already been given, we would not be hearing these things from Gg in the escalating fashion in which they are being presented.

Ninth paragraph: Gg’s pointing to “intercepts” and “disclosures” that “the American people are being set up for another, but even more devastating, 9-11 tragedy” is a shot across the bow. Gg is threatening the 12/27 Gang that Germany will broadcast these details also if it is not immediately given reliable signs of safety.

***

More to follow

more communist misinformation

Ready for tne next analysis, Ears...

Thank you Ears for setting the record straight. What is your connection to all this?

Hey Anonymous Coward, the only one guilty of communist misinformation is you. "Ears" makes the most sense.

Keep it coming while the line is open...

it seems to make as much sense as anything around here at the moment

sell the lie

bttt

bump for more ears

Have saved to read....

Thanks for the info, and thanks for taking the time to share.

::bookmarking::

Thank you for your encouraging words and your sincere hearts.

ANALYSIS VI

German guy, 12/16/2004, 5:11 pm EST

Please allow me to clarify something important. When the Bundesnachrichtendienst seeks to warn other nations about possible covert activity, it is standard procedure to transmit this information only to its opposite number. In the United States this is the CIA, which is then mandated to relay that intelligence to the government. The BND performed this function twice in 2001 prior to the 9-11 attacks, warning very explicitly with detailed information about exactly (and I mean "exactly") what the Wolfowitz network was doing. Twice, the BND was ignored.

Although we are former BND operatives and analysts (plus my technical partner), who also work internationally in conjunction with "The Library", we would still be expected to follow standard procedure. However, we no longer trust the CIA establishment as an impartial mediator of critical information. Nor do we have much faith in the Bush executive, from within which the Wolfowitz network of the Hidden Hand was spawned.

We therefore made an unprecedented decision to communicate these findings directly to the FBI. To date, we have seen no indication that any action has been taken, which is disheartening to say the least, if only because we may very well see history repeating itself.

The sad truth is that almost every major state-based intelligence organisation is heavily compromised in the performance of its duties. As a Canadian operative ("John Doe") himself testified earlier in this discussion, even the BND is subject to arbitrary, politically inspired stand-down orders when it comes to breaking up Mossad subversion of sovereign nations. We know that American public service agencies (and to a lesser degree the British intelligence community) have been infiltrated top to bottom with Mossad and Hidden Hand assets and sympathisers, and that the American media deliberately fails to report this type of subversion.

Why is that? We know that newspaper and media owners themselves are already wealthy and well-disposed toward the Hidden Hand. Well, you need to ask yourselves about the vast sums of cash siphoned off from defence procurement contracts in various budgets that are not properly audited by your Congress, such that said sums of money are given the designation "slush and hush" funds, managed by unaccountable financiers in the City of London. Editors and journalists often enjoy a lifestyle far in excess of their normal salary - just for turning a blind eye.

Analysis:

First paragraph: “The BND performed this function twice in 2001 prior to the 9-11 attacks.” Gg is using the reference “twice” to illustrate that his own initially mild-mannered banter will now be repeated on a stepped-up scale because of the Mossad’s reticence. He makes clear how far he is prepared to go by using the phrase “and I mean exactly.” He also specifies that this warning is aimed at the “Wolfowitz network.”

Second paragraph: Gg’s mention of “my technical partner” is to let the 12/27 Gang know that pertinent BND documents have been secured against destruction or tampering, and that they need not attempt tracking these, because they can be dispatched from multiple locations under Library auspices. It will be of grave interest to the “Wolfowitz network” to learn that the worldwide Library net stands behind Gg’s campaign. Gg’s statement that “we would still be expected to follow standard procedure” implies that he would back off the public campaign if Germany were given the right kind of guarantee of safety, and if a certain diplomatic channel to Germany were being used for communications. “We no longer trust the CIA establishment” means that the desired guarantee for Germany must come from a different source - one that is NOT “from within “the Bush executive.” In other words, Germany wants the guarantee to come by diplomatic channel from London, not from Washington.

Third paragraph: The “unprecedented decision to communicate these findings directly to the FBI” is now being followed up with these messages on GLP, because there has been no action by the FBI. This is inconvenient for the U.S. because the information will now be also picked up from the Internet by all governments, including those who are currently in the crosshairs, Iran and Syria. In addition, the messages may encourage other countries to begin using Gg’s novel use of the Internet for making drops - with deniability.

Going back to Gg’s reference of “twice,” he is also saying that a second contact will be made with the FBI “directly.” How much detail will be communicated to the FBI depends on what Germany sees happening with regard to the Mossad’s presence there. Gg’s use of the phrase “seen no indication that any action has been taken” means that Germany is not satisfied with signs of goodwill that had been extended during the past two days. The dogs are still sniffing around the Central Euro Bank in Frankfurt. Gg calls this “disheartening” and threatens the 12/27 Gang with “history repeating itself.” GLP readers know by now that Gg rarely uses sentences in a simple context. Most of the time they are polycontextual. The intended recipients in each context will understand what part applies to them.

Fourth paragraph: Gg reveals that “every major state-based intelligence organisation is heavily compromised” and is “subject to…stand-down orders when it comes to breaking up Mossad subversion.” The implied contrast to the Gg group is plain. The German underground intelligence network is part of the international Library organization, which is not compromised. Gg’s declaration that all U.S. intelligence is “infiltrated top to bottom with Mossad and Hidden Hand assets and sympathisers” is a call to the patriotic contingent in intelligence to connect with the underground that is also ubiquitous throughout the branches.

Gg is telling the fence-straddlers that there is a powerful group ready to protect them against being swept into the maelstrom of the Mossad subversion, a.k.a. the 12/27 Gang. Gg’s remark about “politically inspired stand-down orders when it comes to breaking up Mossad subversion” will be quite meaningful to the basically patriotic fence-straddlers. The rank and file knows very well that there are taboo topics in the branches, and many feel frustration over having to keep quiet about manifestly subversive activities by mysterious types with foreign accents.

Gg’s allusion to the “American media deliberately” failing to report subversion will fall on fertile soil. Rank and file knows of many instances where important accomplishments of theirs that should have been front-page news never received any notice at all. The perpetrators usually meet behind closed doors with senior personnel and then ride home in their limousines. There is despondency in the rank and file over having no recourse with regard to stopping unpatriotic activities by foreigners in cahoots with senior management.

Gg is offering a rational to the fence-straddlers, explaining why Germany is taking the unusual step of using the Internet as a tool for self-protection. This would under normal circumstances be frowned upon by intelligence professionals who pride themselves on keeping things in the family. Gg’s references to “politically inspired stand-down orders” and the foot-dragging “American media” are meant to allay concerns over Gg’s being a traitor to the profession. It is also a subtle suggestion that any of them twho has something important that the public should know might follow Gg’s example of using the Internet. The statement that British intelligence is compromised “to a lesser degree” underscores Gg’s message that a guarantee is expected to come from London, not from Washington.

Fifth paragraph: Gg reminds the rank and file of what they already know. Media owners and controlling shareholders belong to the very transnationals who are imposing the fascist yoke. Because they are “well-disposed toward the Hidden Hand,” they cannot at the same time be well-disposed toward the country. The fence-straddlers know about offshore accounts and CIA/Mossad business fronts. They know about congressional members in committee positions derailing the investigating of money streams. They see the same money reappear in accounts of bureaucrats, newspaper editors and programming directors who “enjoy a lifestyle far in excess of their normal salary – jut for turning a blind eye.” Gg says that neither the American people nor the patriotic service personnel can expect the media to do anything about government’s subversion. The message will be understood. They are on their own, and nothing will keep the country from racing down the mountain without breaks, unless courage is found somewhere in the hearts of individuals.

***

More to follow