e=mc^2 is just Pi in disguise | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 539828 Canada 11/29/2008 02:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Treasure Bound User ID: 520207 United States 11/29/2008 02:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As the Leprechauns say: "It’s the pot of gold at the end of me rainbow" Quoting: Shoemaker IIpot of gold = piss What morons run science in this day. You peoples need to THINK!! "We don't inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children"--Native-American proverb People were created to be loved while things were created to be used. The reason the world is in chaos is that, things are being loved and people are being used :Treasures122: In Solidarity with Janey [link to i25.photobucket.com] |
WW RAUPP User ID: 561550 Netherlands 11/29/2008 07:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 455142 United States 11/29/2008 07:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | area formula of a circle : a = pr^2 Quoting: Shoemaker IIEinstein BS : e = mc^2 Funny how these are so much alike, identical in basic structure… Why? because light is not linear!! Light "streams" like water, or more specifically: like piss. Yellow and blue make green - that is the facts o' the ring!! For you math persons: factoring. Look at a spectrum. Why do Jews circumcise the males? To show them the true nature of light, and how to understand it. Why else would they cut part of their dicks off? Light is like a "hoop and stick", light moves in all directions, in a forward motion. As the Leprechauns say: "It’s the pot of gold at the end of me rainbow" pot of gold = piss What morons run science in this day. You peoples need to THINK!! BTW, in case you didn’t know, e=mc^2 was NOT needed to split the atom. |
Isaac Brock died for us User ID: 552558 Canada 11/29/2008 07:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 561563 Australia 11/29/2008 08:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, kinetic energy ke = 1/2 x mv^2 All energy is equivalent, so ke = e => m x 1/2v^2 = m x c^2 => v = sqrt(2) x c = 1.414 x c => the velocity of matter is permanently equal to the velocity of two light beams travelling at right angles to each other. Matter is trapped light! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 561129 United Kingdom 11/29/2008 08:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, kinetic energy ke = 1/2 x mv^2 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 561563All energy is equivalent, so ke = e => m x 1/2v^2 = m x c^2 => v = sqrt(2) x c = 1.414 x c => the velocity of matter is permanently equal to the velocity of two light beams travelling at right angles to each other. Matter is trapped light! Methane is trapped wind! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 560992 Belarus 11/29/2008 08:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, kinetic energy ke = 1/2 x mv^2 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 561129All energy is equivalent, so ke = e => m x 1/2v^2 = m x c^2 => v = sqrt(2) x c = 1.414 x c => the velocity of matter is permanently equal to the velocity of two light beams travelling at right angles to each other. Matter is trapped light! Methane is trapped wind! I have seen a vision that we can create solid things from light. That we had some kind of machines that were shining things into existance. Possibly you are one step closer to practical realization. |
Treasure Bound User ID: 520207 United States 11/29/2008 09:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, kinetic energy ke = 1/2 x mv^2 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 561563All energy is equivalent, so ke = e => m x 1/2v^2 = m x c^2 => v = sqrt(2) x c = 1.414 x c => the velocity of matter is permanently equal to the velocity of two light beams travelling at right angles to each other. Matter is trapped light! okay I like that analogy......(much better than the piss one!)....... "We don't inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children"--Native-American proverb People were created to be loved while things were created to be used. The reason the world is in chaos is that, things are being loved and people are being used :Treasures122: In Solidarity with Janey [link to i25.photobucket.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 539102 United States 11/29/2008 09:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, kinetic energy ke = 1/2 x mv^2 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 560992All energy is equivalent, so ke = e => m x 1/2v^2 = m x c^2 => v = sqrt(2) x c = 1.414 x c => the velocity of matter is permanently equal to the velocity of two light beams travelling at right angles to each other. Matter is trapped light! Methane is trapped wind! I have seen a vision that we can create solid things from light. That we had some kind of machines that were shining things into existance. Possibly you are one step closer to practical realization. that would be the "god particle" that the lhc is trying to prove to exist. it is the particle that creates matter. lhc = Large Hadron Collider |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 539102 United States 11/29/2008 09:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, kinetic energy ke = 1/2 x mv^2 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 539102All energy is equivalent, so ke = e => m x 1/2v^2 = m x c^2 => v = sqrt(2) x c = 1.414 x c => the velocity of matter is permanently equal to the velocity of two light beams travelling at right angles to each other. Matter is trapped light! Methane is trapped wind! I have seen a vision that we can create solid things from light. That we had some kind of machines that were shining things into existance. Possibly you are one step closer to practical realization. that would be the "god particle" that the lhc is trying to prove to exist. it is the particle that creates matter. lhc = Large Hadron Collider i forgot to add this link to the comment above: [link to en.wikipedia.org] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 561459 United States 11/29/2008 08:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 553993 Canada 11/29/2008 08:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 561931 Australia 11/29/2008 08:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Please guys... this pseudo-physics is almost as bad as "Null Physics". I am a post-grad in Mathematical Physics, so I have to call... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 553993If you're such an expert, tell us what an electron is. How does it work? What is it made of? You don't know do you... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 553993 Canada 11/29/2008 08:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Please guys... this pseudo-physics is almost as bad as "Null Physics". I am a post-grad in Mathematical Physics, so I have to call... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 561931If you're such an expert, tell us what an electron is. How does it work? What is it made of? You don't know do you... Actually, that is my current research topic. Naturally I can't go into the details, as the papers are not yet ready for publishing. Ask about any other phenomenon and I will provide you with a sound opinion as long as it does not infringe upon the agreements I work under. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 553993 Canada 11/29/2008 08:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 559687 United States 11/29/2008 08:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 561931 Australia 11/29/2008 08:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, kinetic energy ke = 1/2 x mv^2 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 561563All energy is equivalent, so ke = e => m x 1/2v^2 = m x c^2 => v = sqrt(2) x c = 1.414 x c => the velocity of matter is permanently equal to the velocity of two light beams travelling at right angles to each other. Matter is trapped light! This is correct. For example, if you put an electron and a positron in contact, they annihilate each other and the result is two pure photons - light! Scientists have recently forced photons together to create exactly one electron and one positron as a result. i.e. the process IS reversible. Therefore, it is logical to conclude that electrons, positrons and photons are all comprised of two OBJECTS (what they are I don't know.) Assume there are sub-electron sized particles called A and B that combine to form electrons, positrons and photons. For example, an electron is A-A, a positron is B-B and a photon is A-B. => A-A + B-B can be converted into A-B & A-B and vice-verca. If A and B particles always travel at the speed of light, then a matched pair as in an electron will circulate around each other but always will be travelling at right angles. Using pythagorus theorum, speed = sqrt(c^2 + c^2) = 1.414 c^2. The maths looks good to me. Why wouldn't all energy be kinetic energy - even at the subatomic level? |
Police User ID: 548795 United States 11/29/2008 08:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 561931 Australia 11/29/2008 08:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 548795 United States 11/29/2008 08:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 553993 Canada 11/29/2008 08:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, kinetic energy ke = 1/2 x mv^2 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 561931All energy is equivalent, so ke = e => m x 1/2v^2 = m x c^2 => v = sqrt(2) x c = 1.414 x c => the velocity of matter is permanently equal to the velocity of two light beams travelling at right angles to each other. Matter is trapped light! This is correct. For example, if you put an electron and a positron in contact, they annihilate each other and the result is two pure photons - light! Scientists have recently forced photons together to create exactly one electron and one positron as a result. i.e. the process IS reversible. Therefore, it is logical to conclude that electrons, positrons and photons are all comprised of two OBJECTS (what they are I don't know.) Assume there are sub-electron sized particles called A and B that combine to form electrons, positrons and photons. For example, an electron is A-A, a positron is B-B and a photon is A-B. => A-A + B-B can be converted into A-B & A-B and vice-verca. If A and B particles always travel at the speed of light, then a matched pair as in an electron will circulate around each other but always will be travelling at right angles. Using pythagorus theorum, speed = sqrt(c^2 + c^2) = 1.414 c^2. The maths looks good to me. Why wouldn't all energy be kinetic energy - even at the subatomic level? Your statement is misleading. Consider what kinetic energy is: Surely you understand that classically it is defined by mass and speed? This is not so quantum mechanically. Mass is a sub-domain of GR (General Relativity) and thus you cannot impregnate QM with a concept wherein we have no unified field, which is the underlying problem. Mass, energy, curved space -> GR! Yes, there are certain particle pair interactions. This does us no good until we have defined the particle structure accurately. This is why we must rely on mathematics for a suitable analysis - the logic of math does not lie. |
Lemoning User ID: 561898 United Kingdom 11/29/2008 08:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | area formula of a circle : a = pr^2 Quoting: Shoemaker IIEinstein BS : e = mc^2 Funny how these are so much alike, identical in basic structure… Why? because light is not linear!! Light "streams" like water, or more specifically: like piss. Yellow and blue make green - that is the facts o' the ring!! For you math persons: factoring. Look at a spectrum. Why do Jews circumcise the males? To show them the true nature of light, and how to understand it. Why else would they cut part of their dicks off? Light is like a "hoop and stick", light moves in all directions, in a forward motion. As the Leprechauns say: "It’s the pot of gold at the end of me rainbow" pot of gold = piss What morons run science in this day. You peoples need to THINK!! BTW, in case you didn’t know, e=mc^2 was NOT needed to split the atom. OK. I've read some weird stuff on this site, but this is one of the most bizarre. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 561459 United States 11/29/2008 09:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 561459 United States 11/29/2008 09:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Actually, that is my current research topic. Naturally I can't go into the details, as the papers are not yet ready for publishing. Ask about any other phenomenon and I will provide you with a sound opinion as long as it does not infringe upon the agreements I work under. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 553993Since when did truth "infringe upon agreements" You "knowledge for sale" simpletons can stick it!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 561931 Australia 11/29/2008 09:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, kinetic energy ke = 1/2 x mv^2 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 553993Your statement is misleading. Consider what kinetic energy is: Surely you understand that classically it is defined by mass and speed? This is not so quantum mechanically. Mass is a sub-domain of GR (General Relativity) and thus you cannot impregnate QM with a concept wherein we have no unified field, which is the underlying problem. Mass, energy, curved space -> GR! Yes, there are certain particle pair interactions. This does us no good until we have defined the particle structure accurately. This is why we must rely on mathematics for a suitable analysis - the logic of math does not lie. Mass is interchangable with energy right? Electrons have mass, so must also have classical kinetic energy when they move. But if that electron is buzzing around an atom or a circuit, then relative to that atom or circuit, there is no net kinetic energy. And yet within it there is. The mass is proportional to the amount of kinetic energy within the macro object. All energy is actually kinetic energy. Mass is an illusion caused by inertia - and an invalid, though predictably very successful mathematical model such as GR. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 553433 United States 11/29/2008 09:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 548795 United States 11/29/2008 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 561855 United Arab Emirates 11/29/2008 09:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Please guys... this pseudo-physics is almost as bad as "Null Physics". I am a post-grad in Mathematical Physics, so I have to call... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 561931If you're such an expert, tell us what an electron is. How does it work? What is it made of? You don't know do you... Electrons are clouds of potentiality and are not solid 3D matter. A "choice point" as defined by Hugh Everett, III, a phycist from Princeton is the moment of time where the course of an event may be changed. A choice point occurs when conditions appear that create a path between the present course of events and a new course leading to new outcomes. The choice point is like a bridge making it possible to begin one path and change course to experience the outcome of a new path. Thought, feeling, and emotion are actions which become the attractor for a choice point, allowing the quantum leap from a course of events already underway, to a new course with a different outcome. The spaces (or silence) between the pulses of light (or creation) are the places where we have the opportunity to "jump" from one possibility to the next. This space is where the miracles occur. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 553993 Canada 11/29/2008 09:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Actually, that is my current research topic. Naturally I can't go into the details, as the papers are not yet ready for publishing. Ask about any other phenomenon and I will provide you with a sound opinion as long as it does not infringe upon the agreements I work under. Quoting: Shoemaker IISince when did truth "infringe upon agreements" You "knowledge for sale" simpletons can stick it!! Truth infringes upon agreements if there is a great deal at stake when it is released. I am not saying that this is the case, but such a case would suffice in maintaining secrecy. As for the micro and macro, and what you refer to as inertia - ideally we want to analyze the system as a whole, not separate states of motion. All I was trying to convey is that mass isn't really mass, and energy really isn't energy as per the classical definition. It becomes much more interesting :) |