What the bleep do we know? Down the rabbit hole.

quantum physics is trying to say your imagination affects the real world, it certainly affects perception, but not the real world. for instance if you have a shoebox (with its contents unknown to you), you can imagine anything in the shoebox (it essentially has anything you want it to have, but only in potential land not in realty), but once you open it you will discover the reality of its contents. which won't always be what you imagine. sometimes I meet people thinking they will be douche bags, but they turn out to be kind people. sometimes I meet people expecting them to be nice, but they end up being douchebags. my expectations don't change the person.


Are we killing cats yet?

as we all know schroedinger's cat can only be dead or alive in reality, in equations anything goes.


There have been some interesting experiments.

Bible's older than 2000 years and what's your point?

You should do a thread telling people to read the Bible because that'd be as fresh as this thread.


Oh, leave her alone troll.

quantum physics is trying to say your imagination affects the real world, it certainly affects perception, but not the real world. for instance if you have a shoebox (with its contents unknown to you), you can imagine anything in the shoebox (it essentially has anything you want it to have, but only in potential land not in realty), but once you open it you will discover the reality of its contents. which won't always be what you imagine. sometimes I meet people thinking they will be douche bags, but they turn out to be kind people. sometimes I meet people expecting them to be nice, but they end up being douchebags. my expectations don't change the person.


Are we killing cats yet?

as we all know schroedinger's cat can only be dead or alive in reality, in equations anything goes.


There have been some interesting experiments.

please do tell

Bible's older than 2000 years and what's your point?

You should do a thread telling people to read the Bible because that'd be as fresh as this thread.


Oh, leave her alone troll.


No he can say want he wants .. but I doubt if he can defend his position.

quantum physics is trying to say your imagination affects the real world, it certainly affects perception, but not the real world. for instance if you have a shoebox (with its contents unknown to you), you can imagine anything in the shoebox (it essentially has anything you want it to have, but only in potential land not in realty), but once you open it you will discover the reality of its contents. which won't always be what you imagine. sometimes I meet people thinking they will be douche bags, but they turn out to be kind people. sometimes I meet people expecting them to be nice, but they end up being douchebags. my expectations don't change the person.


Are we killing cats yet?

as we all know schroedinger's cat can only be dead or alive in reality, in equations anything goes.


There have been some interesting experiments.

please do tell


Many are in the movie in question especially in the director's cut.

Quantum Experiments

The Classic

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

And others

[link to physicsworld.com]

[link to physicsworld.com]

Bible's older than 2000 years and what's your point?

You should do a thread telling people to read the Bible because that'd be as fresh as this thread.


Oh, leave her alone troll.


No he can say want he wants .. but I doubt if he can defend his position.


Because he's a troll. Of course something five years old can still be a valid topic of discussion. In fact, sometimes looking back a little gives some real perspective that only reinforces the validity.

I remember when people thought a movie like this was so far out of the realm of possibilities. An oldie but goodie...

when you find a way to entangle cats, call me

Bible's older than 2000 years and what's your point?

You should do a thread telling people to read the Bible because that'd be as fresh as this thread.


Oh, leave her alone troll.

when you find a way to entangle cats, call me


In the Director Cut of the movie there are experiments showing entangled humans.

Maybe they should try it with kittens

Bible's older than 2000 years and what's your point?

You should do a thread telling people to read the Bible because that'd be as fresh as this thread.


Oh, leave her alone troll.


That wasn't being a troll. You should see me when I do that stuff.

I eat lightweights like you for breakfast.

I don't think that it was ok for he/she/it to use that bullshit fest flick as an excuse to bash The Bible because the people who read the Bible are as obnoxious as you are.

The real troll was he/she/it bashing The Bible for no reason other he/she/it felt that way which is fine.

I think that we should all just sit and talk about flakey bullshit movies we saw 5 years ago full of fucktards when there are terrorist attacks, economic problems, and political issues going on.

You wanna see a troll, keep yappin skippy.

The short form of this would be : Fuck you, Jack

Bible's older than 2000 years and what's your point?

You should do a thread telling people to read the Bible because that'd be as fresh as this thread.


Oh, leave her alone troll.


That wasn't being a troll. You should see me when I do that stuff.

I eat lightweights like you for breakfast.

I don't think that it was ok for he/she/it to use that bullshit fest flick as an excuse to bash The Bible because the people who read the Bible are as obnoxious as you are.

The real troll was he/she/it bashing The Bible for no reason other he/she/it felt that way which is fine.

I think that we should all just sit and talk about flakey bullshit movies we saw 5 years ago full of fucktards when there are terrorist attacks, economic problems, and political issues going on.

You wanna see a troll, keep yappin skippy.

The short form of this would be : Fuck you, Jack

[link to physicsworld.com]

I'm to lazy to understand. the truth remain that schroedinger's cat is either dead or alive.

when you find a way to entangle cats, call me


In the Director Cut of the movie there are experiments showing entangled humans.

Maybe they should try it with kittens

how do they do it, give me a link to the director's cut (I accidently wrote cat, haha), I'm interested.

[link to physicsworld.com]

I'm to lazy to understand. the truth remain that schroedinger's cat is either dead or alive.


I thought this was an interesting article..


Aug 1, 2000

New life for Schrödinger's cat

The observation of quantum superpositions of distinct macroscopic states by groups at Stony Brook and Delft represents a milestone in experimental quantum physics. Both teams have reported spectroscopic evidence for currents of microamps flowing through a superconducting ring in opposite directions at the same time

When the formalism of quantum mechanics is applied to experiments involving microscopic objects such as electrons, we often find that the resulting description assigns finite probability amplitudes to two, or more, possibilities that appear to be mutually exclusive. In the classic Young's double-slit experiment, for example, these possibilities are the passage of an electron through either the left- or right-hand slit.

According to most interpretations of quantum mechanics, we cannot say that any given electron goes through one slit or the other: to explain the interference patterns observed in double-slit experiments it appears that each electron must leave its options open until it is "observed", at which point it always chooses one possibility (i.e. a particular slit) or the other.

the rest here

 [link to physicsworld.com] 

Thanks for that movie from 4-5 years ago.

You're so cutting edge


Yes it's a few years old but it is still valid ... Look at people who live their whole lives based on a 2,000 book.

Bible's older than 2000 years and what's your point?

You should do a thread telling people to read the Bible because that'd be as fresh as this thread.


Oh, leave her alone troll.


That wasn't being a troll. You should see me when I do that stuff.

I eat lightweights like you for breakfast.

I don't think that it was ok for he/she/it to use that bullshit fest flick as an excuse to bash The Bible because the people who read the Bible are as obnoxious as you are.

The real troll was he/she/it bashing The Bible for no reason other he/she/it felt that way which is fine.

I think that we should all just sit and talk about flakey bullshit movies we saw 5 years ago full of fucktards when there are terrorist attacks, economic problems, and political issues going on.

You wanna see a troll, keep yappin skippy.

The short form of this would be : Fuck you, Jack

Thanks for that movie from 4-5 years ago.

You're so cutting edge


Yes it's a few years old but it is still valid ... Look at people who live their whole lives based on a 2,000 book.


What '2000' year old book did you mean? Was it Julia Child?

Watched the movie twice when i first found it but after continued study of various subjects and theories, I re-watched and it just didn't gel with me as it had the first time round...
some books i liked and still do that ya'll should check out

'The Elegant Universe' by Brian Greene. Book is excellent, movie is great too [i prefere words and my own imagination].

He gives a good crash-course on Q-mechanics/physics and touches on string and m theory. Lots of good interviews in the movies, one with Mr M Theory himself Ed Witten. Very thought provoking and a good grounder for those wishing to learn who don't want to jump right into the Meta pool.

Anything by Fred Alan Wolf [from What the bleep]

Asmat Goswami [sic?] explores Q with a more Eastern approach but from a Western perspective [if that makes sense?].

'The Elegant Universe' by Brian Greene. Book is excellent, movie is great too [i prefere words and my own imagination].

He gives a good crash-course on Q-mechanics/physics and touches on string and m theory. Lots of good interviews in the movies, one with Mr M Theory himself Ed Witten. Very thought provoking and a good grounder for those wishing to learn who don't want to jump right into the Meta pool.

Anything by Fred Alan Wolf [from What the bleep]

Asmat Goswami [sic?] explores Q with a more Eastern approach but from a Western perspective [if that makes sense?].

I found this killer link [link to www.asa3.org]
that disproves the movies claims

The at least try to download the movie, only an hour and a bit. Sorry i don't have a link, after sending my computer to be fixed it came back with no sound, so i haven't seen a youtube in a year.

But def. try to track down the movie and if you see the book, grab it and shelve it for later. He has a unique writing style that both accomadates the iniate to the micro-realm and those that are versed and broadening there theory base.
Seeking Truth

'The Elegant Universe' by Brian Greene. Book is excellent, movie is great too [i prefere words and my own imagination].

He gives a good crash-course on Q-mechanics/physics and touches on string and m theory. Lots of good interviews in the movies, one with Mr M Theory himself Ed Witten. Very thought provoking and a good grounder for those wishing to learn who don't want to jump right into the Meta pool.

Anything by Fred Alan Wolf [from What the bleep]

Asmat Goswami [sic?] explores Q with a more Eastern approach but from a Western perspective [if that makes sense?].

i thought Nova did a FANTASTIC job with thier presentation of ELegant Universe!! ;-)

Thank You again!