It's a basic problem in hoax-ville. A bad idea can be expressed in four words. To explain why it isn't so takes thousands.

(In large part, because the wrong idea is also based on misapprehensions of basic science -- so before you even start explaining how a certain engine burn actually worked, you have to explain GRAVITY. You end up with a fifteen-page lecture on elementary optics before you and the hoax-pusher are even in the same room and ready to discuss the "anomalies" in a photograph.)

The same thing happens all over hoax-ville.

When you talk to the Creotards, all they have to say is "Show me the 'missing link' between dinosaur and bird." To answer their "simple" question you have to provide detailed anatomical linkages between a hundred-odd species.

Which they will usually reject.

In fact, that's the true sorrow of this sort of debate. Which is that the OP in most of these threads isn't interested in discussion. He's made up his mind and wants everyone reading to applaud his intelligence and integrity. So if anyone actually takes the challenge he offers, he will duck away. And a few days later, on some OTHER thread, there's the OP again...only this time he's claiming "And no-one has ever tried to answer my questions!"