The United States Is Already Dead, and Just Doesn’t Know It! The Late Great United States: The Decline and Fall of the United States of America

dang, this place ain't been around long enough to call a "great civilisation"...

We seem alive to me.

.....intelligence in the mind of the average American.....
is just about non-existent.

When was the last time you had an intelligent conversation with an American?

Looks like death to me.

I have intelligent conversations all the time with Americans. You might just be talking with the wrong ones.

And there will be one last big death rattle as it goes down which will shake the whole world to pieces!

The world will recover but the States won't!

You obviously haven't gotten the pink slip and foreclosure notice yet. Too, too, too many people have gotten these, and continue to get them, and it's hard to "pull oneself up by the bootstraps" when jobs are so scarce that over a hundred people, some on their knees, show up to beg for a job at a garbage dump in Tampa. And small businesses are failing because people are only buying essentials. And it's only getting worse.

At least people are still coming to see the doctor :)

and where do your checks come from navy man? if your collecting military checks then your living off tax payer money, that money is about to become worthless. 1/3 of all americas are like navy man, living off the coattails of the tax payer. they are the ones who are most clueless.

The economic collapse 2009

[link to www.youtube.com]

I have tears in my eyes...

I've been waiting for a global depression for sooooo long....is it finally happening?

Will the system break down in mans mind with it?

Will we be dependent on cooperation again?

Will the people in the streets see eachother again?

Do you recognise me again?

Yes, it's me...i am also here...how are you doing, we were living together for years, and we havent spoken for so long, what happened to us?

the world will move on.. mexicans will be affected.

But it will takes several yrs for it to pan out as
Rome wasn't destroyed in one day.

gut shot

I am American and I can clearly state that this is true.
America is indeed dead, stupid, fat, sick, drugged, too busy being entertained, consumer focused, greedy, superficial, swallowers of mass mind control and propaganda, indifferent towards the suffering of others, ignorant of real politics and other countries.
America has been dead for a long time and we have always chose to look the other way as people died and we expanded our massive global empire. All of this empire was built upon greed and death and we have been just fine with all that as long as the cable TV was working, the cell phone was paid and the fast food was just down the street.

Americans are not aware of the massive lies they are told daily because they simply do not care enough to know.
VERY SAD!

wonder what the rest of the world will do without computer chips and software>?

shhh... don't tell anyone about austin texas...

SHHHHH

What a dumbass!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We are still number 1.

I always find it interesting how people try to say other countries or even their own country is dead and ya da...the thing is...IT IS THE WORLD...some same we have little time left..focus on what you can do and make the world a little better from within and around you through those you love or know.

Stop worrying about your country and other countries...focus.

Whoa! That's some radically politically incorrect reading, thanxx for posting it.

It would be very nice if Joseph George Caldwell was wrong, but alas, I'm afraid he's not.

Quote:
Cultural and Political Change in America; Comparison to Israel and South Africa

After decades of being taught that any one culture is just as good as another, Americans have come to believe this. They have been taught that one person, family, tribe or race is no better than any other. Why, then, should one stand up for this culture or country? Americans have lost their self-esteem, sense of purpose and sense of destiny. They have lost pride in the principles, values and accomplishments of their ancestors; the only pride that remains is false, hollow, jingoistic pride. They have lost faith in their leaders, who have abandoned them in favor of the wealthy elite. They see that the US government is no longer “of, by, and for the people,” but now functions mainly for the wealthy elite. Through their policies of mass immigration, massive international free trade and open borders, the country’s leaders have severely diminished the quality of life for the US middle class. The government has emasculated its middle class – it has diminishing freedom, and is a slave to the economy and to debt. The US middle class is filled with fear and doubt about the future. It has lost its confidence and spirit.

It is instructive to compare the situation of present-day America with respect to sense of purpose and destiny to the experiences of two other recent countries – Israel and South Africa. Our children are taught that the annihilation of the Indians was a moral disgrace, and that Andrew Jackson was a brutal promoter of genocide. Israeli children are taught of the endless genocides committed by their ancestors in the Old Testament (Torah) as being religious duties demanded by God. Do you think that Israeli children of today are taught that the takeover and ethnic cleansing of Palestine by their grandparents, the Ashkenazim, was a shameful, moral sin? Or, quite the contrary, that it is their God-given moral right and destiny to possess the Holy Land? Our children are taught that the enslavement of Africans by our ancestors was a moral sin. Our forebears, who brought slavery to the New World, were in fact far more moral than we of today. Slavery is promoted and sustained by economics, not by morality – many of the country’s founders were aware of the moral toll that slavery takes on the owners, and freed their slaves (but only after they were wealthy and old). Quite independently of these acts of individual morality, however, slavery died as a large-scale system because the industrial revolution made it economically unattractive. The moral crusades of people like William Wilberforce could only achieve fruition when the economic conditions were “right.” Slavery still thrives in poor places in Africa, and it will return to the planet when fossil fuels disappear. And, to the dismay of some, it will largely be race-based – the Romans found that it is not practical to have slaves of the same race as the masters.

The following excerpt from Milton Meltzer’s Slavery: A World History (1993) describes the economic basis for slavery in further detail.

“C.L.R. James, in his history of the San Domingo Revolution, asserts that the truth about British abolition was long obscured by scholars pandering to national vanity. Britain was moved less by idealism than by national self-interest, he says. Like James, historian Eric Williams, of Trinidad, holds that Prime Minister William Pitt wanted to abolish the slave trade as a means of ruining the prosperity of San Domingo, the French sugar colony so dependent for labor upon British slave traders. Britain could then recapture the European market with the help of sugar from India. Despite the fact that English idealists such as William Wilberforce and Thomas Clarkson attacked the slave trade on the basis of inhumanity, behind them were merchants and manufacturers who no longer cared what happened to the planters of the West Indies and North America. They had poured the profits of the slave trade into new industries: their economic needs had changed. They were not concerned about finding African slaves because they wanted labor for their factories at home and had to find it inside Great Britain.

“So although colonial planters feared that abolition would ruin them, the new industrial leaders of England didn't care. They and their politicians were ready to listen when the abolitionists massed the popular voice in condemnation of the slave trade. If the political and industrial leaders could suppress the trade, it would allow a broader and more legitimate commerce to develop between Europe and Africa, providing markets for England's young industries. An international movement against the trade had already begun with Danish action in 1804. The Americans made it illegal in 1808, the Dutch in 1814, and the French in 1815. Almost all the maritime powers moved into line eventually, so that by 1842 the Atlantic slave trade was legally dead.

“Legally dead. Good had triumphed over evil with a major assist from business and government, but it was a paper victory….”

The Ashkenazim know how to conquer a country and keep it. They have read their Machiavelli well. In 1948 they launched an intensive program of ethnic cleansing to remove Palestinians from what had been their country. After winning the war against the Arabs in 1948, they adopted a policy of flooding their newly conquered land (now Israel, no longer Palestine) with Jews from around the world – one of Machiavelli’s three ways of keeping and administering a conquered territory. (More specifically, they flooded the country with one million European Jews from Russia, to overwhelm not just the Palestinian Arabs, but the Palestinian Jews as well.) They set up concentration camps into which the former owners of the land – the Palestinians – were herded, just as the United States set up “reservations” for the Indians whom they had dispossessed of their land. The Americans set up reservations for the Indians in the 1800s, and the Askhenazim set up reservations for the dispossessed Palestinians in the mid-1900s.

The successes of the US and the Israelis in conquering a land and assuming control of it is in stark contrast to the experience of the South Africans. White settlers (mainly Dutch and British) conquered what is now South Africa several hundred years ago. With the explosive growth of the black population in the 1900s, the South Africans attempted to set up “homelands” for the blacks in their conquered territory, but they failed. The principal reason for this failure was timing – they tried to do this in the late 1900s, when the world had become too squeamish about this sort of thing. The last country to set up and maintain concentration camps and a system of apartheid was and is Israel, and it is able to do so only because it has the full support of the United States (in the US view, only whites can be racist – it had a problem with South African whites over blacks, but not with European Ashkenazim or Jewish Semites over Arab Semites). The blacks of South Africa garnered world opinion against this, and it became impossible to implement. Unlike the Israelis, who obtained the full support of the US for their program of apartheid, the South Africans failed to garner support from any prominent world power for their program of apartheid, and it collapsed. Their failure is really rather remarkable, inasmuch as the Dutch conquered South Africa several hundred years ago, whereas the Israelis were successful in implementing such a system at about the same time (the mid-1900s) in a land that they had just conquered (in 1948). The South Africans simply made their move too late and, unlike the Israelis, they did not develop and execute an effective plan for doing so (e.g., assumption of control of US culture). The Ashkenazim conquered Palestine in 1948 and promptly set about moving the Palestinians to the occupied territories of West Bank and Gaza. They elicited US support, gained via a takeover of US culture (accomplished through the Immigration Act of 1965). The South Africans were as disorganized as the Arabs, and so they lost the country that they had conquered and lived in for four hundred years. If you want to hold onto your country, you had better read Machiavelli and see how to do it. The importance of having a powerful ally, such as the US, cannot be underestimated. Many nations in Africa maintain racist societies today (e.g., Malawi, Zimbabwe, Liberia) with the blessing of the US (South Africa notably not included, since in US eyes only whites can be racist – it is not terribly concerned when blacks enslave blacks or Semites enslave Semites).

American schoolchildren are taught that we should apologize for slaughtering the Indians and taking their land and putting them on reservations. They are taught that we should apologize to current-day blacks for our ancestors’ enslaving their African ancestors. Do you think that Israeli schoolchildren are told that they should apologize for stealing the Palestinians’ land and herding them into reservations (Gaza and the West Bank), and return the Holy Land to them? No way! They are taught that the Holy Land is their rightful homeland. They are taught that it is their manifest destiny to own Israel, just as American schoolchildren were taught in the nineteenth century that it was their manifest destiny to own America. The Ashkenazim taught that their religion gives them a right to the land. Although they had no ancestral or historical links to the Biblical Jews of the Holy Land, they have created a myth that they are the rightful descendents. They have commingled the political movement of Zionism (to create Israel out of Palestine) with the religion of Judaism. They have created and nurtured the legend of the Jewish Holocaust. They have committed acts of terrorism to draw attention to their cause (I once lived on Hassan Sabry Street in Zamalek, the site of one such action). They have assassinated their enemies around the world. They have managed the press and other media so that criticism of Israel is equated to anti-Semitism, to racism, to bigotry. They have corrupted US culture, through decades of films, books and magazines that depict a dissolute US white culture. Through a century of diligent planning and action, they have taken over the United States and made it a client state of Israel. They have worked hard to conquer Palestine and keep it. They will succeed, because they have the will and because they are doing what has to be done. They are taking steps to preserve their culture, and to retain possession of Palestine. They will endure. The white South Africans and the white Americans will not.

The Israelis, Ashkenazim and Jews of today promote and practice blatant racism – but only for themselves. They discourage Jews from intermarrying with nonJews (when I use “they” here, obviously I am not referring to any or every single individual of the groups, but to typical group characteristics). They restrict citizenship in Israel to Jews. They took over Palestine and adamantly refuse to give it up. They flooded the conquered Palestinian territory with Jews from around the world. They herded Palestinians into concentration camps and set up a rigid system of apartheid. The world calls on them to desist, but they thumb their nose at the rest of the world. They waged a century-long campaign to take over American culture (principal tool: assert that restrictive immigration practices are racist – for the US, not for Israel!) and make America their client state, to funnel massive wealth to their new country and to protect them from their much larger and wealthier adversaries. They have commingled and coalesced the political movement of Zionism with the religion of Judaism, to make it difficult for critics to protest their political ambitions and actions without seeming to attack the Judaic religion. They charge critics of Israel with being racist (anti-Semitic). They endlessly promote their losses in World War II as a major world genocide (the Jewish “Holocaust”). How do they get by with this? Through belief in their cause – that it is ordained (or, at least, blessed) by God. Through diligence and hard work. Through following the dictums of Machiavelli. They set their objectives, they planned their program, they worked hard and long, and they achieved their objectives. They have done all of the things listed in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion forgery, and no one can stop them.

The Afrikaners did and tried to do some of these same things. They conquered (along with the British) southern Africa several hundred years ago, immigrated in large numbers, and for a time took control of the territory. For a while, the Afrikaners followed Machiavelli’s principles (and scriptures of the Bible, which are very big on genocidal wars of conquest), but then they abandoned them. They set up a system of apartheid and tried to maintain it. They moved to restrict the native Africans to homelands. When today’s multicultural world criticized them as being racist and embargoed them, however, they lost their will, abandoned their effort, and promptly lost their country. What did the Israelis have that the South Africans lacked? How can the Israelis get by with blatant racism and the South Africans could not? Why was the United States successful in destroying Indian culture, annihilating the Indian race, rounding up the few survivors into concentration camps (“reservations”) and enslaving millions of blacks, when the South Africans were unsuccessful in accomplishing similar (or even less extreme) things, even on a smaller scale? The difference is really very simple. The US and the Israelis had a belief in a “manifest destiny.” They had faith in their cause. They believed that God was on their side. They believed their Bible, and made very effective use of religion as a political tool. The South Africans were and are religious, but somewhere along the way they lost the belief that they were chosen by God to rule. They came to believe that the blacks, not they, were entitled to control South Africa. Like Peter on the Sea of Galilee, they lost faith and they lost their cause.

In Plato’s time, there was no distinction between the state and religion. Since that time, religion has served mainly as the handmaiden of the state – to justify the state (e.g., divine right of kings), to justify its actions, and to keep the people under control. World empires, such as the British, the French, and the Spanish used religion to justify their global conquests. In Biblical times, the Jews used religion to justify their takeover of the Holy Land and genocide of the previous residents. Although very religious, white South Africans did not make effective use of their religion in furthering their cause of retaining the Republic of South Africa under their control.

In his Apocalypse (1931), D. H. Lawrence wrote, “Pure Christianity anyhow cannot fit a nation, or society at large. The Great War made it obvious. It can only fit individuals. The collective whole must have some other inspiration.” It is because the tenets of Christianity and some other religions apply only to individuals and not to states that most states insist on separation of church and state. The white South Africans of the twentieth century forgot this, and promptly lost the country that their forebears bequeathed to them. The Israelis do not have a problem with this, because they have carefully intertwined their religion and the state. Their Torah (the first five books of Christianity’s Old Testament) teaches that God demands that they slaughter their enemies and possess the Holy Land. Today’s white South Africans are praying for their oppressors and for a multicultural Rainbow Nation, when, if they want their country back, they should be praying for their own victory.

In taking over American culture, a key goal of Jewish interests was assuming control of the press. The US media are now largely controlled by Jewish interests. This is one reason why Jewish “excesses” are underreported, and those of others are emphasized. The prime example of this is reporting on the Israel / Palestine conflict. Another egregious example is the case of South Africa. While South Africa was ruled by whites, there was endless reporting of incidents to show whites in a bad light. Under black rule, horrific murders are committed on a continuing basis by South African blacks against South African white farmers, and there is rarely a murmur about this in the US press. Far more South African whites have been killed by blacks since the onset of black rule in South Africa than blacks were killed by whites under white rule. This fact is of no significance or interest to the Jewish-controlled US media. US media reporting emphasizes reporting and entertainment that disparages, denigrates and weakens traditional US culture and the white race (it may be reasoned that the Ashkenazim are European, and therefore “white,” so this may seem a little strange). Only whites can be racist. (For more on the influence of Jewish interests on the US media, see John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt’s The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy (2007).)

watch this vid!

Just cause the yehudis are moving out of US doen't mean it will collapse.

Think Bizantine.

The way I see it, the U.S. is morphing into the NWO's agenda of having a united North American region. If you look at the past legislation like NAFTA and GATT, you can see the hand writing on the wall. Also, all the so called North American Union (NAU) and Amero currency talk that has gone on in certain political discussions seems to point to such a scenario. I don't think it is out of the realm of possibility that such a thing could occur. If you look at what happened to Europe with the European Union and the Euro currency that transpired, it isn't so far fetched for that to happen here with Canada, U.S. and Mexico.