Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,225 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 313,118
Pageviews Today: 794,370Threads Today: 342Posts Today: 7,538
11:06 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Terrorism, Sedition, and Treason: Why Child Support Enforcement laws are anti-American and an act of Terrorism against Americans

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 574150
United States
12/19/2008 09:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Terrorism, Sedition, and Treason: Why Child Support Enforcement laws are anti-American and an act of Terrorism against Americans
[link to famguardian.org]

Terrorism, Sedition, and Treason:

Why Child Support Enforcement laws are anti-American and an act of Terrorism against Americans


written by: Bruce Eden, Constitutional Rights Director, Fathers Rights Association of New Jersey & Mid-Atlantic Region



Communism is alive and well and it runs the United States of Amerika. I have been involved in the research of child support and welfare reform for years and have researched a number of very astute scientists, economists, psychologists, legal professionals, politicians and many others.

Irwin Garfinkle's paper, "Sweden's Child Support System" (1982) is the current model for the state of Wisconsin which has been emulated by a large number of states in the U.S. However, economics experts studying this field of child support have found that is indeed not from Sweden, but in actuality from the former Soviet Union. Though we can learn from other systems, the transplantation of any foreign social program into the U.S. is fraught with danger. We have our own Constitution and a different relationship between government and private economy. It is nonsensical to transplant social programs outside the political and economic context in which they develop because this inevitably leads to treason and sedition and the overthrow of our government by internal forces.

U.S. child support reforms are based on the Soviet model, Article 81 of the The Russian Family Code, adopted in 1995. Its use was and is promoted in the United States by Irwin Garfinkel as part of a suite of Communist policy which became known to us as "The Wisconsin Model" because it involves the income shares approach--how much each parent makes determines how much child support is paid; rather than the true cost of raising children. As the Communist Manifesto says: "Each according to ability; each according to his needs". Our child support system was conceived and implemented as part of the former Communist way of doing things.

We can start by recognizing that the "percentage of income" formula comes directly from the Russian law books. The Russians used 25% for one child, 30% for two, and 35% for 3 or more. Sound familiar? This must have made sense in a country where most everyone was poor, prices were controlled by the government, and the transfer of "wealth" was the most important fundamental ideal of the oppressive regime's entire economic system. The Income shares model developed by Robert Williams, of Policy Institute, Inc. fame, mimics the "percentage of income" formula to a significant extent.

Russian fathers pay the amount prescribed by the formula. That's it. There are no deviations; there are no exceptions; there is no consideration of individual circumstances (i.e., involuntary loss of employment due to economic downturn, downsizing, outsizing, ageism, etc., disability, illness, underemployment and unemployment, and even death); and there is no excuse for non-payment. Most payments in the Russian system are taken directly by the government. They are all processed by the central bureaucracy. The bureaucracy doesn't care about "special circumstances". There was no "individual" in Soviet society--only compliance. Those who found, or even look for, a way to avoid compliance in the Russian child support system could get jail, credit problems, exclusion from work, loss of rights (to the extent they had any), and loss of government benefits. Sound strikingly familiar? Debtor's prison for CIVIL child support debt in violation of Fourth Amendment since there's no probable cause a crime was committed to arrest and jail someone in a CIVIL matter; prohibitions against imprisonment for debt; ruination of credit; suspension of driver's licenses, professional licenses, hunting and fishing licenses; seizure of Social Security Disability benefits and retirement benefits (I know firsthand since I am disabled and they left me below the regional poverty line after garnishing my Social Security Disability benefits without a trial); denial of visitation rights without any enforcement of court orders for same; jailed for extended periods of time causing loss of employment due to no fault of self because of inability to comply with excessively high support orders leaving people unable to fend for themselves.






Bruce Eden, Constitutional Rights Director, Fathers Rights Association of New Jersey & Mid-Atlantic Region

Last Edited by Account Deleted by User on 11/20/2012 10:48 PM
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 574150
United States
12/19/2008 09:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Terrorism, Sedition, and Treason: Why Child Support Enforcement laws are anti-American and an act of Terrorism against Americans
[link to famguardian.org]



Holy Matrimony vs. Marriage



Holy Matrimony vs. Marriage discuses the difference between an Ecclesiastical ceremony, with no legal significance, and that legally binding covenant with the state called Marriage.


There are many ways in which a legal system increases its limited authority but it is most complete through the consent of the individual. In China they have "the one child contract." If you sign it, you will become eligible for many of the benefits offered by the government, such as free medical care, schooling and better paying jobs. If later the mother becomes pregnant and refuses to abort the child the family becomes responsible for paying for all the expense of the second child, paying back all the benefits they received for the first child and often suffer the loss of their present employed position and pay scale. In America the pressure to abort a child is often much more subtle.



continued...



"Each child belongs to the state."25

The state can and will always consider itself a party in a civil marriage performed by its officers in accordance with the duties and obligations imposed by the permitting authority, but it has no jurisdictional authority over the natural matrimony by "divine will" between two free and natural individuals. It is the previous connecting contractual commitments to the legal society that bind a person's obedience to the commands of that legal society.

Note, that a "common law marriage" is simply when the state assumes and recognizes what did appear at first to be a "Husband and Wife" relationship At Law to be in fact a solemnized civil marriage of husband and wife and state in equity.


continued...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 573181
United States
12/19/2008 09:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Terrorism, Sedition, and Treason: Why Child Support Enforcement laws are anti-American and an act of Terrorism against Americans
cough up the coin deadbeat.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 537220
United States
12/19/2008 10:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Terrorism, Sedition, and Treason: Why Child Support Enforcement laws are anti-American and an act of Terrorism against Americans
I pay and live on $200/week. Everything in the OP's article is true, except he didn't mention one thing; there is no enforcement of how child support monies are spent. WHile I live in a two room spread, my ex spends all that dough on vacations, newer cars, moving from location to location at whim, etc.

Must be nice for the govt to create such a fair and balanced policy for us paying dads.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 574150
United States
12/19/2008 10:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Terrorism, Sedition, and Treason: Why Child Support Enforcement laws are anti-American and an act of Terrorism against Americans
I pay and live on $200/week. Everything in the OP's article is true, except he didn't mention one thing; there is no enforcement of how child support monies are spent. WHile I live in a two room spread, my ex spends all that dough on vacations, newer cars, moving from location to location at whim, etc.

Must be nice for the govt to create such a fair and balanced policy for us paying dads.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 537220



hang in there, bro

God is going to soon destroy this filthy satanic feminist country
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 537220
United States
12/19/2008 10:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Terrorism, Sedition, and Treason: Why Child Support Enforcement laws are anti-American and an act of Terrorism against Americans
I pay and live on $200/week. Everything in the OP's article is true, except he didn't mention one thing; there is no enforcement of how child support monies are spent. WHile I live in a two room spread, my ex spends all that dough on vacations, newer cars, moving from location to location at whim, etc.

Must be nice for the govt to create such a fair and balanced policy for us paying dads.



hang in there, bro

God is going to soon destroy this filthy satanic feminist country
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 574150


I know........that's why I watch all the shit going down in amazement. It's like God is setting everyone else up for one big child support payment.





GLP