Moon Landing Hoax Apollo 17 : Astronaut Says Pre-Scripted One-Liners About Disney's Fake Dog Rock

:persistfai:

Speaking entirely from an engineer's perspective...there is virtually NOTHING valid about NASA's "official" moon landing position.

99+% of engineers have just come to accept the hoax, as there is nothing anyone can do about it.

Speaking entirely from an engineer's perspective...there is virtually NOTHING valid about NASA's "official" moon landing position.

99+% of engineers have just come to accept the hoax, as there is nothing anyone can do about it.



nah i went to wal-mart and bought a telescope made in china

I can see the flag on the moon now

Speaking entirely from an engineer's perspective...there is virtually NOTHING valid about NASA's "official" moon landing position.

99+% of engineers have just come to accept the hoax, as there is nothing anyone can do about it.

Speaking entirely from an engineer's perspective...there is virtually NOTHING valid about NASA's "official" moon landing position.

99+% of engineers have just come to accept the hoax, as there is nothing anyone can do about it.

[japan have been the recently too, the japanese even sent back pictures of hte american land site,

No, they have not.

Actually they did, but not at a resolution capable of seeing the descent stages or the rovers.

Actually they did, but not at a resolution capable of seeing the descent stages or the rovers.

Ergo, it did not happen. Hoaxed.

Actually they did, but not at a resolution capable of seeing the descent stages or the rovers.

Ergo, it did not happen. Hoaxed.


I can't see you at the moment. are you a hoax?

Not having the resolution to see the Apollo remains just means that you can't see things that small, it proves nothing about whether there is anything there.

:persistfai:

Speaking entirely from an engineer's perspective...there is virtually NOTHING valid about NASA's "official" moon landing position.

99+% of engineers have just come to accept the hoax, as there is nothing anyone can do about it.



As an engineer, perhaps you can give some example in realistic detail. Not a hand-wave about "The Van Halen belts(sic) would kill everything!" But a short dissertation on the most dangerous particles, with energies and flux, showing the absorption and secondary products of the known and described shielding materials of the Command Module.

Too difficult?

Actually, I have a question for you. As an engineer, doesn't it EMBARRASS you when the "best" (and certainly the most common) arguments made in favor of a hoax are so laughably bad? Ralph Rene with his glove box at 20 psi? The people who wonder why there's a zipper on a pressure suit? The people who think only multiple lights can explain divergent shadows (and, yet, there don't seem to be any multiple shadows, do there?) The people who can't understand why stars are not visible in pictures taken with daylight film?

Hey, if you've got better arguments, then please take them to the JREF, to the Bad Astronmer, to BAUT and Apollo Hoax! Please don't leave propounding a hoax to the lame-o's who do it now!

Really, though. I dare you to make a better case. I dare you to pick one single example, and defend it with properly cited research and MATH. If you can do that, even if your work is shoddy and full of holes you'll still be ahead of 99.9% of the other hoax proponents.

Not having the resolution to see the Apollo remains just means that you can't see things that small, it proves nothing about whether there is anything there.


Then it did not happen. Simple.

Troll.

I can't see craters on Mars with my telescope, that doesn't mean they aren't real. The Japanese probe Kaguya had a maximum resolution of a few dozen meters, so seeing something just two meters across is obviously not going to happen.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

We need an international tribunal to examine all evidence and extract sworn testimony from all witnesses. Without that, we will never know exactly what really happened in the Apollo program, and future generations will treat the alleged American moon landing the same way we treat the alleged discovery of America in the 6th century by St. Brendan the Navigator and his crew of altarboys:

[link to www.amazon.com]

nah i went to wal-mart and bought a telescope made in china

I can see the flag on the moon now