Well that is clear. I was tired, cut me slack, oh don't I don't give a shit.

I admit, I did not pay much attention to your replies, as I was more focused, if you can call it that, on another.

I was not the one who brought "micro-evolution" into the discussion. I was attempting to remove it, because, like you, it seemed that it was, well, for a lack of better words, bullshit, or just a distraction from the base.

I did not know it was a "Creationist" ideal. From the little I had seen it about in the past, it was used by "Darwinist", if that is a label, to throw off the "Creationist".

Changes to a bacteria are not like a human becoming an elephant. It is not even like a human growing another arm in many cases. It would be more like growing additional stomachs, or a better stomach, or a better chemical process in dealing with certain material in the process of metabolism.

As for links, here is a fun one. No one can argue it is run by biased "Creationist", it is Berkley for crying out loud. [link to evolution.berkeley.edu]