TRUTH ABOUT NIBIRU/PLANETX - Click. Read. Prepare.

Did you see last months issue of Scientific American??

Naked Singularities. Supposedly,... you can go right up to one and touch it,...no nasty little event horizons to deal with.

Exciting times ahead!!!!!!!!


Z

Do you know how far our solar system is from the galactic center? Even if we were caught by it now and travelled to it at the speed of light, we're some 30,000 light years from the center so it would take 30,000 years to get there.

How do we know the speed of light is the speed we would travel

The speed of light is NOT CONSTANT, It is directally relative to the force of gravity at any single point in 3 dimentional space. Time is constant on earth because we have a circular orbit around the main sourse of gravity in our solar system, the sun.

Imagine how time would distort in an eliptical orbit.

I do not understand you saying that they would all list this. My contention is that knoweldge that would aid the general peopulation has been systematically removed for our collective consciousness.

The Library of Alexandria for instance was wipped of knowledge for the average earthing.

The Vatican throughout their wars and such have burned and acquired valuable documents and cached them where no one can get to them. Hell even that Bush funded Despot Hilter was burning books. This is a course in Tyranny 101,...imo. Destroy the history of a people. Keep them ignorant.




Maybe,....but you also have the magnetic alignment of the layers of basalt that flow from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge for instance. They speak of many poll shifts. The planet may not be on an exact orbit,... + or - 1000's of miles maybe.

Passage may not always produce the same results for Earth.




Perhaps.


Z

So are you saying the speed of light is faster as you approach a black hole???

Interesting.


Z

Yes, if you are viewing it from inside the black hole.

From outside the black hole, where time is traveling much slower, you only see the event horizon, or the thin cross section of the gateway. Its like a HUGE POCKET OF SPACE that as you were to approach it, it would expand in front of you as long as you were transitioning smoothly twards it.

A black hole is what the theory of time dilation looks like from outside.

And you have to understand that:

vairable speed of light = variable speed of time

That's not what he's saying. He said that we are 30,000 light years from the center of the galaxy. IF we were to travel at the speed of light, it would take 30,000 years to be pulled in. Certainly we would NOT travel atthe speed of light, but some very tiny fraction of it. The point being that we don't have to worry about the black hole at the center of the galaxy.

These are evidence of MAGNETIC pole shifts. That is NOT what is being considered here. Do you know the difference between a magnetic and a rotational pole shift?

Interesting. What do you think causes the hundred thousand year cycles?

I used this example because it was right on the tip of my tongue/brain/whatever. I shot the PX connection from the hip as an afterthought.

I thought the layering basalt showed a cyclic pattern.

Something must cause it that happens cyclically.

Z

10,000 views

and the shills still can't explain the blacked out sections of wikisky, googlesky and ms world-wide telescope.

why havent the people that protect this earth
told us of such a event?

they can tell the future you know
and they didnt tell us about .....this...


0.0

Its blacked out coz theres a big fat cock behind it.

It appears that a few of the files are missing or corrupted from the DSS2 survey that is used by all three of these services. It's no conspiracy.

[link to skyview.gsfc.nasa.gov]

You think that if something visible was being hidden there wouldn't be thousands of independent astronomers reporting it?

"There would be evidence of of those previous passages, and
not just one or two civilizations"

"if something
was happening all over the planet at the same time the
Chinese and the Indians would have noted it."

[link to www.spirasolaris.ca]

Thanks for the info Dr.Postman.

I have run out of time for now.

Great summer to you.

Until later,
Z

first quote with some comments (+):

I am always amazed at how easily people are persuaded bad news is not true.

+ They do not necessarily are bad. Actually if this system was much more quiet/regular/fixed odds point that life would not be even complex at all and probably we would not even exist, together with the marvels of biodiversity. Long term cycles, great cycles on the system are most likely quite old... what had been happening has happened tens or hundreds of thousands of times already. Our comprehension of natural cycles is quite incomplete yet and much things we understand... are not being informed about thouroughly.

Once again I will repeat.
I have tracked the story of Nibiru since the African tribe first brought it up. This was decades before Stitchin. They not only painted the solar system perfectly, they knew the year of return. They knew the race was Annunaki, they knew these people were very large. Now this was 40 years ago. They did interviews over those paintings and everything. My spouse grew up next to the tribe; his parents were journalist and teachers.

+ Interesting... although non corroborable of course.

Nibiru as an astronomical reference has shown up in our archeology, our geology, our paleontology, our anthropology...not a single science has gone unaffected by these continuing anomalous finds. And this has been consistently born out over the decades that these references go back thousands of years.

+ So it seems.... very much so. And for some phenomena it seems that there are not too much alternative theories/explanations as compelling and explicative as the system being not unusual or at least having a massive planet which is publicly unacknowledged for in public, for reasons.

As for myself, the signs show me that Nibiru is actually quite close. The Crossing is near. I believe if not this July 09' then 3 and 1/2 years later. The planet by the way has a string of moons behind it. It makes a swirling whip like tail with a head (planet) when viewed sideways. Winged Dragon, Red Dragon.

+ Perhaps so? Just ask nature, look for yourselves ; )

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

second quote (evidently attacking the previous one):
And some comments (+)

They deliberately confuse people with the 2012 date of the Mayan calendar. These are in fact two separate events.

+ You do not know. Actually this is a somewhat misteriously/intriguing additional coincidence... probably not a coincidence at all. There are no hard proofs of catastrophical prophecies by the ancient Maya regarding 21 december 2012, but for the rewritten references in some of the Chilam Balam books. However this date is sculpted in stone in a major preclassic/classic city (Tortuguero) in central america. Why was such date relevant? More over, the remaining four original codex (prehispanic Maya) are not widely accesible but kept under controlled collections out of the sight of people. Why again? Mayan myths are just one more of several convergences regarding some events. Creation and destruction myths, as well as cyclic myths exist in many cultures and there is compelling evidence that there are strong similitudes among them... strongly suggesting prior great civilizations which failed, probably because of overwhelming natural cataclysm. One is for sure, the end of the last glaciation covered more than 200 meters of excellent lands worldwide and created havoc most likely giving birth to the universal deluge myths. There is probably much more to this... and so few research.

We have hit and end to not one but three cycles all culminating back to back.
1) The Crossing 3567 year cycle,

+ Such a cycle appear in some paleobotanical studies, specially some on south america for sure. It is also suggested by large events as Santorini and some episodes of human history. More over, trees life expectancies also support it> Alerces and Sequoias live no longer than 3600 years, probably disrupted by periodic climate changes... or some other things. Coincidence?

2) The Purification 26,000 year cycle
+ There is not such a thing. The 25,920 years cycle is called precession... but the timeframe might not be exact.

3) The Grand Alignment 76,000 year cycle.
+ Much less we know for sure such cycles. 41 ky cycles might also be wrongly deduced. There are more relevant things, specially the Milankovitch cycles, Sun's short cycle of about 11 to 12 years (it changes), and more solar cycles.... there is much more, much more. Take it for sure.

+ A lot of cycles, actually. Most likely in harmonics.

It ocnstantly amazes me how guilible people (believers) can be. It constantly amazes me how they confuse different types of evidence fantasy and reality.

+ Just look around! Ask for instance most geologist, why they insist in worshiping "subduction" as a major process when the evidence is more than compelling that it is not the case. The Earth is expanding, just as other planets, just as the very solar system, as the galaxy and as the whole universe.

We have hundreds of years of the scientific process that obviously works since it has given us everything from compters to rockets that can travel to the edge of the solar system. Hundreds of years of improving adapting and refining.

+ This is irrelevant to the point.

All this "science" has shown us how such a planet/ brown dwarf could not possibly have an orbit that regularly takes it into the inner solar system.

+ This is false. More over, there are a lot of questions that are not being answered... at least in public.

Not one real bonafide archelogist,geologist, palentologist thinks it exists or that we have been effected by such a thing in the past. (ok there might be the odd woowoo one trying to make a fast buck, but they are completly disowned as the con artists they are- human nature).

+ This is unaccurate and most likely false. However most are too busy making their extremely limited and focused research withih their overexpecializations area. Why are we not even able to debunk such a thing like junk climate science by politics? This perhaps make it clear enough.

Also please explain how a planet that could be in our inner solar system in just a few months or just a couple of years by your own admission cannot already be seen.

+ Light dispersion from a particle cloud making it less visible? Being a net absorber and radiating just in non visible wavelenghts? Not being very close and perhaps never approaching too much at all, but doing its influence because of its size/mass from farther away? There might be a myriad of potential explanations.

I would imagine it would have to be well within the orbit of Saturn at least if it were to come anywhere close to us in just a couple of years or is this thing travelling at some ridiculous speed on top of everything else. Or will you just make up a tale like its invisible right now ; or its travelling in hyperspace,lol.
Grow up man


+ Actually it seems that the second poster doesnt have a clue, but nevertheless has a very clear objective> debunk something that he doesnt understand at all because it doesnt fit with his learnings/knowledge or worst... for had being asked to do so.

+ I found the possibilities concerning a different nature of our system most interesting and deserving research... but this is likely to already had been done, and what i see around makes me think a lot about such... situations.

+ Dont you people? What an amazing world!

Best hopes for a better world, take care anyway ; )
A Scientist who Cares

Could you pls let me know about the Right Ascension and Declination of NIBIRU ( the exact location in the sky ) so that some one be sure of the fact for the presence of such an object?

The same section of sky is camouflaged differently in each sky-watch program.

However, in google-sky, they only cover half of it.

A nearby brown dwarf would look exactly like the uncovered half. This would also fully explain the need for camouflage and secrecy in the first place.

If file corruption was the reason, then the camouflage would look the same with each sky-watch program. However, the object is camouflaged differently in each sky-watch program.

In google-sky the object is only half-covered and the visible part is what a nearby brown dwarf would look like (an intense circular heat signature).

Brown dwarfs are undetectable from earth based telescopes because infrared light bounces off the atmosphere and brown dwarfs can only be seen in the infrared.

Only 3 space missions had infrared telescopes so it wouldn't be too hard to keep a lid on its existence.

Real efficient conspiracy there. They only concealed half of Planet X? Does that make any sense?

Different programmers concealed that area each time. Maybe he was a truther? Watch this video:

Well that's not true.

Well Hot Damn!!!

Good thing this place is so addictive,...

I am printing this out to take with me into the wild. Thank you kindly for posting.


Z

Sorry if I missed it before, but what are the coordinates we're talking about here?