MARS probe landing, ha, ha, ha, ha, "you couldn't land a probe/rocket using stabilizing thrusters on earth!"

Oh - you mean like the AV8 Harrier does every day here on Earth?

Oh dear, maybe you should do a little research before looking like a fuckwit.

They used parachutes and airbags to get he Rovers safely down.

[link to marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov]

MAR probe doesn't look like a Harrier jet, in case you haven't seen the Probe.

There is no air for this "Harrier Probe" to thrust off. FAIL!

There is no air you fawkin moron. There's no tree on MARS!!!

Why is it that the least educated seem to have th most to say?

OP. I'm embarrassed for you.

air = atmosphere
mars does indeed have an atmosphere, thus it has air.

"to thrust off" - you are a very stupid person who does not know how jet propulsion works.

And therewith treeeeees!!!!

Show me a mars probe picture with treeeeees!!!!

Can't explain it? FAWK-OFF!!!

I could but you are too stupid to listen. First you would have to understand Newton's Law of Motion and how any action causes an equal and opposite reaction.

air does not beget trees.

especially when that air is 95% carbon dioxide.

I/m sorry you're just too stupid, I/m going to have to ask you to leave.


Carbon dioxide (chemical formula: CO2) is a chemical compound composed of two oxygen atoms covalently bonded to a single carbon atom.


For Carbon-dioxide to exist, oxygen has to exist.

For Oxygen to exist, trees would have to exist.


Now get off my thread, STUPID!!

You don't know it and don't understand it, this is why you believe the LIES of science-fiction!!!

Punisher doesn't believe in Isaac Newton.

Plants make oxygen from what? Carbon dioxide! Did you fail Biology along with Earth Science?

Oh, so science is correct when it lines up with what your point of view is but the moment science can argue against you it is wrong? This is called hypocrisy and the reason no one will ever take you seriously. True science does not like hypocrisy, it likes solutions to problems and answers to questions, even if this means that the one making the observations needs to change their mind about their theory.

Funny how science fiction is good enough for you to make an attempt at proving a point.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^666

I can't see you on this thread, 'where are you?"
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^666

I can't see you on this thread, "where are you?"
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

you need to learn the difference between oxygen the element and molecular oxygen. suffice to say that oxygen does not come exclusively from trees, or plant life in general.

Oh, so science is good to be used when you are attempting to prove your point but it is wrong when it can be used against you?

This is called hypocrisy. Science does not like hypocrisy and that is why you will NEVER be taken seriously. Science is about arriving at solutions to problems and questions even if that means a person will have to change their point of view in light of the data that is provided. Science has provided nothing but raw data that destroys your theories yet you keep coming back for more, almost like you enjoy being proven to be a mental midget.

The first few times you posted tripe like this as Punisher and the other handles, it was cute and typical trollish. The problem is that your beliefs seem to be genuine, and if you want to be taken seriously you will need to have your point of view published in a journal of your peers. Until then, conventional 5th grade science will continue to outperform your mentally challenged theories.

>>Think you are breathing oxygen right now, moran?

You brought it here anyway. You can't tell how deep those craters are, but the fact that there are smaller craters on the surface and rim of some of the bigger craters speaks volumes.

BS, it has been done, was called the DX Clipper or something like that.

The biggest meteorites hitting the moon's surface would leave a deeper cavity. The greater the mass/volume, the greater the force the meteorite impacts into the moon's surface leaving a deeper puncture. All moon pictures are plaster putty models, you cannot see the surface of the moon with a telescope let alone beyond as NASA/Government would have you believe. No telescope has seen a Planet. All Planet are drawings, another rendition of NASA and their Pseudoscience. No MARS probe landing. No Lunar landing.

NASA = Government = covert expansion of the War Machine!


EARTH SCIENCE IS SATANIC.

Actually, you can get a pretty good view of lunar craters with a good set of binoculars. Heck, I've seen three of Jupiter's moons with binoculars!

............christ, this kid is a retard.......

the internet is also good for research.....try it sometime



.

You see too many things, you see things that are not there, like the 90 degrees when in realty there was only 8.