From Babylon to Rome - From the Universal Postal Union to the United Nations - the Foundations of the NWO | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19812615 ![]() 01/04/2014 07:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: From Babylon to Rome - From the Universal Postal Union to the United Nations - the Foundations of the NWO Corporation Sole Quoting: Rev. Stargazer In English Law, a corporation sole is a legal entity consisting of a single ('sole') incorporated office, occupied by a single ('sole') man or woman. This allows a corporation (usually a religious corporation) to pass vertically in time from one office holder to the next successor-in-office, giving the position legal continuity with each subsequent office holder having identical powers to his predecessor. (virtual immortality) The concept of corporation sole originated as a means to the orderly transfer of church or religious society property, serving to keep title within the church or religious society. In order to keep the religious property from being treated as the estate of the vicar of the church, the property was titled to the office of the corporation sole. In the case of the Roman Catholic church, the property is usually titled to the diocesan bishop, who serves in the office of the corporation sole. The Roman Catholic Church continues to use the corporation sole for holding title for property, [link to en.wikipedia.org] So...Corporations are 'immortal' persons whereas, we humans are merely 'mortal' and can even loose are rights as humans if it pleases the courts - they have become our 'gods'. Vatican Finances Surviving World Financial CrisisWhile most countries face stagnating economies, the Vatican’s finances flourish. Months before the wave of current bank bankruptcies approached Wall Street; the Holy See withdrew its assets from foreign lending institutions and invested instead in gold and land. By Krzys Wasilewski, Published: October 15, 2008 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19812615 ![]() 01/04/2014 07:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: From Babylon to Rome - From the Universal Postal Union to the United Nations - the Foundations of the NWO Hostis humani generis (Latin for "enemy of mankind") is a legal term of art, originating from the admiralty law, and referring to the peculiar status, before the public international law, of maritime pirates, since time immemorial, and slavers, since the 18th century. It is also used in the present to describe the status of torturers. Quoting: Rev. Stargazer A comparison can be made between this concept and the common law "writ of outlawry," which declared a person outside of the King's law, a literal out-law, and subject to the violence of anyone. (ie - no rights whatsoever) Admiralty Law Seaborne transport was one of the earliest channels of commerce, and rules for resolving disputes involving maritime trade were developed early in recorded history. Early historical records of these laws include the Rhodian law (of which no primary written specimen has survived, but which is alluded to in other legal texts: Roman and Byzantine legal codes) and later the customs of the Hanseatic League. The Hanseatic League (also known as the Hansa) was an alliance of trading cities and their guilds that established and maintained trade monopoly along the coast of Northern Europe, from the Baltic to the North Sea and inland, during the Late Middle Ages and Early modern period (c.13th–17th centuries). The Hanseatic cities had their own law system and furnished their own protection and mutual aid. The Hanseatic free imperial cities owed allegiance directly to the Holy Roman Emperor, without any intermediate tie to the local nobility. Notice how this all deals with commerce and the Holy Roman Empire??? Etymology The English "pirate" is derived from the Latin term pirata and that from Greek πειρατής (peirates) "brigand",[1] ultimately from πεῖρα (peira) "attempt, experience",[2] implicitly "to find luck on the sea" Wow! So to attempt or to experience makes one an outlaw and without any rights! It's a crime against humanity to experience! Be a good little citizen of Rome and do as your told and all be be safe and well. Arrrrgh Matey! Screw the 'system', I wanna to be a pirate! ROME DEMANDS THAT WHICH BELONGS TO GOD - NAMELY SEPARATION OF CHURCH & STATE - THE VATICAN (LITTLE HORN POWER) IS THE ONLY NATION ON EARTH WHICH HAS NO SUCH SEPARATION December 6th, 1865, the 14th Amendment was proclaimed as ratified (even though it never properly was.) The 14th Amendment, which is private Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical Trust Law, constitutes a constructive, cestui que trust, a public charitable trust, “PCT,” that was expressly designed to bring every corporate franchise artificial person called a “citizen of the United States” into an inseparable merging with the government until the two are united (with the power inhering in the government, not the people)…. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s. Matthew 22:21 The Word of Divine authority for the separation of Church and State, the basis upon which the United States of America was allegedly founded ….A cestui que trust is fundamentally different from a regular trust, which is express in nature and consists of a contractual indenture involving three (3) parties: Grantor (Creator or Trustor), Trustee, and Beneficiaries. In an express trust, legal ownership is transferred by written contract between Grantor and Trustee in which the Grantor surrenders ownership of property to the legal person, the Trust, to be managed by the Trustee on behalf of those who are to benefit from the arrangement, the Beneficiaries. A cestui que trust, on the other hand, differs from an express trust in several crucial ways: a. It is not formed by express contract, i.e. overt agreement expressed in writing, but by legal construction, i.e. fiat. b. A cestui que trust has no Grantor, but, being a constructive trust created by operation of law, i.e. by make-believe, has only co-trustees and co-beneficiaries. The co-trustees are the parties with the duties for managing property for the “public good,” i.e. for the benefit of those designated as co-beneficiaries. Inasmuch as all law is contract, the contract involved in a constructive trust is an implied contract. An implied contract can be ratified by two (2) means: a. Acquiescence by silence, i.e. the “government” asserts its intentions concerning your life, rights, and property and you assent, don’t rebut, and compliantly go along with what they claim. In 1871 the Government changed the nature of its contract with the people from law as defined by the original Constitution of 1787 that recognizes law (common law), admiralty (on the sea only), and equity (functioning by voluntary contract between all participating parties), and began relating to people as if they were “citizens of the Unites States” within/under the private, commercial, international, military jurisdiction of the new de facto corporation, i.e. US Inc. They offered people a “new deal,” and almost everyone bought it (based on naïve and foolish trust and assuming that everything was OK). The people were thereby denied access to law and placed on the ship of state of US Inc. where the captain’s word is law and no one has any rights. As Jefferson phrased the matter, “As government grows, liberty recedes.” b. You expressly accept “benefits” offered by the government, and thereby finalize the contract by deed. This is similar to finalizing a contract with a restaurant by sitting down at a table, reading a menu, and then ordering and consuming a meal. By your deeds you affirm to the restaurant that you will pay for the meal in accordance with the price stated on the menu. No written contract is signed, but a contract is formed nevertheless. 1. By the above two (2) means people give implied assent that they are bound by an alleged contract with US Inc. in accordance with the terms and conditions that inhere in being treated as a “citizen of the United States ” under the 14th Amendment, and are therefore placed into permanent legal status as a Debtor and Surety for U.S. Inc.. In such a position people leave the ground of sovereignty and all capacity for asserting their unalienable rights in favor of being presumed as having exercised their sovereignty and free-will autonomy for the purpose of going along with the government’s assertion that they sacrifice everything for the “public good,” i.e. the PCT. By so doing people lose their standing in law, i.e. they “die a civil death in the law.” They are placed in the legal position of mortmain (i.e. as if deceased) and are shorn of capacity for asserting their rights, since the presumption is that they have already exercised those rights for the purpose of being placed in the position they are in, i.e. property of the government with a lien against you and everything your life labor could ever create, including your children. The private being (the real individual) is sacrificed for the good of the public. * The ‘citizens’ will be used as state slaves to rebuild the infrastructure after the desolation of the cities -ed Rome requires the rendering of everything unto Caesar - tax, tithe and worship. The latter two belong to the Creator…return to Him that which is His that you may rest in Him…. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19812615 ![]() 01/04/2014 07:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: From Babylon to Rome - From the Universal Postal Union to the United Nations - the Foundations of the NWO I am finding that the only thing True seems to be Love. Quoting: Mercuriel™ History Truly is His Story... Nothing is as it was taught to Us - We have been lied to from the Cradle. We're stopping it now so it won't continue on into the Grave as it already has for so many for so long. TY to everyone in this Thread that has tried to help. You are all Truly Wondrous Beings and I Love You all... TY, TY, TY... ![]() TY (KNOTS) - KNOTTER MASONRY WE MUST OBEY GOD RATHER THAN MAN WHO ARE ONLY MEN |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19812615 ![]() 01/04/2014 07:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: From Babylon to Rome - From the Universal Postal Union to the United Nations - the Foundations of the NWO A little more about Attalus and the founding of Pergamos - Quoting: Rev. Stargazer But how did Pergamos become the seat of Satan if Babylon was the seat? The answer again is in history. When Babylon fell to the Medes and Persians, the priest-king, Attalus fled the city and went to Pergamos with his priests and sacred mysteries. There he set up his kingdom outside the Roman empire, and thrived under the care of the devil. [link to www.biblebelievers.org.au] BABYLON--Pontifex Maximus--supreme Priest of pagan gods. The last king to reign in Babylon was Belshazzar, who celebrated the pagan Babylonian ritual using the sacred Jewish temple vessels which his father King Nebuchadnezzar confiscated from the Jewish temple in 587 B.C.: After the death of Belshazzar in 539 B.C., the Persian Emperor Cyrus conquered Babylon and forced the Babylonian princes to flee to Pergamum. They continued their reign there as priest-kings of Babylonian paganism. In 133 B.C., Attalus III, the last Babylonian King to rule in Pergamum, willed his dominions to the Roman Caesar, and the kingdom of Pergamum merged with the Roman Empire along with Satan-Nimrod’s throne and the title "Pontifex Maximus." [link to dedication.www3.50megs.com] " . . . . SHE LAID HIM IN A MANGER . . . . ANAGRAM FOR 'GERMAN' - FALSE CORNERSTONE |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73661556 ![]() 12/24/2016 04:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73600084 ![]() 12/24/2016 05:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |