GREATEST ASTRONOMER SCAMS

There you have it, folks. The perfect woo-woo.

How do you escape from any logic, any debate, any reasonable discussion, and win any debate in your own mind?

Just read GL's sentence above.

Does anyone else want me to continue with the Dummies Guides?

UH

YOU MUST BE OUT OF YOUR MIND, TOO MUCH GRAVITY ON THE BRAIN.

I HAVE GIVEN YOU A SMALL SAMPLE. ALL YOU NEED TO DO IS READ IT BUT THAT IS BEYOND YOU. SO YOU RESORT TO THE PERSONAL ATTACKS AGAIN.

THIS REALLY PROVES MY POINT, THE THEORIES ARE SO DISCREDITED, SO FALSE, SO FAKE, THEY CANNOT BE DEFENDED. MATTERS NOT IF IT IS ME, OR A FAMOUS ASTRONOMER, IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THE "MODEL" YOU ARE RIDICULED.

YOU CAN KEEP THAT UP AS LONG AS YOU LIKE, IT WILL MAKE NO IMPRESSION ON ME.

I HAVE NO INTENTION OR NEED TO POST BOOKS OF DATA HERE, YOU KNOW THAT. SO HIDE BEHIND YOUR ATTACKS, FEEL GOOD IN YOUR RIDICULE, THE LAST LAUGH IS IN THE TRUTH WHICH I FIRMLY BELIEVE IS ON MY SIDE.

GL

GL>YOU MUST BE OUT OF YOUR MIND, TOO MUCH GRAVITY ON THE
GL>BRAIN.

That from th guy who despises insults.

GL>I HAVE GIVEN YOU A SMALL SAMPLE.
No, you've given links. You haven't had the guts to actually debate the concepts point by point, because you are afraid to do so.

GL>THIS REALLY PROVES MY POINT
That from the guy who just said "There is nothing to argue, it is my belief." Do you not notice your complete hypocrisy?

GL>THE THEORIES ARE SO DISCREDITED, SO FALSE, SO FAKE
Yes, so false and fake that you haven't the guts to take me on point by point.

GL>IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THE "MODEL" YOU ARE RIDICULED.
You really are a STUPID FUCK. The Big Bang theory is one of many theories. You are welcome to pick the ones you like and debate them. Scientists and astronomers are constantly doing that, to refine, and sometimes eliminate competing theories. The BBT is still in the race, but it may not 'win'. I (and plenty of others, I see) are ridiculing your attitude and unwillingness to sensibly debate, and your inability to post a decent poll.

GL>YOU CAN KEEP THAT UP AS LONG AS YOU LIKE, IT WILL MAKE
GL>NO IMPRESSION ON ME.
Yes, GL, that is eminently clear by this post and others. I make no impression on you, you are justposting these reponses to.. er.. er.. eerrr...

GL>I HAVE NO INTENTION OR NEED TO POST BOOKS OF DATA HERE
Indeed it's best if you don't. Summarising your understanding works better. Like I've done above - you know, all that simple text that you haven't got the balls to properly debate.

GL>SO HIDE BEHIND YOUR ATTACKS
There's lots of data and information up there, all out in the open. Here I am... er, hiding????

If you wish to focus on the attacks, so be it.

GL>FEEL GOOD IN YOUR RIDICULE
Oh, I do.

GL>THE LAST LAUGH IS IN THE TRUTH WHICH I FIRMLY BELIEVE
GL>IS ON MY SIDE.
And you are perfectly entitled to all your beliefs. When the BBT is fully discredited and a new one gains full acceptance, you come on back and gloat, OK?

And when your theory of what happens at the centre of galaxies gains peer review, let us know that too.

I'll be so humbled by your correctness.


Any idea when that might be?

(O;

Stay happy! And don't, whatever you do, get involved in debating with folk like me, in future. It's clearly not productive. For you, anyway.

By the way, I'm an amateur astronomer who doesn't agree with the Big Bang Theory, and guess what?

I don't feel, nor have I ever been, ridiculed in any way whatsoever. Even at my astronomy club, amongst all those paid shills... I'd say 20% of them are not on the BBT side of the debate. (O;

GL, you ever dared to visit an astronomy club? How did that go for you? (((O;

YAWN, THEY ARE STILL HUFFING AND PUFFING, BUMPING THE THREAD, DRAWING ATTENTION TO THE ISSUES AND STILL LAYING ON THE PERSONAL INSULTS AS THICK AS THEY CAN

WONDER WHY THEY ARE SO UPSET

WHAT HAVE THEY TO HIDE

INDEED WHY BREW SUCH A STORM

REMINDS ME OF MACBETHS WITCHES, I WONDER IF THEY ARE RELATED.

THEY WONT EVEN READ THE LINKS,
SAD

ASTRONOMY CLUBS, YES I FOUNDED ONE YEARS AGO

STRANGE HOW YOU FOCUS ON BIG BANG, THAT LEADS TO BLACK HOLES WHICH ARE EVEN BIGGER NONSENSE.

GL

Last Edited by GREY LENSMAN on 05/18/2009 06:28 AM

Sayeth GL, BUMPING the thread...
GL> YAWN, THEY ARE STILL HUFFING AND PUFFING, BUMPING THE
GL> THREAD, DRAWING ATTENTION TO THE ISSUES

Heaven forbid we should draw attention to the issues.

GL> AND STILL LAYING ON THE PERSONAL INSULTS AS THINK AS
GL> THEY CAN

"THINK"??? A little Freudian slip, GL. Hint - don't post when you are angry.

GL> WONDER WHY THEY ARE SO UPSET

I'm very happy to bump your thread, sweetness. That way more folk get to see you in full flight.

GL> WHAT HAVE THEY TO HIDE

Mmmm. Bumping the thread and posting information - they always hide like that. The miserable stealthy BASTARDS.

GL> INDEED WHY BREW SUCH A STORM

Says he, SHOUTING...

GL> REMINDS ME OF MACBETHS WITCHES, I WONDER IF THEY ARE
GL> RELATED.

Ookay. Yes, right. fine.

GL>THEY WONT EVEN READ THE LINKS, SAD

He won't stop using capitals, sad. He can't summarise the points and instead posts links to OTHER GLP THREADS. Not references, but other (no doubt capitalised) GLP threads. Yes, I can see a lot of folk jumping on over there to study those.

Ummm, did you have to pass any test to become a mod, GL? You know, about netiquette, appropriate posting behavior, the use of links, quotes and references?

Just curious. Rhetorical question, really.

I know why you were chosen.

You really don't have a clue how science works, do you? Have you mastered high school math and physics?

And, clearly you don't know any real astronomers.

ANOTHER FINE BUMP.

GOD, THEY SO FOAMED UP THAT THEY CANT CLICK THE LINKS. GOD SO MUCH DEBATE THEREM KEEP EM BUSY FOR YEARS. BUT THEY ARE SCIENTIST, CANT DO THAT.

THEN WE HAVE A BAD ASTRONOMER IN CHEF BUTT IN. MASTERS GOOD ENOUGH FOR YOU. YOU WONT LIKE THAT BUT THATS YOUR PROBLEM NOT MINE.

GL

Last Edited by GREY LENSMAN on 05/18/2009 07:00 AM

Good point, your infantile foaming in all caps is not worth bumping.

Have fun wallowing in a sea of inane codswallop.

The assholes attacking you are probably reincarnations of the astronomers who refused to view the moons of Jupiter through Galileo's telescope.

Laugh while you can.

Which astronomers were those, exactly? It was in fact philosophers and church officials who refused to look through the scope, according to any references I have ever seen. All of Galileo's fellow astronomers were only too eager:
[link to thezodiac.com]
[link to www.400years.org]
[link to astro.nmsu.edu]

But I'm sure you can back up your claims with countering references, after all, it would be REALLY embarrassing if you completely screwed up the only point you actually made...

THEY DID NOT END UP IN HOUSE ARREST LIKE HIM BUT THE POINT IS THE SAME. THOSE WHO ACCUSED HIM REFUSED TO LOOK THROUGH HIS TELESCOPE. COULD SAY THE SAME ABOUT YOUR INABILITY TO READ THE LINKS.

YOU SEE, I WILL NOT JUMP INTO YOUR BOX, YOUR PRISOM. YOU VAN HUFF AND PUFF AS MUCH AS YOU LIKE.

WHEN THERE ARE SO MANY PEOPLE DOING GREAT WORK AND STUDIES, THAT I UNDERSTAND AND AGREE WITH IN THE MAIN, WHY SHOULD I GO ON MY OWN AND DUPLICATE THEIR WORK WITH A PEER REVIEWED PAPER. ESPECIALLY WHEN SUCH PEER REVIEW MEANS DIDLY SHIT.

VIOXX WAS PEER REVIEWED, OFF TOPIC I KNOW ,BUT ITS THE SENTIMENT THAT COUNTS.

RED SRITES, BLUE JETS, ELVES. YOU KNOW WHAT THEY ARE. DUPLICATED IN THE LAB. EASY TO SEE HOW AND WHY THEY FORM. EXPERIMENT, DEMONSTRATE.

CARE TO TELL ME IN SENTIENT ENGLISH HOW I MAY CONSTRUCT AN "EVENT HORIZON" DEMONSTRATE BOTH IT AND HOW IT WORKS. THAT WOULD BE COOL.

GL

"Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn, and caldron bubble.
Fillet of a fenny snake,
In the caldron boil and bake;
Eye of newt, and toe of frog,
Wool of bat, and tongue of dog,
Adder's fork, and blind-worm's sting,
Lizard's leg, and owlet's wing,—
For a charm of powerful trouble,
Like a hell-broth boil and bubble."


and still the truth will shoot out like a bolt of lightning
lol

That's because it's always there. Right in front of us!

one star for caps

+1

[link to web13.s116.mittwaldmedien.de]

I have nothing against GL, but his constant use of caps makes me want to ignore his threads.

GL, just WHY are you constantly using caps?

And there you are correct, I have a theory... you SHOUT to make yourself feel superior... Does it work for you?

Is that the Abrahamic God you are referencing? if so I'll pass thanks.

I was being perfectly serious, my wife is blind and uses text to speech software, but you seem happy to jump to incorrect conclusions.

NO YOU DO. ITS THE WAY I TYPE. HOW YOU CONSTRUE THAT IS YOUR MISFORTUNE AND NOTHING TO DO WITH FAKE ASTRONOMY, NOR MY MENTAL ABILITIES OR REASONING SKILLS.

THE FACT THAT YOU SEEM TO HAVE TO KEEP REPEATING THE SAME NONSENSE ALSO INDICATES A POSSIBLE OBSESSIVE NATURE, WHICH YOU MIGHT LIKE TO HAVE INVESTIGATED.

NOW WOULD IT BE TOO MUCH TO ASK YOU TO CONCENTRATE ON THE TOPIC.

IF YOU DONT LIKE IT OR EVEN DISAGREE WITH IT, YOU HAVE SEVERAL CHOICES

1. IGNORE IT
2. SUBMIT SOME PROOFS
3. START YOU OWN THREAD POLL WITH ITEMS THAT PLEASE YOU

SEE A WHOLE RAFT OF POSITIVE THINGS FOR YOU TO DO THERE.

GL

This website exists for entertainment purposes only.


Failing to understand netiquette does reflect on your mental abilities.


"My dear Kepler, what would you say of the learned here, who, replete with the pertinacity of the asp, have steadfastly refused to cast a glance through the telescope? What shall we make of this? Shall we laugh, or shall we cry?" -- Galileo Galilei

ditto,bang