Evolution .Debunked .Sorry .History channel

I didn't know there was pure hydrogen peroxide flowing out of my tap when I open it.

Water is 2 atoms hydrogen and 1 atom oxygen, oxygen is 2 atoms oxygen.

Hydrogen Peroxide is 2 atoms hydrogen and 2 atoms oxygen, which isn't even found in nature.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Claiming there is oxygen (in the O2 sense) everywhere is completely and utterly retarded, not even a 14 year old highschool kid should make such rediculous claim.

And yes in the post I refused to go into your chemistry knowledge you did assert that since plants create the molecule oxygen and plants aren't nuclear plants creating new elements (not even taking the fact into consideration that there are for example algae producing oxygen through photosynthesis as well).

Seriously discussing this shit is even degrading for me to have to write a rebuttal to.

The bugs, believed to be descended from ocean-dwelling organisms
descends = evolved from
ocean = H2Oxygen

6666666666666666666666666666666666666666

Thanks for helping prove Evolution.

Oxygen -- Destroyed the Theory of Evolution.

For any living organism to exist and to have evolved there would have had to be the presents of Oxygen, and as you all well know plant-life (treeeees) produce OXYGEN.

Plant-life (treeeees) would still need oxygen for the plant themselves to evolve (water = H2Oxygen) + (carbon dioxide = CO2-2 oxygen atoms), therefore, only divine & infinite intelligence could have master-crafted the Universe and all life within.

Evolutionists are some of the most ignorant, tow the company line types out there.

They've been sold a form of Hinduism and in the ever wishful thinking they can somehow "evolve" into a "god" they've flushed their brain down the toilet.

Teach a man he's a monkey and you have a fool for a lifetime.



---------------------------------------------------

I bet you didnt know that your god fugger is the offspring of two retarded monkeys, did you?

Not only that, your god humper dumper dood was born horribly deformed.

Yep it's true, His asshole is in the center of his face. That's why he spends his life doodling other monkeys, and of course pigs and goats.

That's just one of the many reasons your humpty dumpty assholeface dog turd god guy will never appear to save you silly brain dead christurds.

So suck up some more of your ignorant silly worthless BLIND FAITH you mindless loser.

I didn't know there was pure hydrogen peroxide flowing out of my tap when I open it.

Water is 2 atoms hydrogen and 1 atom oxygen, oxygen is 2 atoms oxygen.

Hydrogen Peroxide is 2 atoms hydrogen and 2 atoms oxygen, which isn't even found in nature.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Claiming there is oxygen (in the O2 sense) everywhere is completely and utterly retarded, not even a 14 year old highschool kid should make such rediculous claim.

And yes in the post I refused to go into your chemistry knowledge you did assert that since plants create the molecule oxygen and plants aren't nuclear plants creating new elements (not even taking the fact into consideration that there are for example algae producing oxygen through photosynthesis as well).

Seriously discussing this shit is even degrading for me to have to write a rebuttal to.


Oxygen — Atomic Symbol: O
[link to www.google.ca]


How old are you?

Shouldn't you be playing with your friends?

The bugs, believed to be descended from ocean-dwelling organisms
descends = evolved from
ocean = H2Oxygen


Thanks for helping prove Evolution.

Dead Sea eh?

Water - H2Oxygen

O K A Y!!!!

Evolutionists are some of the most ignorant, tow the company line types out there.

They've been sold a form of Hinduism and in the ever wishful thinking they can somehow "evolve" into a "god" they've flushed their brain down the toilet.

Teach a man he's a monkey and you have a fool for a lifetime.

Why cant you athiests get it through your head that everything around you, including yourselves were imagined first and then created?

How about the computer you are on? First it was imagined, and then it was constructed.

Your bodies and brains are way more advanced than the most advanced computer ever made. Can you code .D.N.A to grow into a computer? NO.

When talking about a creator, no religion, or bible needs to be mentioned. Why is the subject of God such a touchy subject? When the science teacher was teaching our class evolution, I thought ''no way'' and i wasnt at all religious.

Why does the subject of God always need to be about religion. Religion is only the opinions of others as to what they think god expects from us.

That fact that people have grown adapted to the magic that is around you blinds people. Maybe thats why you couldnt be raised with god, because

Its a lot easier to prove god exists than to prove god doesnt exist. Just think logical. People try so hard to debunk creation, when in fact all they are doing is making themselves look ignorant.

Then you have these Darwinists who claim that creation and evolution coincide. Humans were created as humans, and not very long ago at all. Over 6 billion people on the outskirts of our family trees right now. Look at a big tree with lots of branches and follow the branches inward toward the trunk. If the family trees were planted even 20000 years ago there would be a trillion people right now. Now some narrow mind is going to say '' wars & diseases kept the population down over time.'' True but still, a family tree has less and less branches the closer you get to the trunk. This very civilization is only a few thousand years old, not millions. Sure this planet is millions of years old, but for some reason our family trees were planted or replanted not very long ago. Do the math. The world population a century

FREE oxygen.

If you skip what you think are unnecessary words, you get the wrong answers.

Euhm you still didn't comprehend the difference between the molecule oxygen we breath (O2) and the atomic element (O)...

:wewin:

If a species needed to evolve, or adapt to its environment to survive, the species would completely die off long before it was able to adapt. The single-cell organism that allegedly started life on this planet would have become extinct long before an evolution process would be complete. If a fish needed to grow gills to breath in water, it would take a long time, and many generations of fish to complete the process. Unfortunately, the first generation could not breath in the water, so they drowned and became extinct before being able to start growing gills. What came first, the chicken or the egg? The chicken was imagined first, then it was grown through cell-reproduction. Everything was imagined first, and then created by an extremely advanced, imaginative entity. Why isn't your creator here right now? I already explained why in the thread .''.Aleph-tau'' .Take time to read it. Jason

WOW Jason, when you pick a topic for discussion, you pick a doozy!

The gulf between science and spirituality (not religion) is one of the broken things that must be fixed before man completes this phase of his growth (aka evolution).

We must not dismiss either paradigm in parroting the arguments of the last 500 years. The rational male element (science) and the intuitive female element (spiritual) must be reconciled with each other to balance our understanding of creation. Only then can we move to the next level of learning.

The scientist must admit that he resorts to spontaneous generation at some point in his argument, and the spiritualist needs to understand that time is perceived and described in scripture in different ways.

Look for points of agreement rather than differences. Be kind and respect your adversary's opinion. The law of reconciliation should be applied.

The way to the future is found through open minds and hearts.

Thank You for your time,

dennis

Why can't God use the process of evolution for creation?


Life began with the Big Bang, we presume, and life evolved from water or an asteroid containing DNA, because our DNA did not come from earth.

Christians have their silly fairytale story of God modeling clay. The Source is within all and my conception of God is an intelligent consciousness that we knew in the beginning.
This intelligent consciousness is in all things and water.

So, why can't we have evolution and creationism combined?

ill start with a simple 1.
Debunk the evolution of birds

we have fossil evidence of dinosaurs with feathers and birds have an eerily similar bone structure to that species of dinosaur

I take it that the 'debunkers' of evolution went to American Public High School, ergo they have these false arguments and questions that may 'sound' right, but really do not address the mechanisms of adaptation and evolution of species.

Evolution is at the very least a two step process.

You have the adaptation of species, ergo we have Indian Elephant, Asian elephant and African Elephant.

Then we have the generation of new species from older species. Thus we have a primate way back in history that lead to us and lead to the Great Apes.

You ought to read about the Toba eruption that almost made
humans extinct 74,000 years ago.

You ought to read about the Toba eruption that almost made
humans extinct 74,000 years ago.


Radioactive ‘dating’ failure
Recent New Zealand lava flows yield ‘ages’ of millions of years

by Andrew Snelling

Standing roughly in the centre of New Zealand’s North Island, Mt Ngauruhoe is New Zealand’s newest volcano and one of the most active. It is not as well publicized as its larger close neighbour MT Ruapehu, which has erupted briefly several times in the last five years.

However, Mt Ngauruhoe is an imposing, almost perfect cone that rises more than 1,000 metres (3,300 feet) above the surrounding landscape.

Mt Ngauruhoe is thought to have been active for at least 2,500 years, with more than 70 eruptive periods since 1839, when European settlers first recorded a steam eruption. Of course, before that, the Maoris witnessed many eruptions from the mountain. The first lava eruption seen by Europeans occurred in 1870. Then there were ash eruptions every few years until a major explosive eruption in April–May 1948, followed by lava flowing down the northwestern slopes in February 1949. The estimated lava volume was about 575,000 cubic metres (20 million cubic feet).

Conclusion

The radioactive potassium-argon dating method has been demonstrated to fail on 1949, 1954, and 1975 lava flows at Mt Ngauruhoe, New Zealand, in spite of the quality of the laboratory’s K–Ar analytical work. We know the true ages of the rocks because they were observed to form less than 50 years ago. Yet they yield ‘ages’ up to 3.5 million years which are thus false. How can we trust the use of this same ‘dating’ method on rocks whose ages we don’t know? If the method fails on rocks when we have an independent eye-witness account, then why should we trust it on other rocks where there are no independent historical cross-checks?
[link to www.answersingenesis.org]
[link to www.detectingdesign.com]
[link to www.trueorigin.org]

The age of the earth has changed several times over the centuries. After the supposed moon mission and resulting rock samples were tested these estimates increased to 4.5 billion.

Moon rocks

In general, the rocks collected from the Moon are extremely old compared to rocks found on Earth, as measured by radiometric dating techniques. They range in age from about 3.16 billion years old for the basaltic samples derived from the lunar maria, up to about 4.5 billion years old for rocks derived from the highlands. Based on the age dating technique of "crater counting," the youngest basaltic eruptions are believed to have occurred about 1.2 billion years ago, but we do not possess samples of these lavas. In contrast, the oldest ages of rocks from the Earth are about 3.8 billion years old, a vastly different value from that of the moon.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

This all rest on the supposed moon mission, rocks and faulty radiometric dating.

Age of the Earth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Modern geologists and geophysicists consider the age of the Earth to be around 4.54 billion years. This age has been determined by radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samples.

Arthur Holmes published The Age of the Earth, an Introduction to Geological Ideas in 1927 in which he presented a range of 1.6 to 3.0 billion years based on radiometric dating.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
____

Evolution: Fact or Belief?
[link to video.google.com]

Is the Theory of Evolution a scientific fact or a mere belief? Five world top scientific minds give their answer on Evolution. A ground breaking video sold all round the world, award winning international documentary, now available for all to see.
( 1 hr 13m )
[link to www.noevolution.org]
The thrust of the film is the lab research from Colorado State University on stratification of the geocolumn and subsequent dating methods.
including:
Prof M. Giertych, geneticist
Prof R. Fondi, paleontologist
Prof G. Sermonti, molecular biologist
Prof. Boudreaux, inorganic chemist
Guy Berthault, sedimentologist

Colorado State University flood modeling - Experiments on Stratification by Pierre Julien & Guy Berthault. Published by Geological Society of France, French Academy of Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences Journal, and others...

I take it that the 'debunkers' of evolution went to American Public High School, ergo they have these false arguments and questions that may 'sound' right, but really do not address the mechanisms of adaptation and evolution of species.

Evolution is at the very least a two step process.

You have the adaptation of species, ergo we have Indian Elephant, Asian elephant and African Elephant.

Then we have the generation of new species from older species. Thus we have a primate way back in history that lead to us and lead to the Great Apes.


American schools teach evolution.

There is no evolution between man and apes.

I take it that the 'debunkers' of evolution went to American Public High School, ergo they have these false arguments and questions that may 'sound' right, but really do not address the mechanisms of adaptation and evolution of species.

Evolution is at the very least a two step process.

You have the adaptation of species, ergo we have Indian Elephant, Asian elephant and African Elephant.

Then we have the generation of new species from older species. Thus we have a primate way back in history that lead to us and lead to the Great Apes.


American schools teach evolution.

There is no evolution between man and apes.