Planet X: Right To Know

It's interesting. thanks OP.

Yeah I'm wondering that also. Maybe we'll see some news about it later. Who knows.

Fucking shill asshole postman responds 3 minutes after the thread is created when the video is 10 minutes long.

Fuck you shill.

Hey now.. be nice..

Sorry. I just hate that guy so much....

[link to www.holyconservancy.org]

Bingo. It's behind our sun these days, unlit.

Ok. That is one counter excuse and two challenges. Great job Postman. I owe you $200 and I forwarded a recommendation for promotion to HQ, not to mention a spot in bunker CT32. You've really been outdoing your co-workers as of late. You don't post too much to be obvious and you pretend to really know what you're talking about. I love it.

I'm the op (youtube user name: RWNSD)... Strange, I was logged in when I posted this last night but the thread shows it was posted by an Anonymous Coward, neither of which I am.

Hey Postman, so you didn't even watch the vid? But yet you posted with your quick pre-fabb'd, pre-written response? Don't you have anything better to do than monitor the forums for any discussion regarding PX? No, okay then. You have revealed your true nature. Thanks.

Of course the establishment is going to deny the existence of PX! But prior to the IRAS sighting in 1983 the discussion of PX was not censored:
- Jan. 30, 1983 NY Times: "Clues Get Warm in the Search for Planet X"
- Dec. 31, 1983 Washington Post: "Possibly as Large as Jupiter: Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered"
- Sept. 10, 1984 US News & World Report: "Planet X-Is it Really Out There?"
- The 1983 Encyclopedia Britannica has a diagram showing that the Pioneer 10 and 11 Probes were launched into space to get a triangulated fix on the "Tenth Planet" (Planet X)!

In regards to why PX is difficult to capture on film, check the Russian Second Sun Vid. Many variables need to be considered, including but not limited to Px's distance and angle from the viewer in relation to the Sun. As the vid demonstrates, PX is lost in the Sun's glare when viewed from a normal distance and requires a long focal point (zoom) lens with proper filter to reduce the glare.



How about the four recent PX sightings, all within a 3.5 week period?
March 27, 2009 SOHO C3: Winged Globe
April 16, 2009 Alberta, Canada: Second Sun at sunrise
April 19, 2009 SOHO C3: Winged Globe
April 21, 2009 Chkalovsky, Russia: Second Sun at sunset

And what's your excuse for the Magnetosphere Breach? And what's happening with the Ionosphere?

[link to www.youtube.com]

Sure, no prob.

Hey, I'm finally no longer an "Anonymous Coward"! Not sure why but my first response to Postman was "AC" too. I logged out and back in and here I am!

Here's the Magnetosphere Breach Vid:



Last Edited by Truth to Power on 05/28/2009 12:35 AM

So is that a no on bunker CT32? How come no one wants in on that bunker? Alright let me check, I've got only one opening left on bunker UT17, so you'd have to ditch your girlfriend. However, let me check in with the boss. There was an agent last week who thought about going rogue, and needless to say, he won't be needing his spot anymore.

[link to www.universetoday.com]

"Infrared observations = Planet X
Is this Planet X, or is it simply a young galaxy? (NASA - possible source)
There is much emphasis placed on the 1983 “discovery” of a mysterious heavenly body by NASA’s Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) on the outskirts of the Solar system, some 50 billion miles (540 AU) away. Naturally the world’s media will have been very excited by such a discovery and began making noises that perhaps this was Planet X (the most popular accessible resources for Planet X advocates is the Washington Post article published on December 31st 1983 titled “Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered“). In actuality, astronomers weren’t sure what the infrared object was (the clue is in the word “mystery”). Initial media reports postulated that it could be a long-period comet, or a planet, or a far-off young galaxy or a protostar (i.e. a brown dwarf). As soon as the last possibility is mentioned, suddenly this became the “discovery” that Planet X was in fact a brown dwarf orbiting in the outer reaches of our Solar System.

“So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a nearby “protostar” that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the light cast by its stars ever gets through.” - Thomas O’Toole, Washington Post Staff Writer, December 30th 1983 (from text on the Planet X and Pole Shift website)

So where did the Washington Post get its story? The story was published in response to the research printed a paper titled “Unidentified point sources in the IRAS minisurvey” (by Houck et al, published in Astrophysical Journal Letters, 278:L63, 1984). Dr. Gerry Neugebauer, co-investigator in the IRAS project, was interviewed and strongly stated that what IRAS had seen was not “incoming mail” (i.e. the results did not suggest there was an object approaching Earth). On reading this interesting research, I was especially drawn to the paper’s conclusion:

“A number of candidate identifications have been considered including near-solar system, galactic, and extragalactic objects. Further observations at infrared and other wavelengths may provide additional information in support of one of these conjectures, or perhaps these objects will require entirely different interpretations.” - Houck et al, Astrophysical Journal Letters, 278:L63, 1984.

Although these IRAS observations were seeing mysterious objects, at this stage, there was no indication that there was an object (let alone a brown dwarf) powering its way toward us. But the rumours had already begun to flow. When follow-up papers were published in 1985 (Unidentified IRAS sources - Ultrahigh-luminosity galaxies, Houck et al., 1985) and 1987 (The IRAS View of the Extragalactic Sky, Soifer et al., 1987), there was little if any media interest in their findings. According to these publications, most of the IRAS observations in the 1984 paper were distant, ultra-luminous young galaxies and one was a filamentary structure known as “infrared cirrus” floating in intergalactic space. IRAS never observed any astronomical body in the outer reaches of the Solar System."

Plenty of great information at that site.

BEFORE 2012! LET'S REMEMBER THAT!

Last Edited by ZETA FREAK on 05/28/2009 01:37 AM

LOL that is okay! He is a good man.

Guess you didn't get around to reading what IRAS really found.

[link to adsbit.harvard.edu]

But actually reading is not to be expected from a planet eX wanker.

Better luck next time, kid.

Here's the situation as I see it.
We have two separate theories here, one is possibly true, the other is laughably stupid and untrue.

First, the untrue...

The myth that Planet X is currently visible and can be photographed by very specific people with apparently magic cameras, is profoundly false.

I believe it might be deliberate disinformation with the added help of gullible fools who will believe any idiotic theory.

The crap that PlanetX (Nibiru) is here now and visible from Earth is absolute bullshit, and I agree with DrPostman regarding this and the request for real evidence.



Now, there is a second story that has the possibility of being true...

I believe there is very compelling evidence that there is indeed another planetary body in our solar system with an orbit of approximately 3600 years.

There is a chance it is Wormwood, Nibiru, Marduk, The Destroyer, The Red Star, and many other names for this rogue planet.

However, I think the preponderance of the evidence would suggest that the planet will return somewhere around 2012; possible the Mayan calendar is counting down to the return of this planet.


Basically, the "Planet X is here now" idea is complete bullshit and the people that somehow believe this nonsense are profoundly ignorant and foolish.

But the idea of a real planet that will soon make its way through the inner solar system and bring a shitload of trouble to Earth is a very possibly true.


From research I have done, I learned that as Planet X (Nibiru) gets closer to the sun in its orbit, it will gradually pick up speed (and gradually lose speed as it moves away). From the models I saw, it seems likely that Planet X will not be visible to most telescopes until a few months before its pass around the sun; a year at the most.

Therefore, if the Mayan calendar is counting down to the return of Planet X on December 21, 2012, then I do not expect any real visual evidence to be available until early 2012.

Actually a brown dwarf or red dwarf star three years away should be easily visible to the naked eye by now. It would likely dwarf in brightness everything but the moon and sun.

One other thing: What do people mean when they talk about the "return" or "arrival" of planet x?

God Bless!

What does this picture have to do with Planet X? The symbology shows dream time and expression in the dream state and being part of a state of being we are not aware of when awake, unless we are evolved.

Looks to me like a very decorated womb, complete with umbilical cord and vagina.

:nancycomic:

From one world into the next and Nibiru is interwoven the bridge from one to the other.

And it's a gift from the Wingmakers to look at while thinking about it all.

Peace,
Michael

What does any of this have to do with an imaginary planet?

Obviously you have not watched the video?

I have, and this planet is still imaginary.

of course you could prove me utterly, staggeringly wrong. All you have to do is show an orbit that a planet that large could occupy that is stable over geological time frames and still fits the characteristics that it is supposed to have while leaving the rest of the Solar System intact as we see it now..

Oh yes, please show your math.

Doesn't make it any less bullshit.

Why do you idiots keep trying to push the 1983 IRAS NYT report when the researchers themselves in later papers say that the only thing found was a new type of distant galaxy which has been confirmed by other researchers many times over? Do you really think that if you keep saying it that it will come true?

Fuckin px tards.

" The 1983 Encyclopedia Britannica has a diagram showing that the Pioneer 10 and 11 Probes were launched into space to get a triangulated fix on the "Tenth Planet" (Planet X)!"

Hey, I have this set. Bought it from the local high school book sale for $10. Do I look up Pioneer 11, or what?

Thank you! And yes, we do have a right to know. Even Obama is keeping us from knowing about Planet X. It should be announced as a SCIENTIFIC discovery and let the chips fall where they may.

I think the Zeta are right: Most people are so stuck in their daily lives, trying to pay the bills and keep their families fed, that not much would change if Planet X was announced. So what is the delay?

The delay is the power elite are scared to death of YOU, the common man, and what you might do when you find out that the government has known about Planet X since aboutr 1946 and FOUND it using the IRAS telescope in 1983, but NEVER bothered to tell us, the people.

It is outrageous, and you know it!

Obama should announce Planet X, NOW! Sure, he did not start the secrecy but he can end it today. He will be making an announcement on TV when he is forced to, but not until then.

Go ahead and post your B.S. flags. I don't care.

Why do you ignore all the followup articles after much more research with more probes into the outer solar system that show no such thing and even state that nothing larger than Pluto could possibly be within a certain range since it would make detectable effects on the other planets?



Which hundreds of thousands of amateur astronomers have and they see no such thing.



All bullshit. The SOHO images are simply pixel bleedover as explained hundreds of times and exactly like all CCD imagers experience with bright objects. The "second sun" crap is all reflections and lens flares. Give me a break!

Get some education.

Tard. This article is not new for Postman.

good video op. concerning the article written in the washington post by thomas o'toole....i wonder if anyone has ever intervied mr. o'toole about this and the real reason the article was pulled/retracted.