| Users Online Now: 1,857 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 756,532 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,290,949 | Threads Today: 494 | Posts Today: 9,058 |
| 02:26 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,857 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 756,532 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,290,949 | Threads Today: 494 | Posts Today: 9,058 |
| 02:26 PM | ||
Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!! | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 4832919  United States02/21/2012 07:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Zetas via their emissary Nancy Lieder endorsed Clif and his work and said that it had an accuracy track record. Therefore, Clif is definitely ON TOPIC. BAN melty FOR LYING, TROLLING AND IN GENERAL BEING AN ASSHOLE!!! |
**ZetaMax**  User ID: 10632471 United States02/21/2012 08:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Zetas via their emissary Nancy Lieder endorsed Clif and his work and said that it had an accuracy track record. Therefore, Clif is definitely ON TOPIC. BAN melty FOR LYING, TROLLING AND IN GENERAL BEING AN ASSHOLE!!! Name ONE single "lie" I have told - I DARE YOU!!!!! |
| **ZetaMax** User ID: 10632471 United States02/21/2012 08:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | >> imaginary "masons, illuminati, [amd] agents of rome." Quoting: **ZetaMax** Seriously? You've got to be kidding! There is no masonic conspiracy for world domination and there is zero evidence of the continuation of the Bavarian Illuminati beyond the 18th century. Not as much fun as the GLP paradigm but it's the truth. Really now - tell me, just "how" do you go about telling such a LIE and looking at yourself in the mirror?? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 3559821 United States02/21/2012 08:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There is no masonic conspiracy for world domination and there is zero evidence of the continuation of the Bavarian Illuminati beyond the 18th century. Not as much fun as the GLP paradigm but it's the truth. Really now - tell me, just "how" do you go about telling such a LIE and looking at yourself in the mirror?? I have trouble looking in the mirror and seeing an old man but it has nothing to do with telling lies. :) What you are holding onto is an unexamined belief, just like a Catholic believing in the Virgin Birth without ever questioning it simply because that was what they were taught as children. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 4832919 United States02/22/2012 12:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Zetas via their emissary Nancy Lieder endorsed Clif and his work and said that it had an accuracy track record. Therefore, Clif is definitely ON TOPIC. BAN melty FOR LYING, TROLLING AND IN GENERAL BEING AN ASSHOLE!!! Name ONE single "lie" I have told - I DARE YOU!!!!! Try your "Bridget" stunt, or your claim that debunkers re paid. Pure, baldfaced lies and trollery! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 10422385  Canada02/22/2012 01:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Zetas via their emissary Nancy Lieder endorsed Clif and his work and said that it had an accuracy track record. Therefore, Clif is definitely ON TOPIC. But we already have established that Nancy Lieder is full of shit. Hap has had his steak and Melfy is 150 clams down. That is the topic of this thread. Clif has nothing to do with it. And if Nancy endorses Clif, that's another strike against him. The only difference between Clif and Nancy is that Clif made quite a bit more money off his scam than she ever did. I don't know about the rest of the debunkers, but I couldn't give a fig about Clif. I think Max wants TLR to change the name of the thread to something like "ZetaMax trolls for attention", since he always tries to make it about him and his current flavour of doom. That's a thread I don't want to be a part of. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 4832919 United States02/22/2012 03:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Zetas via their emissary Nancy Lieder endorsed Clif and his work and said that it had an accuracy track record. Therefore, Clif is definitely ON TOPIC. But we already have established that Nancy Lieder is full of shit. Hap has had his steak and Melfy is 150 clams down. That is the topic of this thread. Clif has nothing to do with it. And if Nancy endorses Clif, that's another strike against him. The only difference between Clif and Nancy is that Clif made quite a bit more money off his scam than she ever did. I don't know about the rest of the debunkers, but I couldn't give a fig about Clif. I think Max wants TLR to change the name of the thread to something like "ZetaMax trolls for attention", since he always tries to make it about him and his current flavour of doom. That's a thread I don't want to be a part of. A VERY good reason to ban his lying, trolling, pathologically stupid ass! |
| **ZetaMax** User ID: 10632471 United States02/22/2012 06:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: **ZetaMax** The Zetas via their emissary Nancy Lieder endorsed Clif and his work and said that it had an accuracy track record. Therefore, Clif is definitely ON TOPIC. BAN melty FOR LYING, TROLLING AND IN GENERAL BEING AN ASSHOLE!!! Name ONE single "lie" I have told - I DARE YOU!!!!! Try your "Bridget" stunt, or your claim that debunkers re paid. Pure, baldfaced lies and trollery! The "stunt" you refer to is the only thing you can come up with? Please explain how that is any worse than the OP's using a script to up the view count - for which he got banned, and the view count slashed to a number probably less than the actual one? Yet he was re-admitted, and still is the OP for this thread. However, I suspect that the banning you call for is a permanent one. Please explain how that is "fair"? As for debunkers being paid, there ARE paid debunkers - the DOD has admitted such, and it is known that many are employed as contractors by public relations firms under contract with said agency. This is not speculation. What *is* speculation is whether any of them show up HERE - in this thread. Suggesting that one of them might from time to time is not "lying". Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 02/22/2012 07:02 AM |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 10422385 Canada02/22/2012 07:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| **ZetaMax** User ID: 659599 United States02/22/2012 07:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fuck off Max. How many times did you call for banning people on Nancy's threads? You are such a fucking hypocrite. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10422385 Nobody ever got banned because of a "call" I made. In fact, I never actually "called" for anyone's banning. I only "celebrated" when it happened - post event. If this were football, the only call that could be made, was for "excessive celebration". An admitted "personal foul", and one for which I now APOLOGIZE to everyone for. Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 02/22/2012 07:49 AM |
| Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States02/22/2012 07:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Clif's radio schedule for his next two appearances: Quoting: **ZetaMax** February 22, 2012 - 4 to 6pm pst with Bill Xam, at Surrounded by Idiots Radio . February 26, 2012 - 6 to 9pm pst with James Aurthur Jancik (the hottest foot in radio). FIVE FULL HOURS OF CLIF!!!!! Good...that means you won't be here for shilling for at least five hours. On the downside - after it's over, you'll be shilling his latest bullshit. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
| Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States02/22/2012 07:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States02/22/2012 07:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Zetas via their emissary Nancy Lieder endorsed Clif and his work and said that it had an accuracy track record. Therefore, Clif is definitely ON TOPIC. Quoting: **ZetaMax** Well, considering the "Zetas" have a 100% track record of FAILURE, it isn't surprising they would endorse someone else with a 100% track record of failure.  A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
| Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States02/22/2012 07:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That you had evidence of palm fronds being found in the Artic and you were going to post it. You never did. Oh, and here's the one you tell almost on a daily basis - claiming "debunkers" are paid shills. I'm sure I can come up with more. Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 02/22/2012 07:56 AM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
| **ZetaMax** User ID: 659599 United States02/22/2012 08:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That you had evidence of palm fronds being found in the Artic and you were going to post it. You never did. Oh, and here's the one you tell almost on a daily basis - claiming "debunkers" are paid shills. I'm sure I can come up with more. >> That you had evidence of palm fronds being found in the Artic and you were going to post it. You never did. At the time I posted that pledge, I thought I had the reference I was contemplating. But after spending over an hour trying to locate it, I gave up. I still think I have it "somewhere" in some book I read, and if it ever turns up - I'll be sure to post it. The pledge was an HONEST one, and I have a REASON for not following through - i.e., I LOST it. That is NOT lying. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States02/22/2012 12:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4832919 BAN melty FOR LYING, TROLLING AND IN GENERAL BEING AN ASSHOLE!!! Name ONE single "lie" I have told - I DARE YOU!!!!! Try your "Bridget" stunt, or your claim that debunkers re paid. Pure, baldfaced lies and trollery! The "stunt" you refer to is the only thing you can come up with? Please explain how that is any worse than the OP's using a script to up the view count - for which he got banned, and the view count slashed to a number probably less than the actual one? Yet he was re-admitted, and still is the OP for this thread. However, I suspect that the banning you call for is a permanent one. Please explain how that is "fair"? As for debunkers being paid, there ARE paid debunkers - the DOD has admitted such, and it is known that many are employed as contractors by public relations firms under contract with said agency. This is not speculation. What *is* speculation is whether any of them show up HERE - in this thread. Suggesting that one of them might from time to time is not "lying". The comparison is irrelevant. You dared someone to come up with one lie of yours. They did. You lose. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 991880 United States02/22/2012 05:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Zetas via their emissary Nancy Lieder endorsed Clif and his work and said that it had an accuracy track record. Therefore, Clif is definitely ON TOPIC. BAN melty FOR LYING, TROLLING AND IN GENERAL BEING AN ASSHOLE!!! Name ONE single "lie" I have told - I DARE YOU!!!!! You keep posting "Debunkers wrong again"...YOU tell us one single time that we've been wrong - I DARE you!!!!! |
| **ZetaMax** User ID: 659599 United States02/22/2012 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Try your "Bridget" stunt, or your claim that debunkers re paid. Pure, baldfaced lies and trollery! The "stunt" you refer to is the only thing you can come up with? Please explain how that is any worse than the OP's using a script to up the view count - for which he got banned, and the view count slashed to a number probably less than the actual one? Yet he was re-admitted, and still is the OP for this thread. However, I suspect that the banning you call for is a permanent one. Please explain how that is "fair"? As for debunkers being paid, there ARE paid debunkers - the DOD has admitted such, and it is known that many are employed as contractors by public relations firms under contract with said agency. This is not speculation. What *is* speculation is whether any of them show up HERE - in this thread. Suggesting that one of them might from time to time is not "lying". The comparison is irrelevant. You dared someone to come up with one lie of yours. They did. You lose. So I'm "once" and "forever" a liar, because I was caught ONCE doing a tiny little sock-puppet routine for kicks? And it had to be for "kicks" because I took no precautions that would have saved me from being "caught" - as evidenced by the fact that I was outed minutes after that one and only posting. So I'll NEVER be able to live it down, never be able to crawl out from under it's canapy. I am to be judged - SEVERELY judged, derided, condemned, mocked, insulted, berated for this one tiny little misstep ... FOREVER. It that the way you guys "roll"??? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1015670 United States02/22/2012 06:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4832919 Try your "Bridget" stunt, or your claim that debunkers re paid. Pure, baldfaced lies and trollery! The "stunt" you refer to is the only thing you can come up with? Please explain how that is any worse than the OP's using a script to up the view count - for which he got banned, and the view count slashed to a number probably less than the actual one? Yet he was re-admitted, and still is the OP for this thread. However, I suspect that the banning you call for is a permanent one. Please explain how that is "fair"? As for debunkers being paid, there ARE paid debunkers - the DOD has admitted such, and it is known that many are employed as contractors by public relations firms under contract with said agency. This is not speculation. What *is* speculation is whether any of them show up HERE - in this thread. Suggesting that one of them might from time to time is not "lying". The comparison is irrelevant. You dared someone to come up with one lie of yours. They did. You lose. So I'm "once" and "forever" a liar, because I was caught ONCE doing a tiny little sock-puppet routine for kicks? And it had to be for "kicks" because I took no precautions that would have saved me from being "caught" - as evidenced by the fact that I was outed minutes after that one and only posting. So I'll NEVER be able to live it down, never be able to crawl out from under it's canapy. I am to be judged - SEVERELY judged, derided, condemned, mocked, insulted, berated for this one tiny little misstep ... FOREVER. It that the way you guys "roll"??? Stop obfuscating. You challenged for someone to point out a single lie. A debunker did. 74444 is right. All the rest of the handwaving you are doing is just that: handwaving. A single lie you told has been produced. Your excuses are irrelevant. You lose. (Sorry if I am stealing your thunder, 74444) |
| Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States02/22/2012 09:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| **ZetaMax** User ID: 10632471 United States02/22/2012 09:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hmmm, "Surrounded by Idiots Radio"...that implies that the radio is surrounded by idiots. Since you're listening, I guess that would be true. The show just ended. I'm waiting for the MP3. Here is what the show's host said in his chat: 22 Feb 12, 09:07 PM billxam: Thank you. Clif was attacked at the end of the show and we ended a few minutes early. 22 Feb 12, 09:08 PM billxam: I've never seen a denial of service attack like it. It was stunning in it's strength. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 11301000 United States02/23/2012 02:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4832919 Try your "Bridget" stunt, or your claim that debunkers re paid. Pure, baldfaced lies and trollery! The "stunt" you refer to is the only thing you can come up with? Please explain how that is any worse than the OP's using a script to up the view count - for which he got banned, and the view count slashed to a number probably less than the actual one? Yet he was re-admitted, and still is the OP for this thread. However, I suspect that the banning you call for is a permanent one. Please explain how that is "fair"? As for debunkers being paid, there ARE paid debunkers - the DOD has admitted such, and it is known that many are employed as contractors by public relations firms under contract with said agency. This is not speculation. What *is* speculation is whether any of them show up HERE - in this thread. Suggesting that one of them might from time to time is not "lying". The comparison is irrelevant. You dared someone to come up with one lie of yours. They did. You lose. So I'm "once" and "forever" a liar, because I was caught ONCE doing a tiny little sock-puppet routine for kicks? And it had to be for "kicks" because I took no precautions that would have saved me from being "caught" - as evidenced by the fact that I was outed minutes after that one and only posting. So I'll NEVER be able to live it down, never be able to crawl out from under it's canapy. I am to be judged - SEVERELY judged, derided, condemned, mocked, insulted, berated for this one tiny little misstep ... FOREVER. It that the way you guys "roll"??? Face reality, melfy, you are a lying troll. You are, in short, a waste of electrons. |
| **ZetaMax** User ID: 10632471 United States02/23/2012 06:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: **ZetaMax** The "stunt" you refer to is the only thing you can come up with? Please explain how that is any worse than the OP's using a script to up the view count - for which he got banned, and the view count slashed to a number probably less than the actual one? Yet he was re-admitted, and still is the OP for this thread. However, I suspect that the banning you call for is a permanent one. Please explain how that is "fair"? As for debunkers being paid, there ARE paid debunkers - the DOD has admitted such, and it is known that many are employed as contractors by public relations firms under contract with said agency. This is not speculation. What *is* speculation is whether any of them show up HERE - in this thread. Suggesting that one of them might from time to time is not "lying". The comparison is irrelevant. You dared someone to come up with one lie of yours. They did. You lose. So I'm "once" and "forever" a liar, because I was caught ONCE doing a tiny little sock-puppet routine for kicks? And it had to be for "kicks" because I took no precautions that would have saved me from being "caught" - as evidenced by the fact that I was outed minutes after that one and only posting. So I'll NEVER be able to live it down, never be able to crawl out from under it's canapy. I am to be judged - SEVERELY judged, derided, condemned, mocked, insulted, berated for this one tiny little misstep ... FOREVER. It that the way you guys "roll"??? Face reality, melfy, you are a lying troll. You are, in short, a waste of electrons. >> You are, in short, a waste of electrons. Reality, huh? How about this for "reality". Clif had predicted a new "ice age" forming and that North America would get hit severely with mountains of snow and ice. Well, he was WRONG AGAIN. It was instead EASTERN EUROPE and Western Asia (Siberia) that is getting it instead. But it doesn't matter does it - he's either ALL "RIGHT" or ALL WRONG, with no quarter for partial accuracy. Right? |
| Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States02/23/2012 06:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | >> You are, in short, a waste of electrons. Quoting: **ZetaMax** Reality, huh? How about this for "reality". Clif had predicted a new "ice age" forming and that North America would get hit severely with mountains of snow and ice. Well, he was WRONG AGAIN. It was instead EASTERN EUROPE and Western Asia (Siberia) that is getting it instead. But it doesn't matter does it - he's either ALL "RIGHT" or ALL WRONG, with no quarter for partial accuracy. Right? I'd say he's wrong for two reasons. 1) It didn't happen in the U.S. and 2) because one winter of heavy snow in Europe doesn't constitute an ice age. You're quite premature if you're calling it that. Why don't we see where Europe stands next winter. Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 02/23/2012 07:02 AM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 11301000 United States02/23/2012 12:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444 The comparison is irrelevant. You dared someone to come up with one lie of yours. They did. You lose. So I'm "once" and "forever" a liar, because I was caught ONCE doing a tiny little sock-puppet routine for kicks? And it had to be for "kicks" because I took no precautions that would have saved me from being "caught" - as evidenced by the fact that I was outed minutes after that one and only posting. So I'll NEVER be able to live it down, never be able to crawl out from under it's canapy. I am to be judged - SEVERELY judged, derided, condemned, mocked, insulted, berated for this one tiny little misstep ... FOREVER. It that the way you guys "roll"??? Face reality, melfy, you are a lying troll. You are, in short, a waste of electrons. >> You are, in short, a waste of electrons. Reality, huh? How about this for "reality". Clif had predicted a new "ice age" forming and that North America would get hit severely with mountains of snow and ice. Well, he was WRONG AGAIN. It was instead EASTERN EUROPE and Western Asia (Siberia) that is getting it instead. But it doesn't matter does it - he's either ALL "RIGHT" or ALL WRONG, with no quarter for partial accuracy. Right? No one but idiots, fools, frauds, trolls and liars give a flying fuck what clif says. BAN MELFY!!! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 3559821 United States02/23/2012 01:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Reality, huh? How about this for "reality". Clif had predicted a new "ice age" forming and that North America would get hit severely with mountains of snow and ice. Well, he was WRONG AGAIN. Quoting: **ZetaMax** It was instead EASTERN EUROPE and Western Asia (Siberia) that is getting it instead. But it doesn't matter does it - he's either ALL "RIGHT" or ALL WRONG, with no quarter for partial accuracy. Right? Clif predicted an ice age for America and it got cold somewhere else in the winter. How is that partially correct? It's like predicting an earthquake will happen in California. Definitely the Jeane Dixon effect. He churns out volumes of vague, cryptic material and then his followers wade through it after the fact trying to make whatever connections they can no matter how tenuous. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1015670 United States02/23/2012 03:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444 The comparison is irrelevant. You dared someone to come up with one lie of yours. They did. You lose. So I'm "once" and "forever" a liar, because I was caught ONCE doing a tiny little sock-puppet routine for kicks? And it had to be for "kicks" because I took no precautions that would have saved me from being "caught" - as evidenced by the fact that I was outed minutes after that one and only posting. So I'll NEVER be able to live it down, never be able to crawl out from under it's canapy. I am to be judged - SEVERELY judged, derided, condemned, mocked, insulted, berated for this one tiny little misstep ... FOREVER. It that the way you guys "roll"??? Face reality, melfy, you are a lying troll. You are, in short, a waste of electrons. >> You are, in short, a waste of electrons. Reality, huh? How about this for "reality". Clif had predicted a new "ice age" forming and that North America would get hit severely with mountains of snow and ice. Well, he was WRONG AGAIN. It was instead EASTERN EUROPE and Western Asia (Siberia) that is getting it instead. But it doesn't matter does it - he's either ALL "RIGHT" or ALL WRONG, with no quarter for partial accuracy. Right? Well, as far as I know, Clif never claimed 100 percent accuracy, as Nancy Lieder did. So he has that going for him. But, that said, his guesses about the future have been no more accurate than the average joe. So why should I listen to him? My guess *IS* as good as his, if not better. |
| Menow User ID: 11328206 United States02/23/2012 05:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 3559821 United States02/23/2012 07:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 11301000 United States02/24/2012 04:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Zetas via their emissary Nancy Lieder endorsed Clif and his work and said that it had an accuracy track record. Therefore, Clif is definitely ON TOPIC. BAN melty FOR LYING, TROLLING AND IN GENERAL BEING AN ASSHOLE!!! Name ONE single "lie" I have told - I DARE YOU!!!!! Isn't it interesting you don't deny trolling and being an asshole. |
