| Users Online Now: 1,333 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 108,180 | |
| Pageviews Today: 177,357 | Threads Today: 61 | Posts Today: 1,073 |
| 01:48 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,333 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 108,180 | |
| Pageviews Today: 177,357 | Threads Today: 61 | Posts Today: 1,073 |
| 01:48 AM | ||
Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!! | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1015670  United States07/06/2012 07:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| More about Tunnel-Vision User ID: 19248064  Germany07/06/2012 07:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | btw Member Numbers, Quoting: More about Tunnel-Vision 16056172 Ning naturally has limitations, even though they managed to prevent the member-number from being shown,the memberpage is still accessible: [link to poleshift.ning.com] On one page are 3 x 7 = 21 members, x 103 pages = 2163 members currently.   The purge must still be ongoing - now it's only showing 92 pages - 21 x 92 = 1,932. Stalin would be pleased. Think they are looking for the "Trojan horses". At least one they didn't find yet. :-)) . Damn it, they burned my sock before I had a chance to unleash my volley of truth regarding SDO. hehe, dont worry...All they can do is check your e-mail for records or scanning through your profile questions. In that you can sign up anytime (considering you are not too obvious) and contact members via personal messages. (Fortunately they cannot spy on these). They will call it "blackmailing" although if their "theories" are supposedly based on the truth they wouldn't need to worry anyway. |
| More about Tunnel-Vision User ID: 19248064 Germany07/06/2012 07:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Check out this one: [link to poleshift.ning.com] The member writes: "Consensus of good heads is this. The bright objects that seem to be rising when the Sun is setting are NOT the Moon (which is in the East), NOT Venus (because it would be moving right to left with the setting Sun, seen looking S from Antarctica). They are reflections on the cam windows. Note the bright lights move from left to right! The reflection bounce is making this apparent motion. If these lights were a planet, having a relationship to the Sun, they would be moving right to left, along with the Sun. Snap for 17:50 does, apparently, show Venus to the left of the Sun. Below, the Moon at Azumtu 120, and Venus as Azmuth 215." and astrogal50's response: "Wow. Now we know for sure why the debunkers are anxiously trying to debunk this evidence. The Dark Twin does not officially even exist, and the Establishment most certainly does not (yet) agree that the Dark Twin is caught (and moving) in the cup with the earth and Venus. Admitting to that cup would also mean admitting the earth stopped in its orbit, and the Establishment (currently) fakes or quashes anything that shows otherwise." .. she just don't gets it. BTW: The Moon was there and just left the webcam to the left again: [link to api.ning.com] Skymap: [link to www.imagebanana.com] Cover-UP! Cover-UP! lol...  |
**ZetaMax**  User ID: 18590531 United States07/06/2012 08:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Paid by YOU is not what the typical Doomie is tending to imply with their epithet. I am going on record RIGHT NOW with a NEW PREDICTION: Nothing out of the ordinary will happen at the London Olympics. You heard it here FIRST!!!  |
| Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States07/06/2012 08:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States07/06/2012 08:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Check out this one: Quoting: More about Tunnel-Vision 19248064 [link to poleshift.ning.com] The member writes: "Consensus of good heads is this. The bright objects that seem to be rising when the Sun is setting are NOT the Moon (which is in the East), NOT Venus (because it would be moving right to left with the setting Sun, seen looking S from Antarctica). They are reflections on the cam windows. Note the bright lights move from left to right! The reflection bounce is making this apparent motion. If these lights were a planet, having a relationship to the Sun, they would be moving right to left, along with the Sun. Snap for 17:50 does, apparently, show Venus to the left of the Sun. Below, the Moon at Azumtu 120, and Venus as Azmuth 215." and astrogal50's response: "Wow. Now we know for sure why the debunkers are anxiously trying to debunk this evidence. The Dark Twin does not officially even exist, and the Establishment most certainly does not (yet) agree that the Dark Twin is caught (and moving) in the cup with the earth and Venus. Admitting to that cup would also mean admitting the earth stopped in its orbit, and the Establishment (currently) fakes or quashes anything that shows otherwise." .. she just don't gets it. BTW: The Moon was there and just left the webcam to the left again: [link to api.ning.com] Skymap: [link to www.imagebanana.com] Cover-UP! Cover-UP! lol... Mark Twain once said: "It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them they've been fooled." I'd say that describes Nancy's followers to a T. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
| **ZetaMax** User ID: 18590531 United States07/06/2012 08:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| More about Tunnel-Vision User ID: 19248064 Germany07/06/2012 08:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Check out this one: Quoting: More about Tunnel-Vision 19248064 [link to poleshift.ning.com] The member writes: "Consensus of good heads is this. The bright objects that seem to be rising when the Sun is setting are NOT the Moon (which is in the East), NOT Venus (because it would be moving right to left with the setting Sun, seen looking S from Antarctica). They are reflections on the cam windows. Note the bright lights move from left to right! The reflection bounce is making this apparent motion. If these lights were a planet, having a relationship to the Sun, they would be moving right to left, along with the Sun. Snap for 17:50 does, apparently, show Venus to the left of the Sun. Below, the Moon at Azumtu 120, and Venus as Azmuth 215." and astrogal50's response: "Wow. Now we know for sure why the debunkers are anxiously trying to debunk this evidence. The Dark Twin does not officially even exist, and the Establishment most certainly does not (yet) agree that the Dark Twin is caught (and moving) in the cup with the earth and Venus. Admitting to that cup would also mean admitting the earth stopped in its orbit, and the Establishment (currently) fakes or quashes anything that shows otherwise." .. she just don't gets it. BTW: The Moon was there and just left the webcam to the left again: [link to api.ning.com] Skymap: [link to www.imagebanana.com] Cover-UP! Cover-UP! lol... Mark Twain once said: "It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them they've been fooled." I'd say that describes Nancy's followers to a T. Yup. Someone else posted this one on the other thread: [link to en.wikipedia.org] same applies. btw: wannabe Public Enemy #1 is still fighting with her doubts and doesn't want to understand that whenever a artificial lense is involved it will produce flares. [link to poleshift.ning.com] Comment by astrogal50: ... Noticed that those same debunkers (currently) ignore all the other photographic and video evidence of Planet X made without a filter of any kind. Why is that? So what are they going to say when the presence of Planet X can no longer be denied? Sorry, we were wrong (while some collect their untraceable debunking payments and prepare to save their own skins)? Please don't hold your breath waiting for any mea culpas from the debunkers/doubters/deniers. Its not about mea-culpas gal, the only that matters is the truth! (Nope, we wont hold our breaths waiting for a mea-culpa from the moderators who just dont know what they're doing!) |
| Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States07/06/2012 08:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Comment by astrogal50: Quoting: More about Tunnel-Vision 19248064 ... Noticed that those same debunkers (currently) ignore all the other photographic and video evidence of Planet X made without a filter of any kind. Why is that? So what are they going to say when the presence of Planet X can no longer be denied? Sorry, we were wrong (while some collect their untraceable debunking payments and prepare to save their own skins)? Please don't hold your breath waiting for any mea culpas from the debunkers/doubters/deniers. I can't WAIT to see what she has to say 10 years from now when she's STILL waiting for this imaginary planet to show up. More than likely, it will be nothing but excuses since I don't think she'll EVER realize she was fooled. Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 07/06/2012 08:21 PM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 10422385  Canada07/06/2012 09:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That astrogal chick is the posterchild for why you need to be wary of internet cults. You follow them long enough without putting some critical thinking skills and basic logic to work, and your brain turns to mashed potatoes. I think she used to cheerlead for Nancy back in the days of the "live chat" on GLP. |
| Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States07/06/2012 09:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 07/06/2012 09:43 PM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States07/06/2012 10:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'd like a frank discussion with this Astrogal person, if only to understand how she can possibly believe the Earth is halted in its orbit, and what motion she imagines allows constellations to appear and disappear from behind the Sun in a scenario where the Earth is halted. I expect I shall not get my wish. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States07/06/2012 10:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Check out this one: Quoting: More about Tunnel-Vision 19248064 [link to poleshift.ning.com] The member writes: "Consensus of good heads is this. The bright objects that seem to be rising when the Sun is setting are NOT the Moon (which is in the East), NOT Venus (because it would be moving right to left with the setting Sun, seen looking S from Antarctica). They are reflections on the cam windows. Note the bright lights move from left to right! The reflection bounce is making this apparent motion. If these lights were a planet, having a relationship to the Sun, they would be moving right to left, along with the Sun. Snap for 17:50 does, apparently, show Venus to the left of the Sun. Below, the Moon at Azumtu 120, and Venus as Azmuth 215." and astrogal50's response: "Wow. Now we know for sure why the debunkers are anxiously trying to debunk this evidence. The Dark Twin does not officially even exist, and the Establishment most certainly does not (yet) agree that the Dark Twin is caught (and moving) in the cup with the earth and Venus. Admitting to that cup would also mean admitting the earth stopped in its orbit, and the Establishment (currently) fakes or quashes anything that shows otherwise." .. she just don't gets it. BTW: The Moon was there and just left the webcam to the left again: [link to api.ning.com] Skymap: [link to www.imagebanana.com] Cover-UP! Cover-UP! lol... Mark Twain once said: "It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them they've been fooled." I'd say that describes Nancy's followers to a T. Yup. Someone else posted this one on the other thread: [link to en.wikipedia.org] same applies. btw: wannabe Public Enemy #1 is still fighting with her doubts and doesn't want to understand that whenever a artificial lense is involved it will produce flares. [link to poleshift.ning.com] Comment by astrogal50: ... Noticed that those same debunkers (currently) ignore all the other photographic and video evidence of Planet X made without a filter of any kind. Why is that? So what are they going to say when the presence of Planet X can no longer be denied? Sorry, we were wrong (while some collect their untraceable debunking payments and prepare to save their own skins)? Please don't hold your breath waiting for any mea culpas from the debunkers/doubters/deniers. Its not about mea-culpas gal, the only that matters is the truth! (Nope, we wont hold our breaths waiting for a mea-culpa from the moderators who just dont know what they're doing!) And you'll certainly never see a mea-culpa from Nancy. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 10422385 Canada07/06/2012 10:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | She has the same attitude and mannerisms as Nancy. There was someone that was, by far, one of Nancy's nastiest believers...other than Luser...I just can't remember what her name is right now. She got caught a few months back posting in one of the threads using a different name but when it was pointed out who she really was she ran off. Quoting: Circuit Breaker That was Soledad. She is a dark storm cloud of doom with nothing but insults. She was the female version of Luser. Then there was burkettgirl, fondly known as bucketheadgirlm the female incarnation of FreeStore. |
| Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States07/06/2012 10:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'd like a frank discussion with this Astrogal person, if only to understand how she can possibly believe the Earth is halted in its orbit, and what motion she imagines allows constellations to appear and disappear from behind the Sun in a scenario where the Earth is halted. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444 I expect I shall not get my wish. She simply believes Nancy's excuse that tilting the Earth can make objects behind the sun visible. I made up three diagrams, back when Luser was still here, showing Orion on the left, the Sun in the center and the Earth on the left side. In each of the diagrams, the ONLY thing that changed was the tilt of the Earth. I asked Luser to explain how, based on those diagrams, Orion became visible. Naturally, he never answered. I may have to make it again and then ask AstroNut to explain it for us to see if she'll try. My guess is she'll pull a Luser and spew insults before running away. Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 07/06/2012 10:37 PM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
| Menow User ID: 18943200 United States07/06/2012 10:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Interesting little development on the ning. It would appear that they removed the "members" section that shows the number of registered members. Quoting: bob_909 I wonder if it's to hide the rather low membership numbers (i.e., less than 3,000 when I last accessed it). That certainly suggests that they're reading what takes place here. Of course they are. That's the only possible reason Nancy ended up changing that Zetatalk about Neumayer Station after I posted here that she had the camera direction screwed up. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19270263  Ireland07/07/2012 12:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Paid by YOU is not what the typical Doomie is tending to imply with their epithet. I am going on record RIGHT NOW with a NEW PREDICTION: Nothing out of the ordinary will happen at the London Olympics. You heard it here FIRST!!! That's not a prediction, that is simply the null hypothesis. |
| V. User ID: 19284287 Canada07/07/2012 06:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Hydra User ID: 19254294 Germany07/07/2012 08:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A new and IMPORTANT UPDATE FROM CLIF!!! Quoting: **ZetaMax** Clif has once again asserted that we "may" face an ALIEN INVASION when the Mayan calendar ends - December 21-23, 2012. A new and IMPORTANT UPDATE FROM HYDRA!!! Hydra has asserted that ZetaMax "may" face a LOAD OF SHIT FALLING FROM HEAVEN ONTO HIM when the Mickey Mouse calendar ends - August 3, 2012. (If ZetaMax doesn't drown in shit on 3rd August 2012 - no problem - Hydra just said: it "may" happen.) . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
| Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States07/07/2012 09:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation |  A new and IMPORTANT UPDATE FROM CLIF!!! Clif has once again asserted that we "may" face an ALIEN INVASION when the Mayan calendar ends - December 21-23, 2012:  I notice the emphasis on "may"...what's the matter? He isn't as sure about it as he was the last time you posted this non-sense? A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
| bob_909 User ID: 7468171 United States07/07/2012 10:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How popular is Nancy on twitter? Not very. 721 tweets 22 following 92 followers [link to twitter.com (secure)] “Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson |
| aussie 763624 User ID: 19294470  United Kingdom07/07/2012 11:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | btw Member Numbers, Quoting: More about Tunnel-Vision 16056172 Ning naturally has limitations, even though they managed to prevent the member-number from being shown,the memberpage is still accessible: [link to poleshift.ning.com] On one page are 3 x 7 = 21 members, x 103 pages = 2163 members currently. The purge must still be ongoing - now it's only showing 92 pages - 21 x 92 = 1,932. Stalin would be pleased. Think they are looking for the "Trojan horses". At least one they didn't find yet. :-)) . and make that two.. I got one active account still too makes you think how many `real' members there are- we know at least still two of the diminishing `under two thousand' members are debunkers- they unfortunately seem to be no longer accepting new members at this time... interestingly- that makes the debunkers 100 times more effective at spreading the truth- there are far more debunkers at the ning in % numbers than nancy has hits in total on the www... a factoid I am happy to see personally I would like to see nancy get zero, zip, nadda, nothing in her hits that would mean nobody nowhere is looking at her bs... |
| More about Tunnel-Vision User ID: 19271638 Germany07/07/2012 11:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How popular is Nancy on twitter? Quoting: bob_909 Not very. 721 tweets 22 following 92 followers [link to twitter.com (secure)] Even the PS-Ning per se is not very popular. 95% of all their followers on twitter are actually "bought" from twiends.com Or it took almost two years to collect 2000 likes on facebook, (truely people who found there on their own) - fortunately not under their control anymore. As for the PS-Ning itself, it roughly has 10.000 visitors per day.. ( it lost attention as it had around 20.000 when "Nancy's big shocking 7/10 event was expected" )... in that the overall attention is decreasing.. (reasonably now that even the Moderators are crucifying their own members). As for the hits on the blogs, they are counted each time you reload the page.. so 1000 hits are not 1000 unique readers.. |
| More about Tunnel-Vision User ID: 19271638 Germany07/07/2012 11:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | btw... Nancy wants the Mods to believe that hundreds of secret people are reading their holy-admin-ning. (Which btw, is mostly used to spy on members, or collect "evidence" for members that are borderline) There are of course no indications that the admin-ning is read/inflitrated by someone else than the Moderators... In fact most of them dont really have a clue about interpreting statcounter = the cookie-tracking-method used on the PS-Ning. |
| aussie 763624 User ID: 19294470 United Kingdom07/07/2012 12:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How popular is Nancy on twitter? Quoting: bob_909 Not very. 721 tweets 22 following 92 followers [link to twitter.com (secure)] Even the PS-Ning per se is not very popular. 95% of all their followers on twitter are actually "bought" from twiends.com Or it took almost two years to collect 2000 likes on facebook, (truely people who found there on their own) - fortunately not under their control anymore. As for the PS-Ning itself, it roughly has 10.000 visitors per day.. ( it lost attention as it had around 20.000 when "Nancy's big shocking 7/10 event was expected" )... in that the overall attention is decreasing.. (reasonably now that even the Moderators are crucifying their own members). As for the hits on the blogs, they are counted each time you reload the page.. so 1000 hits are not 1000 unique readers.. confused- between the blogs,nings,zetababble etc hits.. so to clarify- that 10g hits is not 10 thousand new visitors to the ning- its 10g page views then?? crap I must be a couple of hundred hits a day alone, with refreshing and random `WTF'S leading to thread reads... and I dont even have the `debunkers thread autosaver' running there (or here either for that matter) if I had that script saving the nings post- I would be responsible for 99% of their hits.. fark... they really arent even getting out to the true believers are they?? WHOOHOO good news at last nancy gets the `atomic fail' here |
| aussie 763624 User ID: 19294470 United Kingdom07/07/2012 12:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | btw... Quoting: More about Tunnel-Vision 19271638 Nancy wants the Mods to believe that hundreds of secret people are reading their holy-admin-ning. (Which btw, is mostly used to spy on members, or collect "evidence" for members that are borderline) There are of course no indications that the admin-ning is read/inflitrated by someone else than the Moderators... In fact most of them dont really have a clue about interpreting statcounter = the cookie-tracking-method used on the PS-Ning. Actually- in this case- she may actually be right... (if you count `debunkers' as secret people(who post their full names and addresses online and invite people around to their observatories to look at the skies as `secret')) and if you call the admin ning the public ning... otherwise its b.s from the frowsy mistress of b.s.- nancy LIEder the mistress of lies, bullshitte and insanity |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States07/07/2012 12:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 10422385 Canada07/07/2012 01:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm pretty sure Nancy reads this thread at least once a day, especially now that she has ning detractors posting here. At least in the days of the live chat on GLP before the debunker boycott she could pretend that the amount of comments on her chat threads showed how popular she was. We proved her wrong with the boycott and this thread. Her chat threads were reduced to 3 or 4 pages without the debunkers, when before that her threads were more than 20 pages. Now she's proving that she can't even keep a captive audience from using their thinking skills and realizing she is full of shit, so she has to make up a conspiracy and delete members. I've run forums before and for every real member, there are probably 20 spambot memberships. I would not be surprised if after removing bots and debunkers and the converted she is reduced to maybe 100 members that actually buy her crap. But she can always take out shadow memberships to plump up the numbers. LOL |
| aussie 763624 User ID: 19294470 United Kingdom07/07/2012 01:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm pretty sure Nancy reads this thread at least once a day, especially now that she has ning detractors posting here. At least in the days of the live chat on GLP before the debunker boycott she could pretend that the amount of comments on her chat threads showed how popular she was. We proved her wrong with the boycott and this thread. Her chat threads were reduced to 3 or 4 pages without the debunkers, when before that her threads were more than 20 pages. Now she's proving that she can't even keep a captive audience from using their thinking skills and realizing she is full of shit, so she has to make up a conspiracy and delete members. I've run forums before and for every real member, there are probably 20 spambot memberships. I would not be surprised if after removing bots and debunkers and the converted she is reduced to maybe 100 members that actually buy her crap. But she can always take out shadow memberships to plump up the numbers. LOL Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10422385 If you look at the posts made daily like I do- you have overestimated the `regulars' there by a factor of ten... if there is more than a dozen regular posters on the ning, I would be surprised.. (and I have my suspicions that at least one of them is doing an `elle' aka nancy posting as `someone else') |
| bob_909 User ID: 7468171 United States07/07/2012 02:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How popular is Nancy on twitter? Quoting: bob_909 Not very. 721 tweets 22 following 92 followers [link to twitter.com (secure)] Even the PS-Ning per se is not very popular. 95% of all their followers on twitter are actually "bought" from twiends.com Or it took almost two years to collect 2000 likes on facebook, (truely people who found there on their own) - fortunately not under their control anymore. As for the PS-Ning itself, it roughly has 10.000 visitors per day.. ( it lost attention as it had around 20.000 when "Nancy's big shocking 7/10 event was expected" )... in that the overall attention is decreasing.. (reasonably now that even the Moderators are crucifying their own members). As for the hits on the blogs, they are counted each time you reload the page.. so 1000 hits are not 1000 unique readers.. The same way she used to inflate her supposed hits on zetatalk dot com? “Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson |
