Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 585 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 85,218
Pageviews Today: 210,203Threads Today: 132Posts Today: 3,276
06:26 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

 
MoreAboutTunnelVision​

User ID: 74869492
Germany
05/13/2017 09:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Doesn't change the fact that the rate of CO2 emissions ON EARTH is unprecedented and this directly influences climate and other positive/negative feedback cycles.
 Quoting: MoreAboutTunnelVision

Rock strata layers indicate life flourished during periods of high carbon dioxide. Current levels are NOT the highest ever. Your facts are wrong.

Also, there is NO FACT BASED connection between man made carbon and warming temperatures.
The only connection is the Lucifiean elite controlling the masses.
Please, do ligitimate research instead of regurgitating what the NWO narrative is.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74232721


Learn to read correctly. I said RATE OF CO2 release, not the CO2-ammount in total. We're not speaking about the Carbon-Age here. I'm a geologist, dumass.

And there is indeed a FACT BASED connection between CO2 and warming temperatures: it's called "Greenhouse-effect" and it workes like this:

- Greenhouse gases as CO3, O3, SO4, H2O etc. let sunlight through the atmossphere and absorb the back radiating infra-red radiation, this in turn:
- Heats the oceans (mostly), which means less Ice -> less albedo -> less reflection of sunlight -> even more warming -> even more exposed landmass -> even more decomposition of organic material -> even more green-house gas emissions

That's a positive feedback cycle. (There are "negative" feedback cycles too - namely CaCO3 deposition through silica-rock weathering, but the problem is, that we've greatly distrubed this "balance" that has aligned itself during millions of years by extracting MASSIVE AMMOUNTS of stored CO2 from age-old deposits (that are not subject to the usual CO2-cycle on the surface) namely Carbon from the Carbon-Age, fossil fuels, gas etc.

Of course you'd say something along the lines of "do ligitimate (sic) research instead of regurgitating what the NWO narrative is." because that's what all the tards say, when they can't read scientific papers.

Last Edited by MoreAboutTunnelVision on 05/13/2017 09:54 AM
"People hate the truth, luckily the truth doesn't care."
Author of "Zeta Talk exposed": [link to novnet.org]
MoreAboutTunnelVision​

User ID: 74869492
Germany
05/13/2017 10:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Hmmm, you seem pretty CERTAIN about this. Can you provide any peer reviewed studies to back up this statement?
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


No I can't back up this statement by peer-reviewed studies, because I'm not aware of any and at the same time psychological topics like this are hard to accurately pin-point.

Take it as my personal opinion. And if you are interested why I come to this conclusion, it is because this concept of "reincarnation" has no hard evidence whatsoever yet many people believe in it. It does not seem too far fetched that people would rather believe all their hard work of forming a personality lives on rather than just decomposes into its elements. It's very human to search for a deeper meaning of life - but if you look from a big perspective, earth and humanity is completly irrelevant to the course of the universe. That's something eventually hard to accept, from a childish point of view. So it is not only fear of uncertainity but also fear of meaninglessness.

According to data released by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life (2009 survey), not only do a quarter of Americans believe in reincarnation, but 24 percent of American Christians expressed a belief in reincarnation.

[link to reincarnationafterdeath.com]

So essentially you're saying that 24% of Americans are manifesting delusional fantasies because of paranoia.

From the link above:

How many people believe in reincarnation? A new survey reveals that 51% of the people in the world believe in God. Only 18 percent say they do not believe, and 17 percent are undecided.

More than 18,000 people in 23 countries participated in the survey conducted by the Global Research Society and the Institute for Social Research (Ipsos). The survey also found that 51% of the people believe in reincarnation (sic - should be "life after death" 19% believe in reincarnation), while 23 percent believe that we only will “cease to exist”. About a quarter (26 percent) said they do not know what will happen after death.

Bobby Duffy, managing director of Ipsos, told Reuters that “it may seem to many that we live in a secular world, but this study shows that spiritual life is important to the citizens of the world, since half of them said they believed in a supreme being”.


So YOU represent only 23 percent of the world's population, while suggesting the other 77% (or the 51% who affirmatively expressed belief in an afterlife) are suffering some kind of mental incapacity.

Proof???
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


Well these are shocking results for something that we have no hard evidence of. I assume this goes back a long time where this was accepted as a "common concept", however just because many people believe in something - does not mean it must be true in any case.
Religion is a good example. People tend to assimilate what their surrounding believes, so if you grow up in a religious setting, it is likely that you will assimilate those views.

Last Edited by MoreAboutTunnelVision on 05/13/2017 10:11 AM
"People hate the truth, luckily the truth doesn't care."
Author of "Zeta Talk exposed": [link to novnet.org]
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 71885369
United States
05/13/2017 10:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Doesn't change the fact that the rate of CO2 emissions ON EARTH is unprecedented and this directly influences climate and other positive/negative feedback cycles.
 Quoting: MoreAboutTunnelVision

Rock strata layers indicate life flourished during periods of high carbon dioxide. Current levels are NOT the highest ever. Your facts are wrong.

Also, there is NO FACT BASED connection between man made carbon and warming temperatures.
The only connection is the Lucifiean elite controlling the masses.
Please, do ligitimate research instead of regurgitating what the NWO narrative is.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74232721


Learn to read correctly. I said RATE OF CO2 release, not the CO2-ammount in total. We're not speaking about the Carbon-Age here. I'm a geologist, dumass.

And there is indeed a FACT BASED connection between CO2 and warming temperatures: it's called "Greenhouse-effect" and it workes like this:

- Greenhouse gases as CO3, O3, SO4, H2O etc. let sunlight through the atmossphere and absorb the back radiating infra-red radiation, this in turn:
- Heats the oceans (mostly), which means less Ice -> less albedo -> less reflection of sunlight -> even more warming -> even more exposed landmass -> even more decomposition of organic material -> even more green-house gas emissions

That's a positive feedback cycle. (There are "negative" feedback cycles too - namely CaCO3 deposition through silica-rock weathering, but the problem is, that we've greatly distrubed this "balance" that has aligned itself during millions of years by extracting MASSIVE AMMOUNTS of stored CO2 from age-old deposits (that are not subject to the usual CO2-cycle on the surface) namely Carbon from the Carbon-Age, fossil fuels, gas etc.

Of course you'd say something along the lines of "do ligitimate (sic) research instead of regurgitating what the NWO narrative is." because that's what all the tards say, when they can't read scientific papers.
 Quoting: MoreAboutTunnelVision


Nahle and his Slaying the Sky Dragon compadres demonstrate that carbon dioxide loses the energy it absorbs almost instantaneously, so there is no place for any kind of storage of thermal energy by carbon dioxide. To the more technically minded what Nahle and his colleagues say is that the release of a quantum/wave, at a different wavelength and frequency, lasts the time an excited electron takes to get back to its base state.

Thus the IPCC’s CO2 “sky blanket” is shot full of holes as rational folk are increasingly abandoning the unphysical nonsense that carbon dioxide “traps” heat and raises global temperatures. Policymakers may be the last to wise up but they, too, must nonetheless consign the man-made global warming sham to the trash can marked “junk science.”


[link to co2insanity.com (secure)]
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 71885369
United States
05/13/2017 10:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Hmmm, you seem pretty CERTAIN about this. Can you provide any peer reviewed studies to back up this statement?
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


No I can't back up this statement by peer-reviewed studies, because I'm not aware of any and at the same time psychological topics like this are hard to accurately pin-point.

Take it as my personal opinion. And if you are interested why I come to this conclusion, it is because this concept of "reincarnation" has no hard evidence whatsoever yet many people believe in it. It does not seem too far fetched that people would rather believe all their hard work of forming a personality lives on rather than just decomposes into its elements. It's very human to search for a deeper meaning of life - but if you look from a big perspective, earth and humanity is completly irrelevant to the course of the universe. That's something eventually hard to accept, from a childish point of view. So it is not only fear of uncertainity but also fear of meaninglessness.

According to data released by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life (2009 survey), not only do a quarter of Americans believe in reincarnation, but 24 percent of American Christians expressed a belief in reincarnation.

[link to reincarnationafterdeath.com]

So essentially you're saying that 24% of Americans are manifesting delusional fantasies because of paranoia.

From the link above:

How many people believe in reincarnation? A new survey reveals that 51% of the people in the world believe in God. Only 18 percent say they do not believe, and 17 percent are undecided.

More than 18,000 people in 23 countries participated in the survey conducted by the Global Research Society and the Institute for Social Research (Ipsos). The survey also found that 51% of the people believe in reincarnation (sic - should be "life after death" 19% believe in reincarnation), while 23 percent believe that we only will “cease to exist”. About a quarter (26 percent) said they do not know what will happen after death.

Bobby Duffy, managing director of Ipsos, told Reuters that “it may seem to many that we live in a secular world, but this study shows that spiritual life is important to the citizens of the world, since half of them said they believed in a supreme being”.


So YOU represent only 23 percent of the world's population, while suggesting the other 77% (or the 51% who affirmatively expressed belief in an afterlife) are suffering some kind of mental incapacity.

Proof???
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


Well these are shocking results for something that we have no hard evidence of. I assume this goes back a long time where this was accepted as a "common concept", however just because many people believe in something - does not mean it must be true in any case.
Religion is a good example. People tend to assimilate what their surrounding believes, so if you grow up in a religious setting, it is likely that you will assimilate those views.
 Quoting: MoreAboutTunnelVision


>> this concept of "reincarnation" has no hard evidence


Neither is there "hard" evidence of black holes. The existence of black holes are inferred from observing other evidence. It's true that one cannot put "reincarnation" under a microscope, but just as with black holes, it's existence can be inferred from examining other evidence. What "other evidence"? Well for starters, the testimony of children who display detailed knowledge of past events they have no rational means for obtaining.

Dr. Jim Tucker, M.D., the Bonner-Lowry Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences at the University of Virginia.

The child psychiatrist has spent more than a decade studying the cases of children, usually between the ages of 2 and 6 years old, who say they remember a past life.

In his book, “Return To Life,” Tucker details some of the American cases he has studied over the years, including Ryan's.

“These cases demand an explanation,” Tucker said, “We can’t just write them off or explain them away as just some sort of normal cultural thing.”

Tucker’s office contains the files of more than 2,500 children— cases accumulated from all over the world by his predecessor, Ian Stevenson. Stevenson, who died in 2007, began investigating the strange phenomena back in 1961, and kept detailed interviews and evidence on each case.

Tucker has painstakingly coded the handwritten files, discovering intriguing patterns. For instance, 70 percent of the children say they died violent or unexpected deaths in their previous lives, and males account for 73 percent of those deaths— mirroring the statistics of those who die of unnatural causes in the general population.

“There’d be no way to orchestrate that statistic with over 2,000 cases,” Tucker said.


[link to www.today.com]

Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 05/13/2017 10:25 AM
MoreAboutTunnelVision​

User ID: 74869492
Germany
05/13/2017 10:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Nahle and his Slaying the Sky Dragon compadres demonstrate that carbon dioxide loses the energy it absorbs almost instantaneously, so there is no place for any kind of storage of thermal energy by carbon dioxide. To the more technically minded what Nahle and his colleagues say is that the release of a quantum/wave, at a different wavelength and frequency, lasts the time an excited electron takes to get back to its base state.

Thus the IPCC’s CO2 “sky blanket” is shot full of holes as rational folk are increasingly abandoning the unphysical nonsense that carbon dioxide “traps” heat and raises global temperatures. Policymakers may be the last to wise up but they, too, must nonetheless consign the man-made global warming sham to the trash can marked “junk science.”


[link to co2insanity.com (secure)]
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


Even assuming this were true: When "carbon dioxide loses the energy it absorbs almost instantaneously" doesn't this still mean the energy is given back to the environment?
You know of Newton's third law: there is no "spooky disappearance" of energy, it must be converted into something else. Since CO2 is obviously not glowing (heat energy converted into light), nor is CO2 converted into other elements (e=mc²), there is only: HEAT

[link to www.scientificamerican.com (secure)]

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]
"People hate the truth, luckily the truth doesn't care."
Author of "Zeta Talk exposed": [link to novnet.org]
MoreAboutTunnelVision​

User ID: 74869492
Germany
05/13/2017 10:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Neither is there "hard" evidence of black holes. The existence of black holes are inferred from observing other evidence. It's true that one cannot put "reincarnation" under a microscope, but just as with black holes, it's existence can be inferred from examining other evidence. What "other evidence"?
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


That's true. As of yet there is no direct observation of black-holes (to be changed later this year, because we soon WILL HAVE a direct "photograph"). But yeah, bottomline you're right, we have no way of getting past the event horizon and take samples, but what we can say for certain is:
- these objects cause gravitational lensing, which has been proven by observing the same stars or galaxy multiple times through lensing
- these objects must have an incredible density because they produce a photon-sphere and ultimatively an event-horizon (which we can calculate by r=(2*G*Mass/c²)^0.5 btw) making them "black"
- these objects have large gravitational effects on surrounding objects, which correlate to the assumed high density (our Milky-Way is circling one supermassive black hole)
- we are able to observe other extremly dense objects (neutron-stars, quasars, pulsars etc.) where a sugar-cube has the equivalent weight of Mt.Everest (roughly)

Just to name a few.
So unlike "reincarnation" we actually have plenty of tangible data that no-doubtly prove there are objects that we describe as "black holes" (which is rather misleading and should be "black spheres").

Well for starters, the testimony of children who display detailed knowledge of past events they have no rational means for obtaining.

[link to www.today.com]
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


Which has been debunked several times: [link to skeptico.blogs.com]

Last Edited by MoreAboutTunnelVision on 05/13/2017 10:35 AM
"People hate the truth, luckily the truth doesn't care."
Author of "Zeta Talk exposed": [link to novnet.org]
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 71885369
United States
05/13/2017 10:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Nahle and his Slaying the Sky Dragon compadres demonstrate that carbon dioxide loses the energy it absorbs almost instantaneously, so there is no place for any kind of storage of thermal energy by carbon dioxide. To the more technically minded what Nahle and his colleagues say is that the release of a quantum/wave, at a different wavelength and frequency, lasts the time an excited electron takes to get back to its base state.

Thus the IPCC’s CO2 “sky blanket” is shot full of holes as rational folk are increasingly abandoning the unphysical nonsense that carbon dioxide “traps” heat and raises global temperatures. Policymakers may be the last to wise up but they, too, must nonetheless consign the man-made global warming sham to the trash can marked “junk science.”


[link to co2insanity.com (secure)]
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


Even assuming this were true: When "carbon dioxide loses the energy it absorbs almost instantaneously" doesn't this still mean the energy is given back to the environment?
You know of Newton's third law: there is no "spooky disappearance" of energy, it must be converted into something else. Since CO2 is obviously not glowing (heat energy converted into light), nor is CO2 converted into other elements (e=mc²), there is only: HEAT

[link to www.scientificamerican.com (secure)]

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]
 Quoting: MoreAboutTunnelVision


... one other important fact often glossed over is that CO2 comprises a tiny 0.4% of all the gases above our heads. Nasif Nahle reminds us that this is a crucial point when considering the claims of the “grandfather” of the greenhouse gas hypothesis (GHE), Svente Arrhenius.

Change in CO2 Temperature Is NOT Change in Atmospheric Temp

When applying the GHE formula devised by Arrhenius, IPCC scientists appear to have forgotten that we must consider the proportion of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, not the proportion of the whole mixture of gases.

Even if Arrhenius was right about the GHE any change of temperature obtained from his formula is exclusively a change of temperature of the mass of carbon dioxide, not of the atmosphere.

The trick of climate doomsayers is that they draw their conclusions obtained from the Arrhenius formula for CO2 (only 0.04% of atmosphere), then apply that change of temperature to the WHOLE Earth; this is bad science, or possibly fraud.

Nahle poses this question for GHE believers:

“Is the atmosphere composed only of carbon dioxide? Why calculate the change of temperature of a mass of carbon dioxide and then after say it is the change of temperature of this trace gas that now becomes the temperature of the whole Earth?”

Astrophysicist and climate researcher, Joe Postma similarly comments:

“No one seems to have realized that any purported increase in temperature of CO2 due to CO2 absorption is APPLIED TO CO2, not the whole danged atmosphere! Again, just a slight tweak in comprehending the reality makes a whole paradigm of difference.”


[link to co2insanity.com (secure)]

Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 05/13/2017 10:33 AM
MoreAboutTunnelVision​

User ID: 74869492
Germany
05/13/2017 10:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The trick of climate doomsayers is that they draw their conclusions obtained from the Arrhenius formula for CO2 (only 0.04% of atmosphere), then apply that change of temperature to the WHOLE Earth; this is bad science, or possibly fraud.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


Claim: CO2 comprises less than 0.04 percent of the air.

Nitrogen, oxygen and argon together make up close to 100 percent of the atmosphere. But all three are invisible to incoming "short-wave" radiation from the sun and outgoing "long-wave" radiation from the Earth's surface. They play no role in regulating the planet's atmospheric temperature.

But carbon dioxide and other trace gases in the atmosphere do absorb the outgoing long-wave radiation.

So while their concentrations are miniscule, their effect is anything but: If the atmosphere didn't have those trace amounts of greenhouse gases, New York City would be covered in ice sheets – not sweltering – on a typical summer afternoon. The globe's average temperature would be almost 60 degrees Fahrenheit lower.

Similarly, toxicity is not an issue in the climate change debate. Yes, crops need CO2. Breathing a little more of it while out on the links won't impair your golf game. But earlier findings that suggested higher CO2 levels could increase crop yields have been disproved by recent research showing that other nutrients are more often the limiting factor.

The relevant questions for climate science are how CO2 changes atmospheric temperatures and circulation and alters the oceans' chemistry and heat capacity.

[link to www.scientificamerican.com (secure)]


No matter how hard you're trying, you won't be able to deny the fact that 97% of climate-studies agree on man-made climate change, as I posted earlier with the link.

Do you realize that you are JUST SEARCHING for counter-evidence and ignore the (extremly high) consensus of most of these studies? That's why you still believe in doom and gloom and all this other BS. You just don't want it the other way round - even if the vast majority of evidence says otherwise.

Last Edited by MoreAboutTunnelVision on 05/13/2017 10:51 AM
"People hate the truth, luckily the truth doesn't care."
Author of "Zeta Talk exposed": [link to novnet.org]
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 71885369
United States
05/13/2017 10:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Neither is there "hard" evidence of black holes. The existence of black holes are inferred from observing other evidence. It's true that one cannot put "reincarnation" under a microscope, but just as with black holes, it's existence can be inferred from examining other evidence. What "other evidence"?
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


That's true. As of yet there is no direct observation of black-holes (to be changed later this year, because we soon WILL HAVE a direct "photograph"). But yeah, bottomline you're right, we have no way of getting past the event horizon and take samples, but what we can say for certain is:
- these objects cause gravitational lensing, which has been proven by observing the same stars or galaxy multiple times through lensing
- these objects must have an incredible density because they produce a photon-sphere and ultimatively an event-horizon (which we can calculate by r=(2*G*Mass/c²)^0.5 btw) making them "black"
- these objects have large gravitational effects on surrounding objects, which correlate to the assumed high density (our Milky-Way is circling one supermassive black hole)
- we are able to observe other extremly dense objects (neutron-stars, quasars, pulsars etc.) where a sugar-cube has the equivalent weight of Mt.Everest (roughly)

Just to name a few.
So unlike "reincarnation" we actually have plenty of tangible data that no-doubtly prove there are objects that we describe as "black holes" (which is rather misleading and should be "black spheres").

Well for starters, the testimony of children who display detailed knowledge of past events they have no rational means for obtaining.

[link to www.today.com]
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


Which has been debunked several times: [link to skeptico.blogs.com]
 Quoting: MoreAboutTunnelVision


DOrolleyes That's the best you can do?? One solitary story that of a single child whose testimony was tainted by a visit to an air museum at 2 years old? Did you even read the entire article that YOU referenced?, for if you had you would have read this:

Admittedly there appear to be a couple of inexplicable hits. First, the child said he flew off a boat. When asked the name of the boat he says "Natoma", and when asked the name of someone on the boat, he says "Jack Larson". While flipping through another book on WWII, James points at Iwo Jima and says that's where he got shot down. The father discovers there was a boat called the Natoma Bay, and finds there was only one Corsair pilot from this ship who was shot down at Iwo Jima, and his name was James M. Huston Jr. (So now they have an explanation of the "James 3" he keeps writing on his pictures, since "3rd" would come after "Jr.".) Also, John Larson turns out to be a real person who knew James M. Huston Jr.

The "skeptical" author then goes through a desperate exercise coming up with the weakest of conventional arguments for each element of this phenomena, and even admits at the end that he can't account for the "John Larson" hit. But it matters not, somehow this was all successfully DEBUNKED nevertheless.

ONE stinking case incompletely debunked is what you offer as refutation.

Please try harder.
MoreAboutTunnelVision​

User ID: 74869492
Germany
05/13/2017 11:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Please try harder.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


I won't, because I will not change my opinion based on sole statements (as is true with UFOs), because they can have multiple reasons and origins.
Unless there is a method to independently prove that reincarnation is real without the influence of biased accounts (which from a physical perspective obsviously is not) - it remains meta-physical and therefore irrelevant to me.

It's not even something that I necessarily NEED TO KNOW. Life is happening now, what happens afterwards remains to be seen when you're dead - and I'd be fine with either outcome (or even completly different ones).

Have a good day, I'm going to enjoy million year old photons hitting my skin to have my outer skin-molecules vibrating which in turn creates a fuzzy feeling of warmth on my body. (Sounds pretty fantastic, yet is scientifically accurate, one example of the wonderful world of physics without all the magical woo) hf
"People hate the truth, luckily the truth doesn't care."
Author of "Zeta Talk exposed": [link to novnet.org]
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 71885369
United States
05/13/2017 11:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The trick of climate doomsayers is that they draw their conclusions obtained from the Arrhenius formula for CO2 (only 0.04% of atmosphere), then apply that change of temperature to the WHOLE Earth; this is bad science, or possibly fraud.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


Claim: CO2 comprises less than 0.04 percent of the air.

Nitrogen, oxygen and argon together make up close to 100 percent of the atmosphere. But all three are invisible to incoming "short-wave" radiation from the sun and outgoing "long-wave" radiation from the Earth's surface. They play no role in regulating the planet's atmospheric temperature.

But carbon dioxide and other trace gases in the atmosphere do absorb the outgoing long-wave radiation.

So while their concentrations are miniscule, their effect is anything but: If the atmosphere didn't have those trace amounts of greenhouse gases, New York City would be covered in ice sheets – not sweltering – on a typical summer afternoon. The globe's average temperature would be almost 60 degrees Fahrenheit lower.

Similarly, toxicity is not an issue in the climate change debate. Yes, crops need CO2. Breathing a little more of it while out on the links won't impair your golf game. But earlier findings that suggested higher CO2 levels could increase crop yields have been disproved by recent research showing that other nutrients are more often the limiting factor.

The relevant questions for climate science are how CO2 changes atmospheric temperatures and circulation and alters the oceans' chemistry and heat capacity.

[link to www.scientificamerican.com (secure)]


No matter how hard you're trying, you won't be able to deny the fact that 97% of climate-studies agree on man-made climate change, as I posted earlier with the link.

Do you realize that you are JUST SEARCHING for counter-evidence and ignore the (extremly high) consensus of most of these studies? That's why you still believe in doom and gloom and all this other BS. You just don't want it the other way round - even if the vast majority of evidence says otherwise.
 Quoting: MoreAboutTunnelVision


So while their concentrations are miniscule, their effect is anything but: If the atmosphere didn't have those trace amounts of greenhouse gases, New York City would be covered in ice sheets – not sweltering – on a typical summer afternoon. The globe's average temperature would be almost 60 degrees Fahrenheit lower.


So the asphalt I burned my feet on is really CO2? Heat is absorbed by the surface and the oceans. Deserts get really hot during the day, and really cold at night. New York doesn't because of CLOUDS - of water vapor, not CO2. Why isn't all that CO2 keeping temperatures from approaching freezing in the Sahara at night? Could it be because they already shed their heat in a fraction of a second and there was no nighttime storage? Allowing the "extra" heat to escape back into space along with the rest of the heat that the desert experienced during daylight?

Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 05/13/2017 11:06 AM
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 71885369
United States
05/13/2017 11:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Please try harder.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


I won't, because I will not change my opinion based on sole statements (as is true with UFOs), because they can have multiple reasons and origins.
Unless there is a method to independently prove that reincarnation is real without the influence of biased accounts (which from a physical perspective obsviously is not) - it remains meta-physical and therefore irrelevant to me.

It's not even something that I necessarily NEED TO KNOW. Life is happening now, what happens afterwards remains to be seen when you're dead - and I'd be fine with either outcome (or even completly different ones).

Have a good day, I'm going to enjoy million year old photons hitting my skin to have my outer skin-molecules vibrating which in turn creates a fuzzy feeling of warmth on my body. (Sounds pretty fantastic, yet is scientifically accurate, one example of the wonderful world of physics without all the magical woo) hf
 Quoting: MoreAboutTunnelVision


>> It's not even something that I necessarily NEED TO KNOW.


Fine, that is your choice. If it stopped right there I wouldn't have a problem. But earlier you said that my interest in it was because of my "fear of uncertainty". Implying of course that your lack of interest is "healthy and good" and my interest is "unhealthy and bad". I'd say there is a bit of arrogance and intellectual intolerance trying to offer itself as "charity" going on here.
KeepingItReal

User ID: 30776013
Canada
05/13/2017 11:47 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Melfy still looking for fake doom in all the wrong places.

Take a look around you. There is plenty of slow boil real doom all around you, but as long as people fixate on the fake doom, fake news scandals, fake climate change doom, fake alien niburu doom, the temperature keeps going up on the real doom and sooner than a lot of us think, the pot will boil and it will be too late to do anything about it.
If a rogue extraterrestrial object were to impact earth, it is beyond our control and we will be wiped out. If man has caused global climate change, we are beyond the point of return, but it's more likely that the planet is a lot mightier than the puny human race and is going through a natural cycle of instability. Our understanding of what is normal climate is based on observations over a few centuries at best. Hardly enough data to presume to know what's normal.

I am all for keeping the air, water, earth, food, flora, fauna and oceans clean. I am all for developing cleaner more sustainable and inexpensive energy sources, but I also know that even if we get to negative carbon output tomorrow, it all means nothing if a big volcano goes off and brings on a mini ice age. It's happened before, it will happen again and there is nothing any of us can do about it, so why fret about something that will probably never happen in our lifetime and that we are powerless to prevent?


The biggest doom today is related to the Vault 7 revelations and the cyber attack that is ongoing. In just a few decades we have gone from being a manual society, where people had to actually know things and have a skill to do the jobs that need doing, to a society that doesn't know anything and doesn't know how to do anything. Banking was done without computers, there was no online banking or atm, people carried real cash, the cashier at the supermarket manually read the price tag and entered it into a manual cash register. The mechanic could change a part and fix a broken car, doctors touched and prodded their patients and knew how to interpret an x ray without the help of software. Today, just a few decades later everything is online and with corrupt and inept intelligence agencies and governments, viruses have been developed as weapons, they have been carelessly managed and have escaped into the hacking community. It doesn't even have to be the Russians, Chinese, North Koreans, or any other Goldstein they want us to fear, it is more likely to be cyberthugs, and good luck finding and stopping them.

This is dangerous shit. If enough systems and networks are affected, we would be fucked in a matter of hours. We have more than 2 generations now that can't find their way home from the corner store without GPS. Nobody knows how to do anything anymore unless the computer helps out. Our jobs today are more about performing tasks on a computer than knowing the substance of what we are accomplishing by doing the task.

We don't need Planet X, or an extraterrestrial catastrophe, doom is happening now, even if most people are too busy texting and retweeting nonsense over a latte to notice. That's real fucking doom right there.
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 71885369
United States
05/13/2017 12:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Melfy still looking for fake doom in all the wrong places.

Take a look around you. There is plenty of slow boil real doom all around you, but as long as people fixate on the fake doom, fake news scandals, fake climate change doom, fake alien niburu doom, the temperature keeps going up on the real doom and sooner than a lot of us think, the pot will boil and it will be too late to do anything about it.
If a rogue extraterrestrial object were to impact earth, it is beyond our control and we will be wiped out. If man has caused global climate change, we are beyond the point of return, but it's more likely that the planet is a lot mightier than the puny human race and is going through a natural cycle of instability. Our understanding of what is normal climate is based on observations over a few centuries at best. Hardly enough data to presume to know what's normal.

I am all for keeping the air, water, earth, food, flora, fauna and oceans clean. I am all for developing cleaner more sustainable and inexpensive energy sources, but I also know that even if we get to negative carbon output tomorrow, it all means nothing if a big volcano goes off and brings on a mini ice age. It's happened before, it will happen again and there is nothing any of us can do about it, so why fret about something that will probably never happen in our lifetime and that we are powerless to prevent?


The biggest doom today is related to the Vault 7 revelations and the cyber attack that is ongoing. In just a few decades we have gone from being a manual society, where people had to actually know things and have a skill to do the jobs that need doing, to a society that doesn't know anything and doesn't know how to do anything. Banking was done without computers, there was no online banking or atm, people carried real cash, the cashier at the supermarket manually read the price tag and entered it into a manual cash register. The mechanic could change a part and fix a broken car, doctors touched and prodded their patients and knew how to interpret an x ray without the help of software. Today, just a few decades later everything is online and with corrupt and inept intelligence agencies and governments, viruses have been developed as weapons, they have been carelessly managed and have escaped into the hacking community. It doesn't even have to be the Russians, Chinese, North Koreans, or any other Goldstein they want us to fear, it is more likely to be cyberthugs, and good luck finding and stopping them.

This is dangerous shit. If enough systems and networks are affected, we would be fucked in a matter of hours. We have more than 2 generations now that can't find their way home from the corner store without GPS. Nobody knows how to do anything anymore unless the computer helps out. Our jobs today are more about performing tasks on a computer than knowing the substance of what we are accomplishing by doing the task.

We don't need Planet X, or an extraterrestrial catastrophe, doom is happening now, even if most people are too busy texting and retweeting nonsense over a latte to notice. That's real fucking doom right there.
 Quoting: KeepingItReal


I do computer programming for a living. I was deeply concerned about Y2K. There was a real problem, but the scope was exaggerated and we got through it without any major impact. The big concern was that it would disrupt finance, and perhaps worse, cause a failure in the electric grid.

You are now echoing all those same concerns - so vault seven is Y2K part deux.

Maybe ...

But somehow I don't find it as worrying. Maybe I've become too acclimated to fake doom to notice the real thing happening under our noses. I guess we'll know in short order.
KeepingItReal

User ID: 30776013
Canada
05/13/2017 01:08 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Y2K was overhyped, if there ever was a danger, it was more because of an oversight in the code than anything sinister. The viruses that the NSA and CIA lost were deliberately created to infiltrate and infect vital infrastructure and systems of an enemy. Big difference. It isn't even the fact that hypothetically someone could take everything down. The scary fact is that the human species is devolving and no longer learning the skills that allowed us to survive and thrive in the first place. I work around and with younger people. Most of them no longer feel the need to actually learn and commit to memory any knowledge, because wikepedia is always there to retrieve the "facts" the moment you need them. I was training some young people last summer, they questioned the need to commit certain vital information to memory, when there is a data base they can look up the answer on as needed. If the data base goes down, many of them wouldn't be able to answer the easiest question from a customer. Without the computer they don't know shit about the product they sell and the company they work for. My industry isn't vital, but I know this happens in other vital workplaces.

We are way too dependent on computers and the internet, we have made ourselves absolutely vulnerable, and it could be wiped out in the blink of an eye. Only a very few would have a clue what to do, the freaked out masses would be out of control. If people wake up now, we may be able to get back on a sane path, but I don't see that happening because people have become entitled and lazy.
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 71885369
United States
05/14/2017 12:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Y2K was overhyped, if there ever was a danger, it was more because of an oversight in the code than anything sinister. The viruses that the NSA and CIA lost were deliberately created to infiltrate and infect vital infrastructure and systems of an enemy. Big difference. It isn't even the fact that hypothetically someone could take everything down. The scary fact is that the human species is devolving and no longer learning the skills that allowed us to survive and thrive in the first place. I work around and with younger people. Most of them no longer feel the need to actually learn and commit to memory any knowledge, because wikepedia is always there to retrieve the "facts" the moment you need them. I was training some young people last summer, they questioned the need to commit certain vital information to memory, when there is a data base they can look up the answer on as needed. If the data base goes down, many of them wouldn't be able to answer the easiest question from a customer. Without the computer they don't know shit about the product they sell and the company they work for. My industry isn't vital, but I know this happens in other vital workplaces.

We are way too dependent on computers and the internet, we have made ourselves absolutely vulnerable, and it could be wiped out in the blink of an eye. Only a very few would have a clue what to do, the freaked out masses would be out of control. If people wake up now, we may be able to get back on a sane path, but I don't see that happening because people have become entitled and lazy.
 Quoting: KeepingItReal


Thread: Updated Pg 5: (New Variants 5/14) WannaCry 2.0 Launced: And has no "kill switch".

I agree this is pretty serious. And you're right about the young people these days. Some of them have never even boiled a hotdog, or even know how to make a bed properly, or even how to hold a broom. I know, I've witnessed it first hand.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 60275060
United States
06/20/2017 10:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Dance faster, Melfy. Your ignorance is showing again.
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
06/25/2017 01:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Well, I had to use my last 25 karma thingies to get immunity for a month. Apparently, even when I'm not posting much, I'm on the list.

So, if I vanish completely, it's been interesting and amusing.
#Geomagnetic_Storm#
"WeatherTard”

User ID: 70684744
United States
06/26/2017 04:18 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Well, I had to use my last 25 karma thingies to get immunity for a month. Apparently, even when I'm not posting much, I'm on the list.

So, if I vanish completely, it's been interesting and amusing.
 Quoting: 74444


verysad
Reality420

User ID: 30926399
United States
06/26/2017 06:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Well, I had to use my last 25 karma thingies to get immunity for a month. Apparently, even when I'm not posting much, I'm on the list.

So, if I vanish completely, it's been interesting and amusing.
 Quoting: 74444


When does it run out?
If you post the date you are going to be banned I will give you a Trial Upgrade for a month. I don't have a lot of karma myself and am prone to random banning but I have enough to do you once.

With any luck the other folks will give you enough green to get you on the road to recovery.

hth.


R.

Edited to add: I just looked it up and the Trial Upgrade (100 karma) apparently does not include ban immunity.
The Full Upgrade (200 karma) apparently does include ban immunity.
I barely have enough karma to do you a Full, but I do have enough and will do it if you give me a date.

If anyone knows if the Trial Upgrade also gives Ban Immunity please post that info.

Last Edited by Reality420 on 06/26/2017 06:50 PM
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions.
-- Thomas Jefferson

Nothing is more terrible than to see ignorance in action.
-- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
06/27/2017 01:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Well, I had to use my last 25 karma thingies to get immunity for a month. Apparently, even when I'm not posting much, I'm on the list.

So, if I vanish completely, it's been interesting and amusing.
 Quoting: 74444


When does it run out?
 Quoting: Reality420


Not until 7/25.


If you post the date you are going to be banned I will give you a Trial Upgrade for a month. I don't have a lot of karma myself and am prone to random banning but I have enough to do you once.
 Quoting: Reality420


That is ridiculously kind of you. Sorry I didn't give more warning, but I honestly didn't notice until it happened. Hold onto your karma, we'll see what happens.

If anyone knows if the Trial Upgrade also gives Ban Immunity please post that info.
 Quoting: Reality420


It would be good to know!

Thank you for the kind words, everyone. They are appreciated.
Hydra

User ID: 75147763
Germany
06/27/2017 07:06 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Well, I had to use my last 25 karma thingies to get immunity for a month. Apparently, even when I'm not posting much, I'm on the list.

So, if I vanish completely, it's been interesting and amusing.
 Quoting: 74444


You have mail.

.
If the Moon is off, if Earth wobbles or if there is a pole shift
how can things like this, predicted decades ago, happen?

aseindia
Annular Solar Eclipse - January 15, 2010 - Rameshwaram, India
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
06/28/2017 12:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Well, I had to use my last 25 karma thingies to get immunity for a month. Apparently, even when I'm not posting much, I'm on the list.

So, if I vanish completely, it's been interesting and amusing.
 Quoting: 74444


You have mail.

.
 Quoting: Hydra


Thank you!
Hydra

User ID: 75155932
United States
06/28/2017 07:40 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Well, I had to use my last 25 karma thingies to get immunity for a month. Apparently, even when I'm not posting much, I'm on the list.

So, if I vanish completely, it's been interesting and amusing.
 Quoting: 74444


You have mail.
 Quoting: Hydra

Thank you!
 Quoting: 74444

And two other mails.

.

Last Edited by Hydra on 06/29/2017 12:21 PM
If the Moon is off, if Earth wobbles or if there is a pole shift
how can things like this, predicted decades ago, happen?

aseindia
Annular Solar Eclipse - January 15, 2010 - Rameshwaram, India
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
06/29/2017 12:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Thank you, squared!
Reality420
User ID: 30926399
United States
06/29/2017 11:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Well, I had to use my last 25 karma thingies to get immunity for a month. Apparently, even when I'm not posting much, I'm on the list.

So, if I vanish completely, it's been interesting and amusing.
 Quoting: 74444


You have mail.
 Quoting: Hydra

Thank you!
 Quoting: 74444

And two other mails.

.
 Quoting: Hydra

Wow.
How do you find them all and what, exactly, constitutes one?
I've never been able to figure that out considering the wild west attitude this site is famous for.

Very nice of you, Hydra.
*** applause ***
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
06/30/2017 10:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Well, thank you everyone! That was unexpected and very kind of you all. I will endeavor not to get popped again, but if I do, I'll continue to spend my ill-gotten green.

Cheers, everyone.
Setheory

User ID: 36555423
United States
07/07/2017 01:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Well, thank you everyone! That was unexpected and very kind of you all. I will endeavor not to get popped again, but if I do, I'll continue to spend my ill-gotten green.

Cheers, everyone.
 Quoting: 74444


As long as you get busted for telling the truth, there will never be a problem.....
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'
Reality420

User ID: 30926399
United States
07/11/2017 05:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Well, thank you everyone! That was unexpected and very kind of you all. I will endeavor not to get popped again, but if I do, I'll continue to spend my ill-gotten green.

Cheers, everyone.
 Quoting: 74444


74444,
Does that mean you've now amassed enough green to buy immunity again and you will not need help on July 25, 2017?


R.
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions.
-- Thomas Jefferson

Nothing is more terrible than to see ignorance in action.
-- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
74444

User ID: 74444
United States
07/13/2017 02:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Well, thank you everyone! That was unexpected and very kind of you all. I will endeavor not to get popped again, but if I do, I'll continue to spend my ill-gotten green.

Cheers, everyone.
 Quoting: 74444


74444,
Does that mean you've now amassed enough green to buy immunity again and you will not need help on July 25, 2017?


R.
 Quoting: Reality420


Looks like I'm good! Thanks to all who helped out, I really appreciate it. It was surprising and lovely and generous.





GLP