Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,815 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 708,377
Pageviews Today: 917,957Threads Today: 235Posts Today: 3,186
07:56 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Poster Handle Menow
Post Content
Obvious to anyone who knows the first thing about science, logic or astronomy, OR IS WILLING TO STUDY THOSE THINGS.
 Quoting: Menow 20098721


I guess this does not include the majority of the Ningsters then..
 Quoting: More about Tunnel-Vision 20081569


Obviously, but several of us are curious about your specific mindset. We are just incredulous that anyone who has any modicum of intelligence could be taken in by Nancy's story.

I consider that a non-answer. Did you just not THINK about the "explanations" Nancy trotted out?
 Quoting: Menow 20098721


Of course I did think about them... and many of them follow rational paths.
 Quoting: More about Tunnel-Vision 20081569


No, they didn't. They required that you steadfastly ignore all rational input from other sources and listen ONLY to Nancy. It's cult-stuff, for sure.

Nancy provided many claims that are imaginnable (like her descriptions about ET lifeforms or what they might be like) and sometimes even realistic (like the thought of some organisation-structure that would develop over time, given that an intelligent species came to some conclusions previously.), though on the contrary totally absurd and clearly wrong claims aswell.


Well, that could explain it. It's just that every bit of nonsense Nancy uttered was thoroughly debunked. I suppose you just refused to read anything which countered her?
 Quoting: Menow 20098721


Nope. I did read these "debunked" claims, however I also noticed that a lot of ego and battles were involved which lowered the overall credibility of these "debunked claims" as I explained them to myself of a pure emotional background at that time.
 Quoting: More about Tunnel-Vision 20081569


So you ignored all of the factual info offered and focused on the moments when people got frustrated and got a bit reactionary? Didn't you see where Nancy repeatedly got nasty herself?

Which btw is the reason why I think its so important to remain as objective as possible about these matters as there are other people fooled by this aswell.

I see... you don't think it matters whether people use their brains or not... Nothing matters.. No choices are better than any other choices. You're one of those "it's all good" people. Sheesh! I suppose that's how you ended up being sucked in by Nancy, hmm?
 Quoting: Menow 20098721


Um. How do you come to the conclusion that I think it doesn't matter if people use their brains or not? And what is a "it's all good" person, and how do you come to this assumption if I may ask?
 Quoting: More about Tunnel-Vision 20081569


I don't see your words to which I responded, so I can't re-asses my comment on that bit now.

Billy mentioned some non-factual-evidence.
 Quoting: Menow 20098721


Billy mentioned some aspects that rang true for me. (The concepts of densities, awakening etc..)
 Quoting: More about Tunnel-Vision 20081569


All that is vague stuff. I'm talking about concrete factual date. Nancy's story is completely devoid of hard facts. It's just outright lies, one after the other...

I see... you are devoid of emotional response? Get real.
 Quoting: Menow 20098721


Nope. Never claimed that... The point is that sometimes it needs to be pointed out because not everyone can read between the lines to interpret statements in a more objective way.
Im not devoid(denying) my human-nature. Not at all.
 Quoting: More about Tunnel-Vision 20081569


You lost me, except where there is clearly an emotional aspect of how people got sucked into Nancy's story. That is certainly true.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP