Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!! | |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 07/23/2012 01:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No - they refuse to have the notion SHOVED DOWN THEIR THROATS by arrogant and rude debunkers. Quoting: **ZetaMax** No, some of them simply refuse to accept it...regardless of any evidence proving that Nancy is wrong. Given time, most will QUIETLY discern the truth, and unceremoniously fade from the scene. Quoting: **ZetaMax**Yes, for some...but others will continue to cling to it. Look at Nancy - regardless of how many times she's been wrong, she refuses to admit she's wrong...and when she does admit she's wrong on something - she blames someone else like Obama. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 07/23/2012 06:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Obviously, but several of us are curious about your specific mindset. We are just incredulous that anyone who has any modicum of intelligence could be taken in by Nancy's story. Quoting: Menow 20098721 Um okay.. this gonna be a long reply.. Im basically a regular intelligent, curious human. Specifically I initially was interested in anti-gravity tech. or the free-energy stuff... Invariably came across the alien-presence, UFOs, CCs, prophets, conspiracies and finally the 2012 Hype. Curious as we are, I went into the jungle to search for the truth, if any. What is left, is what most of these alternative-news contain: bits of truth in a jungle of BS (HS). Then some day I came across ZT (Dont remember how exactly). A rubbish html website with some crazy stuff written in it. An old woman claims to be in contact with some aliens and they seem to be giving her a lot of information, several thousand sites in fact. Whats written in it? Seemingly unrelated and disorganized at first a structure became obvious over time and claims began to support each other, seemingly explaining a lot of questions: What are the aliens doing here? Why do the UFOs appear as they do, and why is the government having a certain stance to it? Why are aliens portrayed in the media in a certain way, and what is the general mindest about extra-terrestrial life? Then these more "spiritual" questions: Is there something as an "awakening" going on, as seemingly hinted by many individual sources? What could our spiritual-situation may be? And is there a something as a soul? Finally, Are there earth-changes going on? The weather seems getting unpredictable? Are earthquakes on the increase or volcanoes waking up? Could this be related? And Nancy of course provided answers to all these questions that many of us asked themselves when they came across the conspiracy theories. Facts are constantly bended to dramatisize the situation to keep the believers in the constant belief that they are expecting what is to be expected. The USGS was claimed to be wildy downgrading, NASA claimed to be doctoring, all to have nothing but PX on the stage. Yes it seems like a obvious-horseshit from this perspective, however this goes deeper. People ignore these matters if they percept enough correlation elsewhere (her alleged ZT accuracy which is no accuracy at all) and feel enough comfortable with the overall theories.) (BTW: did you read the "when prophecy fails" entry on wikipedia? Thats basically what is occuring with her believers. ) What is left now? Some concepts still relate to reality with me or are considered likely possible, such as "telepathy", that souls exist, the alien-presence, which in my opinion is undeniable nowadays with regular sightings around the world (Yes I think there are genuine sightings with some advanced technology, beside myself having an obvious sighting at local place with a couple of friends which was a personal confirmation for us, that some awakening process seems going on globally, which seems to be related to people getting increasingly aware, intelligent, and striving for a better future, that cropcircles are an interesting phenomena with seemingly unexplained effects. (Like bent grain, or magnetic particles found in the soil, "apical-node-elongation", although these claims would need to be analysed more closely, [link to www.bltresearch.com] , at best from more sources, anyone?). that humans could have had contact with extra-terrestrials in the past, that "earth changes" are seemingly on the increase and common scientific theories seem to falter. (Or does anyone found a explain-it-all as yet? "Global Warming"? that a lot of charlatans are out there who noticed the potiential of placing baits into these areas to prey on new victims, and its easy to fall for it even if you are an overall intelligent person. No, they didn't. They required that you steadfastly ignore all rational input from other sources and listen ONLY to Nancy. It's cult-stuff, for sure. Quoting: Menow 20098721 Rational thinking is just a way of coming to our conclusions and I never really lost it. (Even though it was not "critical enough" for sure.) However Nancy made her "construct" in a way that seems to support rational thinking. Cause and effect. "The totally dramatizised earth changes are due to PX slowing the earths core, causing friction, heating the plates from below, heating the ocean, heating the air, blah blah..." "The UFO's appear in a certain way to not interfere with the free-will and some other rules, and they are related to an awakening process, gradually increasing to prevent too much influence to the inhabitants of the planets." For every question there is an answer, so Nancy presents seemingly rational explanations because she knows it is that what the human mind is asking for. Some big quake over Plate A? Nancy: Plate B crumbles into Plate A, because PX pushes the earths northpole, causing the famous "earth wobble" smashing the plates against each other. A cropcircle showing a swirl? Nancy: Depicting PX clockwise rotation in relation to Earths rotation as she stated before.. And so on...and so on.. A pile of lies, supporting one another. (Though not truely) Nancy seemed to be familar with local plate-tectonics, astronomic questions, psychological questions, sociological questions. Could an old woman answer so many questions? For such a long while? The perfect wolf in sheep's clothing. So you ignored all of the factual info offered and focused on the moments when people got frustrated and got a bit reactionary? Didn't you see where Nancy repeatedly got nasty herself? Quoting: Menow 20098721 Not really.. at least I dont have anything directly popping up into my mind regarding factual info that I was aware at that time. Can you name some highlights? Im sure they'll be worthy to bring up again. I was aware of Zetasquawk at that time, though they were often defamatory (like many others who ride on the puppy-thing) which Nancy uses to claim they're pushing a bad image of herself.. The "puppy thing" was an unfortunate issue for people to focus on. Yes, she DID suggest that people should kill their pets, but it was just unneeded inflamatory rhetoric from people who were too shallow to see through her story on the technical issues basis. All that is vague stuff. I'm talking about concrete factual date. Nancy's story is completely devoid of hard facts. It's just outright lies, one after the other... Quoting: Menow 20098721 Um. Thats a little too simplistic in my mind. Afterall Nancy's BS comes from her own.. and she needs think about the questions presented to her. There are thoughts of herself that are even going into the right direction, since she needs to do her best because she has to avoid too many lies. Some of the thoughts about an apocalyptic scenario are quite useful. (Although I guess it was more of an achievment from the TT guys and overall people.) However saying "one lie after another" is a little unrealistic, its more a set of lies based on bits of truth. No. All of her astronomical claims were outright fabrications. OBVIOUS ones! NO "bits of truth" there at all. Only those who knew absolutely NOTHING about astronomy and steadfastly refuses to consult a real astronomer (because they are all in on the coverup) would believe them. The bits of truth form the bait. Quoting: More about Tunnel-Vision 20081569 Lies are applied over the bait, expanding the (w)hole while supporting each other. Keep piling and you have your "horseshit" Yes, but each original bit was pure horseshit. It was just that each time Nancy would make a claim, it would be disproven by "debunkers", but all Nancy's believers were brainwashed in to discounting anything which ran counter to what Nancy said. Then, Nancy would declare each subsequent tidbit of hers to have been "proven" and built on that. It was actually quite ingenious, IMO. You lost me, except where there is clearly an emotional aspect of how people got sucked into Nancy's story. That is certainly true. Quoting: Menow 20098721 ;) "A pile of lies, supporting one another..." Absolutely agreed. Thanks for taking time to respond. I guess it's clear that you, too, just didn't read the countering information which constantly proved Nancy wrong. In the end, I think it was the belief in a grand conspiracy which was the prime factor in keeping people sucked in to Nancy's story. Agreed? |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 07/23/2012 06:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Is this Planet X? Lurking Near Venus in our View? Quoting: Hydra [link to poleshift.ning.com] Is she just extremely cautious or is she going to become rattled? All her highlights were debunked: Dark Twin Neumayer 3 in April Solar eclipse in May Venus transit in June PX with moons in CFH-Telescope video Dark Twin Neumayer 3 just now . btw: Im watching "Osage Pete" for a while now, [link to poleshift.ning.com] Could be a fake-support. And "xtcpctech", [link to poleshift.ning.com] Yeah, there HAVE to be people there who are just playing Nancy. |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 07/23/2012 06:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have to admit that the latest zeta talk Q and A has failed to impress. In fact I'm terribly disappointed. A video of the occultation of Jupiter being passed off by Nancy as a "hoax"... Even I could read the Youtube comments and do a quick google search to find out what was going on. Quoting: _Billy Madison_ [link to www.youtube.com] omg. I just went to look for her claims, she's saying its a laser-pointer aimed at the moon (through a glass): [link to www.zetatalk.com] "... This is not evident from the video, but this is the case, with a light laser pointed at the where the tip of the Moon crescent would appear. The distance between the cam and the Moon, and the cam and the window, differ. Thus in a zoom, there is an adjustment to one, but not the other. This is a fraud. " Geez..she must be having a hard one these days... so many mistakes, this one even per the Zetas. (I instantly made a copy of it of course... we need to be savy). Thanks for the notice Billy! Good one to work on.. "When some objects move, and others remain solid, this indicates they have a different source." This is bizarre, even for Nancy. It's really easy to see that both objects ARE equally affected by the camera's motions. |
bob_909 User ID: 7468171 United States 07/23/2012 11:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Classic! Comment by Nancy Lieder 13 hours ago Oh Benito! Look, there is NOTHING there, per Skymap. NOTHING. So what is that planet!!! Wow Comment by Nancy Lieder 13 hours ago We have been looking in the wrong place. NOT by Venus/Jupiter at all, but just to the right of the rising Sun. These objects are NOT lens flares! Comment by Nancy Lieder 12 hours ago Oops! Might be droplets dried on the lens. Here's at another hour, not sunrise. That's from: [link to poleshift.ning.com] Looks like she's getting real shy in stating that such-and-such shows planet eX and it's moons. Once bitten, twice shy! “Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 07/24/2012 06:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Hydra User ID: 20365643 Germany 07/24/2012 09:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And if it does turn out to be a dried water spot, naturally, it won't be Nancy's fault for jumping the gun. She'll blame someone else. Quoting: Circuit Breaker Yes, it's outrageous that they don't clean the webcam lenses on an hourly basis, so that poor Nancy mistakes the droplets for her eagerly awaited Planet X. But "Benito Maray" gives new candidates on a per diem basis: [link to poleshift.ning.com] (Just dumb, a troll or a trojan?) BTW: members down to less than 1500 . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
**ZetaMax** User ID: 659599 United States 07/24/2012 09:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Truther User ID: 20442929 Germany 07/24/2012 12:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Their latest hoax is another picture of that weird Alberto Cardin. He even defeats Nancy Liar and Gerard Zwaan in being stupid. Like always he is presenting some lame lense flares and claims that this is a moon swirl. This freaks have neither basic knowledge about photos nor about astronomy. Such an object would be visible to everybody on the our whole planet with the naked eye. Besides that the gravity of a planet of this size would have devastating effects on the sun and all the other planets. We would already be in the middle of Armageddon. Lense-flare-Albeto is a fascinating hoaxer. He must either be totally insane or a nobrainer. Well so he is a good assistance for Astrogal50 and Nancy Liar. It is no shame to be stupid, but sooo stupid. And hey, if this was a moon swirl (a thing that for sure does not exist in reality) how big would their planet X be. Two times the size of the sun? Three times? And nobody could detect apart from some madmen with floppy disks and other funny objects they put in front of their cameras. Wake up. Nancy`s freak show has got a bunch of very bad hoaxes lately. Well, it always was a bunch of bad hoaxes, but now she produces them weekly and they are so evident. IMAGE ( [link to api.ning.com] ) |
Menow User ID: 1394150 United States 07/24/2012 02:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Comment by Nancy Lieder 4 hours ago Not a lens flare nor a ghost, these Moon Swirls are so bright they have been seen and filmed lately, naked eye! This is a wake-up call, world! Thank you Alberto! Gawd, Nancy... How do you "film" something, "naked eye"?! |
bob_909 User ID: 7468171 United States 07/24/2012 07:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And if it does turn out to be a dried water spot, naturally, it won't be Nancy's fault for jumping the gun. She'll blame someone else. Quoting: Circuit Breaker Yes, it's outrageous that they don't clean the webcam lenses on an hourly basis, so that poor Nancy mistakes the droplets for her eagerly awaited Planet X. But "Benito Maray" gives new candidates on a per diem basis: [link to poleshift.ning.com] (Just dumb, a troll or a trojan?) BTW: members down to less than 1500 . Looks like she's going mealy-mouth - at one moment saying one thing then leaving the door slightly cracked. "Comment by Nancy Lieder 6 hours ago They appear to be water droplets dried on the lens. They stay stationary, despite the skyview rolling up continuously. So far we have discovered NO Planet X objects from this cam. I note that when the Sun rises, the cam is not overwhelmed. This means that they are suppressing the light received, overall, and this would eliminate the light from Planet X itself, I think. An observatory would not be allowed to display evidence of Planet X. Venus is a planet that reflects light, where Planet X is dust shrouded. The Moon Swirls are very close around the Sun, as they require sunlight to be funneled down them, therefore would be lost in the overall glare of the Sun, I suspect. This is certainly a challenge!" “Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 07/24/2012 07:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And if it does turn out to be a dried water spot, naturally, it won't be Nancy's fault for jumping the gun. She'll blame someone else. Quoting: Circuit Breaker Yes, it's outrageous that they don't clean the webcam lenses on an hourly basis, so that poor Nancy mistakes the droplets for her eagerly awaited Planet X. But "Benito Maray" gives new candidates on a per diem basis: [link to poleshift.ning.com] (Just dumb, a troll or a trojan?) BTW: members down to less than 1500 . Looks like she's going mealy-mouth - at one moment saying one thing then leaving the door slightly cracked. "Comment by Nancy Lieder 6 hours ago They appear to be water droplets dried on the lens. They stay stationary, despite the skyview rolling up continuously. So far we have discovered NO Planet X objects from this cam. I note that when the Sun rises, the cam is not overwhelmed. This means that they are suppressing the light received, overall, and this would eliminate the light from Planet X itself, I think. An observatory would not be allowed to display evidence of Planet X. Venus is a planet that reflects light, where Planet X is dust shrouded. The Moon Swirls are very close around the Sun, as they require sunlight to be funneled down them, therefore would be lost in the overall glare of the Sun, I suspect. This is certainly a challenge!" This is exactly the type of thing I was asking the guy from the ning about. "...require sunlight to be funneled down them..." It's pure gobbldygook- made up bullshit of the purest form- utter nonsense. How can anybody read that sort of thing and not have alarm bells go off? Nancy's story is comprised of layer after ridiculous layer of inane crapola like this which make no sense at all. I once challenged a person at, I think TT-watch, about something like that and she said that she assumed that it didn't make sense to her because she wasn't as smart as the "Zetas". Sheesh! |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 07/24/2012 08:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And if it does turn out to be a dried water spot, naturally, it won't be Nancy's fault for jumping the gun. She'll blame someone else. Quoting: Circuit Breaker Yes, it's outrageous that they don't clean the webcam lenses on an hourly basis, so that poor Nancy mistakes the droplets for her eagerly awaited Planet X. But "Benito Maray" gives new candidates on a per diem basis: [link to poleshift.ning.com] (Just dumb, a troll or a trojan?) BTW: members down to less than 1500 . Looks like she's going mealy-mouth - at one moment saying one thing then leaving the door slightly cracked. "Comment by Nancy Lieder 6 hours ago They appear to be water droplets dried on the lens. They stay stationary, despite the skyview rolling up continuously. So far we have discovered NO Planet X objects from this cam. I note that when the Sun rises, the cam is not overwhelmed. This means that they are suppressing the light received, overall, and this would eliminate the light from Planet X itself, I think. An observatory would not be allowed to display evidence of Planet X. Venus is a planet that reflects light, where Planet X is dust shrouded. The Moon Swirls are very close around the Sun, as they require sunlight to be funneled down them, therefore would be lost in the overall glare of the Sun, I suspect. This is certainly a challenge!" "An observatory would not be allowed to display evidence of Planet X." Yet she has consistently pointed out images from various observatories which she says show her planet. Again... it makes NO SENSE AT ALL. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 07/24/2012 08:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And if it does turn out to be a dried water spot, naturally, it won't be Nancy's fault for jumping the gun. She'll blame someone else. Quoting: Circuit Breaker >> And if it does turn out to be a dried water spot, naturally, it won't be Nancy's fault That's rather obvious ... But it IS her fault - she's the one that claimed it to be "Planet X." No one else. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 07/24/2012 08:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Comment by Nancy Lieder 6 hours ago Quoting: bob_909 An observatory would not be allowed to display evidence of Planet X. Venus is a planet that reflects light, where Planet X is dust shrouded. The Moon Swirls are very close around the Sun, as they require sunlight to be funneled down them, therefore would be lost in the overall glare of the Sun, I suspect. I see she still thinks and claims that a planet shrouded in dust wouldn't reflect light and, therefore, wouldn't be visible. Apparently, her believers are stupid enough to believe it...and don't even see the MAJOR contradiction. If "Planet X" doesn't reflect any light - then how the f**k does it show up in all these images she claims show it? A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 07/24/2012 08:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
_Billy Madison_ User ID: 20465085 New Zealand 07/25/2012 01:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I hope your skeptical heads aren't so far up your skeptical asses that you fail to comprehend the direction the future of man kind is headed. Humans and beings from Zeta Reticuli are intimately linked, they need us and we need them. I like the pole shift ning. Better than the news that's for damn sure at least any way. Who cares if Nancy fucks up. The pole shift is still going to happen. |
aussie 763624 User ID: 20497330 United Kingdom 07/25/2012 03:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I hope your skeptical heads aren't so far up your skeptical asses that you fail to comprehend the direction the future of man kind is headed. Humans and beings from Zeta Reticuli are intimately linked, they need us and we need them. Quoting: _Billy Madison_ I like the pole shift ning. Better than the news that's for damn sure at least any way. Who cares if Nancy fucks up. The pole shift is still going to happen. I am quite sure that the `sceptics' aren't the ones with their heads buried in shitte LOL And I have no interest in being intimate with imaginary grey aliens (or real ones either)- as most aliens seem to have a rather unhealthy interest in anal probing people. And as for the pole shift `still gunna happen'... We know that it is still not going to happen, never has, never will and if by some miracle it did happen as nancy described then the Earth would be a mass of molten lava... Bit hard to survive that, unless you pack a pair of asbestos wellies along with your sheet of corrugated iron to hide under from those thousands of kilometer of hour winds, and your packet of fur flavoured gravox for dinner with man's best friend |
The Lone Ranger (OP) User ID: 20497993 New Zealand 07/25/2012 03:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I hope your skeptical heads aren't so far up your skeptical asses that you fail to comprehend the direction the future of man kind is headed. Humans and beings from Zeta Reticuli are intimately linked, they need us and we need them. Quoting: _Billy Madison_ I like the pole shift ning. Better than the news that's for damn sure at least any way. Who cares if Nancy fucks up. The pole shift is still going to happen. A Pole is about to Shift somewhere?...anywhere?...... Watch out for those freaken Poles I say.....they can sure be a dangerous thing!!...... Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
**ZetaMax** User ID: 20501811 United States 07/25/2012 05:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I hope your skeptical heads aren't so far up your skeptical asses that you fail to comprehend the direction the future of man kind is headed. Humans and beings from Zeta Reticuli are intimately linked, they need us and we need them. Quoting: _Billy Madison_ I like the pole shift ning. Better than the news that's for damn sure at least any way. Who cares if Nancy fucks up. The pole shift is still going to happen. A Pole is about to Shift somewhere?...anywhere?...... Watch out for those freaken Poles I say.....they can sure be a dangerous thing!!...... According to John Moore's "sources", as SOON as August 17th! (When Niburu makes it's closest passage to the sun!) Thread: Ed Dames’ Killshot Solar Flare coming next month August 2012 due to Nibiru Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 07/25/2012 10:00 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4832919 United States 07/25/2012 04:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1015670 United States 07/25/2012 05:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I hope your skeptical heads aren't so far up your skeptical asses that you fail to comprehend the direction the future of man kind is headed. Humans and beings from Zeta Reticuli are intimately linked, they need us and we need them. Quoting: _Billy Madison_ I like the pole shift ning. Better than the news that's for damn sure at least any way. Who cares if Nancy fucks up. The pole shift is still going to happen. No. It's not. |
_Billy Madison_ User ID: 20539455 New Zealand 07/25/2012 06:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Since 2003 shits been getting fucked up 2004 - Sumatra tsunami 2009 - Samoa Tsunami 2011 - Japan tsunami After the new Madrid and California faults go = European tsunami = big death toll, more than the 250 000 who died in Sumatra. When did "planet x" supposedly enter the solar system? 2003? Since then 3 significant tsunamis, How many do you recall before 03?? lol. I'm afraid ZetaMax might actually be right. Soon.... |
Hydra User ID: 20478086 Germany 07/25/2012 07:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Since 2003 shits been getting fucked up Quoting: _Billy Madison_ 2004 - Sumatra tsunami 2009 - Samoa Tsunami 2011 - Japan tsunami After the new Madrid and California faults go = European tsunami = big death toll, more than the 250 000 who died in Sumatra. When did "planet x" supposedly enter the solar system? 2003? Since then 3 significant tsunamis, How many do you recall before 03?? lol. I'm afraid ZetaMax might actually be right. Soon.... It's not the # of tsunamis that's of interest - it's the # of strong earthquakes: Apr. 04, 1905 - 8.6 Jan. 31, 1906 - 8.8 Nov. 11, 1922 - 8.5 Feb. 01, 1938 - 8.5 Aug. 15, 1950 - 8.6 Nov. 04, 1952 - 9.0 Mar. 09, 1957 - 8.6 May 22, 1960 - 9.5 Oct. 13, 1963 - 8.5 Mar. 27, 1964 - 9.2 Feb. 04, 1965 - 8.7 Dez. 26, 2004 - 9.1 Mär. 28, 2005 - 8.6 Sep. 12, 2007 - 8.5 Feb. 27, 2010 - 8.8 Mär. 11, 2011 - 9.0 Apr. 11, 2012 - 8.7 What planet entered the solar system between 1950 and 1965? Or could there be simply a 50 to 60 year EQ-cycle? Seems to me more logical than an undetectable, immeasurable and invisible alleged Planet X. I'm afraid ZetaMax might actually be wrong. Soon.... (Fixed it for you) . Last Edited by Hydra on 07/25/2012 07:47 PM :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 07/25/2012 08:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Um, certainly not in the way Nancy claims it will. There's a huge difference between a geological pole shift and a magnetic pole shift. One happens, the other does not. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 07/25/2012 08:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | According to John Moore's "sources", as SOON as August 17th! (When Niburu makes it's closest passage to the sun!) Thread: Ed Dames’ Killshot Solar Flare coming next month August 2012 due to Nibiru Right...and yet no one can see this "planet?" Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 07/25/2012 08:01 PM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 07/25/2012 08:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Since 2003 shits been getting fucked up Quoting: _Billy Madison_ 2004 - Sumatra tsunami 2009 - Samoa Tsunami 2011 - Japan tsunami After the new Madrid and California faults go = European tsunami = big death toll, more than the 250 000 who died in Sumatra. When did "planet x" supposedly enter the solar system? 2003? Since then 3 significant tsunamis, How many do you recall before 03?? lol. I'm afraid ZetaMax might actually be right. Soon.... Seriously - when HASN'T the world been fucked up? And how do all those events you listed prove the existence of some "rogue planet?" You're drawing a conclusion based on circumstantial evidence at best because all these events could have other causes. As for ZetaMax - the definition for "soon" in his world is a measurement of time equal to now and never. He's been saying "soon" for years and hasn't been right yet. And neither has his master Nancy. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 07/25/2012 08:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
bob_909 User ID: 7468171 United States 07/25/2012 09:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nancy (Zetas) Wrong Again! Her claim: "In fact, the Sun should not even be visible, per Skymap, as it is Winter at the S Pole and they are within their 3 months of darkness there. " Wrong - there is no three months of darkness at Mawson Station (67° 36'S/62° 52'E). The only time during this year the Sun does not come above the horizon is June 13 to 28. As for the Sun here are the calculated rise/set times (all times are local (UTC+5)): July 21 - 1053 1458 July 22 - 1049 1502 July 23 - 1044 1506 July 24 - 1040 1511 July 25 - 1036 1515 July 26 - 1032 1519 July 27 - 1028 1523 Learn how to use Skymap! Here's a screen shot from Cartes du Ciel for Mawson Station on July 22, 2012 [link to www.zetasquawk.com] Notice the Sun? Last Edited by bob_909 on 07/25/2012 09:10 PM “Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 07/25/2012 09:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I love it when the claim is made that earthquakes have increased since 2003. Have they really? Here's a breakdown of the number of earthquakes magnitude 7 or greater worldwide since 1900 - years with more than 20 magnitude 7 or greater earthquakes are in red. 1900 13 1901 14 1902 8 1903 10 1904 16 1905 26 1906 32 1907 27 1908 18 1909 32 1910 36 1911 24 1912 22 1913 23 1914 22 1915 18 1916 25 1917 21 1918 21 1919 14 1920 8 1921 11 1922 14 1923 23 1924 18 1925 17 1926 19 1927 20 1928 22 1929 19 1930 13 1931 26 1932 13 1933 14 1934 22 1935 24 1936 21 1937 22 1938 26 1939 21 1940 23 1941 24 1942 27 1943 41 OMG!! IT MUST BE "PLANET X" FOR SURE!! 1944 31 1945 27 1946 35 1947 26 1948 28 1949 36 1950 39 1951 21 1952 17 1953 22 1954 17 1955 19 1956 15 1957 34 1958 10 1959 15 1960 22 1961 18 1962 15 1963 20 1964 15 1965 22 1966 19 1967 16 1968 30 1969 27 1970 29 1971 23 1972 20 1973 16 1974 21 1975 21 1976 25 1977 16 1978 18 1979 15 1980 18 1981 14 1982 10 1983 15 1984 8 1985 15 1986 6 1987 11 1988 8 1989 7 1990 18 1991 16 1992 13 1993 12 1994 13 1995 20 1996 15 1997 16 1998 12 1999 18 2000 15 2001 16 2002 13 2003 15 2004 16 2005 11 2006 11 2007 18 2008 12 2009 17 2010 24 2011 20 2012 7 (to date) What does the above data tell us? For one thing, it tells us there's no increase in magnitude 7 or greater earthquakes. In fact, when comparing the years from 2003 to present with the the years between 1934 and 1954, the number of earthquakes magnitude 7 or greater is rather tame. Are "Planet X" believers going to tell us that "Planet X" was hovering around the sun during the 30s and 40s? After all, we had the Great Depression along with the Dust Bowl followed by WWII...all of which, had they happened today, would surely be used as evidence or even proof that "Planet X" was here. Now, I realize that "Planet X" believers will say, "Ha! Your list ONLY lists quakes with a magnitude 7 or greater. Earthquakes lower in magnitude are on the increase!" True, at first glance the data may suggest that. However, the explanation provided by geologists seems FAR MORE LIKELY. They claim that the number of small magnitude quakes APPEARS to be on the rise because the sensor network has gotten both larger and more sensitive...which means more earthquakes are being detected than they were before. The reason this seems far more likely to be the truth is because if a "rogue planet four times the size of Venus" were truly lurking about the inner solar system - we wouldn't see just an increase in small magnitude quakes. We'd see an increase across the spectrum. And it should be noted that within the past 10 years the entire west coast of North America hasn't experienced ANY strong quakes at all. How could a "rogue planet" affect all these other fault zones without affecting the San Andreas and the other large faults up and down the west coast? Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 07/26/2012 06:42 AM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |