Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,353 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 243,476
Pageviews Today: 455,709Threads Today: 243Posts Today: 4,054
10:13 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Poster Handle Menow
Post Content
And if it does turn out to be a dried water spot, naturally, it won't be Nancy's fault for jumping the gun. She'll blame someone else.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

Yes, it's outrageous that they don't clean the webcam lenses on an hourly basis, so that poor Nancy mistakes the droplets for her eagerly awaited Planet X.

But "Benito Maray" gives new candidates on a per diem basis: [link to poleshift.ning.com]
(Just dumb, a troll or a trojan?)

BTW: members down to less than 1500



.
 Quoting: Hydra


Looks like she's going mealy-mouth - at one moment saying one thing then leaving the door slightly cracked.

"Comment by Nancy Lieder 6 hours ago

They appear to be water droplets dried on the lens. They stay stationary, despite the skyview rolling up continuously. So far we have discovered NO Planet X objects from this cam. I note that when the Sun rises, the cam is not overwhelmed. This means that they are suppressing the light received, overall, and this would eliminate the light from Planet X itself, I think.

An observatory would not be allowed to display evidence of Planet X. Venus is a planet that reflects light, where Planet X is dust shrouded. The Moon Swirls are very close around the Sun, as they require sunlight to be funneled down them, therefore would be lost in the overall glare of the Sun, I suspect.

This is certainly a challenge!"
 Quoting: bob_909



"An observatory would not be allowed to display evidence of Planet X."

Yet she has consistently pointed out images from various observatories which she says show her planet. Again... it makes NO SENSE AT ALL.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP