Give me a break.

God having put fossils there is not illogical because of any other existing world view, but because it is highly improbable (and quite laughable)

Ok, fossils. We find the skeleton of an animal. Now it's quite easy to assume, it died, lay there, and as time passed, was buried under layers of soil. That's just what is obvious and everyone would think. You don't need a previous world view to arrive at this simple solution of the problem.

Nobody would assume the following though, had they never
heard of the fairytales of religion:

Some invisible, intangible, benevolent, omnipotent, omniscient, mysterious being who does not intervene in our worldy affairs, because he loves us oh so much, and allows to happen what happens on earth here, child rape & murder, hunger, war.. put those fossils there just to confuse you.
I cannot even start to point out the logic fallacies in there, just some pointers: benevolent, omnipotent, confusing us, allowing suffering. There are major weak points in the chrsitian "god" concept itself and in this right-out-insane assumption he put those fossils there to confuse you. Well, he succeeded.

It is not impossible, it is just highly improbable (and quite ridiculous).

To a problem there are always many, if not infinite solutions. Some are simple, some are complicated. The simple wins, unless disproven. Simple as that. Evolution hasn't been disproven. Most concepts of god don't withstand logic. (Some do, but certainly not the traditional arabic-judeo-christian god)

Sorry.

You need to learn something about logics first before you try to apply them.

The world works perfectly without "god". That's why we don't need a god to explain things. It only makes everyhing more complicated and ridiculous.