LOL - Pastor Welcomes Gun Owners to Bring Their Handguns to Church

Unloaded?
The preacher is scared of the congregation?
I don't get that.

[link to www.foxnews.com]


Pastor Welcomes Gun Owners to Bring Their Handguns to Church

LOUISVILLE, Ky. — A Louisville pastor is welcoming gun owners into his church's sanctuary Saturday for what he says is a show of support for the right to bear arms.

Ken Pagano is asking visitors to bring their unloaded handguns in a holster at a late afternoon event at New Bethel Church in southwest Louisville.

Pagano says he got the idea after some members at the Pentecostal church expressed concern over the Obama administration's views on gun control. He says the gathering is meant to promote safe gun ownership.

The "Open Carry Celebration" will include a handgun raffle.

It has prompted a coalition of peace and church groups to stage a peaceful, gun-free event across town at the same time on Saturday.

Unloaded?
The preacher is scared of the congregation?
I don't get that.

No kidding.

It's next to useless if it's not loaded.

It's next to useless if it's not loaded.

It's next to useless if it's not loaded.


It's a symbol.

Does anyone in America realize that their whole government and money and life and country are all symbols?

A sword, in its scabbard, is a symbol. The sword in its scabbard, was seized from the Samurai, by men with ropes and hooks, who would group up and en-snag a Samurai, then disarm him after he'd been rope-hooked.

Disarming Samurai doesn't matter about sword or scabbard, gun or cartridge. Self defense is the principle, the sword/gun is the symbol.

They aren't going to church to shoot, but to symbolize their right to have a weapon which is held in a state of defense. No bullets in the gun, is similar to sword in scabbard, at least from a political standpoint.

Why don't I just bring a sword to church tomorrow? Or how about some nunchucks? Maybe some sticks of dynamite?

I suppose nothing conveys the love of Christ like weapons.

Why don't I just bring a sword to church tomorrow? Or how about some nunchucks? Maybe some sticks of dynamite?

I suppose nothing conveys the love of Christ like weapons.

Here ya go, you sarcastic punk...maybe you will actually read the preamble!!
[link to www.elcivics.com]

Here ya go, you sarcastic punk...maybe you will actually read the preamble!!
[link to www.elcivics.com]


Yes, that's nice, but it's kind of irrelevent to this discussion.

Obviously, the point of all this is, "We have the right to do this, so we should."

But just because we CAN do something, does that mean we SHOULD do it as much as we can?

The whole idea of taking guns to church, just to make a point about doing something to can do seems sort of silly to me.

Let's say while your inside your church with your guns, I stand outside your church and burn an American flag. Now, the First Amendent has protected my actions as 'Symbolic speech,' meaning I have a Constitutional right to burn the flag.

However, if I did that, I'm guessing the people inside wouldn't like it.

So, I'll reiterate: Just because I CAN do something, does that mean I SHOULD?

Here ya go, you sarcastic punk...maybe you will actually read the preamble!!
[link to www.elcivics.com]


Yes, that's nice, but it's kind of irrelevent to this discussion.

Obviously, the point of all this is, "We have the right to do this, so we should."

But just because we CAN do something, does that mean we SHOULD do it as much as we can?

The whole idea of taking guns to church, just to make a point about doing something to can do seems sort of silly to me.

Let's say while your inside your church with your guns, I stand outside your church and burn an American flag. Now, the First Amendent has protected my actions as 'Symbolic speech,' meaning I have a Constitutional right to burn the flag.

However, if I did that, I'm guessing the people inside wouldn't like it.

So, I'll reiterate: Just because I CAN do something, does that mean I SHOULD?

Here ya go, you sarcastic punk...maybe you will actually read the preamble!!
[link to www.elcivics.com]


Yes, that's nice, but it's kind of irrelevent to this discussion.

Obviously, the point of all this is, "We have the right to do this, so we should."

But just because we CAN do something, does that mean we SHOULD do it as much as we can?

The whole idea of taking guns to church, just to make a point about doing something to can do seems sort of silly to me.

Let's say while your inside your church with your guns, I stand outside your church and burn an American flag. Now, the First Amendent has protected my actions as 'Symbolic speech,' meaning I have a Constitutional right to burn the flag.

However, if I did that, I'm guessing the people inside wouldn't like it.

So, I'll reiterate: Just because I CAN do something, does that mean I SHOULD?

Unloaded?
The preacher is scared of the congregation?
I don't get that.

No kidding.

It's next to useless if it's not loaded.

Unloaded?
The preacher is scared of the congregation?
I don't get that.

No kidding.

It's next to useless if it's not loaded.


I can put the clip in my .45 in about a second or so.

Unloaded, loaded. Just like that.

Unloaded?
The preacher is scared of the congregation?
I don't get that.

No kidding.

It's next to useless if it's not loaded.


I can put the clip in my .45 in about a second or so.

Unloaded, loaded. Just like that.

Meanwhile, I only have to draw and aim and squeeze the trigger.

Unloaded?
The preacher is scared of the congregation?
I don't get that.

No kidding.

It's next to useless if it's not loaded.


I can put the clip in my .45 in about a second or so.

Unloaded, loaded. Just like that.

Meanwhile, I only have to draw and aim and squeeze the trigger.


And how many times in your average day do you have to do that.

Me, I hardly ever have to shoot anyone. In fact, I can't even remember the last time I had to blow anyone's keecaps off.

But maybe you live in a different sorta nieghborhood.