NASA ...Show Me The Lunar Rover Tracks !!!

Who gives a fuck about Bielefeld except if a huge amount of money from the citizens goes to them to fake space missions. I can't find anything brainwashing from Bielefeld, but with Nasa I can see brain damaged shills everything truth is posted.

LOL

haha yupp .... yesterday that was footprints btw :)

And compare with a real rendezvous of shuttle and ISS.
The rendezvous I posted is Apollo 11 and it looks like Kubricks movie. In fact Kubrick was probably the one at charge (they after created that documentary of him doing it with his wife and all these rummsfeld, etc).

Proving it was an airless environment, as dust falls very quickly in a vacuum. You can see it in the movies of the rovers - watch the PERFECT dust parabolas off the wheels. Impossible to fake on earth.

Thanks for providing one of the often overlooked proofs of the mission.

The dust devils blew them away.

That NASA video of what is meant to be Apollo 11 docking with the Command Module is some crazy shit. There is a lot of places in the video where there is constant movement, then a sudden stop, no slowing down at all. It shows that these were small models used, and that they were fixed on an external object.

its a good example of why the controversy will remain. The moon deniers simply are too dumb to analyse any "proof" put before them. Their inbuilt predjudice wil lead them to the wrong conclusion everytime.

BTW the lack of swirling dust really does prove it was filmed in a vacuum. I suppose that doesnt 100% prove it was filmed on the moon ( as they could have had a massive vacuum chamber), but then that directly conflicts with the other "proof" the deniers have (such as a waving flag etc). They want it both ways.

Gee, just like a bunch of physicists to miss something like that, huh?

Seriously, the LEM (minus the legs, of course) only weighed about five tons (mass of 4,600kg), and was radially symmetrical. It wouldn't take much to spin it, or to stop it from spinning, very quickly.

Petty dam good simulation here.
[link to www.youtube.com]

Now I wonder, why this test site or stage, looks so much like the so called real video of these missions.

Don't get me wrong, I think we went to the moon alright, just not like they showed us all.

They had photos taken by robot landers to work from.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

NASA is making the extraordinary claim; NASA must supply the corresponding extraordinary proof.

They took pictures, and brought back rocks.

Pictures and rocks are "extraordinary proof"?

LOL.

I guess having a piece of cheese in my fridge is proof that I, too, have been to the moon.

NASA = never a sincere answer

A machine could have brought back the rocks. The pics could be faked easily.

Thread: Who can explain the science behind the ASTRONAUT'S SPACE SUITS?

[link to www.mt.net]

If you claim they're bogus, then you'd need to present evidence for that.

The pictures look fake, and the rocks are all too much like earth rocks--so similar, in fact, that NASA and the geological community have been arguing for decades as to what is or is not a moon rock:

[link to en.wikipedia.org]
---
From the 1950s through the 1990s, NASA aerodynamicist Dean R. Chapman and others advanced the "lunar origin" theory of tektites.
...
O'Keefe [of NASA] suggested explosive, hydrogen-driven lunar volcanoes as the original source of tektites.
...
Regardless, O'Keefe said that "If 14425 was found in Antarctica instead of Fra Mauro (on the Moon), it would probably have been accepted as a tektite."
---

In other words, "moon rocks" look a lot like the product of hydrogen bomb explosions. Of course, only the military-industrial-intelligence complex has access to hydrogen bomb explosions, so the geological community has no way to compare the products of such explosions against the "moon rocks."

Sorry, re-take Science 101.

Anyone can say, "I flew to the moon 6 times, and here are the photos and rocks to 'prove' it." Science requires independent reproducibility; history requires independent confirmation; and the legal system requires sworn testimony as to provenance.

If you can persuade Neil Armstrong to testify under oath and cross-examination of his alleged moon rock collection, let us know.

But a sudden full stop, with no slowing down, how does that happen in the deep vacuum of space?

Well, the moon landings are part of history. Independent confirmation, huh? How about tracking from multiple international tracking stations? Oh, wait, they were all "in on it," right?

With a relatively light, radially symmetrical mass and a quick RCS burn.

Show me a video where the lack of dust demonstrates that is the Moon and I will post some competition videos of motos running in ground throwing ground but without dust (perhaps the competition is in the fucking Moon?).

It is MANNED mission. There is not a computer calculating the exact miliseconds a rocket must be firing to stop in such a way. Now look to the videos where Armstrongs flies here in Earth a "lunar module lander" and search for such stop motions. Also MUST I POST LINKS TO VIDEOS WHERE YOU SEE THE RENDEZVOUS BETWEEN SHUTTLE AND ISS ??? What you want, an official communicate of Nasa saying that rendezvous is the worst thing ever they made in the entire HOAX???????

Dude, the dirt in motorcross racing is wet down before the race.

Well, lets compare masses, shall we?

LM ascent stage: 4,670kg
Space shuttle: 78,000kg empty, usually closer to 100,000kg

Can you see how the shuttle might have just a bit more momentum?

I have a documentary where they say how every rock they found can be found in Earth and you can see Armstrong and Aldrin collecting these rocks to after be able to recognize them in the Moon. The difference between the rocks collected in the Moon and the ones of Earth are the micrometeorites. And that as I am tired of telling here in GLP is where your linear accelerator or circular accelerator or who knows what they did is used to create the microimpacts. And of course probably in only some pieces not in the entire kilos, just one to show in some publication and it is all.

Never a Straight Answer.

ST in BG is the one that created this phrase. I hope greys are not the bad guys but I don't think they are our friends. Interesting future we will have to live indeed.

I have some rock from Mars, some of Venus and some of Mars. I can sell you to a low price. What you need as proof of autenticity? How you know a rock is from Mars or Venus? Microimpacts? Do you believe NASA is unable to create microimpacts?

I saw it long before TG in BS said this lol, I just altered it a little cause they lie lie lie ...

I agree, our future will bring surprises ...